Fort Barfoot Military Defense Lawyer Serving Blackstone, Virginia and the Greater Richmond Area

Q: MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS

MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS LEGAL DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES MILITARY DEFENSE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS INVESTIGATIONS

Q: MILITARY BOARDS & HEARINGS

MILITARY BOARDS & HEARINGS ADMINISTRATIVE & DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ARMY AIR FORCE SPACE FORCE NAVY MARINE CORPS COAST GUARD

Q: UCMJ OFFENSES

UCMJ OFFENSES UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE SEX CRIMES SEXUAL HARASSMENT VIOLENT CRIMES PROPERTY & FINANCIAL INTEGRITY & TRUTH MILITARY CONDUCT CYBER & MISCONDUCT

Understanding UCMJ Defense for Soldiers Stationed at Fort Barfoot

When your military career and reputation are on the line at Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia, the right defense strategy can make all the difference. Our team defends service members facing investigations, Article 15 actions, administrative separation, and court-martial across the United States, including the Richmond and Petersburg region. UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers, known nationally as Waddington & Gonzalez, provide steady guidance from the first interview through final resolution. We understand Army protocols, command dynamics, and the unique tempo at a Virginia Army National Guard installation. Whether you are drilling, mobilized, or on active orders, we help you protect your record, your rank, and your future under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Our approach begins with careful listening, rapid assessment, and proactive protection of your rights. At Fort Barfoot, a conversation with command or investigators can quickly shape a case. We help you avoid common pitfalls, preserve favorable evidence, and build a clear narrative grounded in facts. From Blackstone to the broader Richmond corridor, we coordinate with local resources and understand the logistical realities soldiers face. You will know what to expect at each stage, how decisions affect promotion potential, and where leverage exists to resolve matters early. If litigation becomes necessary, we bring a focused, trial-ready posture to advance your interests under the UCMJ.

Why Timely UCMJ Defense at Fort Barfoot Can Protect Rank, Pay, and Your Future

Early, informed defense can prevent small issues from becoming career-altering problems. At Fort Barfoot, a quick response may limit exposure, influence command decisions, and position your case for a favorable outcome. With the right guidance, soldiers can avoid harmful statements, secure exculpatory records, and address misunderstandings before they escalate. Effective advocacy helps preserve security clearances, deployment eligibility, and promotion opportunities. It also protects your good name in the tight-knit military community surrounding Blackstone, Richmond, and Petersburg. Our role is to steady the process, clarify options, and fight for resolutions that sustain your service path, whether that means dismissal, diversion, or a strong defense at trial.

About UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers: Waddington & Gonzalez

UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers is a nationwide military defense law firm focused on defending soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, Guardians, and members of the Guard and Reserve. Led by Waddington & Gonzalez, our team has defended service members at installations across the United States and abroad. We are known for thorough case preparation, strategic motion practice, and persuasive courtroom presentations. At Fort Barfoot and throughout Virginia, we tailor defense strategies to command culture, local procedures, and the practical realities of military life. We offer discreet consultations, clear communication, and unwavering advocacy anchored in the UCMJ. Call 800-921-8607 to discuss your situation and map a path forward.

Fort Barfoot UCMJ Defense Guide

This guide explains how UCMJ cases typically unfold for soldiers at Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia, and what you can do to protect your rights at every step. You will learn the difference between an inquiry and an investigation, how Article 31(b) warnings work, and why early representation can shape outcomes. We cover Article 15 proceedings, administrative separation, GOMORs, preferral of charges, and the three levels of court-martial. Whether you face allegations on or off duty, our goal is to help you make informed decisions, minimize risk, and pursue a resolution that fits your goals and service obligations.

Every case is unique, and Fort Barfoot’s operational environment adds its own considerations. Guard status, mobilization history, and prior service can affect jurisdiction and options. We explain how evidence is gathered, what investigators look for, and how to respond without harming your position. You will understand command discretion, the role of the Staff Judge Advocate, and opportunities to resolve issues early. If your case proceeds to court-martial, we outline the phases from Article 32 investigation to trial, sentencing, and appeal. Throughout, we emphasize practical steps that protect your career while honoring your duty to the mission and your unit.

