Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
Facing a court-martial, UCMJ action, Administrative Separation Board, or other Adverse Administrative Action for Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16? Call our experienced military defense lawyers at 1-800-921-8607 for a free consultation.
Elite Military Defense Lawyers
“Our military defense lawyers are among the most experienced and hard-hitting in the world. With an unparalleled track record, we provide aggressive, strategic defense tailored to each client’s unique situation. Trust us to fight relentlessly for your rights and deliver the best possible outcome.” (Michael Waddington, Military Defense Lawyer)
Note: This law applies only to Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under 16 offenses committed on and after 1 January 2019.
What is Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under 16?
Article 128 of the UCMJ addresses battery upon a child under the age of 16, a grave offense involving the intentional use of force or violence against a minor. This act is considered particularly heinous due to the vulnerability of children and the trust placed in military personnel. Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 ed.)
Convictions for this offense carry severe consequences, including lengthy confinement, dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of pay, and long-term social and professional repercussions. Given these harsh penalties, it is crucial for anyone accused to seek the best military defense lawyers.
Court martial lawyers play a vital role in defending against such serious charges. They possess a thorough understanding of military law and can build a robust defense, challenging evidence, and procedural errors while protecting the accused’s rights. Experienced legal representation can significantly influence the case’s outcome, potentially reducing penalties or achieving acquittal.
Engaging skilled court martial lawyers, such as those at Gonzalez & Waddington, is essential for anyone facing charges under Article 128 UCMJ. Their comprehensive approach to military defense ensures that every aspect of the case is thoroughly examined and defended, increasing the chances of a favorable outcome.
Note: The maximum and minimum punishments for Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16 vary depending on the date of the offense.
What are the Elements of Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16?
- That (state the time and place alleged), the accused did bodily harm to (state the name of the alleged victim) by (state the manner alleged);
- That the bodily harm was done unlawfully;
- That the bodily harm was done with force or violence; and
- That (state the name of the alleged victim) was then a child under the age of 16 years.
What are the Maximum Punishments for Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16?
For Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16 offenses committed between 1 January 2019 and 27 December 2023:
- 2 Years of Confinement
- Dishonorable Discharge, Bad Conduct Discharge, Dismissal
- Total Forfeitures
- Reduction to E-1
For Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16 offenses committed after 27 December 2023
- Under the Sentencing Parameters, Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16 is a Category 2 Offense – Confinement from 1-36 months (1 month to 3 years)
- Dishonorable Discharge, Bad Conduct Discharge, Dismissal
- Total Forfeitures
- Reduction to E-1
- Note: The Military Judge MAY impose a period of confinement less than the jurisdictional maximum period of confinement upon finding specific facts that warrant such a sentence. Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 ed.), Appendix 12B-C
Combined UCMJ Maximum Punishment Charts
- Maximum Punishments for UCMJ Offenses 2024: Combined UCMJ Punishments Chart
- UCMJ Lesser Included Offenses Chart 2024 UCMJ
Sample Specification for Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
In that TSgt Wayne Garcia, US Air Force, did, at or near Minot Air Force Base, on or about 4 October 2025, unlawfully strike James Garcia, a child under the age of 16 years, in the mouth with a fist.
Model Specification for Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
In that __________ (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board—location), on or about __________, unlawfully (strike) (__________) __________, (a child under the age of 16 years), (in) (on) the __________ with _______.
What are the Definitions for Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16?
An assault in which bodily harm is inflicted is called a “battery.” A “battery” is an unlawful infliction of bodily harm to another, made with force or violence, by an intentional (or a culpably negligent) act or omission.
“Bodily harm” under Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16 means an offensive touching of another, however slight.
An infliction of bodily harm is “unlawful” if done without legal justification or excuse and without the lawful consent of the victim.
“Culpable negligence” under Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16 is a degree of carelessness greater than simple negligence.
“Simple negligence” under Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16 is the absence of due care. The law always requires everyone to demonstrate care for the safety of others, which a reasonably careful person would demonstrate under the same or similar circumstances; that is what “due care” means.
“Culpable negligence,” under Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16 the other hand, is a negligent (act) (or) (failure to act) accompanied by a gross, reckless, wanton, or deliberate disregard for the foreseeable results to others, instead of merely a failure to use due care.
The accused’s knowledge of the child’s age and Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
When the alleged victim is a child under the age of 16 years, the following instruction may be appropriate.
Knowledge that the person assaulted was under the age of 16 years is not an element of the offense.
Accordingly, if you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that (state the name of the alleged victim) was under the age of 16 years at the time of the alleged offense(s), you are advised that the prosecution is not required to prove that the accused knew that (state the name of the alleged victim) was under the age of 16 years at the time of the alleged offense(s). It is not a defense to battery upon a child even if the accused reasonably believed that (state the name of the alleged victim) was at least 16 years old.
Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16 Military Defense Lawyers
Background of Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
Article 128 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) addresses assault and battery offenses. Battery upon a child under the age of 16 is considered a particularly egregious offense due to the vulnerability of the victim. This article ensures the protection of minors within the military community and upholds standards of conduct.
