Fort Barfoot Article 120 Sexual Assault Defense Lawyer

Q: MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS

MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS LEGAL DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES MILITARY DEFENSE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS INVESTIGATIONS

Q: MILITARY BOARDS & HEARINGS

MILITARY BOARDS & HEARINGS ADMINISTRATIVE & DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ARMY AIR FORCE SPACE FORCE NAVY MARINE CORPS COAST GUARD

Q: UCMJ OFFENSES

UCMJ OFFENSES UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE SEX CRIMES SEXUAL HARASSMENT VIOLENT CRIMES PROPERTY & FINANCIAL INTEGRITY & TRUTH MILITARY CONDUCT CYBER & MISCONDUCT

Understanding Article 120 Defense at Fort Barfoot, Virginia

If you are a Soldier at Fort Barfoot in the United States, located in Virginia near Blackstone and within reach of Richmond, an Article 120 allegation can upend your career and life in an instant. These cases are complex, fast-moving, and investigated aggressively by military law enforcement. One statement to CID or a hasty text can change the entire trajectory of a case. Early guidance helps you protect your rights, preserve favorable evidence, and avoid avoidable missteps. Our approach centers on rapid response, careful fact development, and command-facing strategy tailored to the realities of service at Fort Barfoot and the surrounding community.

UCMJ Defense Lawyers, led by attorneys Waddington and Gonzalez, defends service members facing Article 120 allegations worldwide and throughout Virginia. We focus on building strong, fact-driven defenses, engaging with investigators through counsel, and preparing for Article 32 hearings and potential courts-martial. Whether your case involves consent, intoxication, or mistaken identity, we move quickly to secure digital and witness evidence while protecting your rights under Article 31(b). If you or a loved one at Fort Barfoot needs immediate guidance, call 800-921-8607. A timely, strategic response can make a meaningful difference at every stage of the process.

Why a focused Article 120 defense matters for Soldiers

Article 120 cases demand precision because credibility assessments, forensic issues, and command pressures interact in ways unique to the military. A focused defense safeguards your rights, frames your narrative early, and helps ensure investigators and commanders see the full context. Strategic engagement can narrow issues before the Article 32 hearing, challenge unreliable statements, and preserve grounds for motions under the Military Rules of Evidence. Thoughtful communication planning protects you from adverse inferences while a tailored evidence plan addresses digital data, medical records, and timelines. A well-structured defense gives you clarity, reduces risk, and positions you to make informed decisions.

About UCMJ Defense Lawyers: Waddington & Gonzalez

UCMJ Defense Lawyers represents Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Guardians in Article 120 cases across the United States and abroad. Led by Waddington and Gonzalez, the firm is known for thorough case preparation, strong courtroom advocacy, and respectful, direct communication with clients and families. We coordinate with local conditions around Fort Barfoot, Virginia, including Blackstone and Richmond, to locate witnesses, gather surveillance, and secure essential records. Our team handles investigations, Article 32 hearings, and courts-martial, as well as administrative actions that often accompany these cases. We approach each matter with discipline, discretion, and a commitment to clear, steady guidance.

Guide to Defending Article 120 Allegations

Defending an Article 120 allegation begins with asserting your rights and limiting statements. Avoid casual conversations, social media commentary, and explanations that can be used out of context. Through counsel, gather messaging history, location data, and witness recollections while they are fresh. Expect investigators to pursue phone dumps, medical exams, and collateral witness interviews. Your defense plan should map out consent issues, intoxication levels, timelines, and any prior interactions. Early counsel can shape the Article 32 hearing, evaluate diversionary options, and anticipate motions aimed at excluding unreliable or prejudicial evidence that does not advance the search for the truth.

As the case progresses, your lawyer will challenge assumptions, test witness reliability, and assess forensic claims with independent review where appropriate. The Article 32 preliminary hearing is a critical checkpoint for cross-examination and issue framing. Prepare for command decisions, potential pretrial negotiations, and the possibility of trial. Throughout, maintain compliance with no-contact directives and protect your digital footprint. A structured defense timeline, combined with thoughtful communication planning, helps avoid misunderstandings and keeps your case focused on verifiable facts. This careful, persistent approach supports better outcomes while reducing avoidable risks to your career and reputation.

