Fort Barfoot Court-Martial Defense Lawyers

Q: MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS

MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS LEGAL DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES MILITARY DEFENSE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS INVESTIGATIONS

Q: MILITARY BOARDS & HEARINGS

MILITARY BOARDS & HEARINGS ADMINISTRATIVE & DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ARMY AIR FORCE SPACE FORCE NAVY MARINE CORPS COAST GUARD

Q: UCMJ OFFENSES

UCMJ OFFENSES UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE SEX CRIMES SEXUAL HARASSMENT VIOLENT CRIMES PROPERTY & FINANCIAL INTEGRITY & TRUTH MILITARY CONDUCT CYBER & MISCONDUCT

Understanding Court-Martial Defense at Fort Barfoot, Virginia

Facing a court-martial at Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia, United States, can put your rank, career, and future on the line. The Uniform Code of Military Justice is complex, and early decisions often shape the outcome. UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers, led by Waddington and Gonzalez, defends Soldiers across the Army, including those stationed at Fort Barfoot and throughout the region. We guide clients through investigations, preferral, and trial with focused strategy and clear communication. If you’re under investigation or have received notice of charges, do not go it alone. Call 800-921-8607 to discuss your situation and protect your rights from the start.

From the first interview to the final findings, your actions matter. Statements to law enforcement, interactions with command, and social media activity can all impact a case at Fort Barfoot. Our team helps you understand your options, whether you face Article 15, an Article 32 preliminary hearing, or referral to a general or special court-martial. We coordinate with local procedures near Blackstone and greater central Virginia, and we’re prepared to travel to meet the needs of Soldiers stationed here. With thoughtful planning, measured advocacy, and thorough preparation, you can move forward with confidence and a plan tailored to your goals.

Why Strong Court-Martial Defense Matters for Fort Barfoot Soldiers

Court-martial proceedings carry serious consequences, including confinement, discharge, loss of pay, and damage to your clearance and reputation. A proven defense approach helps manage risk and pursue favorable outcomes through early engagement, targeted motions, and strategic negotiations. Effective counsel brings perspective on local practice in Virginia, case law, and the realities of trial before a military panel. For Soldiers at Fort Barfoot near Blackstone, a well-planned defense can protect your career, preserve retirement prospects, and support future civilian opportunities. Whether your case calls for negotiation or trial, proactive representation helps safeguard your rights and positions you for the best path forward.

About UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers: Waddington & Gonzalez

UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers represents service members worldwide, including Soldiers stationed at Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia. Led by Waddington and Gonzalez, our firm brings battle-tested courtroom skills, meticulous case preparation, and a client-focused approach to every matter. We have appeared across Army posts and understand the unique demands of military justice and the pressures Soldiers face both on and off duty. From investigations to sentencing, we focus on clear communication and solid strategy. When your career, liberty, and reputation are on the line, our team provides the steady guidance and tireless advocacy you need to move forward with confidence.

Guide to the Court-Martial Process at Fort Barfoot

The court-martial process typically begins with an investigation, followed by preferral and possible referral of charges. Depending on case type, you may face an Article 32 preliminary hearing, discovery, motions practice, plea negotiations, trial, and sentencing. Post-trial review and appeals may also follow. Each step presents opportunities to challenge the government’s evidence, develop defense themes, and seek resolution aligned with your goals. Understanding timelines, how evidence is handled, and the roles of counsel, convening authorities, and panels is essential. With focused guidance, you can make smart, timely decisions that protect your rights and best interests at every stage.

Fort Barfoot’s location near Blackstone, Virginia, means your case proceeds within a local military community while often intersecting with regional civilian agencies. Commands at Fort Barfoot coordinate with law enforcement and legal offices that follow specific procedures and expectations. Knowing how local practice impacts investigations, interviews, and motions helps shape a strong plan. Our team navigates these dynamics, prepares witnesses, and organizes evidence to fit both the UCMJ and regional realities. Whether your matter involves on-post incidents, training events, or off-post allegations with on-post implications, we work to ensure your defense is thorough, strategic, and responsive to the environment.

What Is a Court-Martial Under the UCMJ?

