Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon
Facing a court-martial, UCMJ action, Administrative Separation Board, or other Adverse Administrative Action for Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon? Call our experienced military defense lawyers at 1-800-921-8607 for a free consultation.
Elite Military Defense Lawyers
“Our military defense lawyers are among the most experienced and hard-hitting in the world. With an unparalleled track record, we provide aggressive, strategic defense tailored to each client’s unique situation. Trust us to fight relentlessly for your rights and deliver the best possible outcome.” (Michael Waddington, Military Defense Lawyer)
Note: This law applies only to Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon offenses committed on and after 1 January 2019.
What is Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon?
Article 128 of the UCMJ addresses aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon, which involves intentionally inflicting or attempting to inflict bodily harm using a weapon capable of causing death or serious injury. This severe charge can result in significant penalties, including confinement, dishonorable discharge, and forfeiture of pay. Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 ed.)
Those accused of aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon should seek the best military defense lawyers to navigate the complexities of their case. Court martial lawyers play a crucial role in building a robust defense, challenging the prosecution’s evidence, and protecting the rights of the accused.
Given the potential for severe consequences, engaging experienced court martial lawyers, such as those at Gonzalez & Waddington, is essential. They possess a deep understanding of military law and can provide comprehensive legal representation to achieve the best possible outcome for the accused.
Note: The maximum and minimum punishments for Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon vary depending on the date of the offense.
What are the types of Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon?
- Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon
- Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon With a loaded firearm
- Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon Committed upon a child under the age of 16 years
What are the Elements of Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon?
- That, (state the time and place alleged), the accused assaulted (state the name of the alleged victim) by offering to do bodily harm to him/her;
- That the accused did so by (state the manner alleged) with a certain weapon, to wit: (state the weapon alleged).
- That the accused intended to do bodily harm; and
- That the weapon was a dangerous weapon.
What are the Elements of Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon, a Loaded Firearm?
- That, (state the time and place alleged), the accused assaulted (state the name of the alleged victim) by offering to do bodily harm to him/her;
- That the accused did so by (state the manner alleged) with a certain weapon, to wit: (state the weapon alleged).
- That the accused intended to do bodily harm;
- That the weapon was a dangerous weapon; and
- That the weapon was a loaded firearm.
What are the Elements of Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon, Committed upon a child under the age of 16 years?
- That, (state the time and place alleged), the accused assaulted (state the name of the alleged victim) by offering to do bodily harm to him/her;
- That the accused did so by (state the manner alleged) with a certain weapon, to wit: (state the weapon alleged).
- That the accused intended to do bodily harm;
- That the weapon was a dangerous weapon; and
- That, at the time, (state the name of the alleged victim) was a child under the age of 16 years.
What is the Maximum Punishment for Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon?
For offenses committed between 1 January 2019 and 27 December 2023:
- 3 Years of Confinement
- Dishonorable Discharge, Bad Conduct Discharge, Dismissal
- Total Forfeitures
- Reduction to E-1
For offenses committed after 27 December 2023
- Under the Sentencing Parameters, Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon is a Category 2 Offense – Confinement from 1-36 months (1 month to 3 years)
- Dishonorable Discharge, Bad Conduct Discharge, Dismissal
- Total Forfeitures
- Reduction to E-1
- Note: The Military Judge MAY impose a period of confinement less than the jurisdictional maximum period of confinement upon finding specific facts that warrant such a sentence. Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 ed.), Appendix 12B-C
What is the Maximum Punishment for Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon (With a loaded firearm)?
For offenses committed between 1 January 2019 and 27 December 2023:
- 8 Years of Confinement
- Dishonorable Discharge, Bad Conduct Discharge, Dismissal
- Total Forfeitures
- Reduction to E-1
For offenses committed after 27 December 2023
- Under the Sentencing Parameters, Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon With a loaded firearm is a Category 3 Offense – Confinement from 30-120 months (2 years and 6 months to 10 years)
- Dishonorable Discharge, Bad Conduct Discharge, Dismissal
- Total Forfeitures
- Reduction to E-1
- Note: The Military Judge MAY impose a period of confinement less than the jurisdictional maximum period of confinement upon finding specific facts that warrant such a sentence. Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 ed.), Appendix 12B-C
What is the Maximum Punishment for Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon Committed upon a child under the age of 16 years?
For Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon offenses committed between 1 January 2019 and 27 December 2023:
- 5 Years of Confinement
- Dishonorable Discharge, Bad Conduct Discharge, Dismissal
- Total Forfeitures
- Reduction to E-1
For Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon offenses committed after 27 December 2023
- Under the Sentencing Parameters, Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon Committed upon a child under the age of 16 years is a Category 3 Offense – Confinement from 30-120 months (2 years and 6 months to 10 years)
- Dishonorable Discharge, Bad Conduct Discharge, Dismissal
- Total Forfeitures
- Reduction to E-1
- Note: The Military Judge MAY impose a period of confinement less than the jurisdictional maximum period of confinement upon finding specific facts that warrant such a sentence.
