Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyers – NY Court Martial Attorneys

Stationed at Fort Drum, New York? Facing a court-martial, UCMJ action, Administrative Separation Board, or other Adverse Administrative Action? Call our experienced Fort Drum military defense lawyers at 1-800-921-8607 for a free consultation.

Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyers: Protecting Those Who Defend Our Nation

Facing a court-martial, CID investigation, UCMJ action, or an Adverse Administrative Action at Fort Drum, New York? Contact our experienced Fort Drum military defense lawyers today to discuss your legal rights and options.

Fort Drum, home to the 10th Mountain Division, has long served as a pivotal base for the United States Army. With a rich history dating back to the early 20th century, it has consistently proven its strategic importance to national defense.

However, serving at such a prestigious base does not make one immune to the rules and regulations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). When a soldier at Fort Drum faces accusations of UCMJ violations, it becomes crucial to seek out the best Fort Drum military defense lawyers.

Understanding the UCMJ at Fort Drum, NY:

The UCMJ is the foundation of military law in the United States. It outlines a comprehensive set of legal standards and procedures for all military members. Fort Drum soldiers must adhere to these regulations, which cover a broad spectrum of offenses from minor infractions to severe crimes. Violations of the UCMJ can lead to serious disciplinary actions and judicial proceedings. Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 ed.)

Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyers & Court-Martials at Fort Drum, NY:

Court-martials are the military’s way of conducting trials for service members accused of breaking the UCMJ. These proceedings can result in various outcomes, ranging from acquittals to severe sentences, including imprisonment or dishonorable discharge. Given the high stakes, any soldier facing a court-martial at Fort Drum needs the best Fort Drum military defense lawyers available to ensure a fair trial and just outcome.

Article 120, 120b, and 120c UCMJ Violations at Fort Drum, NY:

Article 120 of the UCMJ deals with sexual assault and rape, making it one of the most severe charges a service member can face. Article 120b addresses sexual abuse of a child, while Article 120c covers other sexual misconduct, including indecent exposure. These charges come with life-altering consequences and carry significant stigma and legal repercussions.

Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyers & Article 120 Violations

Article 120 outlines offenses ranging from rape to sexual assault, and any soldier accused under this article must navigate a complex and rigorous legal battle. Conviction can lead to prison, loss of rank, and a permanent mark on one’s record. Immediate consultation with Fort Drum military defense lawyers from a reputable firm like Gonzalez & Waddington is essential.

Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyers & Article 120b Violations

Article 120b UCMJ involves sexual abuse and molestation of minors, making it one of the most severely judged crimes under military law. False accusations can cause irreparable damage to a soldier’s life and career, making proficient legal defense indispensable.

Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyers & Article 120c Violations

Article 120c covers a range of misconduct, like indecent exposure and other inappropriate sexual behavior. While these may seem less severe than other crimes under Article 120, they still carry substantial penalties, including incarceration and dismissal from service.

Other Severe UCMJ Violations at Fort Drum, NY:

Aside from Articles 120, 120b, and 120c, numerous other UCMJ violations can have severe consequences. These can include drug offenses, assault, theft, and desertion, among others. These violations necessitate a deep understanding of military law and the overall military justice system, making it critical to engage experienced Fort Drum military defense lawyers.

Why Choose Gonzalez & Waddington as Your Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyers?

When defending yourself against UCMJ violations at Fort Drum, the competency and experience of your legal counsel can make all the difference. Gonzalez & Waddington offers unparalleled expertise in handling complex military cases. Here’s why you need the best Fort Drum military defense lawyers from our firm:

Comprehensive Knowledge: Our Fort Drum military defense lawyers thoroughly grasp the UCMJ and court-martials, ensuring we can build a robust defense for you.
Proven Track Record: Our firm has a history of successful outcomes in high-stakes military cases, protecting soldiers’ careers and lives.
Personalized Defense: We tailor our strategies to each case’s unique circumstances, providing personalized legal scrutiny and advice.
Relentless Advocacy: We are committed to fighting tirelessly on your behalf, both in and out of court, to secure the best possible outcome.

Facing a UCMJ violation at a distinguished military base like Fort Drum is a daunting experience. Don’t navigate this complex legal terrain alone. Entrust your defense to the best Fort Drum military lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington. They possess the skills, commitment, and knowledge to protect your rights and future.