What Article 120 covers under the UCMJ

Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice addresses sexual offenses, including sexual assault and abusive sexual contact, among other offenses defined by statute and case law. Key issues often involve consent, capacity to consent, intoxication, and the accused’s state of mind. The government bears the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and the defense may raise reasonable doubt through consent, mistake of fact as to consent, and challenges to witness reliability or forensic interpretations. Understanding these definitions, the elements of each offense, and how they apply to your specific facts is fundamental to building a clear, effective defense strategy.

Key elements, investigations, and court-martial process

Article 120 cases commonly involve investigations by CID, NCIS, or OSI, medical evaluations, and digital forensics. The process typically includes an initial inquiry, rights advisement, evidence collection, and command decisions that may lead to an Article 32 preliminary hearing and potential referral to court-martial. Defense counsel assesses the government’s theory, challenges chain-of-custody issues, and considers motions under the Military Rules of Evidence, including relevance, hearsay, and privacy privileges. Throughout, careful witness preparation, timeline analysis, and documentation gathering are essential. Each stage presents opportunities to narrow the issues, test the evidence, and present a coherent defense supported by facts and proper procedures.

Key terms and glossary for Article 120 cases

Understanding common terms empowers you to make informed decisions. Article 31(b) rights govern when and how you must be advised before questioning. Consent remains a central concept and is assessed based on words, actions, and circumstances, including capacity. Mistake of fact as to consent addresses whether, under the circumstances, an honest and reasonable belief existed. The Article 32 preliminary hearing tests probable cause and shapes the case before trial. Additional terms, such as Military Rules of Evidence 412 and 513, can affect privacy issues and admissibility. Knowing how these concepts interact helps guide defense strategy from day one.

Article 31(b) rights

Article 31(b) requires that service members be informed of the nature of the accusation and their right to remain silent before questioning by persons subject to the UCMJ. Invoking these rights helps prevent statements from being taken out of context or used against you later. You may request counsel and decline to answer questions without negative inference at trial. Exercise these rights politely and consistently, then direct all inquiries to your lawyer. At Fort Barfoot and throughout Virginia, early rights invocation often preserves important defenses and prevents unintentional waivers that could complicate your case down the line.

Mistake of fact (consent)

Mistake of fact as to consent applies when an accused honestly, and in some scenarios reasonably, believed the other person consented based on words, actions, or context. This defense turns on careful analysis of communication, sobriety, prior interactions, and corroborating evidence such as messages or witness accounts. The defense may present evidence showing ambiguity, mixed signals, or conduct consistent with consent. Although the burden of proof remains with the government, mistake of fact can create reasonable doubt. Documenting events promptly, preserving digital communications, and identifying witnesses who observed interactions are vital to developing this defense in Article 120 cases.

Consent

Consent is a freely given agreement to the conduct at issue, evaluated from the totality of the circumstances. It can be expressed by words or actions, but cannot be inferred from silence or lack of resistance alone. Capacity to consent is central; intoxication or impairment may affect whether a person could agree. Investigators often examine messages, timing, demeanor, and witness observations. The defense may highlight mutual flirtation, contemporaneous communications, or conduct inconsistent with the government’s theory. Because consent assessments are nuanced, early preservation of digital records and precise timeline reconstruction are essential to accurately present what happened and why.

Article 32 preliminary hearing

The Article 32 preliminary hearing is a pretrial proceeding where a neutral hearing officer assesses probable cause and provides recommendations to the convening authority. It allows limited discovery and cross-examination, helping both sides test the strength of the case. Defense counsel can challenge reliability, expose inconsistencies, and frame legal issues for motions. While not a full trial, outcomes can influence referral decisions, negotiations, and trial strategy. Proper preparation focuses on key witnesses, forensic gaps, and evidentiary weaknesses, often shaping the litigation path well before court-martial. This stage is a vital opportunity to build momentum for the defense.

