Fort Barfoot Administrative Separation Boards Defense Lawyer

Q: MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS

MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS LEGAL DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES MILITARY DEFENSE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS INVESTIGATIONS

Q: MILITARY BOARDS & HEARINGS

MILITARY BOARDS & HEARINGS ADMINISTRATIVE & DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ARMY AIR FORCE SPACE FORCE NAVY MARINE CORPS COAST GUARD

Q: UCMJ OFFENSES

UCMJ OFFENSES UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE SEX CRIMES SEXUAL HARASSMENT VIOLENT CRIMES PROPERTY & FINANCIAL INTEGRITY & TRUTH MILITARY CONDUCT CYBER & MISCONDUCT

Understanding Army Administrative Separation Boards at Fort Barfoot, Virginia

An administrative separation board can change the course of a Soldier’s life. At Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia, commanders may send you to a board to determine whether you should be retained or separated, and what characterization of service you receive. The outcome can affect your benefits, reentry code, reputation, and future employment in the United States. The process moves quickly, evidence rules differ from court-martial practice, and your chain of command controls much of the timeline. Having a clear plan, strong evidence, and confident advocacy helps you present the full story of your service. If you face board proceedings at Fort Barfoot, act early to protect your record and your future.

UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers, led by attorneys Waddington and Gonzalez, defends Soldiers before administrative separation boards across the country, including Fort Barfoot and installations throughout Virginia. Our team brings a battle-tested approach to board practice, from building mitigation to cross-examining witnesses and challenging paperwork errors. We coordinate closely with families and commands to keep cases on track, and we are available to travel to Blackstone for hearings and preparation sessions. Call 800-921-8607 to request a confidential case review. Whether your case involves alleged misconduct, substandard performance, or a pattern of issues, we work to protect your career, benefits, and hard-earned reputation while guiding you through every step.

Why Separation Board Defense Matters for Soldiers Near Blackstone

A well-run defense at an administrative separation board can preserve more than a uniform; it can safeguard healthcare access, GI Bill eligibility, and future opportunities. Boards at Fort Barfoot consider your entire career, not just allegations, and targeted advocacy helps members see your achievements, deployments, and character. Effective counsel helps secure favorable witnesses, frame your narrative, and challenge weak, stale, or uncorroborated evidence. Even when separation is likely, a strong presentation can improve characterization and narrative reason, protecting employability and veterans’ benefits. For Soldiers stationed in or near Blackstone, Virginia, timely guidance ensures deadlines are met, discovery is obtained, and your rights under Army regulations are fully exercised from the outset.

About UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers and Our Track Record

UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers is a Military Defense Law Firm known for handling high-stakes cases at installations worldwide, including administrative separations and courts-martial. Led by Waddington and Gonzalez, the firm blends courtroom skill with boardroom strategy, focusing on meticulous preparation, persuasive storytelling, and relentless attention to detail. We coordinate with character witnesses, compile performance records, and expose procedural flaws to shape the board’s perspective. Our team routinely travels to Fort Barfoot and other Virginia locations to meet Soldiers, conduct mock boards, and prepare evidence binders. We provide clear communication, straightforward guidance, and steady advocacy designed to protect careers while respecting the realities of military life and chain-of-command expectations.

Guide to Defending an Administrative Separation at Fort Barfoot

Administrative separation boards decide whether a Soldier should be retained or discharged and, if separated, the characterization of service. The board at Fort Barfoot typically includes three members who review evidence, hear testimony, and ask questions. The government presents a case through documents and witnesses, and the Soldier has the right to counsel, to present evidence, and to call and cross-examine witnesses. Because the standard of proof is preponderance of the evidence, targeted responses to allegations and strong mitigation can make a decisive difference. Understanding the local practice near Blackstone, Virginia, and anticipating how members view credibility and leadership potential are key to a stronger defense.

Preparation starts with early discovery requests, a clean timeline of events, and a curated packet of achievements, awards, and evaluations. Your defense should connect performance and character with the mission at Fort Barfoot and your future value to the Army. Identify discrepancies, policy misapplications, and hearsay that weakens the government’s case. Decide strategically whether to testify, and if so, rehearse difficult questions. Secure letters from leaders, peers, and subordinates who can speak to integrity and teamwork. Above all, meet deadlines, track delivery of exhibits, and keep the record organized. Precision and clarity help the board weigh your service fairly and see retention as a reasonable outcome.