What a Military Defense Lawyer Does Under the UCMJ

A military defense lawyer advises and defends service members on matters arising under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. At Fort Barfoot, that includes guidance during interviews, responses to command inquiries, representation at Article 15 hearings, defense at administrative separation boards, and litigation at court-martial. Your lawyer evaluates the government’s theory, investigates the facts, and pursues motions that exclude unreliable evidence or improper statements. They advocate for alternatives to trial when appropriate and prepare a robust defense when litigation is the best path. Above all, your lawyer ensures your rights are respected, your voice is heard, and your future is considered in every decision.

Key Elements of a Fort Barfoot UCMJ Case and How the Process Unfolds

Most cases begin with a report, a complaint, or observed conduct. Command may initiate an inquiry or refer matters to investigative authorities. Soldiers receive rights advisements before questioning, and decisions made in those moments can have lasting effects. Evidence collection follows, including digital data, records, and witness statements. The command team, with legal guidance, assesses disposition options ranging from counseling to nonjudicial punishment, administrative separation, or preferral of charges. If charges are preferred, the case may proceed to an Article 32 preliminary hearing and then to court-martial. At each step, strategic engagement and persuasive advocacy can redirect the trajectory of the case.

Key UCMJ Terms for Fort Barfoot Soldiers

Understanding UCMJ terminology helps you make informed choices and communicate effectively with command and counsel. The following terms frequently arise at Fort Barfoot and across Virginia Army National Guard matters. While the concepts may appear technical, each directly affects your rights, responsibilities, and options. Clarity on these terms empowers you to protect your record, preserve your future opportunities, and confidently navigate interactions with investigators and leaders. If any term remains unclear, ask questions. Your understanding is part of your defense, and informed soldiers consistently make better decisions at every stage of the process.

Article 15 (Nonjudicial Punishment)

Article 15, also known as nonjudicial punishment, allows commanders to address alleged misconduct without a court-martial. At Fort Barfoot, soldiers may accept or demand trial by court-martial, depending on the circumstances and the type of Article 15. Proceedings are less formal than trial, but the consequences can still affect rank, pay, and career progression. Preparation matters. You can present evidence, witness statements, and a written or oral defense. Mitigation and extenuation can influence the outcome. Choosing whether to accept an Article 15 or demand trial depends on the strength of the government’s case, potential punishment, and your long-term goals.

Court-Martial Convening Authority (CMCA)

The Convening Authority is the commander empowered to convene courts-martial and make significant decisions about your case. At Fort Barfoot, the CMCA determines whether charges move forward, what level of court-martial is appropriate, and whether alternative resolutions are available. The Convening Authority also reviews the record and may take action after trial. Effective defense practice includes persuasive submissions to the CMCA that highlight evidentiary weaknesses, favorable character information, and mission impact. Understanding the CMCA’s priorities and presenting a clear, credible defense narrative can shape outcomes before, during, and after litigation.

Preferral and Referral of Charges

Preferral is the formal act of signing and swearing to charges against a service member. Referral is the decision by the Convening Authority to send those charges to a particular level of court-martial. For a Fort Barfoot soldier, this sequence signals that the case is moving from investigation to litigation. Preferral and referral trigger important rights and deadlines, including discovery, motion practice, and the opportunity to investigate defensively. Strategic engagement at this stage can lead to withdrawals, modifications, or negotiations that better align with the facts and the soldier’s service history, performance, and potential for continued duty.

Article 31(b) Rights Advisement

Article 31(b) requires that service members be informed of the nature of suspected offenses and their right to remain silent before questioning. At Fort Barfoot, soldiers may encounter rights advisements during command inquiries or formal investigations. Exercising your rights is not an admission; it is a safeguard designed to prevent misunderstandings and protect fairness. Many cases turn on early statements. Consulting a defense lawyer before speaking can avoid harmful admissions and ensure your account is presented accurately and in context. If you already spoke, a lawyer can assess whether statements were properly obtained and whether they should be limited or excluded.