Basics of Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
To secure a conviction for Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16, the prosecution must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
- Battery: The accused committed a battery, meaning they made unlawful physical contact with the victim.
- Victim’s Age: The victim was under the age of 16 at the time of the battery.
- Intent: The contact was done with unlawful force or violence.
Collateral Consequences of Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16 Conviction
A conviction for battery upon a child under the age of 16 can have numerous collateral consequences, including:
- Difficulty obtaining civilian employment due to the nature of the conviction and any resulting discharge status
- Loss of military benefits, including retirement pay, VA benefits, and healthcare
- Significant damage to personal and professional reputation
- Potential civil lawsuits from the victim or the victim’s guardians for damages
- Mandatory registration as a sex offender, depending on the nature of the battery
Purpose of Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
The primary purpose of penalizing battery upon a child under the age of 16 under Article 128 is to maintain good order and discipline within the military and to protect vulnerable individuals. By criminalizing such behavior, the military aims to:
- Ensure the safety and well-being of minors within the military community
- Promote a culture of respect and protection for vulnerable individuals
- Deter potential offenders by highlighting the serious consequences of such behavior
- Uphold the standards of conduct necessary for military readiness and effectiveness
If you are suspected or accused of Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16, speak with one of our experienced military court martial lawyers to discuss your case.
Why a Civilian Military Defense Lawyer is Crucial for Article 128 UCMJ Charges: Protecting Your Family, Your Career, and Your Future
Facing accusations of battery upon a child under the age of 16 under Article 128 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is a nightmare scenario for any servicemember. The stakes are incredibly high, with potential consequences ranging from dishonorable discharge to imprisonment. While military personnel have access to military defense counsel, hiring a civilian military defense lawyer offers distinct advantages that could be crucial to your case.
Here’s why you should consider a civilian military defense lawyer:
-
Unbiased Advocacy: Military defense counsel, while competent, are part of the same military system as the prosecution. This can sometimes create a perception of bias or lack of independence. A civilian lawyer operates outside this system, offering independent and unbiased advocacy solely focused on your best interests.
-
Specialized Expertise: Civilian military defense lawyers often specialize exclusively in military law, possessing in-depth knowledge of the UCMJ and its intricacies. They stay up-to-date on the latest legal precedents and defense strategies specific to Article 128 cases, ensuring your defense is informed and effective.
-
Extensive Resources: Civilian lawyers typically have access to a wider range of resources, including expert witnesses, investigators, and consultants. These resources can be crucial in building a strong defense, challenging the evidence against you, and uncovering mitigating factors.
-
Experience with Civilian Courts: In some cases, Article 128 charges may involve both military and civilian courts. A civilian military defense lawyer is well-versed in both systems, ensuring seamless coordination and comprehensive representation throughout the legal process.
-
Confidentiality and Attorney-Client Privilege: While military defense counsel are bound by confidentiality, their communications may still be subject to military chain of command review. A civilian attorney’s communications are protected by attorney-client privilege, providing a layer of confidentiality for sensitive matters.
Specific Advantages for Article 128 Cases:
- Sensitivity and Compassion: Cases involving allegations of child abuse are emotionally charged and complex. A civilian lawyer experienced in these matters can provide the sensitivity, compassion, and support needed throughout the legal process.
- Understanding Family Dynamics: Many Article 128 cases involve family dynamics and child custody issues. A civilian lawyer can collaborate with family law experts to ensure the best possible outcome for your family.
- Protecting Your Reputation: A civilian lawyer can work to minimize the negative publicity associated with the charges, protecting your reputation within the military and civilian communities.
Don’t Face These Charges Alone
If you’re facing Article 128 charges, don’t hesitate to seek the help of a civilian military defense lawyer. Their expertise, resources and independent advocacy can differentiate between a devastating outcome and a chance to clear your name and protect your family.
Contact our experienced civilian military defense lawyers today for a free and confidential consultation. We understand the gravity of the situation and are committed to providing you with the best possible defense. Don’t let these charges define your future – let us fight for you.
Examples of Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16:
- Slapping: A service member slaps a child across the face.
- Punching: A service member punches a child in the arm or torso.
- Kicking: Kicking a child during a disciplinary action.
- Spanking with Excessive Force: Using excessive force while spanking a child.
- Choking: Choking a child in a fit of anger.
- Shaking: Shaking a child violently.
- Throwing: Throwing a child onto a bed or couch.
- Hitting with an Object: Striking a child with a belt, stick, or other object.
- Pushing: Pushing a child causing them to fall and get injured.
- Pulling Hair: Pulling a child’s hair aggressively.
- Biting: Biting a child during a moment of frustration.
- Elbowing: Using an elbow to strike a child.
- Kneeing: Kneeing a child in the stomach or back.
- Tripping: Intentionally tripping a child causing them to fall.
- Pinching: Pinching a child hard enough to cause bruising.
- Squeezing: Squeezing a child’s arm or hand tightly enough to cause pain or injury.
- Hitting the Head: Striking a child on the head with an open hand or object.
