Aggressive Washington DC Military Defense Attorneys
Stationed in Washington, DC? Facing a court-martial, UCMJ action, Administrative Separation Board, or other Adverse Administrative Action? Call our experienced Washington, DC military defense lawyers at 1-800-921-8607 for a free consultation.
Hiring a Washington, DC Civilian Military Defense Lawyer
Facing a military investigation or court-martial in Washington, DC? The consequences can severely impact your career, freedom, and reputation. Whether you’re stationed at the Pentagon, Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, or anywhere in the DC area, you need experienced Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers to protect your rights.
At Gonzalez & Waddington, our dedicated team of attorneys understands the complexities of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and the unique challenges of navigating the military justice system. We have a proven track record of successfully defending service members against a wide range of charges, including:
- Article 120 UCMJ (Sexual Assault)
- Sexual Harassment
- Drug Offenses
- Disrespect Toward a Superior Officer
We know that the stakes are high. A court-martial conviction can lead to:
- Imprisonment
- Dishonorable Discharge
- Loss of Rank and Pay
- Damage to Your Reputation
Don’t face these challenges alone. Our Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers will provide aggressive and strategic representation at every stage of your case. We will:
- Thoroughly investigate the charges against you
- Challenge the evidence
- Negotiate with prosecutors
- Protect your rights in court
With our deep understanding of military law and procedure, we are committed to achieving your best possible outcome. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation. We are here to help you navigate this difficult time and fight for your future.
Understanding the UCMJ and Military Law
When you’re a service member facing legal trouble, you’re not dealing with the same rules as civilians. The military operates under its legal system, governed by the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). If you’re stationed in the Washington, DC area, it’s crucial to understand how the UCMJ works and why you need specialized Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers to navigate this complex system.
What is the UCMJ?
The UCMJ is a federal law that outlines the criminal laws and procedures applicable to all members of the U.S. Armed Forces. It covers a wide range of offenses, from minor infractions to serious felonies, including those that have civilian equivalents (like theft or assault) and those unique to the military (like desertion or disobeying a lawful order).
Key Differences Between Military and Civilian Law
While there are some similarities, military law differs significantly from civilian law in several key ways:
- Jurisdiction: The UCMJ has worldwide jurisdiction over military personnel. This means you can be charged with a crime under the UCMJ regardless of where the offense occurred, whether on a military base, in the United States, or overseas.
- Investigation and Charging: In the military system, commanders have significant authority in deciding whether to initiate an investigation and what charges to file. This differs from the civilian system, where law enforcement and prosecutors typically make those decisions.
- Court Structure and Procedures: Military courts, known as courts-martial, have a different structure and follow different procedures than civilian courts. There are three levels of courts-martial: summary, special, and general. The severity of the offense determines which type of court-martial is appropriate.
- Burden of Proof: In a civilian criminal trial, the prosecution must prove guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.” In a general court-martial, the standard is slightly lower – “beyond a reasonable doubt and to the moral certainty of the members.”
- Sentencing: Military courts can impose a wider range of punishments than civilian courts, including confinement, fines, reduction in rank, dishonorable discharge, and even death (in certain cases).
- Appeals: The appeals process for court-martial convictions also differs from the civilian system, involving military appellate courts and potentially the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
Why You Need Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers
Navigating the UCMJ and military justice system is incredibly challenging. The rules and procedures are complex, and the stakes are high. If you’re facing a military investigation or court-martial in Washington, DC, you need experienced legal representation to protect your rights and achieve the best possible outcome.
Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers understand the nuances of military law and have the knowledge and skills to:
- Conduct a thorough investigation: Gather evidence, interview witnesses, and build a strong defense strategy.
- Challenge the charges: Identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and fight to reduce or dismiss the charges.
- Negotiate with prosecutors: Seek a favorable plea agreement or pretrial agreement (PTA) if appropriate.
- Represent you effectively at trial: Present a compelling defense and protect your rights in court.
- Handle appeals: If necessary, pursue appeals to higher military courts.
Don’t underestimate the importance of having skilled legal representation. Contact Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers as soon as possible if you face any military legal issues.
