Malmstrom AFB Military Defense Lawyers

Stationed at Malmstrom AFB, Montana? Facing a court-martial, UCMJ action, Administrative Separation Board, or other Adverse Administrative Action? Call our experienced Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers at 1-800-921-8607 for a free consultation.

Elite Military Defense Lawyers

“Our military defense lawyers are among the most experienced and hard-hitting in the world. With an unparalleled track record, we provide aggressive, strategic defense tailored to each client’s unique situation. Trust us to fight relentlessly for your rights and deliver the best possible outcome.” (Michael Waddington, Military Defense Lawyer)

Welcome to our comprehensive guide about Malmstrom Air Force Base Military Defense Lawyers and Court martial attorneys. Suppose you are a service member facing legal challenges in the military. In that case, this page aims to provide you with crucial insights into the military justice system, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and the importance of enlisting experienced civilian court martial lawyers.

The Military Justice System and the UCMJ

The military justice system governs the conduct of service members in the United States Armed Forces. The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is the primary law governing military justice. The UCMJ outlines the protocols for court-martials, non-judicial punishment, and other disciplinary actions. It applies to all branches of the U.S. military, including the personnel stationed at Malmstrom Air Force Base.

Malmstrom AFB Military Defense Lawyers and Article 120 UCMJ: Military Sexual Offenses

Article 120 of the UCMJ deals specifically with military sexual offenses, including rape, sexual assault, and other related crimes. Being charged under Article 120 is a serious matter that can lead to severe consequences, including lengthy imprisonment, dishonorable discharge, and a permanent criminal record. The complexities involved in defending such charges necessitate the guidance of skilled Malmstrom AFB Military Defense Lawyers.

The Benefits of Civilian Malmstrom AFB, Montana Military Defense Lawyers

Facing a court-martial is a daunting experience, and the stakes are incredibly high. Experienced civilian court martial lawyers bring a wealth of knowledge and dedication to the defense of service members. Here are some key benefits of hiring seasoned Malmstrom Air Force Base court martial attorneys:

Extensive knowledge of the UCMJ and military judicial procedures
Proven track record of defending similar cases successfully
Ability to provide a vigorous defense that challenges every aspect of the prosecution’s case
Comprehensive understanding of the military environment and culture

Punishments at a Court-Martial

A court-martial can result in a wide range of punishments depending on the severity of the offense. Potential penalties include:

Confinement
Reduction in rank
Forfeiture of pay and allowances
Dishonorable or bad conduct discharge
Reprimands and restrictions

These consequences can have a long-lasting impact on a service member’s career and life, making it crucial to have dedicated Malmstrom Air Force Base military Defense Lawyers by your side.

Malmstrom AFB Military Defense Lawyers Defense Administrative Actions

In addition to court-martial, service members may face administrative actions for misconduct. These can include:

Administrative separation from the military
Non-judicial punishment (NJP)
Reprimands
Loss or reduction of security clearance

Such administrative actions can impact your military career and future employment opportunities. Consulting with experienced Malmstrom AFB Military Defense Lawyers is vital.

The History of Malmstrom Air Force Base

Established in 1942, Malmstrom Air Force Base has a rich history of strategic importance to the United States Air Force. Initially built as an operational training unit for the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, the base has evolved over the years to become a key component of America’s nuclear deterrent strategy. Today, Malmstrom AFB is home to the 341st Missile Wing and is critical in maintaining national security.

Malmstrom AFB, Montana and the Military Connection

Malmstrom AFB is more than just an airfield; it’s a community of dedicated service members committed to protecting the nation. The base supports various operational missions and has many personnel who may face various legal challenges during their service. The connection between Malmstrom AFB and the military underscores the need for competent Malmstrom Air Force Base Military Defense Lawyers.

Malmstrom Air Force Base Court Martial Attorneys & Collateral and Emotional Consequences of a Court-Martial Conviction

A conviction at a court-martial can lead to significant collateral and emotional consequences. Collateral consequences include loss of veterans’ benefits, inability to secure civilian employment, and difficulty obtaining professional licenses. The emotional toll can be devastating, leading to mental health issues, family disruptions, and lasting stigmatization. These consequences highlight the importance of securing adept Malmstrom Air Force Base court martial attorneys.