Comparing defense strategies and forums

Article 120 matters may resolve through multiple avenues: unfounded determinations, administrative actions, nonjudicial punishment, or referral to court-martial. Some cases benefit from limited engagement that clarifies misunderstandings and addresses command concerns early. Others call for full litigation, with aggressive evidentiary challenges and a robust trial plan. The best approach depends on facts, goals, and risk tolerance. Your counsel can assess whether to seek administrative solutions, pursue negotiation, or prepare for trial, considering collateral exposures such as separation, adverse evaluations, or registration consequences. A tailored strategy helps you navigate the process with clarity and purpose.

When a limited, targeted response may suffice:

Early clarification through counsel

In some cases, misunderstandings can be addressed by timely, carefully crafted communications through counsel. When facts show consensual interaction or discrepancies in the initial account, a focused submission may help investigators or commanders contextualize the event. This approach avoids unnecessary statements by the accused while highlighting materials like messages, location data, or third-party observations. It is most effective early, before narratives harden. At Fort Barfoot, where units are tight-knit and information travels fast, a clear, professional presentation can reduce confusion and guide decision-makers toward a fair assessment without committing to a full litigation posture.

Administrative avenues over court-martial

When evidence is thin or contested issues do not support a trial, administrative options may resolve the matter more efficiently. Counsel can engage with the command to explore alternatives, such as no further action, counseling, or other administrative outcomes that avoid the burdens of a court-martial. This route can preserve readiness and reduce reputational harm while still addressing command concerns. It is not right for every case, but where facts, risk, and goals align, limited engagement can achieve a measured resolution. Your defense team will weigh these options against long-term career considerations and the chance of full exoneration.

When a full-scale defense is necessary:

Contested credibility and forensic issues

If the case turns on conflicting witness accounts, disputed timelines, or complex forensic claims, a full-scale defense is often the prudent path. Comprehensive preparation allows for independent analysis of digital artifacts, medical findings, and communication patterns. It also enables robust cross-examination strategies and targeted motions addressing hearsay, relevance, or privacy issues. Where credibility is central, your defense benefits from thorough witness interviews, impeachment material, and fact reconstruction. This level of preparation supports a persuasive presentation at the Article 32 hearing and at trial, ensuring the panel hears a clear, coherent narrative supported by tangible evidence.

High-stakes exposure and collateral consequences

When the exposure includes significant confinement risk, a punitive discharge, or potential registration, the cost of a misstep is too high to leave issues underdeveloped. A comprehensive defense ensures that every avenue—motions practice, expert consultations, forensic review, and in-depth witness work—is fully considered. It also addresses collateral consequences such as loss of benefits, administrative separation, and long-term career impacts. In higher-stakes cases, full-scale preparation offers more opportunities to identify weaknesses in the government’s theory and to present an alternative story backed by credible evidence, enhancing your ability to pursue the best attainable outcome.

Benefits of a comprehensive Article 120 defense

A comprehensive approach gives your defense the structure and depth needed to meet evolving allegations head-on. It synchronizes fact development, legal research, and motion practice so that each effort supports the next. By mapping timelines, gathering digital evidence, and preparing witnesses early, your team stays ahead of late surprises and shifting narratives. This approach also allows for coordinated communication with the command and thoughtful negotiation when appropriate. At Fort Barfoot and across Virginia, thorough preparation promotes fairness, keeps decision-makers focused on verifiable facts, and improves your ability to make informed choices about litigation or resolution.

Comprehensive defense planning also preserves options. When you understand the strengths and vulnerabilities of the case, you can choose whether to push toward trial, seek targeted administrative outcomes, or negotiate. Detailed preparation supports meaningful plea discussions when appropriate, and it provides leverage grounded in evidence, not speculation. It also ensures critical motions are identified and briefed on time, protecting your rights throughout. Most importantly, a broad, coordinated defense helps you maintain control, reduces uncertainty, and centers the case on facts and law rather than assumptions or rumor. That stability matters at every stage of the process.

Stronger case theory and preservation of rights

Building a compelling case theory early gives your team a framework for every decision that follows. It guides evidence collection, witness interviews, and use of digital artifacts, while ensuring Article 31(b) rights remain protected. With a clear theory, your motions and cross-examinations reinforce one another, narrowing the government’s narrative and highlighting reasonable doubt. This disciplined structure also helps avoid inconsistent statements or unnecessary disclosures. For Soldiers at Fort Barfoot, where unit dynamics and command priorities can influence a case’s direction, a strong, rights-focused defense plan keeps proceedings on track and supports fair, fact-based evaluations.