A court-martial is the military’s criminal trial system governed by the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It addresses offenses ranging from alleged misconduct in training to off-duty accusations that affect good order and discipline. Depending on the charge and severity, a case may proceed as a summary, special, or general court-martial. Like civilian courts, the process includes investigation, arraignment, motions, trial, and sentencing, but features unique rules, panels, and command involvement. For Soldiers at Fort Barfoot, understanding how military law differs from civilian practice is essential to making informed choices and protecting your career, freedom, and future.

Key Stages and Players in a Court-Martial

Essential stages include investigation, preferral of charges, referral by the convening authority, and, for qualifying cases, an Article 32 preliminary hearing. Discovery, motions, and negotiations follow, leading to trial or resolution. Key participants include the accused, defense counsel, trial counsel, the military judge, and the panel in contested cases. Each has specific duties and powers that influence outcomes. Understanding rights related to silence, search, counsel, and evidence is vital. At Fort Barfoot in Virginia, local command policies and regional practices can shape how interviews, inspections, and pretrial decisions unfold. Knowing this landscape helps your defense anticipate challenges and seize opportunities.

Key UCMJ Terms Soldiers Should Know

Military justice uses terms that carry practical consequences for Soldiers at Fort Barfoot. Knowing the difference between Article 15, Article 32, and referral can shape your response and protect your rights. Understanding the types of courts-martial helps you anticipate potential exposure and plan a strategy that matches the risks. This glossary highlights common terms you will hear during investigations and pretrial conferences in Blackstone, Virginia, and throughout the United States. Use it as a starting point to ask informed questions, understand timelines, and coordinate with your defense team to build a smart, effective defense grounded in the realities of the UCMJ.

Article 15 (Nonjudicial Punishment)

Article 15 is a command-level process to address alleged misconduct without a court-martial. Punishments can include extra duties, restriction, and reduction in grade, depending on rank and circumstances. While not a criminal conviction, it can still impact promotions, assignments, and future opportunities. You have rights, including the ability in many cases to demand trial by court-martial instead. Deciding whether to accept or turn down Article 15 at Fort Barfoot requires understanding the allegations, available evidence, and likely outcomes. A careful review with counsel helps determine whether negotiation, rebuttal evidence, or demanding trial best protects your career in Virginia.

Article 32 Preliminary Hearing

An Article 32 preliminary hearing evaluates whether probable cause exists to proceed to a general court-martial. The defense can cross-examine witnesses and present evidence, subject to rules and limitations. It provides an opportunity to test the government’s case, preserve testimony, and gather insight into trial strategy. For Soldiers at Fort Barfoot near Blackstone, preparation for Article 32 is critical to shaping motions, plea discussions, and trial themes. While not a full trial, the hearing can influence referral decisions and reveal weaknesses in the case. Thorough planning with your defense team maximizes this chance to challenge assumptions and refine your approach.

Preferral and Referral of Charges

Preferral is the formal act of swearing charges against a service member, often following an investigation. Referral occurs when the convening authority sends those charges to a particular level of court-martial. These decisions affect the potential maximum punishment and the procedural path of the case. At Fort Barfoot in Virginia, early engagement before referral can be pivotal, allowing the defense to present mitigation, challenge evidence, or negotiate case disposition. Understanding command considerations and the documentation supporting preferral and referral helps your team anticipate next steps. Timely advocacy can influence venue, charge selection, and whether a case advances toward trial.

General, Special, and Summary Courts-Martial

Courts-martial come in three types. A summary court-martial is streamlined and typically reserved for minor offenses, with limited rights and punishments. A special court-martial handles mid-level allegations, with a military judge and, in many cases, a panel. A general court-martial addresses the most serious offenses and carries the highest potential punishments. For Soldiers at Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia, the type of court-martial shapes strategy, sentencing exposure, and how evidence is presented. Selecting the right approach—motions practice, negotiations, or trial—requires a clear view of the forum, the government’s case, and your goals, both short-term and long-term.

Comparing Limited Actions and Full Court-Martial Defense

Not every allegation at Fort Barfoot requires an all-out litigation posture. Some cases benefit from targeted steps that address command concerns while minimizing risk and disruption. Others demand comprehensive defense with aggressive investigation, motions, and trial readiness. The right choice turns on the strength of the government’s evidence, the forum, and your career priorities. A calibrated strategy may involve rebuttal packages, character evidence, or well-timed negotiations in Virginia. Conversely, complex cases often require deep dives into digital forensics, witness credibility, and procedural safeguards. An honest assessment helps match resources to stakes, preserving leverage while positioning you for the best outcome.

