Elite Military Defense Lawyers
As Featured On:
Our military defense lawyers aggressively defend criminal cases in the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard court-martial cases worldwide.
Our experienced court-martial defense attorneys focus on defending military sexual assault, Article 120 UCMJ, Article 120b, Article 120c, Internet Stings, false sexual assault accusations, and computer crimes. Having been involved in some of the highest-profile criminal cases from the “War on Sexual Assault” and the “War on Terror,” our military defense attorneys have been fighting difficult court-martial cases for over twenty years.
People Also Search For:
- Military defense lawyer
- UCMJ defense attorney
- Military investigations legal help
- Court-martial defense lawyer
- Military legal representation
- Defense against military charges
- Military disciplinary defense
- UCMJ legal defense services
- Military investigation attorney
- Article 120 UCMJ
LEGAL SERVICES
MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS
MILITARY BOARDS & HEARINGS
UCMJ OFFENSES
Meet Your Defense Team
Michael S. Waddington
Criminal Defense Lawyer
PARTNER
Alexandra González-Waddington
Criminal Defense Lawyer
PARTNER
Recent Case Results
Gang-Rape Allegation Collapses Against Navy Officer
U.S. v. Navy O-2 – Norfolk, Virginia – Pre-Charge Defense Allegations: Rape, Conspiracy, Indecent Acts, Fraternization, Adultery, Conduct Unbecoming Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal,
Facebook Exposé Shuts Down Fake Rape Allegation in Japan
U.S. v. Marine E-6 – Iwakuni Air Base, Japan – Article 32 Hearings Allegations: Rape, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Adultery, Fraternization, Violation of an Order Max
Army Officer Beats Aggravated Assault & Conduct Unbecoming Charges
U.S. v. Army O-1 – Fort Bragg, NC / Tried at Fort McNair, Washington D.C. – General Court-Martial Allegations: Aggravated Assault with Means Likely to
Navy Sailor’s Sex Assault Case Tossed After UCI Bombshell
U.S. v. Navy E-6 – Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault Max Punishment: 40+ years confinement, Dishonorable Discharge, Sex
Cleared of Rape Charges in Wild Multi-Victim Court-Martial Drama
U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Polk, LA – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Rape, Sexual Assault x4, Article 128 Assault, Total of 14 allegations
Army E-6 Beats False Sex Assault Charges at Fort Bragg
U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Bragg, North Carolina – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault, Article 128 Assault Consummated by Battery, Conduct Unbecoming
Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year
U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA
Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2
Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape
U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration
Take Command of Your Defense
Why Service Members Choose UCMJ Defense Lawyers with Proven Military Legal Expertise
Call Us Today
Check Out Our Newest Book
UCMJ Survival Guide
UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers
Worldwide Military Defense Experience
Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation
Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses
War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense
Media and High-Profile Case Experience
Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets
Important Things To Know:
Military prosecution teams often outnumber assigned military defense lawyers 5 to 1.
Many military prosecutors will use every tactic they can to manipulate all aspects of a case and thwart the defendant’s ability to mount an adequate defense. Thus, it is crucial to put up the best court-martial defense possible.
Requests for delays and continuances to give defendants adequate time to prepare their defense are often denied.
Prosecutors offer witnesses favors, plea deals, and immunity as long as they say what they’re asked to help win a case.
While military prosecutors can take advantage of any number of expert witnesses, it’s common for prosecutors and Staff Judge Advocates (SJA) to work together and deny defendants the same right.
Even requests to use the same experts as used by the prosecution are often denied. It is critical to select an attorney with the experience and skill to win a case without defense experts, if needed. Our firm teaches other lawyers how to attack and discredit prosecution experts.
Another common tactic is charging a service member using the “shotgun approach.”
This tactic uses as many charges as possible to leave defendants little choice but to plead guilty. It is not uncommon to see court-martial charge sheets that are three pages long with the same charge repeated in different ways.
The Government has plenty of well-trained investigators, including CID, CIS, OSI, MPI and CGIS.
They are all working to find any and all information about you. Investigators often lose, overlook, or misplace evidence that helps the defense. Prosecutors and law enforcement will twist favorable facts and use them against you at trial.
Military investigators commonly use lies, trickery, and deceit.
They are trained in shady interrogation tactics, and they’re good at it. Investigators will try to get away with as many sneaky tactics as a defense lawyer allows. That’s why it’s important to hire a lawyer who knows the tricks of the trade and can use them to your advantage.
Rank plays a key role in determining a case’s outcome.
From the Judge to the jury, defendants are outranked. That includes the Chief of Military Justice (the Convening Authority that decides if a defendant will face a court-martial and picks the jury), the Staff Judge Advocate, preliminary hearings officers, and your assigned military lawyer. That’s why an aggressive military defense lawyer who’s not subject to rank is critical to a winning defense.
The Staff Judge Advocate, the Convening Authority’s legal adviser, is required to be fair and impartial in the name of justice.
But to many SJAs, “justice” means getting a conviction, a discharge, and the toughest sentence possible. As the prosecutor’s boss, the SJA isn’t concerned about your freedom or your family’s welfare. They just want a conviction. They will bully prosecutors and your own defense attorneys alike to get it. Even when preliminary hearing officers find facts that don’t support bringing charges, some SJA offices still proceed to trial.
The rules of a court-martial trial also work against defendants.
The prosecution is allowed to call any witnesses they desire without informing the defense of what those witnesses will say. But the defense must disclose exactly what its witnesses will say and what role their testimonies will play. Some judges require the defense to disclose even more details, revealing the entire defense strategy. In high profile cases, military defense lawyers face incredible pressure to plead guilty.
Playlist
3:34
7:32
6:57
7:58
21:35
7:24