Article 120 UCMJ: Sexual Assault – Understanding the Charges and Defenses
Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) addresses the serious offense of sexual assault. If you are stationed in the Washington, DC area and are facing charges under Article 120, it is vital to seek the immediate counsel of experienced Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers. The consequences of a conviction can be devastating, including imprisonment, dishonorable discharge, and a lifetime of social stigma.
What Does Article 120 Cover?
Article 120 is a broad statute that encompasses a range of sexual offenses, including:
- Rape: Sexual intercourse by force, threat of force, or without consent.
- Sexual Assault: Intentional sexual contact by force, threat of force, or without consent. This includes acts like unwanted touching, groping, and other forms of sexual abuse.
- Aggravated Sexual Contact: Sexual contact that involves specific aggravating factors, such as causing bodily harm or using a weapon.
- Abusive Sexual Contact: Sexual contact that is intentional, wrongful, and not consensual.
Elements of the Offense
To secure a conviction under Article 120, the prosecution must prove several elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
- That the accused committed the alleged sexual act.
- That the act was done by force, threat of force, or without consent.
- That the accused had the requisite criminal intent (meaning they knew the act was wrong).
Consent is Key
Consent is a critical element in Article 120 cases. The UCMJ defines consent as “freely given agreement to the conduct by a competent person.” Factors that can negate consent include:
- Use of force or threats
- Incapacitation due to drugs or alcohol
- Mental incompetence
- Age (if the victim is a minor)
Potential Penalties
The penalties for an Article 120 conviction vary depending on the specific offense and the circumstances of the case. However, they can be severe and include:
- Lengthy imprisonment
- Dishonorable discharge
- Forfeiture of pay and allowances
- Reduction in rank
- Sex offender registration
Defending Against Article 120 Charges
Defending against Article 120 charges requires a skilled and experienced legal team. Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers will employ various strategies to protect your rights, including:
- Thoroughly investigating the allegations: Gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and challenging the accuser’s credibility.
- Attacking the evidence: Examining forensic evidence, questioning the chain of custody, and identifying inconsistencies in witness statements.
- Raising consent defenses: Presenting evidence that the sexual contact was consensual or that the accused had a reasonable belief that it was consensual.
- Negotiating with the prosecution: Seeking a plea or pretrial agreement (PTA) to minimize the potential penalties.
- Providing a strong defense at trial: Presenting a compelling case to the court-martial panel and challenging the prosecution’s evidence.
Why You Need Experienced Legal Representation
Article 120 cases are complex and emotionally charged. The accusations are serious, and the consequences of a conviction can be life-altering. If you are facing charges under Article 120, you must have experienced Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers on your side.
Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers deeply understand the UCMJ, military law, and the specific nuances of Article 120 cases. They will fight aggressively to protect your rights, reputation, and future. Don’t hesitate to contact a qualified attorney immediately if you are facing these serious charges.
Navigating Military Discipline: Letters of Reprimand, Boards of Inquiry, Administrative Separations, and Non-judicial Punishment
Military service demands adherence to a high standard of conduct. When a service member’s actions fall short of these expectations, they may face disciplinary actions ranging from minor administrative measures to serious career-ending consequences. If you are stationed in the Washington, DC area and are facing any form of military discipline, it’s essential to understand your rights and options. Consulting with Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers can provide invaluable guidance and help you navigate these challenging situations.
Here’s a breakdown of some common disciplinary actions and how legal counsel can make a difference:
1. Letters of Reprimand
A Letter of Reprimand (LOR) is a written censure that documents misconduct or substandard performance. While not as severe as a court-martial, a LOR can still have significant consequences, potentially impacting promotions, security clearances, and future career opportunities.
How Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers Can Help:
- Guidance during the response phase: You can respond to an LOR, providing your perspective on the allegations. An attorney can help you craft a strong and effective response that mitigates the potential damage to your record.
- Seeking removal or mitigation: In some cases, it may be possible to remove the LOR from your file or have its impact lessened. An attorney can advocate on your behalf and negotiate with command to achieve the best possible outcome.