When a Targeted, Limited Approach Can Work:

Minor Misconduct Addressed at the Command Level

For lower-level allegations handled through counseling, locally filed letters, or potential Article 15 at Fort Barfoot, a focused presentation to command may resolve concerns without escalating to court-martial. Preparing a thorough rebuttal, documenting corrective actions, and offering credible character evidence can be persuasive. Many Soldiers in Blackstone, Virginia, benefit from early engagement that separates misunderstandings from misconduct and demonstrates accountability. A limited approach can reduce stress, conserve resources, and protect future opportunities while keeping the door open for stronger responses if needed. The key is disciplined planning and a clear narrative aligned with both the facts and command expectations.

Early Resolution Through Smart Negotiation

Some cases at Fort Barfoot can be resolved early by identifying what the command truly needs to feel confident in a fair outcome. That may include targeted counseling, restitution, or alternative disposition. By assessing weaknesses in the evidence and presenting mitigation tied to your service record, you can often negotiate terms that avoid the uncertainty of trial. In Virginia’s military community, timely communication and professional advocacy matter. Negotiation is not surrender; it is strategy. When used wisely, it narrows issues, limits exposure, and lets you move forward without the delays and risks that come with a full litigation posture.

When You Need a Full-Scale Court-Martial Defense:

Serious Charges or Complex Evidence

High-level allegations, multiple specifications, or cases driven by digital forensics, medical issues, or contested witness credibility typically require a comprehensive defense. At Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia, that means coordinated investigation, expert consultation where appropriate, and a well-sequenced motions strategy. Complex cases demand a deep review of interviews, search procedures, and data handling to uncover weaknesses and suppress unlawfully obtained evidence. Thorough preparation builds leverage for negotiations and readiness for trial. When the government’s theory relies on assumptions, timelines, or unreliable technology, a full-scale approach is often the only way to level the playing field and protect your future.

High-Stakes Consequences and Collateral Risks

If your case could affect a security clearance, professional license, retirement eligibility, or civilian employment, a comprehensive strategy is often warranted. In Virginia, collateral consequences can follow you beyond Fort Barfoot, impacting opportunities for years. A thorough defense looks beyond guilt or innocence to manage long-term risks through mitigation, character development, and careful sentencing planning if needed. It also addresses publicity, digital footprints, and family considerations. By building a record that highlights service, rehabilitation, and context, your team can advocate effectively before trial, during proceedings, and at sentencing. The goal is to protect the whole person, not just the case.

Benefits of a Comprehensive Defense Strategy

A comprehensive strategy allows your defense to anticipate government arguments, identify evidentiary flaws, and set the pace of litigation. At Fort Barfoot, where cases may move quickly, being prepared with witnesses, timelines, and targeted motions can shift leverage and enhance negotiation outcomes. Thorough preparation ensures you are ready for trial while keeping every resolution option on the table. It also helps align your objectives with practical opportunities, from charge adjustments to favorable stipulations. The result is a defense that is organized, responsive, and capable of adapting to developments in Blackstone, Virginia, and across the broader military justice system.

Comprehensive preparation pays dividends at sentencing if a case proceeds to findings. Mitigation packages, service histories, and rehabilitation plans help present the full story of the Soldier behind the allegations. For Fort Barfoot cases, thoughtful presentations to the panel or judge can influence outcomes and support post-trial matters. A broader strategy also supports appeals by preserving issues and creating a clear record. Beyond the courtroom, it helps manage command perceptions and maintain unit relationships. Most importantly, it places you in control of your narrative, showing a committed, disciplined response that protects your future in Virginia and beyond.

Stronger Case Development and Motion Practice

Comprehensive defense means testing every assumption and using motions strategically to shape the case. At Fort Barfoot, that includes challenging searches, interviews, identification procedures, and digital extractions. Effective motions can suppress unreliable evidence, exclude prejudicial material, or compel discovery that reveals weaknesses in the government’s theory. With a well-documented timeline, focused cross-examinations, and persuasive themes, your defense sets the tempo rather than reacting. Thorough case development also refines plea negotiations by clarifying risk and exposing litigation hazards, often leading to more favorable terms. The result is a defense built on facts, law, and preparation, not wishful thinking.

