Michael Stewart Waddington – Partner and Military Defense Attorney

Understanding Military Court-Martial Defense and UCMJ Representation

Michael Stewart Waddington is a globally recognized military defense attorney and partner at UCMJ Defense Lawyers, the Military Defense Law Firm trusted by service members worldwide. He defends high-stakes cases in courts-martial and complex investigations, drawing on years as an Army JAG, international trial work, and bestselling trial advocacy books. Michael teaches cross-examination and closing argument to civilian and military counsel, and his commentary has appeared on CNN, 60 Minutes, ABC’s Nightline, the BBC, and other outlets. Fluent in English and Spanish, with intermediate French, he helps clients navigate the UCMJ wherever they serve. If you need immediate guidance, call 844-470-0740 to connect with a team that understands the demands of military life and litigation.

Michael focuses on serious criminal matters, including sexual assault allegations under Article 120, war crimes, violent offenses, and white-collar cases. He also counsels service members facing administrative actions, adverse findings, and career-impacting investigations. Known for methodical preparation and tenacious courtroom advocacy, Michael brings the same discipline he practices in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu to building defense strategies: constant improvement, attention to detail, and relentless pressure on weak evidence. He partners with Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington to deliver thoughtful, trial-tested representation for Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Guardians, and Coast Guardsmen. Whether you are stateside or overseas, the firm works quickly to preserve evidence, shape the narrative, and protect your future from day one.

Why Skilled UCMJ Defense Matters for Service Members

The UCMJ is a distinct justice system with unique procedures, evidentiary rules, and command dynamics. A tailored military defense can protect not only liberty, but rank, security clearance, pay, retirement, and post-service opportunities. Early intervention helps preserve evidence, challenge flawed assumptions, and prevent administrative actions from escalating. With Michael Waddington, clients benefit from hard-won trial insight, strategic motion practice, and persuasive advocacy shaped by years in courtrooms worldwide. Whether the case involves Article 120 allegations, war-zone incidents, or alleged fraud, a focused defense can counter government narratives, expose unreliable statements, and ensure decision-makers see the full picture. The right strategy can change outcomes and quickly stabilize a chaotic situation.

About UCMJ Defense Lawyers and Michael Waddington’s Background

UCMJ Defense Lawyers is led by Michael Stewart Waddington and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington, known for trial-tested advocacy across the United States and abroad. Michael is a former Army JAG who has served as Senior Defense Counsel, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Chief of Military Justice, with courtroom experience spanning Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and the U.S. He is a Life Member of NACDL, a Fellow of the American Board of Criminal Lawyers, and rated 10.0 Superb by AVVO. Michael writes for the ABA’s The State of Criminal Justice and has authored widely used books on cross-examination and closing arguments. For responsive help and clear guidance, contact 844-470-0740.

Guide to Military Justice and Court-Martial Defense

Military justice is mission-driven and distinct from civilian criminal courts. Command influence, rapid timelines, and service-specific regulations shape investigations and charges. A defense plan should address early investigative steps, witness interviews, digital evidence, and chain-of-custody issues. Understanding the different court-martial forums, the role of a convening authority, and the impact of administrative alternatives is equally important. Michael Waddington helps clients navigate each stage, from initial inquiry to trial and post-trial matters, while safeguarding a client’s rank, security clearance, and career trajectory. Clear communication, diligent preparation, and practical trial strategy allow service members to make informed decisions at every turning point.

Many cases begin with an investigation by military law enforcement or a command-directed inquiry. Early counsel can prevent avoidable statements, identify exculpatory material, and secure defense-friendly witnesses. If charges are preferred, an Article 32 preliminary hearing evaluates probable cause and frames the issues for trial. Pretrial motions can challenge unlawful searches, unreliable expert methods, or suggestive interviews. At trial, persuasive cross-examination, thoughtful use of forensic science, and compelling closing arguments are central to shaping the outcome. After verdict, post-trial and appellate options may address legal errors or sentence relief. Throughout, disciplined case management and attentive client communication remain essential.

What Is UCMJ Defense?