Combined UCMJ Maximum Punishment Charts
- Maximum Punishments for UCMJ Offenses 2024: Combined UCMJ Punishments Chart
- UCMJ Lesser Included Offenses Chart 2024 UCMJ
Sample Specification for Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon
In that PVT Dane Kirkland, US Army, did, at or near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on or about 15 May 2025, with the intent to inflict bodily harm, commit an assault upon Billy Bookeeper by shooting at him with a dangerous weapon, to wit: a loaded firearm.
Model Specification for Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon
In that __________ (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board location), on or about __________, with the intent to inflict bodily harm, commit an assault upon __________ (a child under the age of 16 years) by (shooting) (pointing) (striking) (cutting) (__________) (at (him) (her)) with a dangerous weapon, to wit: a (loaded firearm) (pickax) (bayonet) (club) (__________).
What are the Definitions for Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon?
An “assault” under Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon is an unlawful offer, made with force or violence, to do bodily harm to another, whether or not the offer is consummated.
An “offer to do bodily harm” under Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon is an unlawful demonstration of violence by an intentional act or omission, which creates in the mind of another a reasonable apprehension of receiving immediate bodily harm. (The use of threatening words alone does not constitute an assault. However, if the threatening words are accompanied by a menacing act or gesture, there may be an assault since the combination constitutes a demonstration of violence.)
“Bodily harm” under Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon means the offensive touching of another, however slight. Bodily harm doesn’t need to be inflicted. However, the accused must have intended to do bodily harm.
Intent to do bodily harm may be proved by circumstantial evidence. When bodily harm has been inflicted using intentionally using force in a manner capable of achieving that result, it may be inferred that the bodily harm was intended.
An offer to do bodily harm is “unlawful” under Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon if done without legal justification or excuse and without the lawful consent of the victim.
A weapon is a “dangerous weapon” under Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon when used in a manner capable of inflicting death or grievous bodily harm. What constitutes a dangerous weapon depends not on the nature of the object itself but on its capacity, given the manner of its use, to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm.
“Grievous bodily harm” means a bodily injury that involves a substantial risk of death, extreme physical pain, protracted and obvious disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.
Loaded firearm alleged and Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon
If a loaded firearm is alleged, the below instruction may be appropriate.
“Firearm” under Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon means any weapon that is designed to or may be readily converted to expel any projectile by the action of an explosive. (A fully functional revolver with an automatic rotating cylinder is a loaded weapon if there is a round of live ammunition in any chamber.) (A functional (clip) (magazine) fed weapon is a loaded weapon if a (clip) (magazine) containing a round of live ammunition has been inserted into it, regardless of whether there is a round in the chamber.)
The accused’s knowledge of the child’s age and Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon
When the alleged victim is a child under the age of 16 years, provide the following instruction: Knowledge that the person assaulted was under 16 years of age is not an element of this offense.
The accused’s belief that (state the name of the alleged victim) was (____ years old) (16 years or older) is not a defense to this offense.
Consent as a defense to Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon
Under certain circumstances, consent may be a defense to simple assault or assault. See US v. Arab, 55 M.J. 508 (A. Ct. Crim. App. 2001). Consent is not generally a defense to aggravated assault. See US v. Bygrave, 46 M.J. 491 (CAAF 1997). However, even in aggravated assault cases, military judges must carefully examine the facts and law to determine whether consent is a possible defense. If the judge determines that consent is not a defense, the following instruction may be given, if necessary.
A victim may not lawfully consent to an assault with a dangerous weapon.
Consent is not a defense to Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon.
Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon Military Defense Lawyers
Background of Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon
Article 128 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) covers assault offenses, including aggravated assault. Aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon is a more severe form of assault that involves the use of a weapon or other means likely to produce death or grievous bodily harm. This article addresses violent behaviors that pose a significant threat to individuals and military order.
Basics of Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon
To secure a conviction for aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon under Article 128, the prosecution must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
- Assault: The accused committed an assault, which means an attempt or offer with unlawful force or violence to do bodily harm to another person.
- Dangerous Weapon: The assault was committed with a dangerous weapon or other means likely to produce death or grievous bodily harm.
- Intent: The accused had the specific intent to inflict bodily harm.
Collateral Consequences of Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon Conviction
A conviction for aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon can have numerous collateral consequences, including:
- Difficulty obtaining civilian employment due to the nature of the conviction and any resulting discharge status
- Loss of military benefits, including retirement pay, VA benefits, and healthcare
- Significant damage to personal and professional reputation
- Potential civil lawsuits from the victim for damages
Purpose of Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon
The primary purpose of penalizing aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon under Article 128 is maintaining good order and discipline within the military. Such assaults pose a serious threat to the safety and well-being of service members and undermine unit cohesion. By criminalizing such behavior, the military aims to:
- Protect service members from serious harm or death
- Ensure a safe and disciplined working environment
- Deter potential offenders by highlighting the severe consequences of such behavior
- Uphold the standards of conduct necessary for military readiness and effectiveness
If you are suspected or accused of Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon, speak with one of our experienced military court martial lawyers to discuss your case.