Proactive evidence development and advocacy

Proactive defense work identifies favorable evidence before it disappears. That can include surveillance footage, ride-share logs, text threads, social media metadata, and third-party witness accounts. Acting quickly prevents loss of data due to routine deletion cycles or device changes. It also allows timely requests for medical records and forensic review where needed. Early development means your counsel can confront inconsistencies at the Article 32 hearing and position the case effectively for trial or negotiation. This steady, forward-leaning approach demonstrates preparedness and helps ensure the panel sees all relevant context, not just the government’s interpretation of events.

As Featured On:

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

Top Searched Keywords

Fort Barfoot Article 120 defense
Virginia military sexual assault lawyer
UCMJ Article 120 attorney
Article 32 preliminary hearing counsel
Military court-martial defense Virginia
Consent defense under UCMJ
Mistake of fact consent defense
CID investigation rights Article 31(b)
Blackstone VA military defense lawyer

Pro tips for Soldiers facing Article 120 allegations

Invoke your rights and avoid statements

If approached by CID, NCIS, or your chain of command, politely assert your Article 31(b) rights and request counsel. Do not guess, explain, or try to talk your way out; well-intended comments often create confusion and can be used out of context later. Decline interviews and invite all inquiries to go through your lawyer. Avoid discussing the case with peers or on social media. Preserve your phone and communications, and do not delete anything. Early discipline protects your credibility, prevents misunderstandings, and helps your defense team take control of the process from the very first contact.

Preserve digital and physical evidence

Evidence disappears quickly. Save texts, call logs, photos, rideshare receipts, and location history. Screenshot content and back it up to a secure location. Identify potential witnesses and write down what they know while memories are fresh. If there are cameras at venues near Blackstone or Richmond, alert your counsel so preservation requests can be sent before footage is overwritten. Do not alter or edit materials. Provide everything to your lawyer so the defense can build a verified timeline. Timely preservation often makes the difference in demonstrating consent, challenging assumptions, and correcting incomplete or inaccurate narratives.

Move quickly to build your defense

Speed matters. Early action allows your team to locate witnesses, secure records, and request forensic materials before they become harder to obtain. At Fort Barfoot, unit movements and training cycles can make people difficult to reach, so moving quickly preserves critical context. Your lawyer will design a plan that addresses communication with the command, compliance with no-contact orders, and preparation for an Article 32 hearing if one is scheduled. This plan helps reduce uncertainty, aligns your goals with realistic options, and positions the case for the strongest possible showing should litigation become necessary.

Reasons to consult a Fort Barfoot Article 120 defense lawyer

Consulting a defense lawyer immediately provides direction when the stakes feel overwhelming. Counsel explains your rights, outlines the investigative path, and identifies the steps that support your goals, whether that means seeking administrative resolution or preparing for trial. An experienced team can identify favorable witnesses and digital proof that others might overlook. At Fort Barfoot, with its proximity to Blackstone and Richmond, local knowledge aids in locating records and coordinating with civilian entities. Having a plan helps you focus on your duties while your defense moves forward deliberately and protects your interests at each step.

Early legal guidance can also reduce collateral harm. A thoughtful strategy helps prevent unnecessary statements, social media missteps, or violations of no-contact orders that can complicate your case. Your lawyer can engage with the command to address concerns, clarify misunderstandings, and frame the issues before they harden. Whether you are facing an Article 32 hearing, administrative action, or potential referral to trial, measured counsel supports better decisions and calmer execution. If you need immediate guidance in Virginia or at Fort Barfoot, call 800-921-8607 to discuss a plan that fits your situation and priorities.

Common situations that lead to Article 120 charges

Article 120 allegations often arise from events involving alcohol, mixed messages, or rapidly changing relationships. Encounters in barracks, off-post housing, or after a night out near Blackstone or Richmond can produce incomplete or conflicting recollections. Group dynamics, rumor, and command pressures may complicate what witnesses remember or are willing to say. Digital communications, when viewed in context, frequently tell a more nuanced story than initial reports. These realities make quick preservation of texts, location data, and third-party observations essential. A calm, methodical approach helps separate assumptions from facts and brings clarity to an otherwise confusing situation.