What Is an Administrative Separation Board?

An administrative separation board is a panel of three members that reviews allegations of misconduct or substandard performance and recommends whether to retain or separate a Soldier. Soldiers with sufficient time in service or facing an Other Than Honorable risk generally have a right to a board. The process is less formal than a court-martial, yet outcomes can be life-changing. At Fort Barfoot, the board hears evidence, weighs credibility, and recommends retention or separation with a characterization such as Honorable, General, or Other Than Honorable. The Separation Authority makes the final decision after considering the record and the board’s recommendations.

Core Elements and Procedures in a Fort Barfoot Board

Key features include the appointment of board members, a recorder, and counsel; notice to the Soldier; access to discovery; and the opportunity to present a defense. The government must prove the basis for separation by a preponderance of the evidence. The Soldier may present documents, testimony, and argument, and can challenge witnesses and exhibits. After evidence closes, the board deliberates on findings, retention or separation, and characterization. The recorder prepares a summarized record, which goes to the Separation Authority for the final decision. At Fort Barfoot, coordination with units in Blackstone, Virginia, is essential to align witness availability, facility scheduling, and command timelines.

Key Terms and Separation Board Glossary

Separation board language can feel unfamiliar, especially when the timeline is tight and the stakes are high. Understanding common terms helps you follow the process, communicate clearly with counsel, and make smart decisions about evidence and testimony. Whether your case involves notification or board procedures, the characterization of service and the Separation Authority’s role will shape your future. The following glossary clarifies frequent phrases used at Fort Barfoot and across Army installations in the United States. Use these definitions to decode correspondence, prepare your packet, and anticipate how the board will evaluate the record and recommend retention or separation.

Notification Procedure

The notification procedure is a streamlined separation process used for certain cases where a board is not required. The Soldier receives written notice describing the basis, recommended characterization, and rights. The Soldier may submit a written rebuttal and supporting documents within a set timeframe. While there is no live board, well-crafted responses, evaluations, and letters can influence the final outcome. At Fort Barfoot, attention to deadlines and accurate delivery of rebuttal materials is essential. Even under notification, errors in evidence, missing counseling, or inconsistent documentation can justify retention or a more favorable characterization.

Characterization of Service

Characterization of service is the description placed on a discharge: Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), or Other Than Honorable. It affects benefits, employment prospects, and how future employers perceive your military record. Boards at Fort Barfoot weigh the whole person, balancing the basis for separation against achievements and conduct. Strong mitigation packages, credible testimony, and a clear plan for future service can influence the board toward a more favorable characterization. Even when separation is recommended, shaping the narrative reason and characterization can protect long-term opportunities and support post-service success in Virginia and beyond.

Administrative Board Procedure

Administrative board procedure applies when a Soldier has the right to a hearing before a three-member panel. The government presents evidence through a recorder, witnesses, and exhibits. The Soldier, with counsel, can challenge the evidence, present alternative explanations, and call witnesses. The standard is preponderance of the evidence, and the rules of evidence are relaxed. After deliberation, the board recommends retention or separation and a characterization. At Fort Barfoot, the process also involves unit coordination, room scheduling, and timely exchange of exhibits, making early preparation and thorough organization vital to a persuasive presentation.

Separation Authority

The Separation Authority is the commander empowered to approve or disapprove the board’s recommendations. This official reviews the full record, including the board’s findings, evidence, and any written submissions from the Soldier. While the board’s recommendation carries weight, the Separation Authority makes the final decision on retention, discharge, and characterization of service. At Fort Barfoot, communicating key points in a concise post-board memorandum, supported by exhibits and endorsements, can help ensure your strongest arguments are seen and understood before the decision is signed and forwarded for final processing.