Persuasive Sentencing Mitigation if Needed

If a case proceeds to sentencing, a comprehensive approach ensures you are ready to present a complete, compelling picture of your service and character. In Virginia, panels and judges respond to credible mitigation: performance records, deployment history, mentorship, community ties, and rehabilitation steps. At Fort Barfoot, we coordinate statements, documentation, and targeted witnesses to humanize the process and address concerns. Preparing early allows your defense to respond quickly and effectively. Even where accountability is appropriate, thoughtful mitigation can significantly influence outcomes, help preserve future opportunities, and support transition planning. Strong sentencing advocacy is part of a complete, forward-looking defense.

As Featured On:

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

Top Searched Keywords

Fort Barfoot court-martial defense
UCMJ lawyer Virginia
military defense attorney Blackstone VA
Article 32 hearing Fort Barfoot
Army court-martial representation
UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers
Waddington and Gonzalez
military justice Virginia
Fort Barfoot legal counsel

Pro Tips for Service Members at Fort Barfoot

Speak With Counsel Before Making Statements

When contacted by law enforcement or command about alleged misconduct, politely request counsel and stop talking until you have legal advice. Well-meaning explanations can be misinterpreted and used against you. At Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia, investigations move quickly, and small details matter. Ask for a lawyer, assert your rights, and avoid speculation. Do not delete messages or change device settings. Preserve your phone and records in their current state. Then, call 800-921-8607 to discuss next steps. A short delay to get advice now can prevent long-term problems and help you make choices that protect your future.

Preserve Evidence and Timeline Immediately

Memories fade and digital data changes. Write down a timeline of events and identify potential witnesses as soon as possible. Save texts, photos, location data, and relevant social media content. At Fort Barfoot, where training schedules and duty rosters can clarify events, securing records early makes a difference. Share your timeline with your defense team, not with friends or online. Avoid posting about the case. In Virginia, simple steps—like keeping notes and preserving devices—can strengthen your defense, support motions, and sharpen cross-examination. The sooner you act, the better your team can evaluate evidence and build a focused strategy.

Mind Your Digital Footprint and Chain of Command

Your online activity and interactions with leadership can shape a case. Avoid discussing allegations on social media, texts, or group chats. Maintain professionalism with your chain of command at Fort Barfoot, and follow lawful orders. Keep all counseling statements, leave forms, and duty logs. If contacted by investigators or command, ask to schedule discussions after speaking with counsel. In Blackstone, Virginia, respect for process goes a long way while protecting your rights. Focus on your duties, document your performance, and let your defense team handle communications. Consistent conduct builds credibility and helps position you for a better outcome.

Reasons to Hire a Court-Martial Defense Lawyer at Fort Barfoot

Allegations can move quickly from rumor to investigation. An attorney helps you understand your rights, the government’s burden, and the costs and benefits of each option. At Fort Barfoot near Blackstone, Virginia, a seasoned defense team knows how local practice influences interviews, discovery, and motions. Early advice helps avoid missteps, preserve evidence, and begin mitigation where appropriate. Whether you face Article 15, Article 32, or referral to trial, counsel provides a roadmap and clarity. Protecting your career, rank, and clearance starts with informed choices and a strategy that matches your goals and the realities of the UCMJ.

Beyond the courtroom, a defense lawyer helps manage collateral risks, from security clearances to civilian licensing. Your defense should consider family needs, unit dynamics, and your long-term plans in Virginia and beyond. With focused investigation, motion practice, and negotiation, you can reduce uncertainty and improve leverage in discussions with command. For Soldiers at Fort Barfoot, a strong defense supports both immediate needs and future opportunities. When freedom, reputation, and livelihood are on the line, thoughtful advocacy and careful preparation offer a path forward. Start by understanding your rights and building a plan you can trust and execute.

