Fort Gregg-Adams Military Defense Lawyers

Stationed at Fort Gregg-Adams, Virginia? Facing a court-martial, UCMJ action, Administrative Separation Board, or other Adverse Administrative Action? Call our experienced Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers at 1-800-921-8607 for a free consultation.

Aggressive Fort Gregg-Adams Military Defense Lawyers

Fort Gregg-Adams, located in Virginia, is a military installation with a storied past and a crucial role in the United States Army. Established during World War I, it has been a pivotal training and logistics hub, evolving over the years to meet the dynamic needs of the military.

As with any major military installation, adherence to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is paramount, and violations can lead to severe consequences. Understanding the history of Fort Gregg-Adams and the importance of having the best Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers is essential for anyone facing charges under the UCMJ.

The History of Fort Gregg-Adams

Fort Gregg-Adams, initially known as Camp Lee, was established in 1917 to train soldiers for World War I. After the war, it was deactivated but later reactivated during World War II, serving as a training center for quartermaster troops. Over the decades, the installation has been renamed and repurposed multiple times, reflecting its ongoing importance to the Army’s mission. Today, Fort Gregg-Adams is a vital logistics and training center that is key in preparing and supporting Army personnel.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) at Fort Gregg-Adams

The UCMJ is the foundation of military law in the United States, providing a comprehensive legal framework for the governance of all service members. At Fort Gregg-Adams, adherence to the UCMJ is critical, and violations can lead to court-martial and other disciplinary actions. The UCMJ covers a wide range of offenses, from minor infractions to severe crimes, and it is crucial for accused service members to have robust legal representation.

Court-Martials at Fort Gregg-Adams

Court-martials are the military’s judicial proceedings for addressing violations of the UCMJ. There are three types of court-martials: summary, special, and general. Each varies in complexity and severity of potential punishments. Service members facing court-martial at Fort Gregg-Adams must navigate a complex legal process, making the expertise of Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers invaluable.

Fort Gregg-Adams Military Defense Lawyers & Article 120 UCMJ

Article 120 of the UCMJ deals with sexual assault and other sexual misconduct. These charges are taken very seriously, and convictions can result in severe penalties, including imprisonment, dishonorable discharge, and mandatory registration as a sex offender. Given the gravity of these charges, having experienced Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers is crucial to ensure a fair trial and the best possible defense.

Fort Gregg-Adams Military Defense Lawyers & Article 120b UCMJ

Article 120b specifically addresses sexual offenses involving children. This includes acts such as rape, sexual assault, and other abusive sexual contact involving minors. The penalties for violating Article 120b are among the most severe in military law, reflecting the seriousness of these crimes. Accused service members at Fort Gregg-Adams need the dedicated support of Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers to defend against these charges effectively.

Fort Gregg-Adams Military Defense Lawyers & Article 120c UCMJ

Article 120c covers other sexual misconduct offenses, including indecent exposure and indecent viewing, recording, or broadcasting. While these offenses may carry less severe penalties than those under Articles 120 and 120b, they can still have significant personal and professional repercussions. The legal representation of Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers is essential to navigate these charges and mitigate their impact.

Other Severe Crimes Under the UCMJ

In addition to sexual offenses, the UCMJ addresses a wide range of serious crimes, including assault, larceny, drug offenses, and conduct unbecoming an officer. Each of these offenses can lead to severe punishments, and the complexity of military law requires skilled legal defense. Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers are equipped to handle these cases, providing expertise and support for service members facing UCMJ violations.

The Necessity of Skilled Legal Defense

Service members accused of UCMJ violations at Fort Gregg-Adams face a daunting legal process. A conviction can have life-altering consequences, impacting not only their military careers but also their personal lives. It is imperative to secure the best legal representation possible to ensure a fair trial and the protection of their rights.

Gonzalez & Waddington is a law firm with extensive experience in military defense, dedicated to providing top-tier legal representation to service members at Fort Gregg-Adams. Their team of Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers is committed to defending the rights of the accused and achieving the best possible outcomes in court-martial cases. Whether facing charges under Articles 120, 120b, 120c, or other severe crimes, service members can rely on Gonzalez & Waddington for skilled and dedicated legal defense.