- Poking: Poking a child with a sharp object.
- Burning: Burning a child with a cigarette or hot object.
- Throwing Objects: Throwing objects at a child causing injury.
- Forced Immersion: Forcing a child’s head underwater or into another substance.
- Restraining: Tying or binding a child’s hands or feet.
- Forcing to Eat: Forcing a child to eat non-food items or food in a harmful manner.
- Hitting with a Closed Fist: Punching a child with a closed fist.
- Slamming Against a Wall: Slamming a child against a wall or door.
- Shoving: Shoving a child into furniture or hard surfaces.
- Using a Weapon: Striking a child with a weapon such as a bat or knife.
- Kicking a Child While Down: Kicking a child while they are on the ground.
- Drowning: Attempting to drown a child in a bathtub or pool.
- Throwing a Child: Throwing a child across a room or into a hard object.
These examples cover a range of actions that constitute battery upon a child under the age of 16, as defined under Article 128 of the UCMJ.
Fictional fact patterns that could lead to charges under Article 128 UCMJ (Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16) along with potential defense strategies a civilian military defense lawyer could employ:
Fact Pattern 1:
- Charge: Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
- Facts: A Navy officer is accused of spanking their 12-year-old child, leaving visible bruises.
- Possible Defenses:
- Argue that the discipline was reasonable and did not constitute excessive force.
- Claim that the bruises were accidental or caused by another source.
- Raise cultural or religious defenses regarding disciplinary practices.
Fact Pattern 2:
- Charge: Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
- Facts: A Marine Corps sergeant is accused of pushing their 14-year-old stepchild during an argument, causing the child to fall and hit their head.
- Possible Defenses:
- Dispute the severity of the push and the resulting injury.
- Argue that the contact was accidental or in self-defense.
- Challenge the stepchild’s credibility or motive for reporting the incident.
Fact Pattern 3:
- Charge: Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
- Facts: A Navy sailor is accused of slapping their 8-year-old niece across the face for misbehaving.
- Possible Defenses:
- Claim that the contact was minimal and did not cause any harm.
- Assert that the sailor was acting in loco parentis (in place of a parent) with the consent of the child’s parents.
- Dispute the child’s ability to accurately recall or describe the incident.
Fact Pattern 4:
- Charge: Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
- Facts: A Coast Guard petty officer is accused of grabbing their 15-year-old son by the arm and shaking them violently during a heated argument.
- Possible Defenses:
- Argue that the contact was brief and did not cause any physical injury.
- Raise questions about the child’s emotional state and potential for exaggeration.
- Explore the possibility of mutual combat or provocation by the child.
Fact Pattern 5:
- Charge: Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
- Facts: An Air Force captain is accused of kicking their 10-year-old daughter during a soccer game after she missed a goal.
- Possible Defenses:
- Argue that the contact was accidental or in the heat of the moment.
- Present evidence of the captain’s positive parenting history and involvement in their child’s life.
- Challenge the child’s interpretation of the incident and suggest alternative explanations.
Fact Pattern 6:
- Charge: Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
- Facts: A Navy reservist is accused of biting their 6-year-old child as a form of discipline.
- Possible Defenses:
- Assert that the bite was not intended to cause harm and was a momentary lapse in judgment.
- Argue for cultural or religious reasons for the disciplinary practice.
- Highlight the absence of any lasting physical or emotional harm to the child.
Fact Pattern 7:
- Charge: Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
- Facts: A Marine Corps lance corporal is accused of pulling their 13-year-old sibling’s hair during a playful wrestling match.
- Possible Defenses:
- Emphasize the playful nature of the interaction and the lack of intent to cause harm.
- Present evidence of a close and loving relationship between the siblings.
- Challenge the sibling’s motive for reporting the incident, suggesting peer pressure or a desire for attention.
Fact Pattern 8:
- Charge: Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
- Facts: An Air Force staff sergeant is accused of burning their 9-year-old child with a cigarette as punishment.
- Possible Defenses:
- Dispute the child’s account of the incident and suggest alternative explanations for the burn injury.
- Argue that the burn was accidental or caused by another person.
- Raise questions about the child’s mental or emotional state and their ability to accurately recall details.
Fact Pattern 9:
- Charge: Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
- Facts: A Navy officer is accused of striking their 11-year-old child with a belt, leaving welts and bruises.
- Possible Defenses:
- Argue that the discipline was proportionate to the child’s misbehavior and did not constitute abuse.
- Claim that the officer was unaware of the extent of the injuries.
- Raise cultural or religious defenses regarding disciplinary practices.
Fact Pattern 10:
- Charge: Article 128 UCMJ Battery Upon a Child Under the Age of 16
- Facts: A Coast Guard officer is accused of shoving their 15-year-old stepdaughter against a wall during an argument, causing a minor head injury.
- Possible Defenses:
- Challenge the stepdaughter’s credibility and motive for reporting the incident.
- Argue that the contact was accidental or in self-defense.
- Minimize the severity of the injury and emphasize the lack of intent to cause harm.