Gonzalez & Waddington – Attorneys at Law

Article 103a UCMJ Espionage

Facing a court-martial, UCMJ action, Administrative Separation Board, or other Adverse Administrative Action for Article 103a UCMJ Espionage? Call our experienced military defense lawyers at 1-800-921-8607 for a free consultation.

Elite Military Defense Lawyers

“Our military defense lawyers are among the most experienced and hard-hitting in the world. With an unparalleled track record, we provide aggressive, strategic defense tailored to each client’s unique situation. Trust us to fight relentlessly for your rights and deliver the best possible outcome.” (Michael Waddington, Military Defense Lawyer)

Note: This law applies only to Article 103a UCMJ Espionage offenses committed on and after 1 January 2019.

What is Article 103a UCMJ Espionage?

Article 103A Ucmj EspionageArticle 103a of the UCMJ deals with espionage, a grave offense involving the unauthorized transmission of national defense information to a foreign entity intending to harm the United States or benefit a foreign nation. The penalties for espionage are severe, including confinement, dishonorable discharge, and forfeiture of pay. Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 ed.)

Given the high stakes and complexity of espionage cases, it is crucial for anyone accused of this crime to seek the best military defense lawyers. Skilled court-martial lawyers can provide essential legal defense, navigate the intricate legal framework, and strive for a favorable outcome.

Engaging experienced court-martial lawyers, such as those at Gonzalez & Waddington, is essential for a strong defense. Their understanding of military law and court-martial procedures ensures that the accused’s rights are vigorously defended, which is critical in high-stakes cases.

Note: The maximum and minimum punishments for Article 103a UCMJ Espionage vary depending on the date of the offense.

What are the Elements of Article 103a UCMJ Espionage?

  1. That (state the time and place alleged), the accused communicated,  delivered, or transmitted any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, note, instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense;
  2. That this matter was communicated, delivered, or transmitted to (state the  party allegedly communicated with), any foreign government, or to any faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized by the United States, or to any representative, officer, agent, employee, subject, or citizen thereof, either directly or indirectly; and
  3. That the accused did so with intent or reason to believe that such matter would be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation.

What are the Maximum Punishments for Article 103a UCMJ Espionage?

ForArticle 103a UCMJ Espionage offenses committed between 1 January 2019 and 27 December 2023:

  • Life without eligibility for parole
  • Death or other lawful punishment
  • Dishonorable Discharge, Bad Conduct Discharge, Dismissal
  • Total Forfeitures
  • Reduction to E-1

For Article 103a UCMJ Espionage offenses committed after 27 December 2023

  • Under the Sentencing Parameters, Article 103a UCMJ Espionage is a Category 5 Offense – Confinement from 240-480 months (20 to 40 years)
  • Dishonorable Discharge, Bad Conduct Discharge, Dismissal
  • Total Forfeitures
  • Reduction to E-1
  • Note: The Military Judge MAY impose a period of confinement less than the jurisdictional maximum period of confinement upon finding specific facts that warrant such a sentence. Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 ed.), Appendix 12B-C

Combined UCMJ Maximum Punishment Charts

Sample Specification for Article 103a UCMJ Espionage

In that CAPT Meghan McDonnell, US Navy, did, at or near Palermo, Sicily, Italy, on or about 19 October 2024, with intent or reason to believe it would be used to the injury of the United States or the advantage of Russia, a foreign nation, transmit Top Secret War Plans for the Defense of the Island of Cypress, Code Named: Operation Sultan relating to the national defense, which directly concerned a major element of defense strategy to General Jonas Penskova, a representative of, Russia, a foreign government, indirectly by slipping the plans into General Jonas Penskova’s gym locker.

Model Specification for Article 103a UCMJ Espionage

In that __________ (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board—location), on or about __________, with intent or reason to believe it would be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of __________, a foreign nation, (communicate) (deliver) (transmit) __________ (description of item), (a document) (a writing) (a Code book) (a sketch) (a photograph) (a photographic negative) (a blueprint) (a plan) (a map) (a model) (a note) (an instrument) (an appliance) (information) relating to the national defense, [(which directly concerned (nuclear weaponry) (military spacecraft) (military satellites) (early warning systems) (__________, a means of defense or retaliation against a large scale attack) (war plans) (communications intelligence) (cryptographic information) (__________, a major weapons system) (__________, a major element of defense strategy)] to __________, ((a representative of) (an officer of) (an agent of) (an employee of) (a subject of) (a citizen of)) ((a foreign government) (a faction within a foreign country) (a party within a foreign country) (a military force within a foreign country) (a naval force within a foreign country)) (indirectly by __________).