2. Non-judicial Punishment (NJP)
NJP, also known as Article 15, is a disciplinary measure imposed by a commanding officer for minor offenses. It allows commanders to address misconduct without resorting to a court-martial. Possible punishments under NJP include:
- Reduction in rank
- Extra duties
- Restriction to base
- Forfeiture of pay
How Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers Can Help:
- Advising on whether to accept NJP: You have the right to refuse NJP and demand a trial by court-martial. An attorney can help you weigh the pros and cons of each option and make an informed decision.
- Representing you at the NJP hearing: If you accept NJP, an attorney can present evidence and arguments on your behalf to mitigate the punishment imposed by the commander.
Administrative separation is a process used to discharge a service member from the military for reasons other than misconduct. These reasons can include:
- Failure to meet standards
- Personality disorders
- Medical conditions
- Unsatisfactory performance
How Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers Can Help:
- Reviewing the basis for separation: An attorney can examine the evidence and determine if the grounds for separation are valid and if proper procedures are followed.
- Representing you at separation boards: If you are facing an administrative separation board, an attorney can present your case, challenge evidence, and advocate for retention in the service.
- Negotiating a favorable characterization of service: The characterization of your service (e.g., honorable, general, other than honorable) can have significant implications for your future. An attorney can work to secure the most favorable characterization possible.
4. Boards of Inquiry
A Board of Inquiry (BOI) is a formal administrative process determining whether an officer should be retained or separated from the service. BOIs are typically convened for officers with at least six years of service who face potential separation for misconduct or substandard performance.
How Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers Can Help:
- Preparing for the BOI: An attorney can help you gather evidence, prepare your testimony, and develop a strong defense strategy.
- Representing you at the hearing: An attorney can present your case to the board, cross-examine witnesses, and argue for your retention.
- Appealing the BOI decision: If the BOI recommends separation, an attorney can assist with appealing the decision to a higher authority.
Don’t Face Military Discipline Alone
Facing disciplinary action in the military can be a stressful and confusing experience. The consequences can be severe, impacting your career, reputation, and future opportunities. If you are facing any of these situations, seeking legal representation as soon as possible is crucial.
Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers have the knowledge and experience to guide you through the process, protect your rights, and fight for the best possible outcome. Don’t hesitate to contact a qualified attorney today to discuss your case and get the help you need.
Why You Need a Civilian Military Defense Lawyer on Your Side
Facing charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is a daunting experience. The military justice system is complex, and the stakes are high. While military personnel facing legal trouble are assigned a military defense counsel, there are significant advantages to hiring a civilian Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyer.
Here’s why choosing a civilian attorney can make a critical difference in your case:
1. Independent and Objective Advocacy
Civilian Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers operate outside the military chain of command. This independence allows them to provide unbiased and objective representation, solely focused on protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome for you. Unlike military defense counsel who are also part of the military system, civilian attorneys have no inherent conflicts of interest that might influence their decisions.
2. Specialized Skill and Experience
Many civilian attorneys specialize in military law and have extensive experience representing service members in courts-martial and other UCMJ proceedings. They deeply understand the UCMJ, military rules of evidence, and court-martial procedures. Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers often have prior experience as military lawyers themselves, giving them valuable insight into both sides of the courtroom. This specialized knowledge is essential for effectively navigating the complexities of military justice.
3. Unwavering Dedication to Your Case
Civilian Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers are dedicated solely to your case. They have the time and resources to:
- Conduct thorough investigations
- Challenge evidence
- Negotiate with prosecutors
- Develop strong defense strategies
- Provide personalized attention and support
Military defense counsel often have heavy caseloads and limited resources, which can impact their ability to dedicate the necessary time and attention to each case.
4. Access to a Wider Range of Resources
Civilian attorneys have access to a broader network of resources, including:
- Expert witnesses: They can consult and retain experts in various fields, such as forensic science, psychology, or ballistics, to strengthen your defense.
- Investigators: Private investigators can gather evidence, interview witnesses, and uncover crucial information that may be overlooked in a military investigation.
- Support staff: Civilian law firms often have paralegals and other support staff who assist with case preparation and management.
5. Stronger Attorney-Client Relationship
Civilian Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers prioritize building a trusting attorney-client relationship. They understand the importance of open communication, confidentiality, and personalized support during stressful times. This relationship fosters trust and allows for more effective collaboration in developing and executing your defense strategy.