Alcohol-fueled misunderstandings

Alcohol can blur memories, change perceptions, and complicate consent assessments. What felt consensual at the time may be described differently later, especially when peers or leadership become involved. The defense must evaluate level of impairment, timing, and communications before, during, and after the encounter. Screenshots, ride receipts, and witness accounts help reconstruct the night and clarify capacity and behavior. Medical records, if any, can inform the analysis. By organizing these details into a reliable timeline, your team can challenge assumptions and show how the totality of the circumstances fits a narrative consistent with innocence or reasonable doubt.

Barracks and off-post encounters

Encounters in barracks or off-post housing near Fort Barfoot often involve multiple witnesses and overlapping narratives. Privacy is limited, and bystanders may only see fragments that do not reflect the full context. Your defense will identify who observed what, when, and from where, then compare those accounts to digital metadata and messages. Access records, entry logs, and camera footage from nearby locations around Blackstone or Richmond can be important. Small details matter, such as timing of departures, demeanor, and whether communications afterward reflect continued contact. Collecting and organizing these facts helps present a clear, verifiable picture.

Retaliation, rumor, and miscommunication

Military environments are close-knit, and rumors can spread quickly. Personal conflicts, breakups, or social dynamics sometimes influence how events are reported or remembered. Your defense should examine whether messages, timing, or third-party pressure contributed to an evolving account. Interviewing witnesses outside the immediate circle may reveal overlooked context. Careful review of social media interactions and changes in tone can be telling, particularly when considered alongside objective data. The goal is to separate speculation from verifiable facts. By methodically documenting the record, your team can expose inconsistencies and present a grounded, fair narrative to decision-makers.

Meet Your Defense Team

Michael S. Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Michael Waddington is a best‐selling author and criminal defense attorney who represents military personnel in courts worldwide—both after charges are filed and during pre‐charge investigations—specializing in serious offenses such as war crimes, sex crimes, violent crimes, and white‐collar cases. Drawing on his rigorous discipline from Brazilian Jiu‐Jitsu, he trains both civilian and military defense lawyers in advanced cross‐examination techniques, a skillset detailed in his three popular books on the subject. His expertise is regularly sought by major media outlets—ranging from CNN and 60 Minutes to the BBC and ABC’s “Nightline”—and he has even contributed to episodes of the Golden Globe–winning series “The Good Wife.” Michael instructs both civilian and military criminal defense attorneys on the art of effectively cross-examining and discrediting adversarial witnesses. Drawing from his three best-selling books on cross-examination and years of experience confronting numerous cunning and aggressive prosecution witnesses.

Alexandra González-Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Alexandra González is a founding partner of González & Waddington Law Firm, practicing in Florida, Georgia, and military courts worldwide, where she has defended hundreds of clients charged with violent crimes, sexual assault, and white-collar offenses since 2003. She has led high-profile military sexual assault and war-crimes cases stemming from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and is regularly featured by major outlets such as 60 Minutes, ABC’s Nightline, Rolling Stone, the BBC, Fox News, and CNN. As one of the first Public Defenders for Georgia’s Augusta Judicial Circuit, she handled a broad spectrum of cases—including rape, larceny, violent crimes, and domestic violence—and she holds a J.D. from Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, where she completed the nationally ranked Integrated Trial Advocacy Program. A Georgia-registered mediator, she continues to shape the practice of military and civilian defense through her courtroom work and advocacy.

Battle-Tested Results

Recent Case Results

Gang-Rape Allegation Collapses Against Navy Officer

U.S. v. Navy O-2 – Norfolk, Virginia – Pre-Charge Defense Allegations: Rape, Conspiracy, Indecent Acts, Fraternization, Adultery, Conduct Unbecoming Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal,

Facebook Exposé Shuts Down Fake Rape Allegation in Japan

U.S. v. Marine E-6 – Iwakuni Air Base, Japan – Article 32 Hearings Allegations: Rape, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Adultery, Fraternization, Violation of an Order Max

