Recent Developments in Military Justice: Court-Martial Cases and UCMJ-Related Proceedings
The military justice system in the United States operates under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which governs the conduct of service members. Recent cases highlight the system’s handling of both court-martial proceedings and other disciplinary actions under military law.
Notable Court-Martial Cases
-
Major Michael Stockin’s Conviction
In January 2025, Major Michael Stockin, an anesthesiologist at Joint Base Lewis-McChord’s Madigan Army Medical Center, pleaded guilty to 41 counts of sexually abusing soldiers under his care. The charges included 36 counts of abusive sexual contact and five counts of indecent viewing. Following multiple complaints in 2022, the U.S. Army Office of Special Trial Counsel initiated an investigation, leading to Stockin’s suspension from patient care. Victims are seeking $5 million each in damages, alleging negligence by the U.S. Army and Department of Defense. The sentencing phase will include impact statements from numerous victims.
Legal Perspective: This case underscores the military’s commitment to prosecuting sexual misconduct within its ranks. Under the UCMJ, abusive sexual contact and indecent viewing are serious offenses that can lead to significant penalties, including confinement and dishonorable discharge.
Defense Strategies: In such cases, defense counsel may explore arguments related to the accused’s mental state, consent, or procedural errors during the investigation. However, given the gravity of the offenses and the number of victims, mounting a successful defense can be challenging.
Potential Punishments: Convictions for sexual offenses under the UCMJ can result in lengthy prison sentences, forfeiture of pay, reduction in rank, and dishonorable discharge.
2. Lieutenant Colonel Herman West’s Conviction
In December 2024, Lt. Col. Herman West, a former U.S. Army battalion commander at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, was found guilty of sexually harassing a subordinate female officer. His actions included making unwanted sexual remarks, inappropriate touching, and unzipping his pants in her presence. West received a written reprimand and was fined over $92,000, avoiding a dishonorable discharge and jail time. This case is among the first prosecuted under new military justice reforms that classify sexual harassment as a criminal offense.
Legal Perspective: The recent reforms to the UCMJ have criminalized sexual harassment, reflecting the military’s evolving stance on such misconduct. This case sets a precedent for how similar offenses may be handled in the future.
Defense Strategies: Defense attorneys might argue the absence of intent, misinterpretation of actions, or challenge the credibility of witnesses. In this instance, West admitted to his actions and apologized, which likely influenced the sentencing outcome.
Potential Punishments: While West avoided confinement, punishments for sexual harassment can include dismissal from service, forfeiture of pay, and confinement, depending on the severity of the conduct and other factors.
UCMJ-Related Proceedings Without Court-Martial
Upgrades of Discharges Under ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’
As of November 2024, the Pentagon has upgraded over 800 service records to honorable discharges for personnel previously expelled under the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. This policy, repealed in 2011, had led to the discharge of LGBTQ individuals who disclosed their sexual orientation. The upgrades aim to restore benefits and rectify past injustices.
Legal Perspective: The UCMJ’s provisions have evolved, and this action reflects a broader commitment to equity and the correction of past discriminatory practices within the military justice system.
Defense Strategies: While not a traditional defense scenario, individuals seeking discharge upgrades can benefit from legal counsel to navigate the application process and present compelling evidence of their service and the impact of past policies.
Potential Outcomes: Upgraded discharges can restore access to veterans’ benefits, improve employment opportunities, and rectify service records to reflect honorable service.
The Role of Civilian Military Defense Counsel
Experienced civilian military defense attorneys play a crucial role in navigating the complexities of the UCMJ and advocating for service members’ rights. They can provide an objective perspective, challenge evidence, and develop comprehensive defense strategies tailored to the unique aspects of military law.
Burden of Proof
In court-martial proceedings, the burden of proof rests on the prosecution, which must establish the accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This standard is stringent, ensuring that convictions are based on solid evidence.
Conclusion
The military justice system continues to evolve, addressing misconduct through both court-martial proceedings and other disciplinary actions under the UCMJ. Service members facing allegations benefit from understanding their rights and the legal processes involved. It’s essential to recognize that all accused individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Exoneration of Black Sailors from 1944 Port Chicago Explosion
In July 2024, the U.S. Navy exonerated 258 Black sailors who were unjustly court-martialed after refusing to follow orders following a devastating explosion at the Port Chicago Naval Magazine in California in 1944. The explosion killed 320 people, mostly Black sailors who were loading weapons onto ships without proper training or equipment. The exoneration acknowledges the significant legal errors during the courts-martial and represents a long-overdue correction of a historical injustice.
Legal Perspective: This action reflects the military’s commitment to rectifying past injustices and acknowledges the role of systemic racism in historical court-martial proceedings.
Defense Strategies: While this case involves posthumous exoneration, it highlights the importance of due process and the need for vigilant defense advocacy to prevent miscarriages of justice.
Potential Outcomes: Exoneration restores honor to the affected sailors and serves as a precedent for addressing other historical injustices within the military justice system.
Air Force General’s Misconduct
In January 2025, an Inspector General report revealed that Maj. Gen. Christopher Finerty engaged in inappropriate relationships with multiple women, including an enlisted service member, a married Defense Department employee, and three Capitol Hill staffers. His actions violated military laws against extramarital sexual conduct, fraternization, and conduct unbecoming an officer. Following the investigation, Finerty was demoted to brigadier general and retired in November 2023.
Legal Perspective: This case highlights the enforcement of regulations against fraternization and conduct unbecoming an officer, emphasizing the military’s commitment to maintaining professionalism and ethical behavior among its leaders.
Defense Strategies: Defense counsel might argue that the relationships were consensual and did not impact Finerty’s professional duties. However, the power dynamics and potential for perceived favoritism complicate such defenses.
Potential Outcomes: Administrative actions, such as demotion and forced retirement, are common in cases where court-martial is deemed unnecessary but misconduct is evident.
The Role of Civilian Military Defense Counsel
Experienced civilian military defense attorneys play a crucial role in navigating the complexities of the UCMJ and advocating for service members’ rights. They can provide an objective perspective, challenge evidence, and develop comprehensive defense strategies tailored to the unique aspects of military law.
Burden of Proof
In court-martial proceedings, the burden of proof rests on the prosecution, which must establish the accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This standard is stringent, ensuring that convictions are based on solid evidence.
Conclusion
The military justice system continues to evolve, addressing misconduct through both court-martial proceedings and other disciplinary actions under the
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The cases discussed are based on publicly available information, and the authors are not personally involved in these matters.