UCMJ defense is the representation of service members facing investigation, adverse administrative action, or court-martial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It combines knowledge of military procedure, evidentiary rules, and command structures with the courtroom skills required to test the government’s case. Effective defense work addresses the full spectrum of consequences, from criminal penalties to collateral effects on rank, benefits, and future employment. It often involves coordinating with experts in forensics or psychology, navigating classified or international issues, and managing media or command concerns. Michael Waddington provides practical guidance that aligns with the realities of military life and operations.

Key Elements and Processes in a Court-Martial

A court-martial typically follows a sequence: investigation, preferral of charges, Article 32 preliminary hearing in most felony-level cases, referral by the convening authority, pretrial motions, trial before a military judge or panel, and post-trial action or appeals. Each phase presents opportunities to challenge evidence, protect rights, and influence outcomes. Defense counsel assesses interview techniques, forensic testing, discovery compliance, and the reliability of witnesses. Strategic motions can suppress unlawfully obtained evidence or limit improper argument. During trial, clear themes, disciplined cross-examination, and credible defense narratives are vital. After trial, review and appeals can seek sentence relief or correct legal errors that affected the verdict.

Key Terms and Glossary for Military Justice

Military cases often turn on specific procedures and terms that can be unfamiliar to clients. A working understanding of roles, timelines, and thresholds helps you participate in your defense and make timely choices. Terms like Article 32, convening authority, nonjudicial punishment, and administrative separation have concrete implications for rights, strategy, and long-term career impact. Michael Waddington explains how each concept applies to your situation, clarifies what to expect, and identifies decision points where preparation can change the trajectory of a case. Clear definitions empower service members to ask better questions and engage confidently with the process.

Article 32 Preliminary Hearing

An Article 32 preliminary hearing evaluates whether probable cause exists to proceed to a general court-martial. A neutral hearing officer reviews evidence, hears limited witness testimony, and issues a report with findings and recommendations. The defense can present evidence, cross-examine certain witnesses, and challenge investigative gaps or unreliable methods. Although the standard is lower than at trial, the hearing is a critical opportunity to test the government’s theory, preserve testimony, and shape referral decisions. Effective preparation can expose weaknesses, encourage charge reductions, or influence case disposition. Michael Waddington guides clients through the process to protect rights and position the case for success.

Nonjudicial Punishment (Article 15)

Nonjudicial punishment allows commanders to address alleged misconduct without a court-martial. While less formal, Article 15 proceedings can still affect rank, pay, and promotion. Service members often must decide whether to accept NJP or demand trial, a choice that depends on the facts, available evidence, and potential exposure. Defense counsel can assess the strength of the case, prepare matters in extenuation and mitigation, and advise on presentation. Even in an NJP, preserving favorable evidence and avoiding unnecessary statements matters. Michael Waddington helps clients weigh options and long-term consequences so they can choose the path that best aligns with their goals and risk tolerance.

Court-Martial Convening Authority

The convening authority is the commander empowered to refer charges to court-martial, select panel members, and take certain post-trial actions. Their decisions significantly influence the shape and timing of a case. Defense counsel must anticipate command priorities, present persuasive matters for consideration, and address any concerns about fairness or unlawful influence. Understanding the convening authority’s role helps the defense identify opportunities for charge negotiation, forum selection, or alternative disposition. Michael Waddington leverages experience with commands across services and theaters to communicate effectively, protect a client’s rights, and ensure that decision-makers see the defense position clearly and promptly.

Administrative Separation

Administrative separation is a process to remove a service member from the military outside of a court-martial. It can carry significant consequences, including the characterization of service and long-term effects on benefits and employment. The defense may challenge the basis for separation, present witness statements, and submit matters in extenuation and mitigation. Proper preparation can change the characterization outcome or avoid separation entirely. Because administrative actions often move quickly, early involvement by counsel is important to preserve rights and assemble compelling submissions. Michael Waddington advises clients on strategy, evidence collection, and presentation to safeguard careers and future opportunities.

Comparing Your Military Defense Options

Some cases are best handled with targeted guidance and careful monitoring, while others require a full-scale defense with investigators, expert consultants, and trial preparation. The right approach depends on the allegations, evidence, command posture, and your goals. A limited scope may make sense when facts are clear and stakes are contained, but comprehensive representation becomes vital as exposure increases. Michael Waddington evaluates risk, identifies pressure points, and tailors a plan to your situation. From early consultation through trial, the firm prioritizes communication and transparency so you understand options, timelines, and likely outcomes before committing resources.