Contact Gonzalez & Waddington to ensure you have the best team on your side when facing any UCMJ violation at Fort Drum.

Examples of Fictional UCMJ Cases Our Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyers Could Handle and Potential Defenses:

Fort Drum military service members are held to the highest standards of conduct. The following serious but fictional UCMJ cases illustrate the charges servicemembers might face and their potential outcomes. If you face similar accusations, seek immediate assistance from the Fort Drum military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington.

Captain Sarah Thompson – Article 120 UCMJ (Rape) at Fort Drum, NY:

Captain Sarah Thompson was accused of raping a fellow soldier during a deployment in Afghanistan. Witnesses reported seeing Thompson in the victim’s quarters late at night.

Potential Outcome: If convicted, Thompson could face a dishonorable discharge, reduction in rank, and up to 30 years of confinement.

Sergeant First Class James Killington – Article 120b UCMJ (Child Sexual Abuse) at Fort Drum, NY:

Sergeant First Class James Killington allegedly engaged in inappropriate conduct with a minor under the age of 16. Evidence included explicit text messages.

Potential Outcome: A conviction could result in a dishonorable discharge, lifetime registration as a sex offender, and imprisonment for up to 20 years.

Private First Class John Doe – Article 120c UCMJ (Other Sexual Misconduct) at Fort Drum, NY:

Private First Class John Doe was charged with indecent exposure in front of fellow soldiers in the barracks.

Potential Outcome: Upon conviction, Doe may face a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to one year.

Specialist Anna Ravino – Article 118 UCMJ (Murder) at Fort Drum, NY:

Specialist Anna Ravino was accused of murdering her spouse in their home on base after a heated argument.

Potential Outcome: If found guilty, Ravino could receive a life sentence without parole, loss of all military benefits, and a dishonorable discharge.

Corporal Mark Jenkins – Article 128 UCMJ (Aggravated Assault) at Fort Drum, NY:

Corporal Mark Jenkins allegedly assaulted a fellow soldier with a weapon during a physical altercation in the mess hall.

Potential Outcome: If convicted, Jenkins could face up to 10 years in prison, a reduction in rank, and a bad-conduct discharge.

Chief Warrant Officer David Collins – Article 92 UCMJ (Failure to Obey Order or Regulation) at Fort Drum, NY:

Chief Warrant Officer David Collins was accused of disobeying a direct order from a superior officer, leading to a significant security breach.

Potential Outcome: Collins could be subject to a reduction in rank, forfeiture of pay, and confinement for up to two years if found guilty.

Private Kimberly Lang – Article 126 UCMJ (Arson) at Fort Drum, NY:

Private Kimberly Lang was charged with intentionally setting fire to a government vehicle as an act of protest.

Potential Outcome: If convicted, Lang could face a dishonorable discharge, confinement for up to 10 years, and restitution costs.

If you are accused of a similar case, call the Fort Drum military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington to discuss possible defense. Navigating the complexities of military law requires experienced legal representation. Contact the Fort Drum military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington to protect your rights and secure your future.

Hypothetical Examples of UCMJ Cases at Fort Drum, NY:

Sexual Assault (Article 120 UCMJ) at Fort Drum, NY

Sergeant First Class John M. Thomas was accused of sexually assaulting a junior enlisted female soldier during a unit social event at Fort Drum. The alleged victim reported that Thomas cornered her in a bathroom and assaulted her despite her protests. With conflicting witness statements and a lapse in physical evidence, the case draws significant attention.

Fort Drum military defense lawyers, such as those at Gonzalez & Waddington, can challenge the credibility of the allegations by highlighting inconsistencies in the testimonies and presenting evidence of Thomas’s character and prior conduct.

Sexual Abuse of a Child (Article 120b UCMJ) at Fort Drum, NY

Staff Sergeant Michael L. Harris faced accusations of sexually abusing a minor, the 15-year-old daughter of a fellow soldier, during a barbecue. The alleged victim claimed that Harris inappropriately touched her while they were alone in a room.

Fort Drum military defense lawyers can scrutinize the investigation process, question the minor’s reliability, and present a defense centered on the possibility of misinterpretation or false allegations.

Aggravated Sexual Contact (Article 120c UCMJ) at Fort Drum, NY

Private First Class Emily A. Parker was charged with aggravated sexual contact after being accused of groping a fellow soldier without consent during a nighttime training exercise. The incident reportedly occurred in a tent shared by multiple service members.