Army Officer Beats Aggravated Assault & Conduct Unbecoming Charges

U.S. v. Army O-1 – Fort Bragg, NC / Tried at Fort McNair, Washington D.C. – General Court-Martial Allegations: Aggravated Assault with Means Likely to

Navy Sailor’s Sex Assault Case Tossed After UCI Bombshell

U.S. v. Navy E-6 – Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault Max Punishment: 40+ years confinement, Dishonorable Discharge, Sex

Cleared of Rape Charges in Wild Multi-Victim Court-Martial Drama

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Polk, LA – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Rape, Sexual Assault x4, Article 128 Assault, Total of 14 allegations

Army E-6 Beats False Sex Assault Charges at Fort Bragg

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Bragg, North Carolina – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault, Article 128 Assault Consummated by Battery, Conduct Unbecoming

Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year

U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA

Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2

Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape

U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration

Take Command of Your Defense

If you are navigating an Article 120 allegation at Fort Barfoot in Virginia, near Blackstone and Richmond, you do not have to face it alone. UCMJ Defense Lawyers will respond quickly, help protect your rights, and build a defense plan anchored in facts. We coordinate evidence collection, address command communications, and prepare for Article 32 hearings and trials when necessary. Your goals guide our approach, whether that means seeking administrative resolution or litigating. Call 800-921-8607 to discuss your situation in confidence. Prompt action can preserve options, reduce uncertainty, and support a fair, thorough evaluation of your case.

Why Soldiers choose UCMJ Defense Lawyers for Article 120 defense

Service members choose UCMJ Defense Lawyers because we deliver steady guidance, strong preparation, and clear communication at every stage. Led by Waddington and Gonzalez, our team focuses on building a fact-based narrative and protecting your rights from the first contact with investigators. We coordinate witness interviews, digital evidence preservation, and motions practice to shape the case before it reaches a panel. At Fort Barfoot and across Virginia, we understand local dynamics and work to ensure decision-makers see the complete picture, not just a snapshot. Our goal is to put you in the best position to move forward.

We know the pressure an Article 120 allegation creates for Soldiers and families. That is why we prioritize responsiveness, transparency, and collaboration. You can expect timely updates, realistic assessments, and strategies tailored to your goals. Whether the path leads to negotiation or trial, we prepare methodically and advocate firmly. We also address collateral issues such as administrative actions, no-contact orders, and career impacts. If you need focused help at Fort Barfoot or in the surrounding Blackstone and Richmond areas, call 800-921-8607. We are ready to act quickly and support you with a disciplined, evidence-driven defense.

Call Us Today

Check Out Our Newest Book

UCMJ Survival Guide

UCMJ Survival Guide: The Complete Military Justice Manual for Service Members & Families: Whether you’re facing an investigation, court-martial, Article 15 (NJP), or administrative separation, UCMJ Survival Guide is your essential resource for navigating the military justice system. Written by two of the most experienced and respected military defense lawyers in the field—Michael and Alexandra Waddington—this comprehensive guide delivers clear, actionable strategies to protect your career, reputation, and future. Michael and Alexandra are among the top military defense lawyers and recognized as some of the most experienced sexual assault defense attorneys in the country. They have successfully defended service members in high-profile Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault cases, complex court-martials, and administrative separation proceedings across all branches of the U.S. military.

UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers

Worldwide Military Defense Experience

Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation

The González & Waddington Law Firm’s global reach sets them apart from regional military defense attorneys. With active cases spanning from Fort Bragg to forward operating bases in combat zones, from Norfolk Naval Station to remote Air Force installations, their practice truly encompasses the worldwide nature of modern military service.

Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses

War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense

The most serious charges under the UCMJ require the most experienced defense attorneys. The González & Waddington Law Firm has built its reputation by successfully defending service members against the gravest allegations—cases where the stakes couldn’t be higher and the margin for error is virtually nonexistent.

Media and High-Profile Case Experience

Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets

The legal expertise of Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington has garnered attention from the world’s most prestigious media outlets, a testament to their standing as leading authorities in military criminal defense. This media recognition reflects not only their legal acumen but also their ability to handle high-stakes cases under intense public scrutiny.

Playlist

7 Videos

González & Waddington - Court Martial Lawyers - Military Defense Lawyers