Fort Barfoot Article 128b (Domestic Violence) Defense Lawyer

Q: MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS

MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS LEGAL DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES MILITARY DEFENSE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS INVESTIGATIONS

Q: MILITARY BOARDS & HEARINGS

MILITARY BOARDS & HEARINGS ADMINISTRATIVE & DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ARMY AIR FORCE SPACE FORCE NAVY MARINE CORPS COAST GUARD

Q: UCMJ OFFENSES

UCMJ OFFENSES UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE SEX CRIMES SEXUAL HARASSMENT VIOLENT CRIMES PROPERTY & FINANCIAL INTEGRITY & TRUTH MILITARY CONDUCT CYBER & MISCONDUCT

Understanding Article 128b Domestic Violence Defense at Fort Barfoot, Virginia

Facing an Article 128b domestic violence allegation at Fort Barfoot can put your freedom, rank, and future at risk. These cases unfold quickly, often beginning with a Military Protective Order, immediate separation from family quarters, and fast-moving command inquiries. If you are stationed in Blackstone, Virginia, or operating in the surrounding region, you need clear guidance that reflects military reality. UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers helps service members respond decisively, protect their rights, and prepare for investigations, Article 32 hearings, or court-martial. We understand the pressures unique to the United States military justice system and provide measured, battle-tested advocacy tailored to your mission, career, and family.

Article 128b is complex, with consequences that can extend beyond the courtroom, including firearms restrictions under the Lautenberg Amendment, security clearance concerns, and potential administrative separation. Allegations can arise from on-post or off-post incidents and may involve law enforcement, the Family Advocacy Program, and command channels. Our goal is to help you make informed decisions at every stage, from first contact with law enforcement to final disposition. Whether you are at Fort Barfoot in Nottoway County near Blackstone or deployed elsewhere, UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers offers focused, strategic representation designed to protect your record, your livelihood, and your future.

Why a Focused Article 128b Defense Matters and How It Helps

A focused Article 128b defense safeguards your due process rights, prevents avoidable missteps, and positions you to challenge weak or exaggerated claims. Early intervention can shape the investigation, preserve favorable evidence, and counter narratives that might otherwise become accepted as fact. Effective advocacy helps you navigate MPOs, interviews, and command briefings without undermining your case. It also addresses collateral issues, such as firearms possession, housing, and family access. By building a fact-driven timeline, analyzing digital records, and identifying inconsistencies, your defense can reduce charges, negotiate alternatives, or win at trial, giving you a path to move forward with your military career.

About UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers and Our Court-Martial Track Record

UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers is a Military Defense Law Firm led by Waddington & Gonzalez. Our team defends service members worldwide in courts-martial, Article 32 hearings, and adverse administrative actions. We bring deep knowledge of the UCMJ, evidence rules, and command dynamics to domestic violence cases under Article 128b. From Fort Barfoot, Virginia, near Blackstone, to bases across the United States and overseas, we provide steady, strategic representation that respects your mission and your family. We are accessible, thorough, and trial-ready when necessary. Call 800-921-8607 to discuss your situation in confidence and learn how we can help you build a strong, practical defense plan.

Service Member’s Guide to Article 128b Domestic Violence Defense

This guide explains how Article 128b cases move through the military justice system at Fort Barfoot and beyond. It outlines the stages you may encounter, including law enforcement interviews, MPOs, Family Advocacy involvement, command inquiries, Article 32 preliminary hearings, and potential court-martial. You will learn how evidence is gathered and challenged, what rights you have at each step, and how to avoid common pitfalls. We clarify the role of digital communications, medical records, third-party witnesses, and prior relationship history. The goal is to provide clear, mission-focused insight so you can make smart decisions from day one.

Because Article 128b carries serious consequences, early legal guidance can significantly influence outcomes. This guide emphasizes preserving texts, call logs, location data, and social media content; navigating MPOs and command expectations; and preparing for interviews without compromising your defense. We discuss how to document injuries, report inconsistencies, and request records that support your account. You will also find practical strategies for protecting your career interests, including security clearances and future assignments. Whether allegations arose on-post near Blackstone, Virginia, or off-post in the surrounding region, these steps help ensure your rights are protected and your voice is heard.

