Article 120 UCMJ: A Guide to Military Sex Offenses

Facing a court-martial, UCMJ action, Administrative Separation Board, or other Adverse Administrative Action for Article 120 UCMJ allegations? Call our experienced military defense lawyers at 1-800-921-8607 for a free consultation.

Elite Military Defense Lawyers

“Our military defense lawyers are among the most experienced and hard-hitting in the world. With an unparalleled track record, we provide aggressive, strategic defense tailored to each client’s unique situation. Trust us to fight relentlessly for your rights and deliver the best possible outcome.” (Michael Waddington, Military Defense Lawyer)

Military Defense Lawyers for Article 120 UCMJ Accusations

Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) addresses various forms of sexual misconduct and is one of the most serious charges a military member can face. This in-depth guide will explain this offense, its elements, potential defenses, and common misconceptions.

Overview of Article 120 UCMJ

Article 120 of the UCMJ deals with sexual offenses, including rape, sexual assault, and other forms of non-consensual sexual conduct. The primary objective of Article 120 is to protect service members from sexual misconduct and to maintain the discipline and order within the military ranks. The article is comprehensive, covering a range of behaviors that constitute sexual misconduct.

Elements of Article 120 Offenses

Article 120 is divided into several subsections, each specifying different offenses. Here are the key elements for some of the most critical subsections:

Elements of Rape (Article 120(a))

• The accused committed a sexual act upon another person.
• The act was accomplished by using unlawful force, threat of force, or when the victim was incapable of consenting due to impairment, unconsciousness, or other conditions.

Elements of Sexual Assault (Article 120(b))

• The accused committed a sexual act upon another person.
• The act was without the consent of the other person.

Elements of Aggravated Sexual Contact (Article 120(d))

• The accused committed sexual contact upon another person.
• The contact was accomplished by using unlawful force, threat of force, or when the victim was incapable of consenting due to impairment, unconsciousness, or other conditions.

Elements of Abusive Sexual Contact (Article 120(d))

• The accused committed sexual contact upon another person.
• The contact was without the consent of the other person.

Elements of Indecent Exposure (Article 120c)

• The accused intentionally exposed their genitalia, anus, buttocks, or female areola or nipple.
• The exposure was done with the intent to gratify the sexual desire of any person or to alarm another person.

Potential Defenses to Article 120 UCMJ

Given the severity of Article 120 offenses, understanding potential defenses is crucial. The following are common defenses that may be used in court-martial proceedings:

1. Consent

One of the most common defenses in Article 120 cases is consent. The defense will argue that the alleged victim consented to the sexual act or contact. Evidence such as communications (texts, emails), witness testimonies, and the parties’ behavior before and after the incident can support this defense.

2. Mistaken Belief of Consent

The accused may argue that they had a mistaken but honest and reasonable belief that the other party consented to the sexual act. This defense hinges on demonstrating that the belief was genuine and reasonable.

3. Lack of Mental Capacity

If the accused lacked the mental capacity to understand the nature of their actions due to intoxication or other factors, this can be used as a defense. However, voluntary intoxication is rarely a successful defense unless it can be shown that it rendered the accused incapable of forming the intent necessary to commit the offense.

4. False Accusations

Sometimes, the defense will argue that the accusations are false, potentially motivated by personal vendettas, misunderstandings, or other reasons. This defense requires thorough investigation and presentation of evidence that discredits the accuser’s allegations.

5. Insufficient Evidence

The defense may argue that the prosecution has not met the burden of proof. This can involve challenging the credibility of witnesses, the validity of physical evidence, or the interpretation of the facts.

Common Misconceptions About Article 120 UCMJ

Article 120 offenses are often surrounded by misconceptions that can influence the perception of the accused and the proceedings. Here are some common misconceptions:

1. Consent Cannot Be Withdrawn

A common misconception is that once consent is given, it cannot be withdrawn. However, consent can be withdrawn at any time, and continuing a sexual act after consent has been withdrawn constitutes sexual misconduct.

2. Intoxication Equals Consent

Another misconception is that if the alleged victim was intoxicated, they automatically consented to the sexual act. The UCMJ clearly states that an individual who is substantially impaired due to intoxication cannot consent to sexual activity.

3. Immediate Reporting is Required

It is often assumed that if an assault is genuine, the victim would report it immediately. However, delays in reporting sexual assaults are common and can be due to various reasons, including fear of retaliation, shame, or uncertainty about what happened.

4. Male Victims Cannot Be Assaulted

There is a stereotype that males cannot be victims of sexual assault. However, Article 120 applies to all service members, regardless of gender, and male victims are entitled to the same protections and support as female victims.

5. Accusations Always Lead to Convictions

It is a misconception that once accused, a service member will inevitably be convicted. Each case is subject to thorough investigation and legal proceedings, and the burden of proof lies with the prosecution. Many cases result in acquittals due to insufficient evidence or successful defenses.

The Legal Process  of Article 120 Allegations

Understanding the legal process for Article 120 offenses is crucial for anyone involved in such cases. Here is an overview of the steps typically involved:

1. Investigation

Once an allegation is made, a formal investigation is initiated, usually by the Criminal Investigation Command (CID) or a similar body. This investigation includes gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and compiling a report.

2. Preferral of Charges

If the investigation finds sufficient evidence, formal charges are preferred against the accused, and the case proceeds to the next phase.

3. Article 32 Hearing

An Article 32 hearing is similar to a civilian grand jury. It is a preliminary hearing to determine whether there is enough evidence to proceed to a court-martial. The defense has the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and present evidence.

4. Court-Martial

If the case proceeds, it goes to a court-martial, the military’s equivalent of a criminal trial. The accused has the right to be represented by a military defense attorney and can also hire a civilian attorney. The court-martial includes opening statements, presentation of evidence, witness testimonies, cross-examinations, and closing arguments.

5. Verdict and Sentencing

The panel, the military equivalent of a jury, deliberates and delivers a verdict. If the accused is found guilty, the court-martial proceeds to the sentencing phase, where penalties such as confinement, dishonorable discharge, reduction in rank, and forfeiture of pay may be imposed.

Hiring a Military Defense Lawyer for Article 120 UCMJ Allegation

Article 120 of the UCMJ encompasses some of the most serious offenses within the military justice system. Understanding the elements of these offenses, potential defenses, and common misconceptions is crucial for service members and legal practitioners alike.

The legal process for Article 120 cases is rigorous, ensuring that the rights of the accused and the integrity of the military are upheld. Defending against such charges requires a thorough understanding of military law, meticulous preparation, and a strategic approach to presenting evidence and arguments.