When a Limited Legal Approach May Be Enough:

Minor Misconduct With Strong Documentation

A limited approach may fit low-level allegations where objective documentation clearly supports your account. Examples include administrative mistakes, off-duty disputes quickly resolved, or misunderstandings corrected by email trails, duty logs, or GPS data. In such scenarios, counsel can focus on early communication with the command, concise submissions, and preserving favorable evidence rather than full-scale litigation. The goal is to prevent escalation and minimize collateral consequences. Michael Waddington uses targeted strategy to present a clear narrative and steer decision-makers toward reasonable outcomes. Even in smaller matters, timely advice helps avoid unnecessary statements that could complicate future proceedings.

Early-Stage Inquiry Seeking Clarification

When a command or law enforcement inquiry is exploratory and no charges are preferred, a measured defense plan can protect your interests without overcommitting resources. Early involvement allows counsel to evaluate potential exposure, guide interactions with investigators, and preserve evidence that supports your account. If facts favor a quick resolution, focused submissions and careful messaging may resolve concerns before they escalate. Michael Waddington emphasizes discreet coordination, accurate timelines, and thoughtful witness outreach at this stage. The aim is to answer legitimate questions, prevent misunderstandings, and reduce risk while keeping all options open should the investigation expand or shift course.

Why a Comprehensive Defense Strategy Is Often Essential:

Felony-Level Allegations or Article 120 Charges

Serious allegations, including Article 120 sexual assault, violent offenses, or significant fraud, demand a comprehensive strategy. These cases often involve forensic evidence, digital data, complex timelines, and high-stakes credibility assessments. A full defense plan may include independent investigators, forensic consultants, trial graphics, and extensive motion practice. Michael Waddington draws on years of courtroom experience and widely used trial publications to design persuasive cross-examinations and closings that cut through cluttered narratives. The objective is to challenge unreliable methods, expose bias, and present a coherent defense story grounded in facts. Thorough preparation positions the case for negotiation, acquittal, or sentence relief.

High-Visibility or International Cases

Cases arising overseas or with media attention can complicate everything from witness access to jury selection. International logistics, cross-border discovery, and potential language issues require careful planning. Michael Waddington’s global practice includes Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and the United States, with experience coordinating across time zones and commands. Comprehensive representation helps manage operational realities, privacy concerns, and the risk of outside pressures on the process. The defense team prioritizes evidence preservation, consistent messaging, and respectful engagement with command while firmly asserting rights. This approach stabilizes the situation and ensures decision-makers can focus on facts rather than headlines.

Benefits of a Comprehensive Military Defense Approach

Comprehensive representation brings structure, momentum, and clarity to complex cases. It allows the defense to control schedules, plan discovery, and anticipate government arguments while developing persuasive themes for trial. Early investigation uncovers defense witnesses, locates missing records, and tests forensic claims. Consistent client communication reduces uncertainty and supports informed decisions on negotiations or litigation. Michael Waddington integrates courtroom advocacy with practical case management so nothing important falls through the cracks. This deliberate approach positions the defense to challenge weak evidence, present credible alternatives, and pursue outcomes that preserve liberty, career, and long-term opportunities.

A full-scope plan enables the team to consult appropriate professionals, from forensic scientists and digital analysts to mental health providers when relevant. It also leverages motion practice to exclude unreliable methods and limit improper argument. Trial preparation focuses on clear narratives, focused cross-examination, and visual aids that help fact-finders understand complex issues. After trial, post-trial advocacy and appeals may address legal errors or sentence adjustments. With UCMJ Defense Lawyers, clients gain disciplined planning and responsive support from initial inquiry through resolution. The result is a defense that adapts to the case, rather than reacting to it.

Proactive Case Control and Narrative Building

Proactive defense means shaping the case rather than waiting for events to unfold. From day one, the team documents timelines, interviews witnesses, secures digital evidence, and identifies inconsistencies in statements or forensic methods. Michael Waddington focuses on building a clear defense narrative that aligns facts, themes, and lawful trial tactics. Establishing case control early often reduces surprises, strengthens negotiations, and builds credibility with decision-makers. This approach can lower the risk of escalation, narrow contested issues, and preserve options for dismissal, acquittal, or favorable resolution. The earlier the defense starts building the story, the more effectively it can be told.