Comparing Limited Representation and Full-Scope Defense

Some Fort Barfoot cases resolve with targeted guidance focused on early decision points, while others require full-scope defense from investigation through trial. Limited representation can be appropriate when facts are clear, exposure is low, and command shows a willingness to resolve matters informally. Full-scope defense is better when allegations are serious, evidence is disputed, or administrative and criminal actions run in parallel. The right approach balances risk, resources, and goals. We help you evaluate options, anticipate second-order effects, and choose a path that protects your career and future opportunities within the Army and beyond.

When a Focused, Limited Approach Can Work:

Early Command Inquiry With Clear Mitigation

If Fort Barfoot command initiates a preliminary inquiry and the facts support a simple explanation, a limited approach may suffice. Quick consultation can help you avoid missteps while presenting mitigation, context, and supporting documentation. Letters from supervisors, duty performance records, and timeline summaries can answer questions without escalating the matter. When intentions were good, impact was minor, and corrective action has occurred, tailored submissions often persuade command to use counseling or closed-out actions. The goal is to resolve the issue swiftly, preserve trust, and keep your record strong for future promotions and assignments across the Richmond area and beyond.

Minor Misconduct Addressed Through NJP or Counseling

When the alleged conduct is isolated, low impact, and supported by corrective steps, nonjudicial punishment or counseling may be the most efficient path. With targeted preparation, you can present character statements, performance history, and a plan to prevent recurrence. At Fort Barfoot, leaders often seek solutions that restore good order and maintain unit readiness. A limited engagement focuses resources on what matters most: a compelling presentation, favorable facts, and fair process. This approach aims to minimize adverse entries, preserve rank and pay, and maintain mission continuity while avoiding unnecessary escalation to administrative separation or court-martial.

When Full-Scope UCMJ Defense Is the Smart Choice:

Serious Allegations With Career and Liberty at Stake

Allegations involving violence, sexual misconduct, significant fraud, or repeated offenses demand full-scope defense. In these situations, the stakes can include confinement, discharge characterization, loss of benefits, and long-term reputational harm. A comprehensive strategy at Fort Barfoot coordinates investigation, motion practice, expert consultation where appropriate, and persuasive presentation for negotiation or trial. It also addresses collateral impacts such as security clearances and professional licenses. When the government’s theory is aggressive or the evidence is complex, a complete defense effort ensures every avenue is explored and your rights are protected at each stage of the process.

Complex Investigations and Disputed Evidence

Some cases turn on digital forensics, financial records, or technical evidence that requires thorough review and targeted challenges. Witness credibility, chain-of-custody issues, and suppression motions can shape outcomes. At Fort Barfoot, a comprehensive defense coordinates timelines, independent witness interviews, and strategic filings to limit unreliable or unfair evidence. It also prepares alternative theories and mitigation packages that can influence charging decisions or sentencing. This end-to-end approach gives you the best chance to expose weaknesses, present your story clearly, and obtain a resolution that safeguards your service record and future opportunities in Virginia and beyond.

Benefits of a Comprehensive UCMJ Defense Strategy

A comprehensive strategy brings structure, discipline, and momentum to your case. It allows your defense to control timelines where possible, preserve critical evidence, and challenge weak assumptions early. At Fort Barfoot, this approach ensures that every audience is considered, from investigators and command to potential panels. It also aligns litigation steps with negotiation opportunities, maximizing leverage while minimizing unnecessary exposure. By anticipating government tactics and building a layered defense, you improve your chances of favorable outcomes ranging from case dismissal to reduced findings or sensible resolutions that protect your future.

Full-scope defense also protects the parts of your life that matter beyond the immediate allegation. Security clearances, benefits, civilian employment prospects, and family stability can all be affected by UCMJ proceedings. A comprehensive plan addresses these collateral issues while pursuing the best legal result. It coordinates messaging, gathers meaningful character support, and highlights service achievements that reflect who you are, not just what is alleged. In the Richmond and Blackstone area, where communities are tight-knit, a thoughtful, proactive defense helps you maintain dignity, purpose, and momentum in your military career.