Comparing Your Defense Options at Fort Barfoot

Some Soldiers choose a narrow approach focused on a single theme, while others pursue a comprehensive defense built on multiple lines of proof. A limited strategy may highlight exemplary performance, a clean record, and a credible explanation that resolves the allegation. A comprehensive plan layers mitigation, procedural challenges, witness testimony, and well-prepared rebuttals. At Fort Barfoot, the right path depends on the evidence, your goals, and risk of adverse characterization. A tailored approach can conserve resources when the record favors you, while a broader strategy helps when allegations are wide-ranging or when an Other Than Honorable outcome is possible.

When a Targeted, Limited Strategy Can Work:

Clear Record With Minor Allegation

A focused strategy can succeed when the allegation is isolated and your service record is strong. If you have positive NCOERs or OERs, documented achievements, and supportive leaders at Fort Barfoot, concentrating on context and clarification can be persuasive. Emphasize corrective action you took, training you completed, and how the incident contrasts with your overall performance. Provide letters from supervisors and Soldiers who directly observed your conduct. In Blackstone, Virginia, many board members value candor and accountability. Showing the board that the issue is understood, addressed, and unlikely to recur can make retention a reasonable, mission-aligned choice.

Administrative Error or Weak Evidence

If the government’s exhibits contain mistakes, inconsistent statements, or policy misapplications, a targeted approach may be enough. Point out flawed counseling, missing signatures, improper urinalysis handling, or hearsay that lacks meaningful corroboration. When documentation does not support the alleged pattern, highlight accurate records, training rosters, and deployment calendars from Fort Barfoot to correct the narrative. In some cases, the board can resolve doubts in your favor without extensive mitigation if the facts are clarified. Precision matters: organize exhibits, label timelines, and use credible witnesses to explain discrepancies so the record reliably reflects what actually happened.

When You Need Full-Scale Separation Defense:

Risk of an Other Than Honorable Discharge

When an Other Than Honorable is on the table, the long-term impact on veterans’ benefits, employability, and reputation demands a thorough defense. A comprehensive plan at Fort Barfoot weaves procedural challenges with mitigation, credibility assessments, and carefully prepared testimony. It may include detailed performance summaries, leadership endorsements, behavioral health records where appropriate, and post-incident rehabilitation. The goal is to give the board a full picture of your service and potential. By addressing the allegation, demonstrating growth, and presenting a constructive path forward, you maximize the chance of retention or a more favorable characterization in Virginia.

Pattern Allegations or Sensitive Misconduct

Allegations involving patterns of misconduct, drugs, fraternization, or sensitive incidents require layered preparation. A comprehensive defense near Blackstone might involve detailed witness interviews, cross-examination plans, and carefully curated exhibits that challenge consistency and motive. Where appropriate, obtain records that show training, duty demands, and stressors relevant to the allegation. Consider neutral subject-matter consultants for technical issues, such as forensic toxicology explanations or digital data interpretation. When multiple events are alleged, narrative structure is paramount. Organize themes, anticipate board questions, and present a coherent alternative that aligns with your record and the mission at Fort Barfoot.

Benefits of a Thorough Separation Defense

A thorough defense helps you control the story and reduces the risk of surprises. By gathering records, building a timeline, and preparing witnesses early, you improve accuracy and credibility. At Fort Barfoot, a comprehensive approach highlights your contributions to the unit, explains the context behind allegations, and proposes realistic corrective measures. Even if separation occurs, a strong presentation can steer the board toward a better characterization, protect benefits, and minimize long-term consequences. The process also preserves a clear, organized record for any later reviews or applications, which can be valuable if you seek relief after leaving the service.

Comprehensive preparation also builds confidence. Knowing what each witness will say, how exhibits support your themes, and which questions to anticipate allows you to stay focused when it matters most. The board sees a service member who is prepared, accountable, and committed to improvement. That impression matters in Blackstone, Virginia, where board members balance discipline with readiness and retention needs. Thorough planning allows flexibility if circumstances change, such as a witness becoming unavailable or new documents surfacing. With a resilient strategy, you can adapt quickly and keep your strongest arguments front and center for the board’s consideration.

Preserve Career, Benefits, and Reputation

A complete defense maximizes the chance of retention or, if separation is recommended, a more favorable characterization. That protects access to education, healthcare, and future employment options. At Fort Barfoot, demonstrating consistent performance, leadership potential, and a plan for continued service can resonate with board members. Letters from respected leaders, training certifications, and deployment records tell a compelling story of value to the Army. When allegations overshadow achievements, a comprehensive record helps restore balance. Even post-service, employers and licensing bodies in the United States often review characterization and narrative reasons, making a well-prepared board record an important asset.