Stronger Results Through Preparation and Advocacy

Results flow from preparation, clarity, and persuasive advocacy. Thorough review of reports, interviews, and forensic records reveals pressure points for cross-examination and motions. Careful witness preparation avoids surprises and highlights credibility. Strategic use of demonstratives and trial technology helps decision-makers understand complex timelines or technical evidence. Michael Waddington’s courtroom experience and widely used trial publications inform a practical approach to presenting defenses that resonate. By combining disciplined preparation with focused storytelling, the defense can challenge unreliable conclusions, present reasonable alternatives, and advocate for outcomes that protect both liberty and career. Preparation is the foundation of meaningful results.

As Featured On:

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

Top Searched Keywords

UCMJ defense lawyer
military court-martial attorney
Article 120 defense
military sex crimes defense
war crimes defense counsel
military white-collar defense
Article 32 hearing lawyer
administrative separation defense
global military defense firm

Pro Tips for Service Members Facing Investigation

Do Not Go It Alone in Interviews

If investigators or command request an interview, consult counsel before you speak. Well-intended explanations can be misunderstood, and offhand comments may be taken out of context. With guidance, you can decide whether to provide a statement, how to assert rights respectfully, and what documentation to bring. Michael Waddington helps clients plan interactions that protect credibility while avoiding unnecessary risk. Even when you believe you did nothing wrong, proceed carefully. Early advice can prevent mistakes that complicate later defenses. Call 844-470-0740 for immediate support before interviews or written responses, and ensure your voice is heard the right way.

Preserve Evidence and Communications

Preserve texts, emails, social media messages, phone logs, location data, photos, and relevant device backups. Do not alter or delete potential evidence, even if you think it looks bad; context often matters and the defense may need to show how a conversation evolved. Identify witnesses early and write down timelines while details are fresh. If issued a lawful order regarding devices or accounts, follow it and consult counsel about next steps. Michael Waddington helps clients organize materials for secure, lawful review. Thoughtful preservation supports credible defenses, supplies key impeachment points, and can shorten the path to a favorable result.

Mind Your Online Footprint

Assume investigators and decision-makers will review your online activity. Avoid public commentary about the case, the command, or potential witnesses. Adjust privacy settings without deleting relevant content and pause new posts that could be misinterpreted. Refrain from discussing facts in group chats or unit forums. Consult counsel before sharing documents or screenshots to ensure lawful handling. Michael Waddington advises clients on practical digital hygiene that protects credibility while preserving evidence. Smart online choices reduce misunderstandings, prevent unnecessary conflicts, and keep the focus on the facts that matter. When in doubt, ask your lawyer before you post or reply.

Reasons to Choose UCMJ Defense Lawyers

Service members choose UCMJ Defense Lawyers for responsive support, trial-tested strategy, and clear communication. Michael Waddington brings years as an Army JAG, global courtroom experience, and widely used publications on cross-examination and closing arguments. The firm handles serious allegations, from Article 120 cases and violent offenses to white-collar and war-zone incidents. Clients value disciplined preparation, straightforward guidance, and a focus on preserving career, clearance, and future opportunities. Whether your case is stateside or abroad, the team adapts to the operational realities of military life while pressing for practical, favorable outcomes grounded in facts and law.

From the first call, you can expect organized intake, case assessment, and immediate steps to secure critical evidence. The firm coordinates with investigators, consultants, and witnesses as needed, and maps out a plan that aligns with your goals and risk tolerance. You will understand timelines, options, and potential consequences before committing resources. Michael and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington collaborate to deliver thoughtful advocacy that addresses both trial and administrative risks. If you need guidance now, call 844-470-0740 to discuss your situation in confidence. Prompt action can stabilize the process and set the stage for a stronger defense.

Common Situations That Call for Military Defense Counsel

Military defense counsel can help when a command inquiry or law enforcement interview is requested, when you receive a rights warning, or when CID, NCIS, OSI, or CGIS initiates contact. Allegations involving Article 120, assault, theft, fraud, or operational incidents often escalate quickly, particularly if media or international elements are involved. Administrative actions such as GOMORs, security clearance issues, or separation boards also carry lasting consequences. Michael Waddington helps clients understand exposure, preserve evidence, and decide when to make statements, request witnesses, or seek alternative dispositions. Early involvement can prevent missteps and create options for resolution before charges are preferred.