Thorough Case Building and Persuasive Presentation

Comprehensive defense gives your team time and space to uncover facts, secure records, and shape the narrative. At Fort Barfoot, this means gathering training logs, duty rosters, digital data, and eyewitness accounts that support your position. It also means preparing you for interviews, hearings, and trial with clear guidance and realistic expectations. By refining themes and presenting them consistently, your defense earns credibility with investigators, command, and panels. This effort pays dividends during negotiation and litigation, often leading to better outcomes and tangible protection for your rank, pay, and long-term military goals.

Protection of Career, Clearance, and Reputation

A complete defense strategy does more than answer allegations; it protects the trajectory of your service. We address adverse paperwork, respond to clearance concerns, and provide mitigation that reflects your contributions at Fort Barfoot and across Virginia. Thoughtful submissions, strong character support, and a consistent message help decision-makers see the full picture. This approach can reduce collateral damage, protect advancement potential, and preserve opportunities in the Army and in civilian life after service. Your good name matters, and a comprehensive plan works tirelessly to safeguard it while pursuing the best possible legal result under the UCMJ.

As Featured On:

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

Top Searched Keywords

Fort Barfoot military defense lawyer
UCMJ attorney Blackstone VA
Virginia court-martial defense
Article 15 lawyer Fort Barfoot
administrative separation defense
military criminal defense Richmond
CID investigation legal help
GOMOR rebuttal attorney
Army National Guard UCMJ defense

Pro Tips for Defending Your Case at Fort Barfoot

Call Early and Preserve Your Rights

If you learn of an inquiry or investigation, reach out immediately. Early guidance helps you avoid harmful statements, protect digital evidence, and structure communications with command. At Fort Barfoot and across the Richmond area, investigators move quickly, and small decisions can set the tone of a case. Save texts, emails, and social media content that supports your account, and avoid discussing details with anyone but your lawyer. A short, timely consultation often leads to better options, clearer messaging, and fewer surprises, keeping your career and reputation on steadier ground from the very beginning.

Be Careful With Communications

Assume your messages could be reviewed. Do not speculate, exaggerate, or attempt to influence witnesses. At Fort Barfoot, clear and respectful communication protects credibility with both command and investigators. If questioned, invoke your right to remain silent and request counsel before answering. Keep a running timeline of events, list potential witnesses, and store relevant documents in a secure location. These simple steps strengthen your defense, minimize misunderstandings, and help your legal team present a consistent, fact-driven narrative that aligns with your goals and obligations under the UCMJ.

Document Everything That Matters

Strong documentation wins cases. Preserve performance records, training certificates, leave forms, medical visits, and any communications that support your account. At Fort Barfoot, where units can be spread across Virginia, organized records help fill gaps and anchor key facts. Maintain a chronological log with dates, times, and locations, and gather contact information for witnesses. Share these materials with your defense team early so they can identify themes, corroborate events, and anticipate government claims. Detailed documentation not only supports defense theories but also aids negotiation, presenting decision-makers with a clear and credible picture.

Reasons Fort Barfoot Soldiers Choose Civilian UCMJ Defense

Civilian UCMJ defense brings added bandwidth, focused attention, and a tailored strategy to your case. At Fort Barfoot, soldiers often face unique circumstances involving Guard status, mobilization histories, and mixed state and federal considerations. A dedicated defense team can coordinate timelines, manage evidence, and provide steady counsel through every decision. Whether you are dealing with a command inquiry, Article 15, administrative separation, or court-martial, outside counsel can complement your assigned defense resources, broaden your options, and ensure your perspective is heard by those who decide your future in the Army.

We help you understand the likely paths, risks, and opportunities at each stage. From Blackstone to Richmond and Petersburg, we know how local dynamics influence command decisions and panel perceptions. Our role is to help you avoid common pitfalls, present the strongest possible mitigation, and position your case for a fair and lasting resolution. If litigation is necessary, we bring a trial-ready mindset that keeps pressure on the government and protects your rights. If a negotiated outcome is better, we work to secure terms that preserve your career and dignity.