Why Choose the Law Firm of Gonzalez & Waddington?

The law firm of Gonzalez & Waddington offers unparalleled legal representation for service members stationed at Malmstrom Air Force Base. Here’s why you should consider our team:

Dedicated focus on military law and court-martial cases
Strong track record of defending service members
In-depth understanding of the UCMJ and military judicial processes
Client-centered approach ensuring personalized defense strategies

Our attorneys are committed to fighting for your rights and achieving the best possible outcomes in your case. You do not have to face the military justice system alone; our seasoned Malmstrom Air Force Base military Defense Lawyers are here to assist you.

Contact Gonzalez & Waddington Today

If you or a loved one are facing a court-martial or any other military legal issue at Malmstrom Air Force Base, do not hesitate to contact the law firm of Gonzalez & Waddington. Our experienced Malmstrom Air Force Base court martial attorneys are ready to provide you with the exceptional legal representation you deserve. Contact us today for a consultation, and let us help you navigate this challenging time.

Remember, your career, future, and freedom are too important to risk. Trust the knowledge and dedication of Malmstrom Air Force Base Military Defense Lawyers and Malmstrom Air Force Base Court Martial Attorneys from the law firm of Gonzalez & Waddington to stand by your side every step.

Examples of Fictitious Cases Our Malmstrom AFB Military Defense Lawyers Could Handle and Potential Defenses:

Article 120 UCMJ – Rape
An airman is accused of raping a fellow service member in the dormitory after a night of drinking. The alleged victim reported the incident the following day, claiming they were unable to consent due to intoxication. Forensic evidence shows DNA matching the accused was found on the victim. The accused maintains the encounter was consensual.
Experienced Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could challenge the accuser’s credibility and the reliability of forensic evidence. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might also highlight inconsistencies in the alleged victim’s statements.
Article 120b UCMJ – Sexual Abuse of a Child
An airman is alleged to have inappropriately touched the daughter of another Air Force member during a base event. The child, aged 10, told her parents, who reported the incident to the authorities. The accused denies any wrongdoing and states they were never alone with the child.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could cast doubt on the child’s testimony and examine any ulterior motives the family might have. They may also use character witnesses to support the accused’s reputation.
Article 120c UCMJ – Indecent Exposure
An airman is charged with exposing themselves in a public setting on base. Several witnesses claim they saw the individual in a compromising position outside the gym. The accused claims it was a case of mistaken identity.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could scrutinize the eyewitness accounts for any inconsistencies. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might also provide an alibi for the time of the incident.
Article 128 UCMJ – Assault
An airman is accused of assaulting a subordinate during a heated argument in the workplace. The subordinate claims they were pushed to the ground and received minor injuries. Witnesses present during the argument have conflicting accounts of what transpired.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could bring in witnesses to challenge the subordinate’s claims. They might also argue self-defense or a lack of intent to harm.
Article 128b UCMJ – Domestic Violence
A service member is accused of physically assaulting their spouse during an altercation at their on-base home. The spouse has visible injuries and calls security forces, leading to the servicemember’s arrest. The accused claims they were acting in self-defense.
Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys could introduce evidence of the spouse’s aggression. Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers might call on character witnesses to attest to the accused’s non-violent nature.
Article 120 UCMJ – Sexual Assault
An airman allegedly sexually assaulted a civilian contractor at Malmstrom AFB after a social gathering. The contractor claims they were incapacitated and unable to consent. The accused maintains that the contractor was fully aware and consensual at the time.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could question the accuser’s state and recollection of the events. Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers might use evidence from the gathering to dispute the accuser’s account.
Article 134 UCMJ – Child Pornography
An airman is charged with possession of child pornography after images are found on their personal computer during an IT sweep. The servicemember claims ignorance, stating the images were unknowingly downloaded through a file-sharing program.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could challenge the accused’s intent and knowledge of possessing the illegal material. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might also question the legality and process of the IT sweep.
Article 112a UCMJ – Drug Use
A service member is accused of using illegal drugs after failing a random drug test. The airman claims the positive test result came from unknowingly consuming a substance-laced drink at a party. Friends of the airman confirm they saw suspicious behavior at the gathering.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could bring in witnesses who observed the drink being spiked. They might also present experts who can discuss possible false positives in drug testing.
Article 121 UCMJ – Larceny
An airman is accused of stealing a fellow airman’s personal property from the dorms. The items, including a laptop and cash, were found in the accused’s room. The servicemember claims the items were planted by someone trying to frame them.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could interrogate other suspects’ timelines and possible motives. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might also introduce forensic evidence to support the accused’s claim of being framed.
Article 107 UCMJ – False Official Statements
A non-commissioned officer is accused of making false statements in official military documents regarding their whereabouts during a specific period. They allegedly used these false statements to cover up unauthorized absences. The accused admits to errors but claims they were unintentional.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could argue that the false statements were honest mistakes. They might also present evidence of the accused’s good character and lack of intent to deceive.
Article 133 UCMJ – Conduct Unbecoming an Officer
An officer is accused of engaging in a romantic relationship with a subordinate, violating Air Force fraternization policies. The relationship was discovered after a series of inappropriate emails were leaked. The officer argues the relationship was consensual and respectful.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could emphasize the consensual nature of the relationship and lack of coercion. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might also challenge the validity of the leaked emails.
Article 85 UCMJ – Desertion
A servicemember is charged with desertion after failing to report for duty for over 30 days. The airman claims severe personal issues led to the unapproved leave, and they intended to return. The airman was apprehended out of state, living with family.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could argue extenuating personal circumstances and present evidence showing the airman’s intent to return to duty.
Article 92 UCMJ – Failure to Obey an Order or Regulation
An airman is accused of failing to follow a direct order to report to a restricted area for duty. The airman claims they were unaware of the order due to a miscommunication with their superior. Several witnesses confirm the order was given verbally during a chaotic operation.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could argue that the miscommunication led to unintentional non-compliance. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might present witnesses attesting to the order’s confusing nature.
Article 132 UCMJ – Frauds Against the United States
An airman is accused of submitting false travel claims to receive extra compensation. The travel records and receipts were found to be manipulated. The airman claims a clerical error and denies any fraudulent intent.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could scrutinize the evidence for genuine clerical mistakes. Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers might call experts to discuss the complexities of military travel claims.
Article 111 UCMJ – Drunken or Reckless Operation of a Vehicle
An airman is charged with operating a vehicle on base while under the influence of alcohol. The airman was apprehended at a checkpoint and failed a field sobriety test. The accused claims they were not intoxicated, and the test was improperly administered.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could dispute the field sobriety test results. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might also question the legality of the checkpoint procedures.
Article 118 UCMJ – Murder
An airman is accused of fatally shooting a fellow servicemember during an on-base altercation. Witnesses say the shooter acted in self-defense after being attacked. Forensic evidence shows the deceased had a weapon and was advancing towards the accused.
Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys could build a self-defense case. Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers might bring forensic experts to bolster the defense narrative.
Article 125 UCMJ – Forcible Sodomy
An airman faces charges of forcible sodomy against a fellow service member. The alleged victim says they were coerced through threats and physically unable to resist. The accused denies any sexual contact with the victim.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could question the accuser’s truthfulness and motive. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might also seek forensic evidence to disprove the charges.
Article 121a UCMJ – Wrongful Appropriation
An airman is accused of using another member’s vehicle without permission. The accused claims they had prior verbal consent from the vehicle’s owner, but no witnesses can confirm this. The owner disputes any such agreement.
Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys could attack the lack of concrete evidence of wrongful appropriation. Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers might also find inconsistencies in the owner’s statements.
Article 122 UCMJ – Robbery
An airman is alleged to have forcibly taken money from another service member in the barracks. The victim claims they were threatened with a weapon. The accused denies using force or threats and admits to borrowing the money.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could question the victim’s account and lack of physical evidence of threats. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might also bring character witnesses to support the accused’s narrative.
Article 117 UCMJ – Provoking Speeches or Gestures
An airman is accused of making inflammatory and racially charged statements during a unit meeting. The statements allegedly led to a physical altercation among unit members. The accused claims their comments were misunderstood and not meant to provoke.
Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys could argue the intent behind the statements was non-provocative. Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers might also introduce context to mitigate the interpretation of the comments.
Article 86 UCMJ – AWOL
A service member is charged with being absent without leave for three days before returning voluntarily. The airman claims that a family emergency required immediate attention, and they did not have time to obtain proper authorization. The airman’s commanding officer disputes the emergency’s validity.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could gather evidence validating the family emergency. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might also argue the airman’s intentions to return as soon as possible.
Article 131 UCMJ – Perjury
An airman is accused of lying under oath during a court proceeding regarding the whereabouts of a fellow service member. Evidence later emerged showing the accused lied to protect their colleague. The accused admits to making false statements but claims they did so out of loyalty, not malice.
Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys could argue the lack of malicious intent. Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers might emphasize the airman’s previously unblemished record to seek a lenient sentence.
Article 90 UCMJ – Assaulting or Willfully Disobeying a Superior Commissioned Officer
An airman is charged with willfully disobeying and physically assaulting a superior officer during a heated exchange. The incident occurred in a public setting and was witnessed by several other service members. The accused claims they were provoked and acted in self-defense.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could present evidence of provocation. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might argue the necessity of self-defense in the given context.
Article 81 UCMJ – Conspiracy
Several airmen are charged with conspiring to steal military equipment from the base. The alleged conspiracy was uncovered through intercepted electronic communications. The accused claim the conversations were humorous and not to be taken seriously.
Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys could argue that there was no intent to commit a crime. Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers might also highlight any gaps in the prosecution’s electronic evidence.
Article 134 UCMJ – Adultery
An officer is accused of engaging in an adulterous affair with a married civilian. The affair was discovered through a series of text messages. The officer admits to the affair but states it was consensual and believes it should not affect their military career.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could argue the affair’s nature and lack of direct impact on military duty. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might also question the relevance of the texts in military jurisdiction.
Article 121 UCMJ – Robbery with a Weapon
A service member is accused of robbing a fellow member at knifepoint in the dormitory. The victim identified the accused, and the knife was found in the accused’s possession. The accused claims they found the knife and denies committing the robbery.
Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys could challenge the victim’s identification accuracy. Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers might present evidence supporting the accused’s claim of finding the knife.
Article 80 UCMJ – Attempted Murder
An airman is charged with attempted murder after allegedly trying to poison a superior officer. The officer fell ill after consuming a drink prepared by the accused. The accused claims they had no knowledge of the poison and believes they are being framed.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could investigate alternative suspects. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might introduce evidence to show the accused had no access to poison.
Article 132 UCMJ – False Claims
An airman is accused of submitting false medical claims to receive undue compensation. The documents show exaggerated and fabricated injuries. The accused contends that the mistakes were administrative errors, not intentional falsehoods.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could argue clerical errors rather than fraudulent intent. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might bring in medical experts to discuss the legitimacy of the injuries.
Article 120c UCMJ – Indecent Viewing
An airman is charged with indecently viewing another service member in the shower area without their knowledge. The victim reported feeling violated and identified the accused as the perpetrator. The accused denies the allegations, citing a case of mistaken identity.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could undermine the reliability of the victim’s identification. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might present evidence showing the accused was not in the vicinity.
Article 94 UCMJ – Mutiny and Sedition
A group of airmen are charged with mutiny after reportedly attempting to seize control of a unit during a critical mission. The charges stem from intercepted communications proposing the plan. The accused assert the discussions were theoretical and lacked any real intent.
Malmstrom AFB military defense lawyers could focus on the conversations’ speculative nature. Malmstrom AFB court martial attorneys might challenge the interpretation of the intercepted communications as credible evidence of mutiny.

Malmstrom AFB, Montana Court Martial Lawyers

Malmstrom AFB is a U.S. Air Force (Air Force) installation in Montana, neighboring Great Falls. The base was named in 1955 in memory of Colonel Einar A. Malmstrom. Its previous names were Great Falls Army Air Base (GFAAB) and Great Falls AFB (GFAFB). Malmstrom AFB houses the Minuteman III missile and consists of the 341^st MW (Missile Wing) and the 819^th Red Horse Squadron.

Legal Service Provided

UCMJ Article 120 – Sexual Assault
Show Cause Boards
Appeals
Article 32 – Investigations
Court Martial
Discharge Upgrades
Military Records Correction
Letter of Reprimand Rebuttals
Administrative Proceedings
Non-Judicial Punishment

Malmstrom AFB Google Map Embed Code:

View Larger Map

CALL NOW 1-800-921-8607