Sexual Assault Allegations under Article 120

Article 120 allegations involve sensitive facts, credibility assessments, and often digital evidence, intoxication issues, or delayed reporting. These cases demand careful investigation of witness timelines, social media metadata, phone records, and third-party observations. A defense plan may include forensic review of devices, concise motions to exclude unreliable methods, and focused cross-examination on memory and perception. Michael Waddington has taught cross-examination techniques used by lawyers across the country and applies those principles to locate inconsistencies and strengthen defense themes. Protecting privacy, preparing supportive witnesses, and managing command concerns are essential to ensuring decision-makers receive a fair and complete picture.

War Crimes or Rules of Engagement Investigations

Operational cases often involve complex environments, international witnesses, classified information, and intense scrutiny. Accurate timelines, mission records, ROE briefings, and radio logs matter. The defense must coordinate carefully to preserve sensitive material while rigorously testing the government’s narrative. Michael Waddington’s experience across Europe, Asia, and the Middle East includes coordination with commands, attention to cultural and language issues, and practical logistics for witness access. The goal is to reconstruct events faithfully, highlight operational realities, and ensure that any judgment accounts for context and lawful orders. Clear, respectful engagement with command can help maintain credibility while asserting rights.

White-Collar or Fraud-Related Charges

Fraud and financial allegations often turn on records, emails, procurement protocols, and digital trails. A successful defense requires early data preservation, knowledgeable review of transactions, and precise timelines that explain approvals or authorizations. Michael Waddington works with clients to identify key custodians, clarify chain-of-command roles, and address misunderstandings in contracting or travel documentation. Focused motions and demonstratives can simplify complex accounting issues for decision-makers. Because these matters implicate clearance and career viability, the defense plan should address both legal exposure and collateral impact. With disciplined preparation, the team works to resolve disputes, narrow issues, or contest charges in court.

Meet Your Defense Team

Michael S. Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Michael Waddington is a best‐selling author and criminal defense attorney who represents military personnel in courts worldwide—both after charges are filed and during pre‐charge investigations—specializing in serious offenses such as war crimes, sex crimes, violent crimes, and white‐collar cases. Drawing on his rigorous discipline from Brazilian Jiu‐Jitsu, he trains both civilian and military defense lawyers in advanced cross‐examination techniques, a skillset detailed in his three popular books on the subject. His expertise is regularly sought by major media outlets—ranging from CNN and 60 Minutes to the BBC and ABC’s “Nightline”—and he has even contributed to episodes of the Golden Globe–winning series “The Good Wife.” Michael instructs both civilian and military criminal defense attorneys on the art of effectively cross-examining and discrediting adversarial witnesses. Drawing from his three best-selling books on cross-examination and years of experience confronting numerous cunning and aggressive prosecution witnesses.

Alexandra González-Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Alexandra González is a founding partner of González & Waddington Law Firm, practicing in Florida, Georgia, and military courts worldwide, where she has defended hundreds of clients charged with violent crimes, sexual assault, and white-collar offenses since 2003. She has led high-profile military sexual assault and war-crimes cases stemming from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and is regularly featured by major outlets such as 60 Minutes, ABC’s Nightline, Rolling Stone, the BBC, Fox News, and CNN. As one of the first Public Defenders for Georgia’s Augusta Judicial Circuit, she handled a broad spectrum of cases—including rape, larceny, violent crimes, and domestic violence—and she holds a J.D. from Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, where she completed the nationally ranked Integrated Trial Advocacy Program. A Georgia-registered mediator, she continues to shape the practice of military and civilian defense through her courtroom work and advocacy.