What Article 128b Covers Under the UCMJ

Article 128b of the UCMJ addresses domestic violence offenses committed against an intimate partner, spouse, or certain household members. The statute encompasses a range of conduct, from assault and battery to violations of protective orders, and can be charged alongside related offenses such as communicating threats or property damage. The government must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt, but investigations often begin with limited information and urgent command action. Understanding the definitions, required mental states, and available defenses is essential. Context matters, including mutual conflict, self-defense, credibility issues, and evidence consistency. A detailed, evidence-driven approach helps clarify what really happened.

Key Elements, Investigations, and the Court-Martial Process

Article 128b cases typically involve overlapping processes: law enforcement interviews, MPOs, Family Advocacy assessments, and command decisions that may quickly escalate. Core elements can include offensive touching or bodily harm, intent, relationship status, and protective order compliance. The process often moves from investigation to an Article 32 preliminary hearing, where evidence is tested, witnesses are examined, and recommendations are made regarding referral to court-martial. Throughout, defense counsel can engage investigators, challenge probable cause, request discovery, and present mitigation. Understanding timelines, evidentiary thresholds, and your rights at each step helps you avoid missteps and maintain a strong defensive posture from the outset.

Key Terms and Glossary for Article 128b Cases

Military domestic violence cases rely on precise terminology that drives how allegations are investigated and resolved. Knowing these terms helps you anticipate the process, recognize your rights, and communicate clearly with command and investigators. Important concepts include the scope of Article 128b, the meaning and limits of a Military Protective Order, how an Article 32 preliminary hearing functions, and the impact of the Lautenberg Amendment on firearms possession. Understanding each term’s role in your case allows you to make informed choices, preserve helpful evidence, and avoid statements or actions that could be misunderstood, especially during the earliest and most stressful stages.

Article 128b (Domestic Violence)

Article 128b defines domestic violence within the military justice system, covering offenses against spouses, intimate partners, and specific household members. Charges may include assault, battery, strangulation, or violations of protective orders. The statute requires the government to prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt, which may involve medical documentation, digital communications, witness testimony, and prior statements. Defenses can include self-defense, lack of intent, fabrication, or misidentification. Because Article 128b can trigger rapid command actions, early legal intervention is important to preserve favorable evidence, guide interviews, and ensure your rights are honored through investigation, Article 32 hearing, and possible court-martial.

Article 32 Preliminary Hearing

An Article 32 preliminary hearing tests the government’s evidence before a case is referred to a general court-martial. The hearing officer evaluates probable cause, reviews witness statements, and considers the admissibility and reliability of the evidence. The defense can cross-examine witnesses, present evidence, and raise legal objections. While it is not a full trial, the Article 32 allows the defense to probe weaknesses, lock in testimony, and shape the command’s referral decision. A strategic approach can lead to dismissal, lesser charges, or improved negotiation leverage, setting the tone for any subsequent litigation or administrative actions that may follow.

Military Protective Order (MPO)

A Military Protective Order is a command-issued directive that restricts contact between a service member and another person, often in the wake of a domestic allegation. Violating an MPO can create additional charges and severely impact your case. The order’s terms may affect housing, communication, and access to dependents. Compliance is essential, even if the protected person initiates contact. The defense can request reasonable modifications, address misunderstandings, and document full compliance. Preserving communications, call logs, and third-party witness accounts can clarify events and protect you against allegations of violations, especially during emotionally charged situations or when facts are disputed.

Lautenberg Amendment

The Lautenberg Amendment prohibits firearm possession by individuals convicted of certain domestic violence offenses. For service members, this can jeopardize duty assignments, promotions, and long-term career prospects. Even allegations can create temporary firearms restrictions through MPOs or command directives. Understanding how the amendment interacts with Article 128b charges is vital when planning your defense and considering potential plea options or alternative resolutions. A careful approach aims to protect your long-term status, including security clearances and MOS requirements. Early advice helps you evaluate risks, pursue charge reductions, and, when possible, structure outcomes that avoid permanent firearms-related consequences.