Control the Narrative and the Evidence

When you shape the narrative, you prevent misunderstandings from defining your career. Comprehensive preparation ensures that performance evaluations, awards, and witness statements are organized and presented clearly. At Fort Barfoot, that means timely exhibit exchanges, polished witness outlines, and a concise closing argument that links evidence to your themes. If the government relies on hearsay or incomplete records, a well-structured rebuttal shows the board where gaps exist. The result is a hearing focused on accurate facts and fair context, not assumptions. By steering the conversation with credible documentation, you help the board reach a balanced, well-supported outcome.

As Featured On:

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

Top Searched Keywords

Fort Barfoot administrative separation
Army separation board defense lawyer
Blackstone Virginia military lawyer
UCMJ administrative discharge defense
Characterization of service board
Separation Authority appeal
Army notification procedure rebuttal
Administrative board preparation tips
Virginia military defense law firm

Pro Tips for Fort Barfoot Separation Boards

Document Everything Early

Start building your packet the day you receive notice. Gather NCOERs or OERs, awards, training rosters, PT scores, counseling statements, and deployment records. Ask leaders and peers who know your work at Fort Barfoot to write specific, fact-based letters with dates, duties, and examples of reliability. Maintain a running index so you can track exhibits, page numbers, and delivery to the recorder. Document corrective actions you’ve taken, such as classes, counseling, or mentorship. Early organization reduces last-minute stress, helps witnesses prepare, and shows board members you respect the process. Strong documentation can shift focus from allegations to your proven value.

Request Discovery and Build a Timeline

File discovery requests promptly and follow up to ensure you receive all documents the government will rely on. Build a simple timeline that places each allegation against training calendars, duty rosters, and communications. Timelines reveal gaps, contradictions, or misunderstandings that you can explain with exhibits and witness testimony. At Fort Barfoot, confirm facilities, witness availability, and exhibit deadlines early to avoid surprises. Share your timeline with counsel to refine defenses and anticipate questions from board members. A clear, well-supported sequence of events can be one of the most persuasive tools in a board room in Blackstone, Virginia.

Prepare to Testify—or Not

Deciding whether to testify is strategic. Work with counsel to weigh benefits against risks, and rehearse direct and cross-examination if you choose to speak. Practice answering tough questions briefly and honestly while linking your responses to exhibits. If you do not testify, ensure your themes are fully presented through documents and witnesses. At Fort Barfoot, a polished closing argument can synthesize evidence whether or not you take the stand. Either way, plan for credibility: consistent details, calm delivery, and respect for the process. Preparation helps board members focus on your service, potential, and the fairness of the requested outcome.

Reasons to Hire a Separation Board Defense Lawyer

Counsel who understands administrative separation practice brings structure to a stressful process. A lawyer ensures deadlines are met, discovery is complete, and exhibits are properly exchanged and labeled. At Fort Barfoot, coordination with units and witnesses can be challenging without guidance. Your attorney helps secure character statements, prepare witnesses, and practice testimony that connects evidence to your themes. When allegations are complex, professional advocacy helps board members see the full picture of your service and potential, not just accusations. The result is a hearing grounded in facts, context, and a clear plan for retention or a fair characterization.

Legal representation also protects your rights. From objecting to unreliable hearsay to identifying regulatory errors, counsel keeps the record accurate and preserves issues for review. In Blackstone, Virginia, where timelines move quickly, you need someone to track suspenses, coordinate logistics, and ensure your presentation is complete. Your lawyer helps you decide whether to testify, crafts a concise closing argument, and prepares post-board submissions to the Separation Authority. Even if separation occurs, a strong record can support future petitions. Investing in a disciplined defense now can preserve benefits, protect employability, and honor the service you have given the Army.