Experienced Fort Drum military defense lawyers can dissect the context of the incident, argue the absence of intent, and offer evidence or witness testimony to support Parker’s version of events.

Rape (Article 120 UCMJ) at Fort Drum, NY

Lieutenant Andrew J. Stevens was accused of raping a civilian woman he met at a local bar off-base. The woman claimed that Stevens invited her to his residence under false pretenses and then forced himself upon her. DNA evidence and conflicting accounts complicated the matter.

Fort Drum military defense lawyers, like those at Gonzalez & Waddington, can rigorously examine the DNA evidence, investigate the woman’s background, and highlight inconsistencies in her allegations to create reasonable doubt.

Child Pornography (Article 134 UCMJ) at Fort Drum, NY

Captain Sarah T. Williams faced charges related to possession and distribution of child pornography after an investigation revealed explicit images on her laptop. The discovery occurred following a routine cybersecurity check on her account access logs.

Fort Drum military defense lawyers might use defense strategies such as arguing the possibility of unauthorized access or tampering and challenging the legality of the search and seizure of Williams’s digital devices.

Indecent Exposure (Article 120c UCMJ) at Fort Drum, NY

Corporal Daniel R. Nguyen was charged with indecent exposure for allegedly exposing himself to another soldier in the barracks. The incident was reported by a roommate who claimed to have witnessed the act.

Fort Drum military defense lawyers can cast doubt on eyewitness testimony, suggest alternative explanations, and call character witnesses to testify on behalf of Nguyen’s good character and normal conduct.

Aggravated Assault (Article 128 UCMJ) at Fort Drum, NY

Major Franklin A. Johnson faced aggravated assault charges for reportedly causing serious bodily harm to a subordinate during a physical altercation in the unit’s common area. Witnesses had conflicting views on who initiated the confrontation and the severity of the attempted harm.

Fort Drum military defense lawyers may focus on proving self-defense, illustrating inconsistencies in witness accounts, and providing context to Johnson’s actions that might prompt reevaluating the charges.

Strangulation (Article 128 UCMJ) at Fort Drum, NY

Specialist Maria L. Martinez was accused of strangling her spouse during a heated argument in their on-base housing. The spouse brought photos of injuries and a medical report to substantiate the claims.

Fort Drum military defense lawyers such as those at Gonzalez & Waddington could challenge the timeline of events, question the credibility and motivations of the spouse, and present Martinez’s own evidence and witness testimony refuting the claim.

Defending Serious UCMJ Crimes at Fort Drum

With cases as severe as those described, having a skilled legal team in your corner is vital. Fort Drum military defense lawyers understand the complexities involved in UCMJ trials and provide robust defenses tailored to the unique circumstances of each case. The legal team at Gonzalez & Waddington stands ready to protect your rights and defend against serious allegations, leveraging their extensive knowledge and experience in military law.

Below are Samples of the Types of UCMJ Cases a Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyers Would Commonly Defend:

Article 120 UCMJ – Rape at Fort Drum, NY: A soldier is accused of committing rape against another service member in the barracks. It is alleged that the accused used physical force, threats, and intimidation. The victim reported the incident weeks later during a routine counseling session. Friends of the victim claim they observed a change in behavior and demeanor following the alleged incident. Fort Drum military defense lawyers can scrutinize the timeline and victim’s behavior for inconsistencies. Fort Drum court martial attorneys can also challenge the credibility of witness testimonies and examine forensic evidence.
Article 120b UCMJ – Sexual Abuse of a Minor at Fort Drum, NY: The accused allegedly engaged in inappropriate touching and other sexual activities with a minor on base housing. The child’s guardian reported the incident to military authorities after hearing troubling statements from the child. Text messages and video call recordings also implicate the service member. Fort Drum court martial attorneys can question the reliability and verifiability of the digital evidence. Fort Drum military defense lawyers may also seek expert witnesses to challenge the psychological effects reported by the child.
Article 120c UCMJ – Indecent Exposure at Fort Drum, NY: A soldier allegedly exposed themselves in public during a unit social gathering. Several witnesses, including fellow soldiers and civilians, provided statements supporting the allegations. The incident reportedly took place in a heavily trafficked area on base. Fort Drum military defense lawyers can investigate whether the exposure was intentional or accidental. Fort Drum court martial attorneys might also argue a lack of intent or extenuating circumstances.
Article 128 UCMJ – Assault at Fort Drum, NY: The service member allegedly assaulted another soldier during a heated argument in the mess hall. The accused supposedly threw a punch, resulting in serious facial injuries to the victim. Multiple witnesses gave conflicting accounts of how the altercation started. Fort Drum court martial attorneys can explore the inconsistencies in witness testimonies. Fort Drum military defense lawyers may also argue self-defense if the accused felt genuinely threatened.
Article 128b UCMJ – Domestic Violence at Fort Drum, NY: The accused is charged with domestic violence against their spouse, including threatening behavior and physical assault. Neighbors reported hearing frequent loud altercations and crying. Medical records show injuries consistent with spousal abuse. Fort Drum military defense lawyers can analyze the medical records for potential other injury causes. Fort Drum court martial attorneys will also review the neighbors’ testimonies for bias or inaccuracies.
Article 85 UCMJ – Desertion at Fort Drum, NY: A soldier allegedly deserted their unit while deployed overseas. The service member was absent for over 30 days and apprehended stateside. The accused claims they suffered from acute mental health issues at the time. Fort Drum military defense lawyers can present medical evidence to support claims of mental health struggles. Fort Drum court martial attorneys might also argue the absence was due to severe distress rather than intent to desert.
Article 134 UCMJ – Child Endangerment at Fort Drum, NY: The accused left their young child unattended in on-base housing, leading to a dangerous situation. MPs responding to a noise complaint found the child in a perilous state. Neighbors reported prior instances of neglect. Fort Drum court martial attorneys can contest the degree of danger and neglect involved. Fort Drum military defense lawyers may also provide evidence of previous responsible behavior and effective parenting.
Article 133 UCMJ – Conduct Unbecoming an Officer at Fort Drum, NY: An officer is accused of engaging in unethical relationships with subordinates. Allegations include offering favorable treatment for sexual favors. Several soldiers came forward with text messages and voicemails supporting the claims. Fort Drum military defense lawyers can assess the authenticity and context of digital communications. Fort Drum court martial attorneys will also explore potential motivations for false accusations among subordinates.
Article 112a UCMJ – Drug Use at Fort Drum, NY: The service member tested positive for illegal substances during a random drug screening. They reportedly used the drug off-post in a social setting. Additional witnesses assert seeing the service member ingest the substance. Fort Drum court martial attorneys can dispute the chain of custody for the drug test sample. Fort Drum military defense lawyers might also question the reliability of witness statements.
Article 118 UCMJ – Murder at Fort Drum, NY: The accused is charged with the premeditated murder of another soldier. The incident occurred in a secluded area of the base. Evidence includes a weapon registered to the accused and fingerprints at the scene.Fort Drum military defense lawyers can meticulously challenge the forensic evidence. Fort Drum court martial attorneys may also examine possible alibis and alternative suspects.
Article 121 UCMJ – Larceny at Fort Drum, NY: The service member allegedly stole military equipment valued at over $10,000. Surveillance footage captures a person resembling the accused leaving the supply depot with the items. The equipment was later found in the accused’s quarters. Fort Drum court martial attorneys can explore potential identity inaccuracies in the surveillance footage. Fort Drum military defense lawyers could also examine whether the accused had authorized possession of the items.
Article 107 UCMJ – False Official Statement at Fort Drum, NY: The accused allegedly made a false statement about their whereabouts during an incident under investigation. GPS data contradicts their account, showing them in a restricted area. Other service members’ statements also conflict with the accused’s version of events. Fort Drum military defense lawyers can scrutinize the accuracy and relevance of the GPS data. Fort Drum court martial attorneys might also challenge the consistency of witness statements.
Article 90 UCMJ – Disobeying a Superior Officer at Fort Drum, NY: The soldier is accused of willfully disobeying a direct order from a superior officer. The incident allegedly occurred during a training exercise, leading to a safety hazard. Eyewitnesses provided written statements supporting the allegation. Fort Drum court martial attorneys can argue the clarity and legality of the given order. Fort Drum military defense lawyers might demonstrate the accused’s previous exemplary obedience to orders.
Article 92 UCMJ—Failure to Obey Order or Regulation at Fort Drum, NY: The accused is charged with failing to comply with standing protocols regarding handling classified information. An unauthorized individual accessed classified documents under the accused’s watch. Investigators found procedural lapses in document security. Fort Drum military defense lawyers can focus on the systemic failures in protocol enforcement. Fort Drum court martial attorneys might argue that the lapses were not solely the accused’s responsibility.
Article 95 UCMJ – Resistance, Flight, Breach of Arrest, and Escape at Fort Drum, NY: While under arrest for previous charges, the soldier allegedly attempted to escape from custody. MPs reported using necessary force to prevent flight. Additionally, restraint marks on the accused were consistent with a struggle. Fort Drum court martial attorneys can question the necessity and appropriateness of force used by MPs. Fort Drum military defense lawyers could also argue the escape attempt resulted from duress or panic.