Comparing Command Actions, Administrative Remedies, and Court-Martial

Article 128b allegations may be addressed through command counseling, Family Advocacy intervention, administrative separation, nonjudicial punishment, or referral to court-martial. Each path has different burdens, timelines, and outcomes. Command action can move swiftly but may rely on incomplete information. Administrative routes may resolve cases without a federal conviction but still affect benefits and career. Court-martial offers formal due process and the chance to fully challenge the evidence, but the stakes are higher. Understanding these options, and how they interact, helps you choose a strategy that aligns with your goals, whether that is exoneration, charge reduction, or a negotiated resolution.

When a Targeted, Limited Response May Be Enough:

Low-Level Allegation with Minimal Corroboration

Sometimes a narrow strategy is appropriate when the allegation is minor, inconsistently reported, and unsupported by physical evidence or credible witnesses. In these circumstances, careful documentation, limited statements, and disciplined compliance with MPOs may be sufficient to resolve concerns without escalation. Promptly preserving texts, call logs, and location data can clarify misunderstandings and avoid unnecessary disciplinary action. Working with counsel to address command questions and Family Advocacy inquiries can prevent damaging admissions and help close the matter. The goal is to contain risk, correct the record, and quietly move on while protecting your career and relationships.

Early Resolution Through Counseling or Diversion

In select cases, early engagement with resources such as counseling, anger management, or relationship support programs can demonstrate accountability and reduce the need for formal disciplinary action. When legally appropriate and without admitting conduct you dispute, a proactive plan may satisfy command concerns and address underlying stressors. Documenting participation, maintaining MPO compliance, and avoiding inflammatory communication can help resolve the situation. This approach works best where injuries are minor, accounts are conflicting, and both parties want stability. A limited strategy balances legal protection with practical steps that support family well-being, unit readiness, and your long-term service goals.

When a Full-Scope Defense Strategy Is Necessary:

Risk of Court-Martial, Confinement, and a Federal Conviction

If the government alleges significant bodily harm, strangulation, or repeated violations of an MPO, a comprehensive defense is warranted. The consequences can include confinement, a punitive discharge, and a lasting federal conviction. In these cases, your defense should aggressively challenge the timeline, forensic and medical evidence, witness motivations, and digital records. A full-scope approach involves targeted investigation, expert consultations when appropriate, motions practice, and trial preparation. It also accounts for collateral issues such as firearms restrictions, custody disputes, and housing. The goal is to reduce or defeat charges and protect your future inside and outside the military.

Collateral Consequences: Firearms, Custody, and Career Impact

Even without confinement, an adverse outcome in an Article 128b case can affect firearms eligibility under the Lautenberg Amendment, security clearances, promotions, and future assignments. Family dynamics, including custody and visitation, may also be influenced by command findings or court outcomes. A comprehensive defense anticipates these downstream effects and pursues strategies that mitigate long-term harm. That includes seeking charge reductions that avoid permanent firearms prohibitions, documenting positive service history, and developing mitigation packages. Addressing these issues holistically helps protect your livelihood and family stability while maintaining a strong posture for negotiation or trial.

Benefits of a Full-Scope Article 128b Defense

A full-scope defense allows you to control the narrative by systematically gathering, analyzing, and presenting evidence that supports your account. It ensures timely requests for discovery, preservation of texts and digital media, and interviews with witnesses who know the relationship context. This approach prepares you for every stage, from MPO compliance to live testimony, and positions you to challenge unreliable statements and questionable forensics. It also equips you for negotiation by demonstrating trial readiness and highlighting weaknesses in the government’s theory. The result is leverage that can lead to dismissal, reduced charges, or favorable terms.

Comprehensive representation helps manage the stress of a domestic violence allegation by giving you a clear plan and consistent communication. You will understand what to expect, what to avoid, and how to protect your record. It also ensures that command, Family Advocacy, and investigators interact with a unified, fact-based defense. When appropriate, we coordinate character letters, mitigation materials, and treatment records to present a full picture of your service and progress. This broad strategy supports better outcomes at court-martial or in administrative forums and reduces the long-term impact on your career, benefits, and family life.