In conclusion, Fort Gregg-Adams’s history and significance highlight the importance of maintaining military discipline and justice. Having the best Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers is essential for those facing UCMJ violations. The experienced team at Gonzalez & Waddington stands ready to provide legal support to protect the rights and futures of service members stationed at Fort Gregg-Adams.

Examples of Fictitious UCMJ Cases Our Fort Gregg-Adams Military Defense Lawyers Could Handle and Potential Defenses:

1. Article 120 UCMJ – Rape at Fort Gregg-Adams: A service member is accused of raping another soldier in the barracks after a night of heavy drinking. The alleged victim claims to have been physically forced despite verbal protests. There are conflicting witness statements regarding the events leading up to the incident. Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers could challenge the reliability of witness testimonies and question the credibility of the alleged victim’s account.
2. Article 120b UCMJ – Sexual Abuse of a Child at Fort Gregg-Adams: An NCO is accused of sexually abusing a minor who was participating in a base youth program. The minor disclosed the abuse to a school counselor. Digital evidence from the NCO’s computer and phone is presented. Fort Gregg-Adams court martial attorneys would scrutinize digital forensic evidence and question procedural integrity during the investigation.
3. Article 120c UCMJ – Indecent Viewing at Fort Gregg-Adams: An enlisted member is accused of secretly recording a fellow soldier showering in the communal bathroom. The recordings were allegedly found on the accused’s device. Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers can investigate how the recordings were discovered and assess the legality of the evidence collection.
4. Article 128 UCMJ – Assault at Fort Gregg-Adams: A soldier is accused of assaulting another soldier during a heated argument in the mess hall. The alleged victim required medical treatment for minor injuries. Fort Gregg-Adams court martial attorneys could show that the injuries were not as severe as alleged or argue self-defense.
5. Article 128b UCMJ – Domestic Violence at Fort Gregg-Adams: A service member is accused of physically abusing their spouse on base housing. Witnesses include neighbors who reported hearing loud altercations. Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers could question the consistency of witness accounts and analyze any available forensic evidence.
6. Article 121 UCMJ – Larceny at Fort Gregg-Adams: A service member is accused of stealing equipment from the base supply room and selling it online. CCTV footage is presented as evidence. Fort Gregg-Adams court martial attorneys would scrutinize the chain of custody for the CCTV footage and question the adequacy of inventory management practices.
7. Article 125 UCMJ – Kidnapping at Fort Gregg-Adams: An enlisted member is accused of forcibly taking another service member to an off-base location against their will. The accused claims it was a prank gone wrong. Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers could argue the intent behind the actions and the context to mitigate the severity of the charges.
8. Article 134 UCMJ – Child Endangerment at Fort Gregg-Adams: A service member is accused of leaving their child unattended in a parked car while they attended a meeting. The child was unharmed but was found by military police. Fort Gregg-Adams court martial attorneys could highlight mitigating factors and argue that there was no actual harm to the child.
9. Article 133 UCMJ – Conduct Unbecoming of an Officer at Fort Gregg-Adams: An officer is accused of engaging in a public altercation at a local bar, bringing discredit to the uniformed services. Several civilians and military personnel witnessed the incident. Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers can assess the reliability of witness testimonies and possible extenuating circumstances.
10. Article 112a UCMJ – Drug Use at Fort Gregg-Adams: A service member tested positive for illegal substances during a random drug screening. The accused denies knowingly ingesting any drugs. Fort Gregg-Adams court martial attorneys would investigate potential contamination issues or faulty testing procedures.
11. Article 118 UCMJ – Murder at Fort Gregg-Adams: A service member is charged with the murder of a civilian during an off-base altercation. The accused claims self-defense. Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers could examine forensic evidence and gather witness testimonies to support the self-defense claim.
12. Article 119 UCMJ – Manslaughter at Fort Gregg-Adams: A service member is accused of accidentally causing the death of a fellow soldier during a training exercise due to negligence. The unit’s safety protocols are called into question. Fort Gregg-Adams court martial attorneys could argue that systemic failures, rather than individual negligence, were at fault.
13. Article 86 UCMJ – AWOL (Absent Without Leave) at Fort Gregg-Adams: A soldier is accused of being absent without leave for several days after failing to report back following authorized leave. The accused reports they had a family emergency. Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers could present evidence regarding the family emergency to mitigate the absence.
14. Article 92 UCMJ – Failure to Obey Order or Regulation at Fort Gregg-Adams: A service member is accused of disobeying a direct order from a superior officer regarding mission-critical tasks. The accused claims misunderstanding of the instructions. Fort Gregg-Adams court martial attorneys can present a case based on communication issues and unintentional noncompliance.
15. Article 107 UCMJ – False Official Statement at Fort Gregg-Adams: A service member is accused of providing false information on an official report concerning their location during duty hours. The accused claims it was an honest mistake. Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers could demonstrate a lack of intent to deceive and provide corroborating evidence to support the accused’s account.