Common Situations That Call for Defense Counsel

Service members at Fort Barfoot seek counsel for a range of issues: allegations from training incidents, off-duty events with on-post implications, substance-related accusations, and claims tied to digital communications. Administrative actions can escalate, and preliminary inquiries can quickly become law enforcement interviews. In Blackstone, Virginia, local procedures and timelines influence how evidence is collected and reviewed. Having a defense team involved early helps protect your rights, preserve favorable evidence, and identify practical solutions. Whether the goal is resolution without trial or a vigorous contest at court-martial, timely legal guidance helps you navigate uncertainty and focus on what matters most.

Allegations Arising from Training Incidents

Training environments move fast, and misunderstandings can become allegations. Safety issues, performance disputes, or interpersonal conflicts sometimes lead to statements that do not capture context. At Fort Barfoot in Virginia, rosters, logs, and instructor notes can clarify events. Your defense should gather timelines, identify witnesses, and preserve digital records to avoid gaps. A clear narrative backed by documents often resolves concerns early, while also preparing you for more formal proceedings if needed. By addressing the situation quickly and professionally, you show accountability and focus while protecting your rights and your future in the military community near Blackstone.

Off-Duty Accusations with On-Post Impact

Off-post events can carry on-post consequences when they affect good order and discipline. If civilian authorities or local agencies in Virginia are involved, coordination with military law can complicate the path forward. At Fort Barfoot, it is important to avoid conflicting statements, preserve evidence, and let counsel manage communications with investigators. Timelines, surveillance, and digital data often drive these cases. A defense team can assess the interaction between civilian and military processes, protect your rights, and work to limit exposure. The goal is to address both sides effectively while safeguarding your career, clearance, and reputation in Blackstone.

Administrative Actions Escalating to Charges

Counseling statements, reprimands, or adverse administrative actions sometimes escalate toward Article 15 or court-martial. Early intervention at Fort Barfoot can change that trajectory. Your defense can present rebuttal materials, correct factual errors, and propose alternative resolutions that satisfy command concerns without formal charges. In Virginia, demonstrating corrective actions, training, or counseling can influence decision-makers. If the matter advances, the groundwork you lay now informs a stronger litigation posture later. The key is timely, organized engagement that shows you take the issue seriously while preserving rights. With a thoughtful plan, you can protect your record and set conditions for success.

Meet Your Defense Team

Michael S. Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Michael Waddington is a best‐selling author and criminal defense attorney who represents military personnel in courts worldwide—both after charges are filed and during pre‐charge investigations—specializing in serious offenses such as war crimes, sex crimes, violent crimes, and white‐collar cases. Drawing on his rigorous discipline from Brazilian Jiu‐Jitsu, he trains both civilian and military defense lawyers in advanced cross‐examination techniques, a skillset detailed in his three popular books on the subject. His expertise is regularly sought by major media outlets—ranging from CNN and 60 Minutes to the BBC and ABC’s “Nightline”—and he has even contributed to episodes of the Golden Globe–winning series “The Good Wife.” Michael instructs both civilian and military criminal defense attorneys on the art of effectively cross-examining and discrediting adversarial witnesses. Drawing from his three best-selling books on cross-examination and years of experience confronting numerous cunning and aggressive prosecution witnesses.

Alexandra González-Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Alexandra González is a founding partner of González & Waddington Law Firm, practicing in Florida, Georgia, and military courts worldwide, where she has defended hundreds of clients charged with violent crimes, sexual assault, and white-collar offenses since 2003. She has led high-profile military sexual assault and war-crimes cases stemming from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and is regularly featured by major outlets such as 60 Minutes, ABC’s Nightline, Rolling Stone, the BBC, Fox News, and CNN. As one of the first Public Defenders for Georgia’s Augusta Judicial Circuit, she handled a broad spectrum of cases—including rape, larceny, violent crimes, and domestic violence—and she holds a J.D. from Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, where she completed the nationally ranked Integrated Trial Advocacy Program. A Georgia-registered mediator, she continues to shape the practice of military and civilian defense through her courtroom work and advocacy.