Evidence-Driven Case Development

An evidence-driven approach collects and preserves every helpful detail, from timestamps and geolocation data to medical notes and prior inconsistent statements. We build a timeline that clarifies what occurred, who was present, and how accounts changed over time. This method exposes exaggerations and misinterpretations, especially in fast-moving domestic incidents. It also identifies alternative explanations, such as accidental injuries or mutual conflict. By approaching your case like an investigation, we position you to make informed decisions about trial, negotiation, or administrative resolution. Strong evidence creates leverage, reduces speculation, and can decisively shape the outcome of your Article 128b case.

Strategic Negotiation and Litigation Posture

Preparation drives results. A comprehensive defense signals readiness for litigation, which often leads to better negotiations. When the government sees a coherent theory, credible witnesses, and well-supported motions, the conversation changes. We pursue outcomes aligned with your goals, including dismissals, charge reductions, or terms that avoid permanent firearms disqualifications. If negotiations fail, you are prepared for trial with a clear strategy and evidence that supports your account. This posture also helps with command communications, showing that you take the process seriously and are committed to resolving the matter in a way that protects your career and family.

As Featured On:

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

Top Searched Keywords

Article 128b UCMJ
military domestic violence defense
Fort Barfoot court-martial lawyer
Blackstone Virginia military attorney
Military Protective Order MPO
Article 32 hearing defense
Lautenberg Amendment military
UCMJ domestic violence charges
Family Advocacy Program investigation

Pro Tips to Protect Your Rights in Article 128b Cases

Do Not Discuss Your Case Without Counsel

Silence is often your strongest protection at the start of an investigation. Well-meaning explanations can be misunderstood, taken out of context, or used to fill gaps in the government’s theory. Do not discuss your case with anyone other than your lawyer, including friends, coworkers, and social media. Decline interviews until you have legal advice and a plan. If approached by investigators, request counsel and stop the conversation. Even routine command questions deserve careful handling. A measured, legally informed response preserves defenses, prevents harmful admissions, and keeps you from unintentionally corroborating statements you dispute.

Preserve Digital and Physical Evidence Immediately

Domestic allegations often turn on texts, call logs, photos, and location data. Preserve everything. Screenshot relevant messages, back up your phone, save voicemails, and secure photos of any injuries or property damage, even if minor. Keep records of medical visits, counseling, and third-party communications. Do not alter, delete, or edit content. Create a written timeline while events are fresh. Identify witnesses who saw or heard relevant interactions, on-post or off-post near Blackstone, Virginia. Early preservation safeguards context, counters selective narratives, and gives your defense the raw material needed to challenge inaccuracies and present the full picture.

Follow MPOs and No-Contact Orders Precisely

Compliance with a Military Protective Order is non-negotiable. Even accidental or third-party contact can create new allegations and complicate your defense. Save a copy of the order, understand every term, and ask your attorney to request clarifications where needed. Document your compliance, including living arrangements and communication boundaries. If the protected person reaches out, do not respond directly. Inform your counsel immediately. Strict compliance helps avoid additional charges, demonstrates respect for command directives, and can improve your posture in negotiations or at trial. It also supports your credibility with the court and the chain of command.

Reasons to Hire an Article 128b Defense Lawyer at Fort Barfoot

Article 128b allegations move quickly and can reshape your life within hours. A dedicated defense helps you handle investigators, command action, Family Advocacy, and MPOs without missteps. Your attorney can coordinate evidence preservation, guide statements, and build a strategy that aligns with your goals. If the case escalates to an Article 32 hearing or court-martial, you will be prepared to challenge the government’s evidence and present your own. For soldiers in Blackstone, Virginia, and across the United States, experienced military counsel is the difference between reacting to events and steering the outcome with confidence.

Hiring UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers connects you with a team that understands how domestic allegations intersect with security clearances, firearms restrictions, and career progression. We work to protect your record, reduce exposure, and pursue outcomes that preserve your future. Whether the best path is negotiation, administrative resolution, or trial, we help you evaluate options and make informed decisions. We also coordinate mitigation materials, character references, and treatment records when appropriate. Our approach is steady, thorough, and built around your mission. If you or a teammate is facing Article 128b allegations at Fort Barfoot, reach out early to safeguard your rights.