Common Situations Leading to Fort Barfoot Boards

Boards often follow allegations of misconduct, repeated counseling, or substandard performance. At Fort Barfoot, common triggers include patterns of minor infractions, fitness or body composition failures, or a serious incident that brings command scrutiny. Some cases grow from administrative misunderstandings, documentation errors, or misapplied policies. Others involve off-post events that spill into the workplace. Understanding the true source of the board and how the command perceives risk is key to shaping your defense. A clear plan focused on credibility, context, and corrective action helps the board evaluate your value to the mission in Blackstone and across the Army.

Pattern of Minor Misconduct

Multiple small issues can accumulate into a separation case even when none would stand alone. Missed appointments, tardiness, or counseling for workplace friction may be cited as a pattern. The defense focuses on context, corrective training, and improved performance over time. At Fort Barfoot, demonstrating that leaders engaged you constructively and that you responded with measurable progress helps rebut the idea that problems will continue. Provide calendars, duty rosters, and supervisor letters that show reliability and growth. Where a misunderstanding exists, clear documentation and credible testimony can shift the board’s view from separation toward retention and mentorship.

Failed Fitness, Body Composition, or Rehabilitation

Fitness and body composition issues can lead to board action if counseling and rehabilitation do not resolve concerns. Your defense should address medical factors, training plans, and measurable improvements. Provide PT test records, nutrition counseling notes, and corroborating statements from leaders at Fort Barfoot who observed your efforts. If a failure was caused by documented illness, injury, or medication, include medical records that explain timing and impact. Boards value genuine progress and accountability. A detailed plan for continued improvement, tied to duties and mission needs in Blackstone, Virginia, can persuade members that retention is a sound, responsible choice.

Allegations of Serious Misconduct

Serious allegations can prompt a board even without a court-martial. The government may rely on statements, digital evidence, or urinalysis results. The defense should examine reliability, chain-of-custody, and alternative explanations while building mitigation that reflects your entire career. At Fort Barfoot, prepare to challenge inconsistencies, explore motive and context, and present credible witnesses. If you have engaged in rehabilitation or counseling, document it with specificity. A thorough approach demonstrates responsibility and progress without conceding allegations that are unsupported. Board members must weigh both risk and value; your job is to show a path that serves the mission and fairness.

Meet Your Defense Team

Michael S. Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Michael Waddington is a best‐selling author and criminal defense attorney who represents military personnel in courts worldwide—both after charges are filed and during pre‐charge investigations—specializing in serious offenses such as war crimes, sex crimes, violent crimes, and white‐collar cases. Drawing on his rigorous discipline from Brazilian Jiu‐Jitsu, he trains both civilian and military defense lawyers in advanced cross‐examination techniques, a skillset detailed in his three popular books on the subject. His expertise is regularly sought by major media outlets—ranging from CNN and 60 Minutes to the BBC and ABC’s “Nightline”—and he has even contributed to episodes of the Golden Globe–winning series “The Good Wife.” Michael instructs both civilian and military criminal defense attorneys on the art of effectively cross-examining and discrediting adversarial witnesses. Drawing from his three best-selling books on cross-examination and years of experience confronting numerous cunning and aggressive prosecution witnesses.

Alexandra González-Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Alexandra González is a founding partner of González & Waddington Law Firm, practicing in Florida, Georgia, and military courts worldwide, where she has defended hundreds of clients charged with violent crimes, sexual assault, and white-collar offenses since 2003. She has led high-profile military sexual assault and war-crimes cases stemming from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and is regularly featured by major outlets such as 60 Minutes, ABC’s Nightline, Rolling Stone, the BBC, Fox News, and CNN. As one of the first Public Defenders for Georgia’s Augusta Judicial Circuit, she handled a broad spectrum of cases—including rape, larceny, violent crimes, and domestic violence—and she holds a J.D. from Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, where she completed the nationally ranked Integrated Trial Advocacy Program. A Georgia-registered mediator, she continues to shape the practice of military and civilian defense through her courtroom work and advocacy.