Common Situations That Call for a Military Defense Lawyer

Service members at Fort Barfoot contact us for a range of issues, from command inquiries and CID referrals to adverse paperwork and separation boards. Off-duty incidents that spill into the military system, social media misunderstandings, and digital evidence disputes are increasingly common. Article 15 proceedings, GOMORs, and clearance concerns can follow. Some soldiers face allegations while mobilized or soon after return from orders, raising questions about jurisdiction and process. Whether the issue seems minor or serious, timely counsel helps you make smart choices, protect your record, and move forward with confidence in Virginia and beyond.

You Are Contacted By Investigators or Command

A polite request for an interview can feel routine, but your words and reactions matter. At Fort Barfoot, investigators and leaders look for consistency, credibility, and cooperation, while you must protect your rights and future. Before answering questions, ask to speak with a lawyer. Provide basic identifying information, then pause the interview until counsel is present. Document who contacted you, when, and why, and preserve any related messages. This approach keeps your options open, prevents misunderstandings, and allows your defense team to plan a strategic response grounded in facts and aligned with your goals.

You Receive Article 15 or GOMOR Paperwork

Article 15 and GOMOR actions move quickly and carry significant consequences. You have rights to review evidence, submit responses, and present mitigation. At Fort Barfoot, thoughtful rebuttals supported by timelines, witness statements, and performance records can influence the outcome. Decisions about accepting NJP, demanding trial, or responding to a GOMOR should be made with a clear picture of risk, proof, and long-term impact. We help you weigh options, organize documentation, and craft persuasive submissions that reflect your service and potential, not just the allegation on paper.

You Face Administrative Separation or Show-Cause

Separation proceedings put your career, benefits, and reputation at stake. A strong defense challenges weak proof, presents extenuation and mitigation, and highlights the totality of your service. At Fort Barfoot, soldiers often benefit from character letters, fitness reports, training records, and community involvement that demonstrate value to the mission. We build a comprehensive presentation, prepare you for hearing, and seek outcomes that protect your future, including retention when appropriate or fair characterization if separation occurs. The right preparation and message can make a meaningful difference for you and your family.

Meet Your Defense Team

Michael S. Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Michael Waddington is a best‐selling author and criminal defense attorney who represents military personnel in courts worldwide—both after charges are filed and during pre‐charge investigations—specializing in serious offenses such as war crimes, sex crimes, violent crimes, and white‐collar cases. Drawing on his rigorous discipline from Brazilian Jiu‐Jitsu, he trains both civilian and military defense lawyers in advanced cross‐examination techniques, a skillset detailed in his three popular books on the subject. His expertise is regularly sought by major media outlets—ranging from CNN and 60 Minutes to the BBC and ABC’s “Nightline”—and he has even contributed to episodes of the Golden Globe–winning series “The Good Wife.” Michael instructs both civilian and military criminal defense attorneys on the art of effectively cross-examining and discrediting adversarial witnesses. Drawing from his three best-selling books on cross-examination and years of experience confronting numerous cunning and aggressive prosecution witnesses.

Alexandra González-Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

PARTNER

Alexandra González is a founding partner of González & Waddington Law Firm, practicing in Florida, Georgia, and military courts worldwide, where she has defended hundreds of clients charged with violent crimes, sexual assault, and white-collar offenses since 2003. She has led high-profile military sexual assault and war-crimes cases stemming from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and is regularly featured by major outlets such as 60 Minutes, ABC’s Nightline, Rolling Stone, the BBC, Fox News, and CNN. As one of the first Public Defenders for Georgia’s Augusta Judicial Circuit, she handled a broad spectrum of cases—including rape, larceny, violent crimes, and domestic violence—and she holds a J.D. from Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, where she completed the nationally ranked Integrated Trial Advocacy Program. A Georgia-registered mediator, she continues to shape the practice of military and civilian defense through her courtroom work and advocacy.