Common Situations That Lead to Article 128b Charges

Article 128b allegations often arise during high-stress periods: field training, redeployment, financial strain, or relationship transitions. Incidents may occur on-post at Fort Barfoot or off-post in the Blackstone, Virginia area. Reports can originate from neighbors, medical providers, or third parties who witnessed only part of an interaction. Alcohol, misunderstandings, and conflicting accounts frequently complicate the record. Sometimes both parties share responsibility, or injuries are accidental. Early legal guidance helps clarify the facts, protect your rights, and avoid statements that turn a minor dispute into a major case. Document everything, comply with MPOs, and seek counsel before speaking to investigators.

Heated Argument That Escalates Off-Post

Disagreements can intensify quickly, especially off-post where civilian police respond first. A neighbor’s 911 call may capture only raised voices, not context. When officers arrive, statements are recorded under stress, and minor injuries may be misinterpreted. If alcohol is involved, recollections can shift. Preserve texts from earlier in the day, note any witnesses, and document the scene. Do not make statements without counsel. Stay calm, obey lawful orders, and contact a military defense lawyer as soon as possible. Early intervention can correct misunderstandings, protect your rights, and prevent incomplete narratives from becoming the foundation of an Article 128b case.

Allegations During Separation or Divorce

Relationship transitions often bring tension, disputed property, and emotionally charged interactions. During separations, one party may seek protective orders or make allegations that influence custody or housing. These situations require careful documentation and disciplined communication. Save emails, texts, and call logs. Consider making exchanges in public places or with neutral third parties when appropriate. Strictly follow MPOs and any civilian orders. Avoid reactive messages and social media posts that could be misread. A clear legal plan helps maintain boundaries, reduce conflict, and present a consistent, credible record to command, Family Advocacy, and, if necessary, the court-martial forum.

Third-Party Reports and Command Notification

Sometimes a supervisor, neighbor, or medical provider initiates a report based on partial observations. Command may issue an MPO immediately, before all facts are known. Do not panic. Comply with the order, avoid contact, and begin preserving evidence. Identify potential witnesses who can speak to the relationship, relevant history, and what occurred that day. Maintain a written timeline and gather photos, messages, and travel data. Your attorney can communicate with investigators, address command concerns, and seek reasonable adjustments to living or duty arrangements. A methodical approach stabilizes the situation and helps ensure decisions are informed by complete, accurate information.

Meet Your Defense Team

Michael S. Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Michael Waddington is a best‐selling author and criminal defense attorney who represents military personnel in courts worldwide—both after charges are filed and during pre‐charge investigations—specializing in serious offenses such as war crimes, sex crimes, violent crimes, and white‐collar cases. Drawing on his rigorous discipline from Brazilian Jiu‐Jitsu, he trains both civilian and military defense lawyers in advanced cross‐examination techniques, a skillset detailed in his three popular books on the subject. His expertise is regularly sought by major media outlets—ranging from CNN and 60 Minutes to the BBC and ABC’s “Nightline”—and he has even contributed to episodes of the Golden Globe–winning series “The Good Wife.” Michael instructs both civilian and military criminal defense attorneys on the art of effectively cross-examining and discrediting adversarial witnesses. Drawing from his three best-selling books on cross-examination and years of experience confronting numerous cunning and aggressive prosecution witnesses.

Alexandra González-Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Alexandra González is a founding partner of González & Waddington Law Firm, practicing in Florida, Georgia, and military courts worldwide, where she has defended hundreds of clients charged with violent crimes, sexual assault, and white-collar offenses since 2003. She has led high-profile military sexual assault and war-crimes cases stemming from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and is regularly featured by major outlets such as 60 Minutes, ABC’s Nightline, Rolling Stone, the BBC, Fox News, and CNN. As one of the first Public Defenders for Georgia’s Augusta Judicial Circuit, she handled a broad spectrum of cases—including rape, larceny, violent crimes, and domestic violence—and she holds a J.D. from Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, where she completed the nationally ranked Integrated Trial Advocacy Program. A Georgia-registered mediator, she continues to shape the practice of military and civilian defense through her courtroom work and advocacy.