Aggressive Fort Drum, New York Military Defense Attorneys

We have successfully defended and acquitted Army soldiers across the USA, including Fort Drum. Check out our case results to learn more.

Defendants in military criminal cases face several obstacles that require the legal assistance of the best military defense lawyers. Almost everyone in the courtroom outranks the defendant, from the Judge to the jury members. You can hardly call the jury a group of your peers when the jury outranks you by several ranks. Although the Staff Judge Advocate should remain neutral and impartial during court proceedings, the fact remains that the Staff Judge Advocate has one goal: ensuring you receive the harshest sentence possible for crimes you are accused of.

When You Need an Army Court Martial Lawyer in New York

Inexperienced TDS and civilian attorneys may wilt under the unrelenting pressure of military prosecution teams. This means the brave men and women who are prosecuted must hire the best Fort Drum military defense lawyers to defend their rights and freedom.

Why Hire Fort Drum Court Martial Lawyers

Call today to speak with a hard-hitting Fort Drum court martial lawyer.

UCMJ Article 120 Explained: How Fort Drum Court Martial Attorneys Protect Your Rights

Fort Drum, located in upstate New York, is a critical military base for the United States Army and a site where discipline and order are maintained through strict enforcement of military laws and regulations. Among these, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) plays a pivotal role in governing the conduct of service members.

Specifically, UCMJ Article 120, which addresses sexual assault and related offenses, is of significant importance. For those facing charges under this article or any other UCMJ violations, seeking the skill of a Fort Drum military defense lawyer or a Fort Drum court martial attorney is crucial.

Understanding UCMJ Offenses at Fort Drum

The UCMJ is a comprehensive legal framework that outlines military laws and the procedures for prosecuting violations. It covers a wide range of offenses, from minor infractions to serious felonies, and applies to all branches of the U.S. military. Service members stationed at Fort Drum, like their counterparts elsewhere, are subject to the UCMJ and can be tried in military courts, known as court-martials.

Court-martials at Fort Drum are conducted to enforce military law and order, ensuring that service members are held accountable for their actions. These proceedings can vary in complexity and severity, depending on the nature of the offense. In cases involving UCMJ Article 120, the stakes are exceptionally high, given the profound implications of sexual assault allegations. This is where the experience of a dedicated Fort Drum court martial attorney becomes invaluable.

Defending Against UCMJ Article 120 Charges: Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyer Insight

UCMJ Article 120 outlines specific prohibitions against rape, sexual assault, and other sexual misconduct, reflecting the military’s zero-tolerance policy towards such behaviors. Given the complexity of these cases and the potential consequences for the accused, including imprisonment, dishonorable discharge, and loss of military benefits, the role of a Fort Drum military defense lawyer cannot be overstated. These legal professionals specialize in military law and are adept at navigating the intricacies of court-martial proceedings. They provide essential support, guidance, and representation for service members facing charges under the UCMJ.

Selecting the best Military Defense Lawyers for your Fort Drum Case

Choosing the right defense lawyer is critical for any service member facing legal challenges at Fort Drum. A skilled Fort Drum military defense lawyer will deeply understand military law and the specific procedures and nuances of the military justice system. They will be committed to protecting the rights of their clients, working tirelessly to build a strong defense, challenge evidence, and advocate on their behalf. Whether it’s negotiating plea deals, representing clients in court, or providing counsel during investigations, their skill and experience can make a significant difference in the outcome of a case.

The Basics of UCMJ Offenses: What Service Members at Fort Drum Need to Know

Fort Drum, New York, is a beacon of military readiness and discipline, where the enforcement of the UCMJ ensures that service members adhere to the highest standards of conduct. For those facing legal challenges, especially under UCMJ Article 120, the support of a Fort Drum military defense lawyer or court martial attorney is indispensable. These legal professionals are critical in the military justice system, offering experience, advocacy, and support to needy service members. Their commitment to upholding justice and protecting the rights of the accused helps maintain the integrity of the military community. It ensures that all service members are treated fairly under the law.