Battle-Tested Results

Recent Case Results

Gang-Rape Allegation Collapses Against Navy Officer

U.S. v. Navy O-2 – Norfolk, Virginia – Pre-Charge Defense Allegations: Rape, Conspiracy, Indecent Acts, Fraternization, Adultery, Conduct Unbecoming Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal,

Facebook Exposé Shuts Down Fake Rape Allegation in Japan

U.S. v. Marine E-6 – Iwakuni Air Base, Japan – Article 32 Hearings Allegations: Rape, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Adultery, Fraternization, Violation of an Order Max

Army Officer Beats Aggravated Assault & Conduct Unbecoming Charges

U.S. v. Army O-1 – Fort Bragg, NC / Tried at Fort McNair, Washington D.C. – General Court-Martial Allegations: Aggravated Assault with Means Likely to

Navy Sailor’s Sex Assault Case Tossed After UCI Bombshell

U.S. v. Navy E-6 – Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault Max Punishment: 40+ years confinement, Dishonorable Discharge, Sex

Cleared of Rape Charges in Wild Multi-Victim Court-Martial Drama

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Polk, LA – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Rape, Sexual Assault x4, Article 128 Assault, Total of 14 allegations

Army E-6 Beats False Sex Assault Charges at Fort Bragg

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Bragg, North Carolina – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault, Article 128 Assault Consummated by Battery, Conduct Unbecoming

Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year

U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA

Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2

Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape

U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration

Take Command of Your Defense

If you are under investigation or facing charges, you do not have to navigate this alone. UCMJ Defense Lawyers provides prompt, confidential guidance to protect your rights and career from the outset. Michael Stewart Waddington and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington bring years of courtroom experience, international reach, and practical trial strategy to your side. We move quickly to secure evidence, stabilize communications, and chart a path forward that aligns with your goals. Call 844-470-0740 to speak with our team today. The sooner we begin, the sooner we can help you take control of your case and your future.

Why Service Members Choose UCMJ Defense Lawyers

Service members turn to UCMJ Defense Lawyers for trial-tested advocacy, global reach, and steady communication under pressure. Michael Waddington’s background as an Army JAG, memberships in respected defense organizations, and widely read publications reflect years in demanding courtrooms. The firm handles sex crimes, violent offenses, white-collar matters, and operational cases with practical strategies tailored to the facts. From the first consultation, you will understand the plan, your options, and how each step supports your goals. Our mission is to protect liberty, rank, and future opportunities while guiding you through a system unlike any other.

Clients appreciate disciplined preparation, persuasive advocacy, and a respectful approach to command engagement when appropriate. We coordinate investigators, witness outreach, and forensic review while maintaining clear client communication. Whether your case is in the United States or overseas, we adapt to time zones, logistics, and service-specific rules to keep your defense moving. Michael and Alexandra collaborate closely to deliver responsive support and courtroom-ready representation. If you need immediate help, call 844-470-0740. We will assess your situation, prioritize urgent steps, and begin building the defense story that best aligns with the facts and your long-term interests.

Call Us Today

Check Out Our Newest Book

UCMJ Survival Guide

UCMJ Survival Guide: The Complete Military Justice Manual for Service Members & Families: Whether you’re facing an investigation, court-martial, Article 15 (NJP), or administrative separation, UCMJ Survival Guide is your essential resource for navigating the military justice system. Written by two of the most experienced and respected military defense lawyers in the field—Michael and Alexandra Waddington—this comprehensive guide delivers clear, actionable strategies to protect your career, reputation, and future. Michael and Alexandra are among the top military defense lawyers and recognized as some of the most experienced sexual assault defense attorneys in the country. They have successfully defended service members in high-profile Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault cases, complex court-martials, and administrative separation proceedings across all branches of the U.S. military.

UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers

Worldwide Military Defense Experience

Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation

The González & Waddington Law Firm’s global reach sets them apart from regional military defense attorneys. With active cases spanning from Fort Bragg to forward operating bases in combat zones, from Norfolk Naval Station to remote Air Force installations, their practice truly encompasses the worldwide nature of modern military service.

Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses

War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense

The most serious charges under the UCMJ require the most experienced defense attorneys. The González & Waddington Law Firm has built its reputation by successfully defending service members against the gravest allegations—cases where the stakes couldn’t be higher and the margin for error is virtually nonexistent.

Media and High-Profile Case Experience

Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets

The legal expertise of Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington has garnered attention from the world’s most prestigious media outlets, a testament to their standing as leading authorities in military criminal defense. This media recognition reflects not only their legal acumen but also their ability to handle high-stakes cases under intense public scrutiny.

Playlist

7 Videos

González & Waddington - Court Martial Lawyers - Military Defense Lawyers