6. No Obligation to “Play by the Rules”
While ethical and professional, civilian attorneys are not bound by the same military rules and regulations that may constrain military defense counsel. This freedom allows them to be more creative and aggressive in their defense strategies, potentially exploring options that military counsel might not consider.
7. Proven Track Record of Success
Many civilian Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers have a demonstrated history of successfully defending service members against various UCMJ charges. Their experience and expertise can significantly increase your chances of achieving a favorable outcome in your case.
When to Hire a Civilian Military Defense Lawyer
It’s crucial to seek civilian legal representation in any military justice matter as early as possible. Ideally, you should consult with a civilian attorney:
- During the investigative stage: An attorney can advise you on your rights, protect you from self-incrimination, and potentially prevent charges from being filed.
- Before accepting Non-judicial Punishment (NJP): An attorney can help you evaluate the evidence and determine if it’s in your best interest to accept NJP or demand a trial by court-martial.
- If you are facing a court-martial: An attorney will provide skilled representation throughout the process, from pretrial motions to trial and potential appeals.
Don’t Face the UCMJ Alone
Facing military justice proceedings can be intimidating. Protect your rights, career, and future by seeking experienced legal representation. Civilian Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers offer the specialized knowledge, dedication, and resources to fight for you effectively.
Navigating the Court-Martial Process: A Guide for Service Members in Washington, DC
Facing a court-martial is a serious matter with potentially life-altering consequences. Understanding the process and having skilled legal representation is crucial for protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome. If you’re stationed in the Washington, DC area and are facing court-martial charges, experienced Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers can provide invaluable guidance and support.
Here’s an overview of the key stages in the court-martial process:
1. Investigation and Preferral of Charges
The process typically begins with an investigation triggered by an alleged offense. This may involve questioning witnesses, gathering evidence, and conducting forensic analysis. If the investigating officer believes sufficient evidence, charges are formally preferred against the accused.
How Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers Can Help:
- Even at this early stage, having legal counsel is crucial. Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers can advise you on your rights, ensure you understand the charges against you, and protect you from self-incrimination during questioning.
2. Article 32 Hearing
Before a case can proceed to a general court-martial, an Article 32 hearing is conducted. This preliminary hearing is similar to a grand jury proceeding in civilian court. An investigating officer examines the evidence and determines if there is probable cause to believe the accused committed the offense.
How Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers Can Help:
- Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers can represent you at the Article 32 hearing, cross-examine witnesses, challenge evidence, and present arguments to try to get the charges dismissed or reduced.
3. Referral and Arraignment
If the investigating officer finds probable cause, the case is referred to a convening authority (typically a high-ranking commander) who decides whether to proceed with a court-martial. If the case moves forward, the accused is arraigned, formally advised of the charges, and enters a plea (guilty or not guilty).
How Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers Can Help:
- Your Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers will advise you on plea options and negotiate with the prosecution to reach a pretrial agreement (PTA) that could result in reduced charges or a more lenient sentence.
4. Trial
A court-martial can be a bench trial (decided by a military judge alone) or a jury trial (decided by a panel of service members). The prosecution presents its case, followed by the defense. Both sides can call witnesses, present evidence, and make arguments.
How Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers Can Help:
- Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers will vigorously defend you at trial, challenging the prosecution’s evidence, cross-examining witnesses, and presenting a compelling defense to try to secure an acquittal or minimize the potential penalties.
5. Sentencing
If the accused is found guilty, a sentencing hearing is held. The prosecution and defense present evidence and arguments related to the appropriate punishment. The military judge or panel then determines the sentence, including confinement, fines, reduction in rank, and discharge.
How Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers Can Help:
- Your attorneys will advocate for the most lenient sentence possible, presenting mitigating factors and arguing for alternatives to confinement.
6. Appeals
If convicted, the accused can appeal the verdict and/or sentence to higher military courts. The appeals process can be complex and involves reviewing legal errors and challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.
How Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers Can Help:
- Experienced Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers understand the military appeals process and can represent you effectively, ensuring your rights are protected and all legal avenues are pursued.