Battle-Tested Results

Recent Case Results

Gang-Rape Allegation Collapses Against Navy Officer

U.S. v. Navy O-2 – Norfolk, Virginia – Pre-Charge Defense Allegations: Rape, Conspiracy, Indecent Acts, Fraternization, Adultery, Conduct Unbecoming Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal,

Facebook Exposé Shuts Down Fake Rape Allegation in Japan

U.S. v. Marine E-6 – Iwakuni Air Base, Japan – Article 32 Hearings Allegations: Rape, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Adultery, Fraternization, Violation of an Order Max

Army Officer Beats Aggravated Assault & Conduct Unbecoming Charges

U.S. v. Army O-1 – Fort Bragg, NC / Tried at Fort McNair, Washington D.C. – General Court-Martial Allegations: Aggravated Assault with Means Likely to

Navy Sailor’s Sex Assault Case Tossed After UCI Bombshell

U.S. v. Navy E-6 – Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault Max Punishment: 40+ years confinement, Dishonorable Discharge, Sex

Cleared of Rape Charges in Wild Multi-Victim Court-Martial Drama

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Polk, LA – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Rape, Sexual Assault x4, Article 128 Assault, Total of 14 allegations

Army E-6 Beats False Sex Assault Charges at Fort Bragg

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Bragg, North Carolina – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault, Article 128 Assault Consummated by Battery, Conduct Unbecoming

Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year

U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA

Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2

Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape

U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration

Take Command of Your Defense

UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers stands ready to defend soldiers at Fort Barfoot and across Virginia. If you are in or near Blackstone and facing Article 128b allegations, call 800-921-8607 for a confidential case review. We will explain your rights, outline immediate steps, and begin building a plan that protects your career, family, and future. Our team represents service members worldwide and understands the demands of military life. The sooner you reach out, the more options you may have. Contact us today, and let us help you take control of your case and your next steps with confidence.

Why Service Members Choose UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers for Article 128b Defense

Service members trust UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers because we understand how to navigate the intersection of law, command expectations, and real-world military life. Led by Waddington & Gonzalez, our firm has defended soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and Guardians in complex domestic cases around the world. We emphasize preparation, communication, and a steady courtroom presence. From investigations at Fort Barfoot to trials stateside or overseas, we shape clear strategies backed by thorough evidence review and direct engagement with witnesses, digital records, and medical documentation. Our focus remains constant: protect your rights and pursue the best achievable outcome.

Every case is different, so we tailor the plan to your circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance. We will explain your options, from negotiation to trial, and help you pick the path that fits your career and family priorities. When appropriate, we coordinate mitigation packages and character support that present the full picture of your service. If you are stationed in Blackstone, Virginia, or elsewhere, we are accessible and responsive. Call 800-921-8607 to discuss your situation with our team and learn how we can help you move forward with clarity and confidence.

Call Us Today

Check Out Our Newest Book

UCMJ Survival Guide

UCMJ Survival Guide: The Complete Military Justice Manual for Service Members & Families: Whether you’re facing an investigation, court-martial, Article 15 (NJP), or administrative separation, UCMJ Survival Guide is your essential resource for navigating the military justice system. Written by two of the most experienced and respected military defense lawyers in the field—Michael and Alexandra Waddington—this comprehensive guide delivers clear, actionable strategies to protect your career, reputation, and future. Michael and Alexandra are among the top military defense lawyers and recognized as some of the most experienced sexual assault defense attorneys in the country. They have successfully defended service members in high-profile Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault cases, complex court-martials, and administrative separation proceedings across all branches of the U.S. military.

UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers

Worldwide Military Defense Experience

Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation

The González & Waddington Law Firm’s global reach sets them apart from regional military defense attorneys. With active cases spanning from Fort Bragg to forward operating bases in combat zones, from Norfolk Naval Station to remote Air Force installations, their practice truly encompasses the worldwide nature of modern military service.

Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses

War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense

The most serious charges under the UCMJ require the most experienced defense attorneys. The González & Waddington Law Firm has built its reputation by successfully defending service members against the gravest allegations—cases where the stakes couldn’t be higher and the margin for error is virtually nonexistent.

Media and High-Profile Case Experience

Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets

The legal expertise of Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington has garnered attention from the world’s most prestigious media outlets, a testament to their standing as leading authorities in military criminal defense. This media recognition reflects not only their legal acumen but also their ability to handle high-stakes cases under intense public scrutiny.

Playlist

7 Videos

González & Waddington - Court Martial Lawyers - Military Defense Lawyers