Examples of Article 128 UCMJ Aggravated Assault Dangerous Weapon:
- Knife Attack: A service member attacks another with a knife, causing injury.
- Gun Threat: A service member points a loaded gun at another service member and fires, causing injury.
- Bat Assault: A service member strikes another with a baseball bat, causing serious injury.
- Broken Bottle Stab: A service member stabs another with a broken bottle during a bar fight.
- Vehicle Attack: A service member intentionally runs over another service member with a vehicle.
- Machete Assault: A service member attacks another with a machete.
- Blunt Object Attack: A service member hits another with a heavy object, such as a hammer.
- Screwdriver Stabbing: A service member stabs another with a screwdriver.
- Taser Attack: A service member uses a taser on another service member, causing injury.
- Chainsaw Assault: A service member uses a chainsaw to threaten or harm another service member.
- Explosive Device: A service member uses an explosive device to cause harm.
- Sword Attack: A service member attacks another with a sword or similar weapon.
- Chemical Attack: A service member uses a harmful chemical substance to cause injury.
- Arrow Shooting: A service member shoots another service member with a bow and arrow.
- Electric Shock: A service member uses an electrical device to shock and injure another service member.
- Fire Attack: A service member uses fire or a flammable substance to harm another service member.
- Spear Assault: A service member uses a spear or spear-like object to attack another service member.
- Nail Gun Attack: A service member uses a nail gun to injure another service member.
- Poisoning: A service member intentionally poisons another service member’s food or drink.
- Stun Gun: A service member uses a stun gun to incapacitate another service member, causing injury.
These examples illustrate various ways a dangerous weapon can be used in aggravated assault under Article 128 of the UCMJ.
Facing Aggravated Assault Charges Under the UCMJ? Why a Civilian Military Defense Lawyer is Essential
The military justice system can be daunting, especially when facing serious allegations like aggravated assault under Article 128 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). These charges, particularly those involving a dangerous weapon, carry severe consequences, including the potential for lengthy confinement, dishonorable discharge, and a criminal record. If you’re a servicemember in this situation, securing experienced legal representation is paramount. Here’s why a civilian military defense lawyer is often the best choice:
1. Unbiased Advocacy:
Unlike military defense counsel, who are part of the same chain of command, a civilian lawyer operates independently. This allows them to provide unbiased and aggressive representation without perceived pressure from superiors or the military system. They are solely focused on protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome for your case.
2. Specialized Expertise:
Civilian military defense lawyers specialize in UCMJ law. They possess in-depth knowledge of Article 128 and the specific elements of aggravated assault, including the definitions of “dangerous weapon” and “grievous bodily harm.” This expertise allows them to develop a nuanced defense strategy tailored to the unique circumstances of your case.
3. Extensive Trial Experience:
Many civilian military defense lawyers have extensive experience trying cases in military courts. They understand the intricacies of court-martial procedures, rules of evidence, and sentencing guidelines, allowing them to navigate the complexities of the military justice system with confidence and skill.
4. Access to Resources:
Civilian lawyers often access a wider range of resources than military defense counsel. This includes expert witnesses, private investigators, and forensic specialists who can provide valuable testimony and evidence to support your defense. These resources can be crucial in challenging the prosecution’s case and casting doubt on their evidence.
5. Independent Perspective:
A civilian lawyer can objectively assess your case, unburdened by the military’s internal politics or biases. They can provide candid advice and realistic expectations and explore all available options, including negotiating plea agreements or fighting the charges at trial.
6. Dedication to Client Service:
Civilian lawyers are known for their dedication to client service. They prioritize open communication, responsiveness, and building a strong attorney-client relationship based on trust and understanding. They will take the time to explain your options, answer your questions, and address your concerns throughout the legal process.
7. Proven Track Record:
Many civilian military defense lawyers have a proven track record of successfully defending service members against aggravated assault charges. They have the experience, knowledge, and resources to build a strong defense and achieve the best possible outcome for their clients.
Conclusion:
If you’re facing aggravated assault charges under the UCMJ, don’t take any chances with your future. Hire a civilian military defense lawyer who can provide the unbiased advocacy, specialized expertise, and aggressive representation you need to protect your rights and freedom. Their experience and dedication can make all the difference in securing a favorable outcome for your case.
Disclaimer: This blog post is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Consult with a qualified attorney to discuss your specific situation.