Don’t Navigate the Court-Martial Process Alone
Facing a court-martial is a stressful and challenging experience. Having skilled legal representation can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. Washington, DC Military Defense Lawyers provide the expertise, dedication, and support you need to navigate the complexities of the military justice system and fight for your rights and future.
1. Article 86 – Absence Without Leave (AWOL)
- Facts: A service member stationed in Washington, D.C. goes AWOL, claiming they were overwhelmed by the city’s fast-paced environment and sought refuge in the quieter suburbs of Virginia.
- Defense: Washington, D.C. military defense lawyers could argue that the service member experienced a mental health crisis triggered by the unfamiliar urban environment, highlighting their attempts to seek help and return to duty.
- Local Fact: The unique pressures and challenges of living in a high-intensity city like Washington, D.C., could contribute to AWOL cases.
2. Article 92 – Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation
- Facts: A service member refuses to comply with a mandatory vaccination order, citing personal beliefs and concerns about potential side effects.
- Defense: Washington, D.C. military defense lawyers could argue that the service member’s refusal was based on sincerely held beliefs and concerns about their health, potentially challenging the order’s lawfulness.
- Local Fact: The ongoing public discourse and varying opinions surrounding vaccination mandates could be relevant to such cases.
3. Article 112a – Wrongful Use, Possession, etc., of Controlled Substances
- Facts: A service member is found in possession of marijuana, which is legal for recreational use in Washington, D.C.
- Defense: Washington, D.C. military defense lawyers could argue that the service member was unaware of the conflict between local laws and the UCMJ, highlighting the potential for confusion given the District’s marijuana legalization.
- Local Fact: The differing legal status of marijuana in Washington, D.C. compared to federal law creates a unique challenge for service members.
4. Article 120 – Sexual Assault
- Facts: An alleged sexual assault occurs off-base at a bar or nightclub in the District of Columbia.
- Defense: Washington, D.C. military defense lawyers could meticulously examine the evidence, challenge witness accounts, and explore inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony. They could also investigate factors like intoxication or consent.
- Local Fact: The vibrant nightlife and social scene in Washington, D.C. could contribute to increased instances of such allegations.
5. Article 121 – Larceny and Wrongful Appropriation
- Facts: A service member is accused of stealing from a government building or office in Washington, D.C.
- Defense: Washington, D.C. military defense lawyers could investigate potential mental health issues, financial distress, or a misunderstanding as mitigating factors.
- Local Fact: The high concentration of government buildings and sensitive information in Washington, D.C. could increase scrutiny in theft cases.
6. Article 128 – Assault
- Facts: A fight between two service members during a protest or demonstration near a government building in Washington, D.C.
- Defense: Depending on the circumstances, Washington, D.C. military defense lawyers could argue that self-defense, mutual combat, or defense of another are mitigating factors.
- Local Fact: The frequent protests and demonstrations in Washington, D.C., could involve service members in altercations.
7. Article 134 – General Article
- Facts: A service member is accused of making inappropriate comments or gestures towards a civilian during a public event in Washington, D.C., potentially violating public decency or conduct unbecoming standards.
- Defense: Washington, D.C. military defense attorneys could argue that the service member’s actions were misinterpreted, made in jest, or that there was no intent to offend.
- Local Fact: The diverse and politically charged environment in Washington, D.C. could lead to misunderstandings and heightened scrutiny of service members’ conduct.
8. Article 89 – Disrespect Toward a Superior Commissioned Officer
- Facts: A heated exchange occurs between a junior officer and their superior during a meeting at the Pentagon.
- Defense: Washington, D.C. military defense attorneys could argue that the officer’s words were not intended to be disrespectful, were taken out of context, or that they were provoked by the superior’s actions.
- Local Fact: The high-pressure and hierarchical environment within the Pentagon could contribute to tense interactions.
9. Article 91 – Insubordinate Conduct Toward Warrant Officer, Noncommissioned Officer, or Petty Officer
- Facts: A verbal disagreement between a senior enlisted member and a junior service member during a security detail at a government event in Washington, D.C. escalates.
- Defense: Washington, D.C. military defense lawyers could argue that the service member’s actions were not intended to be insubordinate or made in the heat of the moment under stressful conditions.