Battle-Tested Results

Recent Case Results

Gang-Rape Allegation Collapses Against Navy Officer

U.S. v. Navy O-2 – Norfolk, Virginia – Pre-Charge Defense Allegations: Rape, Conspiracy, Indecent Acts, Fraternization, Adultery, Conduct Unbecoming Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal,

Facebook Exposé Shuts Down Fake Rape Allegation in Japan

U.S. v. Marine E-6 – Iwakuni Air Base, Japan – Article 32 Hearings Allegations: Rape, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Adultery, Fraternization, Violation of an Order Max

Army Officer Beats Aggravated Assault & Conduct Unbecoming Charges

U.S. v. Army O-1 – Fort Bragg, NC / Tried at Fort McNair, Washington D.C. – General Court-Martial Allegations: Aggravated Assault with Means Likely to

Navy Sailor’s Sex Assault Case Tossed After UCI Bombshell

U.S. v. Navy E-6 – Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault Max Punishment: 40+ years confinement, Dishonorable Discharge, Sex

Cleared of Rape Charges in Wild Multi-Victim Court-Martial Drama

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Polk, LA – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Rape, Sexual Assault x4, Article 128 Assault, Total of 14 allegations

Army E-6 Beats False Sex Assault Charges at Fort Bragg

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Bragg, North Carolina – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault, Article 128 Assault Consummated by Battery, Conduct Unbecoming

Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year

U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA

Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2

Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape

U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration

Take Command of Your Defense

You do not have to face this alone. UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers supports soldiers stationed at Fort Barfoot in Blackstone, Virginia, and throughout the Richmond region. We offer confidential consultations, clear guidance, and a plan tailored to your goals. Call 800-921-8607 or reach out through our website to schedule a conversation. We will listen, assess the facts, and outline immediate steps to protect your rights, your record, and your future under the UCMJ.

Why Fort Barfoot Soldiers Choose UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers

Waddington & Gonzalez are trusted by service members nationwide for thoughtful strategy, relentless preparation, and compelling advocacy. We understand Army culture, command expectations, and the pressures soldiers face at Fort Barfoot and across Virginia. Our team digs into the facts, identifies leverage, and pursues resolutions that protect both immediate and long-term interests. We coordinate with your schedule, maintain discretion at every step, and keep you informed so you can make confident decisions that align with your mission and your life.

From early inquiry to court-martial, we tailor our approach to your case and your goals. Some clients need focused coaching to resolve matters quietly; others require full-scale litigation. Either way, our process is disciplined, transparent, and oriented toward meaningful results. We are available to consult with soldiers in Blackstone, Richmond, Petersburg, and beyond. When your name, rank, and future are at stake, choose a defense team that brings clarity, strength, and steadfast commitment to your side under the UCMJ.

Call Us Today

Check Out Our Newest Book

UCMJ Survival Guide

UCMJ Survival Guide: The Complete Military Justice Manual for Service Members & Families: Whether you’re facing an investigation, court-martial, Article 15 (NJP), or administrative separation, UCMJ Survival Guide is your essential resource for navigating the military justice system. Written by two of the most experienced and respected military defense lawyers in the field—Michael and Alexandra Waddington—this comprehensive guide delivers clear, actionable strategies to protect your career, reputation, and future. Michael and Alexandra are among the top military defense lawyers and recognized as some of the most experienced sexual assault defense attorneys in the country. They have successfully defended service members in high-profile Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault cases, complex court-martials, and administrative separation proceedings across all branches of the U.S. military.

UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers

Worldwide Military Defense Experience

Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation

The González & Waddington Law Firm’s global reach sets them apart from regional military defense attorneys. With active cases spanning from Fort Bragg to forward operating bases in combat zones, from Norfolk Naval Station to remote Air Force installations, their practice truly encompasses the worldwide nature of modern military service.

Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses

War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense

The most serious charges under the UCMJ require the most experienced defense attorneys. The González & Waddington Law Firm has built its reputation by successfully defending service members against the gravest allegations—cases where the stakes couldn’t be higher and the margin for error is virtually nonexistent.

Media and High-Profile Case Experience

Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets

The legal expertise of Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington has garnered attention from the world’s most prestigious media outlets, a testament to their standing as leading authorities in military criminal defense. This media recognition reflects not only their legal acumen but also their ability to handle high-stakes cases under intense public scrutiny.

Playlist

7 Videos

González & Waddington - Court Martial Lawyers - Military Defense Lawyers