Aggressive Fort Gregg-Adams Military Defense Lawyers

Fort Gregg-Adams, VA  Court-Martial Defense Lawyers

Our court-martial victories speak for themselves. The suspected service member and his or her desired outcome are our main concerns. Our defense attorneys maintain lighter caseloads than the usual free Army defense attorneys to focus on each client individually. Your case will not be outsourced to a random attorney. We will not push you into diving at the last minute. Our court-martial defense attorneys have successfully contested US Army court-martial and ADSEP cases in the US and worldwide.

Fort Gregg-Adams, VA  Military Attorneys

Our law firm’s founding attorneys, Michael Waddington and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington, graduated from Temple University School of Law in Philadelphia, PA. In addition, Mr. Waddington is a member of the American Board of Criminal Lawyers. The ABCL is one of the most prestigious legal groups, comprising some of the best criminal defense attorneys in the USA. Entry is by invitation only and exclusive to highly qualified defense lawyers with a decade of experience defending criminal trials. During this time, they must have defended 50 or more felony trials and won 35 or more jury cases.

Moreover, Michael Waddington was voted a “Super Lawyer” in Georgia and is ranked Superb on AVVO.com. A few of his cases were made into documentary films like “The Kill Team.” He also regularly teaches defense attorneys on criminal defense.
Our high-powered military lawyers will use our experience to fight your court-martial or administrative separation (ADSEP) case.

Military Sex Crimes, Penalties, & Legal Defenses

Our aggressive court-martial defense attorneys and their results from less seasoned lawyers speak for themselves.

If you or a loved one are facing a court-martial for a military sexual offense or if you are facing an administrative discharge, NJP, show cause board, or letter of reprimand, then reach out to our military criminal defense attorneys today.

Background and History of Fort Gregg-Adams, Virginia

Fort Gregg-Adams is an important training base. Army Logistics University that came to Fort Gregg-Adams in 2009, and the US. Army Ordnance Corps Ordnance Campus, two modern operations that prepare soldiers for their roles in national security and foreign operations. Fort Gregg-Adams was also the first army post in the country, and it houses a full-sized statue commemorating the service of women in the army. Fort Gregg-Adams, Virginia Quartermaster of the US Army, and the US Army Women’s Museum offer a unique perspective on the history of the US Army.

Fort Gregg-Adams has 27,000 active members, trains more than 70,000 soldiers annually, and serves as one of the largest Army training sites. Fort Gregg-Adams is three miles south of Petersburg, Virginia, 116 miles east of Washington, D.C., and 21 miles north of Richmond, the state capital.

Fort Gregg-Adams has been a unique facility for hundreds of thousands of soldiers and their families over the past 100 years. It is named after U.S. Army Colonel and Commander in Chief of the Confederate States Robert E. Lee, one of the Army institutions named after a Confederate soldier. The Defense Department Commission for Naming of Objects renamed it to commemorate the Confederate States of America and those who served in that country.

Fort Gregg-Adams was founded in 1917 as an army camp (as Fort Lee) when the United States entered World War I. It was initially built as a state mobilization camp and later transformed into a divisional training camp. After Germany and Japan surrendered, the Army kept Camp Gregg-Adams as an active training facility for US Army Quartermasters.