Battle-Tested Results

Recent Case Results

Gang-Rape Allegation Collapses Against Navy Officer

U.S. v. Navy O-2 – Norfolk, Virginia – Pre-Charge Defense Allegations: Rape, Conspiracy, Indecent Acts, Fraternization, Adultery, Conduct Unbecoming Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal,

Facebook Exposé Shuts Down Fake Rape Allegation in Japan

U.S. v. Marine E-6 – Iwakuni Air Base, Japan – Article 32 Hearings Allegations: Rape, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Adultery, Fraternization, Violation of an Order Max

Army Officer Beats Aggravated Assault & Conduct Unbecoming Charges

U.S. v. Army O-1 – Fort Bragg, NC / Tried at Fort McNair, Washington D.C. – General Court-Martial Allegations: Aggravated Assault with Means Likely to

Navy Sailor’s Sex Assault Case Tossed After UCI Bombshell

U.S. v. Navy E-6 – Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault Max Punishment: 40+ years confinement, Dishonorable Discharge, Sex

Cleared of Rape Charges in Wild Multi-Victim Court-Martial Drama

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Polk, LA – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Rape, Sexual Assault x4, Article 128 Assault, Total of 14 allegations

Army E-6 Beats False Sex Assault Charges at Fort Bragg

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Bragg, North Carolina – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault, Article 128 Assault Consummated by Battery, Conduct Unbecoming

Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year

U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA

Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2

Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape

U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration

Take Command of Your Defense

If you are facing an administrative separation board at Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia, UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers is ready to help. We answer questions, review notices, and map a plan tailored to your goals. Our team coordinates witness preparation, organizes exhibits, and ensures your voice is heard. Call 800-921-8607 to schedule a confidential consultation. We travel to Virginia and work closely with Soldiers and families across the United States. Your service deserves a fair hearing, a clear strategy, and steady advocacy from start to finish.

Why Soldiers Choose UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers for Separation Boards

Service members choose UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers because our team delivers disciplined preparation and persuasive advocacy at installations worldwide, including Fort Barfoot. Led by Waddington and Gonzalez, we focus on the details that matter: timely discovery, credible witnesses, and clear, organized exhibits. We conduct mock boards, refine themes, and craft concise closing arguments that connect the evidence to your goals. Our approach blends boardroom strategy with real-world understanding of command priorities in Blackstone, Virginia. That combination helps the panel see you as a valuable teammate with a plan for success.

From the first call to post-board submissions, you receive direct communication and practical guidance. We build mitigation packets that highlight achievements, leadership potential, and rehabilitation. We coordinate with your schedule, travel to prepare you in person when needed, and keep your case on track despite tight timelines. Our firm has defended Soldiers across the United States, and we bring that experience to every Fort Barfoot case. When your career and benefits are on the line, choose a defense team known for preparation, persistence, and steady advocacy that respects your service and your future.

Call Us Today

Check Out Our Newest Book

UCMJ Survival Guide

UCMJ Survival Guide: The Complete Military Justice Manual for Service Members & Families: Whether you’re facing an investigation, court-martial, Article 15 (NJP), or administrative separation, UCMJ Survival Guide is your essential resource for navigating the military justice system. Written by two of the most experienced and respected military defense lawyers in the field—Michael and Alexandra Waddington—this comprehensive guide delivers clear, actionable strategies to protect your career, reputation, and future. Michael and Alexandra are among the top military defense lawyers and recognized as some of the most experienced sexual assault defense attorneys in the country. They have successfully defended service members in high-profile Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault cases, complex court-martials, and administrative separation proceedings across all branches of the U.S. military.

UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers

Worldwide Military Defense Experience

Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation

The González & Waddington Law Firm’s global reach sets them apart from regional military defense attorneys. With active cases spanning from Fort Bragg to forward operating bases in combat zones, from Norfolk Naval Station to remote Air Force installations, their practice truly encompasses the worldwide nature of modern military service.

Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses

War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense

The most serious charges under the UCMJ require the most experienced defense attorneys. The González & Waddington Law Firm has built its reputation by successfully defending service members against the gravest allegations—cases where the stakes couldn’t be higher and the margin for error is virtually nonexistent.

Media and High-Profile Case Experience

Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets

The legal expertise of Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington has garnered attention from the world’s most prestigious media outlets, a testament to their standing as leading authorities in military criminal defense. This media recognition reflects not only their legal acumen but also their ability to handle high-stakes cases under intense public scrutiny.

Playlist

7 Videos

González & Waddington - Court Martial Lawyers - Military Defense Lawyers