What are the Definitions for Article 103a UCMJ Espionage?

If attempted espionage is raised. Use Instruction 3a-27a-2 for attempted espionage; do not use the Article 80 attempts instruction. Instruct on Article 103a UCMJ Attempted Espionage.

“Intent or reason to believe” that the information “is to be used to the injury of the United  States or the advantage of a foreign nation” means that the accused acted in bad faith and without lawful authority concerning information not lawfully accessible to the public.

“Instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense” includes the full range of modern technology and future developments, including chemical or biological agents, computer technology, and other matters related to the national defense.

“Foreign country” includes those countries that have and have not been recognized by the United States.

NOTE 2: Capital Instructions and Procedures in Espionage Cases. See

RCM 1004, Article 103a, UCMJ, paragraphs (b) and (c), and paragraph 32,

MCM. See also Chapter 8.

Legal References for Article 103a UCMJ Espionage

US v. Richardson, 33 MJ 127 (CMA 1991) Earlier versions of this  instruction about the intent element contained the words “bad faith OR without authority.” Instructing as to “without authority” in the alternative to “bad faith” was expressly rejected in US v. Richardson.

Article 103a UCMJ Espionage Military Defense Lawyers

Background of Article 103a UCMJ Espionage

Article 103a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) addresses the crime of espionage. Espionage involves the unauthorized gathering, transmission, or loss of defense-related information with the intent to aid a foreign entity or harm the United States. Including espionage in the UCMJ underscores the severity of such actions, which threaten national security and the safety of military personnel and operations.

Basics of Article 103a UCMJ Espionage

To secure a conviction for espionage under Article 103a, the prosecution must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • Communication or Transmission: The accused communicated, delivered, or transmitted information related to national defense.
  • Unauthorized Recipient: The information was delivered to a foreign government, agent, or faction or with the intent or reason to believe it would be used to harm the United States or aid a foreign entity.
  • Intent: The accused acted with intent or reason to believe that the information would be used to harm the United States or aid a foreign entity.

Punishments for Article 103a UCMJ Espionage

The punishments for espionage under Article 103a are severe and can include:

  • Death Penalty: In cases where espionage resulted in extreme consequences to national security.
  • Life Imprisonment: For severe offenses that did not necessarily result in death or extreme consequences but still significantly harmed national security.
  • Confinement: Long-term confinement for less severe cases.
  • Forfeiture of Pay and Allowances: Total forfeiture of all pay and allowances.
  • Dishonorable Discharge: Separation from the service with a dishonorable discharge, reflecting the gravity of the offense.

Collateral Consequences of Article 103a UCMJ Espionage Conviction

A conviction for espionage under Article 103a can have numerous collateral consequences, including:

  • Loss of Security Clearance: Permanent revocation of any security clearances, making future employment in certain fields impossible.
  • Employment Issues: Difficulty obtaining civilian employment due to the nature of the conviction and dishonorable discharge.
  • Loss of Benefits: Loss of military benefits, including retirement pay, VA benefits, and healthcare.
  • Reputation Damage: Significant damage to personal and professional reputation.
  • Civil Liability: Potential civil lawsuits for damages caused by the espionage activities.

Purpose of Article 103a UCMJ Espionage

The primary purpose of penalizing espionage under Article 103a UCMJ is to protect national security and maintain the integrity of the armed forces. Espionage directly threatens the safety and effectiveness of military operations and national defense. By criminalizing such behavior, the military aims to:

  • Protect National Security: Ensure that sensitive information related to national defense is safeguarded.
  • Deterrence: Deter potential offenders by highlighting the severe consequences of espionage.
  • Maintain Trust: Uphold trust within and between the military and the public.
  • Ensure Operational Effectiveness: Protect the armed forces’ operational effectiveness by preventing the unauthorized disclosure of defense information.

In summary, Article 103a’s espionage provisions enforce the military’s commitment to national security and protecting its members and operations. If you are suspected or accused of Article 103a UCMJ Espionage, speak with one of our experienced military court martial lawyers to discuss your case.

Skip to content