Role of Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyers in UCMJ Offenses

Fort Drum, located in Jefferson County, New York, is significant in United States military history and vital to national defense. Its origins date back to 1908, when it was initially established as Pine Camp due to its dense pine forests. Over the years, Fort Drum has evolved from a modest, remote training site into a bustling military installation, home to the 10th Mountain Division, one of the most deployed units in the U.S. Army.

Criteria for Choosing the best Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyer for your case

Several key developments marked the transformation of Pine Camp into Fort Drum. In the 1930s, the site was expanded significantly, acquiring more land to accommodate larger training exercises. This expansion proved crucial during World War II when the camp served as a training ground for units participating in the war. The camp’s importance continued to grow, and in 1951, it was redesignated as Camp Drum, recognizing its permanent training center status.

Fort Drum Court Martial Attorneys: Crafting a Winning Case

Establishing the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum in 1985 marked a new era for the installation, solidifying its role in U.S. military operations. The division is renowned for its skill in fighting in rugged terrain and harsh conditions, attributes that reflect the challenging environment of Fort Drum itself.

Building Your Defense: Strategies from Fort Drum Military Lawyers

Fort Drum’s strategic importance extends beyond its training capabilities. It is crucial in supporting military operations worldwide, with its units frequently deployed to conflict zones. The base also significantly impacts the local economy, providing jobs and fostering community relations.

Fort Drum Court-martial defense lawyers

Fort Drum’s history is a testament to its enduring importance in American military strategy. From its early days as Pine Camp to its current status as a cornerstone of the U.S. Army, Fort Drum has adapted and evolved to meet the changing needs of the nation’s defense. It symbolizes military readiness, resilience, and commitment to securing domestic and international peace and stability.

How Fort Drum Has Evolved

Nestled in the densely wooded areas that define upstate New York, Fort Drum covers over 105,000 acres to provide a fertile training ground for army recruits.

The Jefferson County Army installation covers 25.4 square miles of densely wooded areas and rugged undulating terrain. Several villages surround the large army base, with Watertown being the nearest commercial center, which attracts Fort Drum military personnel. The Indian and Black Rivers flow adjacent to the installation boundary.

The United States military purchased land in 1908 to develop Pine Camp. Major General Frederick Dent Grant led an officer team that trained 2,000 regular army personnel and 8,000 state militia members. In 1935, the largest peacetime maneuvers ever held in the United States unfolded at Pine Camp.

Over 36,000 soldiers stayed at the remote Army base to train for what many military members considered preparation for another worldwide conflagration. When conflict broke out in Europe and Asia, the United States government rapidly expanded Pine Camp to accommodate more army recruit training. The Army changed the name of Pine Camp to Fort Drum in 1951 to commemorate the military service of Lieutenant General Hugh A Drum. Because of the climate and terrain, the Army eventually made Fort Drum one of the most active Army training bases within the United States.

Fort Drum Transitions into the 21st Century

Fort Drum continues to follow its original mission of training and commanding new Army recruits for deployment to hostile regions anywhere across the globe. The army installation provides logistical and administrative support to tenant units and mobilizes, on average, about 80,000 troops annually. Fort Drum expanded between 1986 and 1992 to account for the installation’s increasingly important role in fighting terrorism.

The army constructed 130 new buildings and built 35 miles of paved roads in and around the base. The United States government has Fort Drum on a shortlist of military installations to become the home of the proposed Eastern United States missile defense system. 2014, a biofuel plant opened to provide supplemental energy for Army installations.

Hire the Best Fort Drum Military Defense Lawyers

An aggressive criminal attorney such as Michael Waddington makes the difference between spending considerable time in the stockade and regaining your previously sterling military reputation. Mr. Waddington and the team of Fort Drum military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington protect clients against frivolous criminal charges.

Whether you face disciplinary action for violating the Uniform Code or face sexual assault charges, you can ill afford to place your career on the line by hiring inexperienced Fort Drum military defense lawyers. The dedicated men and women who serve in the United States military need a bulldog such as Michael Waddington to guide them through the legal land mines of a military criminal trial.