- Local Fact: The high-profile nature of events and security details in Washington, D.C. could create tense situations.
10. Article 107 – False Official Statements
- Facts: A service member is accused of lying about past political affiliations or activities on a security clearance application.
- Defense: Washington, D.C. military defense attorneys could argue that the service member misunderstood the question, was unaware of the significance of their affiliations, or that their involvement was minimal and non-threatening.
- Local Fact: The political climate and heightened scrutiny of security clearances in Washington, D.C. could be relevant.
Remember, these are fictional examples, and the specifics of any case and the applicable defense strategies will depend on the unique circumstances and evidence involved. Washington, D.C. military defense lawyers are crucial in navigating the complexities of the UCMJ and advocating for the rights of service members facing charges in the nation’s capital.
A Capital Forged in Conflict: Washington D.C.’s Military and Legal Legacy
Washington D.C., a city synonymous with American power and democracy, also holds a fascinating and often overlooked military history. From its conception, the city has been intertwined with conflict, defense, and the evolution of military law. This article explores the rich tapestry of D.C.’s military past and its impact on the legal landscape for service members today.
Early Days and the Birth of a Nation
The story begins with the city’s founding. Chosen by George Washington himself as the nation’s capital, the District of Columbia was strategically located on the Potomac River, intended to be easily defensible. Early fortifications, like Fort Washington (now a National Park) [https://www.nps.gov/fowa/index.htm], were built to protect the nascent capital from foreign powers and internal threats.
The War of 1812 saw the city occupied and burned by British forces, a stark reminder of its vulnerability. This led to a renewed focus on defense, with the construction of a series of forts surrounding the city. Many of these forts still stand today, played a crucial role in the Civil War, protecting Washington from Confederate attack.
The Civil War also saw the District of Columbia Militia play a vital role, with local citizens taking up arms to defend their city. This militia would eventually evolve into the District of Columbia National Guard [https://dc.ng.mil/About-Us/Heritage/History/], a unique force with a direct responsibility to the President of the United States.
The Rise of Modern Military Justice
The 20th century significantly changed the military’s role in Washington D.C. The city became home to the Pentagon, the headquarters of the Department of Defense, and a hub for military planning and operations. The need for a clear and consistent military justice system came with this increased military presence.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), enacted in 1950, codified the rules and regulations governing the conduct of service members. It established a system of courts-martial, non-judicial punishment, and administrative separation boards to address misconduct and maintain discipline within the armed forces.
Military Justice in the Capital Today
Washington, DC remains a critical center for military legal activity. The city is home to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, the highest military court in the United States. Numerous military legal offices and organizations operate within the District, providing legal services and representation to service members facing various legal challenges.
The unique history of Washington, DC, has profoundly shaped the military justice landscape. The city’s early vulnerability strongly emphasized defense and the development of a local militia. The rise of the Pentagon and the UCMJ cemented the city’s role as a center for military law and justice.
Today, service members stationed in or near Washington DC facing legal issues under the UCMJ can benefit from the expertise of experienced military defense lawyers with a deep understanding of the city’s unique military and legal history. These lawyers play a vital role in ensuring that service members’ rights are protected and that they receive a fair and impartial hearing under military law.
Washington DC: The headquarters of a busy administration
Washington DC is the capital of the United States of America, but there are more facts to know about this place, apart from this point. The former name of Columbia District was Washington DC, and it was ratified to be established after a declaration made in 1790 about the formation of a capital district that would be established along the Potomac River on the country’s eastern coast.
The foundation stone of the settlement: formation of Washington DC according to the Residence Act
The Residence Act was passed and ratified by the US Congress in the year 1790, and this marked the first establishment of a national capital. President George Washington was allocated the task of selecting the exact location for the capital formation. As the name suggests, it has clear imprints of the name of the US President in it.The military bases and army camps near Washington DC
Many military bases are located within the capital city of Washington DC. For instance, the Joint Base Anacostia Bolling is about three miles to the southernmost region of the Downtown headquarters of Washington DC Air Force districts. There is a museum and medical library, which has been made for the armies.
Washington DC Court Martial Attorneys
Our high-powered court martial attorneys will use our experience to fight your court martial or administrative separation case in Washington, D.C.