Hiring Fort Gregg-Adams Military Defense Lawyers

Equipment and other materials associated with the Army Ordnance Museum were brought for use by the U.S. Army Ordnance Training and Heritage Center to Fort Gregg-Adams in 2009 and 2010. One of the realignments and closings of the base under the BRAC Act was the requirement to relocate the US Army Military Equipment Center, School Headquarters, Ordnance Mechanical Maintenance School, U.S. Army Ammunition, Electronic Maintenance School, and Fort Gregg-Adams Military Equipment Museum to the end of 2011. Traffic restrictions on the official training track included the complete closure of the shopping street from the main post office to the Quartermaster Museum.

List of Fisctional UCMJ Cases Commonly Handled by Fort Gregg-Adams Military Defense Lawyers

• Article 120: Sexual Assault
  Private John Smith was accused of sexual assault at an off-base party.
• Article 120b: Rape of a Minor
  Sergeant Jane Doe was accused of raping a 15-year-old family friend.
• Article 120c: Indecent Viewing
  Staff Sergeant Alex Brown was caught secretly recording in the women’s showers.
• Article 134: Sexual Harassment
  Lieutenant Mark Johnson allegedly made persistent unwanted advances toward a subordinate.
• Article 121: Larceny
  Sergeant Emily Wilson was accused of stealing military equipment.
• Article 112a: Drug Use
  Private First Class Rachel Adams tested positive for illegal substances during a random urinalysis.
• Article 128: Assault
  Private Michael Harris was accused of assaulting another soldier during a bar fight.
• Article 92: Failure to Obey Order
  Corporal Andrew Lee failed to follow direct orders during a training exercise.
• Article 134: Fraternization
  Sergeant Lisa Green was accused of engaging in an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate.
• Article 85: Desertion
  Private David Kim was charged with desertion after being AWOL for 30 days.
• Article 93: Cruelty and Maltreatment
  Sergeant Olivia Clark was accused of hazing new recruits.
• Article 107: False Official Statements
  Sergeant Thomas White allegedly provided false information during an investigation.
• Article 133: Conduct Unbecoming an Officer
  Captain Jason Brown was accused of inappropriate conduct at a formal event.
• Article 86: Absence Without Leave
  Private First Class Samantha Thompson was AWOL for two weeks without authorization.
• Article 134: Child Pornography
  Sergeant Mark Taylor was caught with illegal images on his computer.
• Article 132: Fraud
  Sergeant Jessica Lee allegedly falsified travel expense reports.
• Article 81: Conspiracy
  Corporal Brian Wilson was accused of conspiring to steal military property.
• Article 117: Provoking Speeches
  Private Christopher Green allegedly made threatening statements to a fellow service member.
• Article 128: Aggravated Assault
  Sergeant Angela Brown was accused of assault with a weapon.
• Article 134: Indecent Exposure
  Private Matthew Scott allegedly exposed himself in a public place.
• Article 121: Wrongful Appropriation
  Captain Sara White was accused of misusing a government vehicle for personal errands.
• Article 92: Dereliction of Duty
  Sergeant Kevin Miller was accused of failing to perform his assigned duties.
• Article 123: Forgery
  Sergeant Nicole Green allegedly forged signatures on official documents.
• Article 134: Disorderly Conduct
  Private Adam Clark was accused of causing a disturbance at a military event.
• Article 134: Adultery
  Sergeant Amanda Johnson was accused of engaging in an extramarital affair with a fellow service member.
• Article 133: Conduct Unbecoming
  Captain Laura Brown allegedly engaged in behavior inappropriate for an officer.
• Article 134: Obstructing Justice
  Sergeant Kyle Adams allegedly interfered with a military investigation.
• Article 134: Misprision of Serious Offense
  Private Michael Lee was accused of failing to report knowledge of a crime.
• Article 125: Kidnapping
  Private David Johnson allegedly kidnapped a civilian during an off-base altercation.
• Article 134: Bribery
  Sergeant Susan Brown allegedly accepted bribes in exchange for favorable treatment.

Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers are experienced in handling a wide range of UCMJ cases. Whether you face charges under Article 120, Article 92, or any other serious offense, Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers are committed to providing robust legal defense. From investigating the facts to challenging the evidence, Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers work diligently to protect the rights and careers of service members. Trust Fort Gregg-Adams military defense lawyers to navigate the complexities of military law and ensure the best outcome possible.