Battle-Tested Results

Recent Case Results

Gang-Rape Allegation Collapses Against Navy Officer

U.S. v. Navy O-2 – Norfolk, Virginia – Pre-Charge Defense Allegations: Rape, Conspiracy, Indecent Acts, Fraternization, Adultery, Conduct Unbecoming Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal,

Facebook Exposé Shuts Down Fake Rape Allegation in Japan

U.S. v. Marine E-6 – Iwakuni Air Base, Japan – Article 32 Hearings Allegations: Rape, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Adultery, Fraternization, Violation of an Order Max

Army Officer Beats Aggravated Assault & Conduct Unbecoming Charges

U.S. v. Army O-1 – Fort Bragg, NC / Tried at Fort McNair, Washington D.C. – General Court-Martial Allegations: Aggravated Assault with Means Likely to

Navy Sailor’s Sex Assault Case Tossed After UCI Bombshell

U.S. v. Navy E-6 – Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault Max Punishment: 40+ years confinement, Dishonorable Discharge, Sex

Cleared of Rape Charges in Wild Multi-Victim Court-Martial Drama

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Polk, LA – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Rape, Sexual Assault x4, Article 128 Assault, Total of 14 allegations

Army E-6 Beats False Sex Assault Charges at Fort Bragg

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Bragg, North Carolina – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault, Article 128 Assault Consummated by Battery, Conduct Unbecoming

Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year

U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA

Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2

Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape

U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration

Take Command of Your Defense

If you are under investigation or facing charges at Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia, UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers is here to help. Waddington and Gonzalez provide focused, battle-tested advocacy for Soldiers across the United States. We listen, clarify your options, and build a strategy shaped by your goals. Whether you need early guidance, negotiation, or trial representation, we are ready to move. Call 800-921-8607 to schedule a confidential consultation. You do not have to face the UCMJ alone. With the right plan and steady support, you can protect your career, your freedom, and your future.

Why Soldiers Choose UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers

UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers brings relentless preparation, courtroom presence, and clear communication to every case. Waddington and Gonzalez have defended service members across installations and understand the demands Soldiers face at Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia. Our approach is practical and disciplined: investigate thoroughly, analyze the law, and fight for smart, achievable outcomes. We tailor strategies to your goals, whether that means early resolution or trial. From Article 15 counseling to general courts-martial, we stand with you at every step, ensuring your voice is heard and your rights are protected throughout the military justice process.

Access matters. We make ourselves available to answer questions, explain risks, and help you make informed decisions. Our team coordinates travel and appearances to meet the needs of Soldiers at Fort Barfoot and throughout Virginia. We work closely with you to gather evidence, prepare witnesses, and build a strong record. With thoughtful counsel and steady advocacy, you gain clarity and confidence to navigate the UCMJ. If you are facing an investigation or charges, reach out and let us help you plan the next steps. The sooner we engage, the better we can protect your future and your career.

Call Us Today

Check Out Our Newest Book

UCMJ Survival Guide

UCMJ Survival Guide: The Complete Military Justice Manual for Service Members & Families: Whether you’re facing an investigation, court-martial, Article 15 (NJP), or administrative separation, UCMJ Survival Guide is your essential resource for navigating the military justice system. Written by two of the most experienced and respected military defense lawyers in the field—Michael and Alexandra Waddington—this comprehensive guide delivers clear, actionable strategies to protect your career, reputation, and future. Michael and Alexandra are among the top military defense lawyers and recognized as some of the most experienced sexual assault defense attorneys in the country. They have successfully defended service members in high-profile Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault cases, complex court-martials, and administrative separation proceedings across all branches of the U.S. military.

UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers

Worldwide Military Defense Experience

Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation

The González & Waddington Law Firm’s global reach sets them apart from regional military defense attorneys. With active cases spanning from Fort Bragg to forward operating bases in combat zones, from Norfolk Naval Station to remote Air Force installations, their practice truly encompasses the worldwide nature of modern military service.

Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses

War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense

The most serious charges under the UCMJ require the most experienced defense attorneys. The González & Waddington Law Firm has built its reputation by successfully defending service members against the gravest allegations—cases where the stakes couldn’t be higher and the margin for error is virtually nonexistent.

Media and High-Profile Case Experience

Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets

The legal expertise of Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington has garnered attention from the world’s most prestigious media outlets, a testament to their standing as leading authorities in military criminal defense. This media recognition reflects not only their legal acumen but also their ability to handle high-stakes cases under intense public scrutiny.

Playlist

7 Videos

González & Waddington - Court Martial Lawyers - Military Defense Lawyers