UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers

Fort Bragg Military Administrative Separation Boards Defense Lawyer

Military Criminal Defense Lawyers

Fort Bragg Administrative Separation Board Lawyers – UCMJ Attorneys

If you are stationed at Fort Bragg and facing an administrative separation board (also known as a Chapter board or Separation Board), you are standing at one of the most important crossroads of your military career. A separation board can take your rank, your benefits, your retirement, your reputation, and your future. Even Soldiers with outstanding service records, deployments, jumpmaster ratings, combat patches, or years of honorable service can suddenly find themselves fighting for their careers based on incomplete investigations, weak allegations, or command bias.

If your command has recommended separation or you have received a notification of administrative elimination, you must act immediately. Do not assume that good service alone will save you. Do not rely solely on your assigned military counsel. Contact Gonzalez & Waddington at 1-800-921-8607 for a confidential consultation. Our civilian military defense lawyers defend Soldiers worldwide and understand exactly how Fort Bragg handles separation boards, why they are initiated, and how to win them.

Fort Bragg, home to the 82nd Airborne Division, XVIII Airborne Corps, U.S. Army Special Operations Command, and numerous elite formations, has a reputation for issuing administrative separations aggressively. Whether you are accused of misconduct, substandard performance, alcohol-related incidents, drug use, domestic issues, sexual misconduct, or any other matter affecting “good order and discipline,” the command climate at Fort Bragg pushes leaders to remove Soldiers quickly rather than take risks. This is why administrative separations are one of the most common career-ending actions at this installation.

Official installation details are available at home.army.mil/bragg, and information about the local community can be found at fayettevillenc.gov. Understanding the environment and local context is essential because many Fort Bragg separation cases involve off-post incidents, Fayetteville arrests, or community-related allegations.

Understanding Administrative Separation Boards at Fort Bragg

What an Administrative Separation Board Is

A separation board is an administrative legal hearing where a panel of three senior NCOs or officers decide whether the government has presented sufficient evidence to separate a Soldier from the Army. It is not a criminal trial, but the consequences can be worse than some UCMJ punishments. The government only needs to meet a “preponderance of the evidence” standard, meaning they must convince the board that the allegations are more likely true than not.

This low standard makes separation boards especially dangerous for Soldiers accused based on hearsay, biased investigations, shaky allegations, or emotional incidents. Commanders at Fort Bragg often prefer administrative separations over court-martial because they are faster, easier, and don’t require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

When You Are Entitled to a Separation Board

Soldiers are entitled to a board when:

  • They are NCOs (E-5 and above), regardless of years of service
  • They have six or more years of service
  • They face separation under certain characterization types
  • The command seeks an Other Than Honorable (OTH) discharge

But even if you do not qualify automatically, you may still fight the case with the help of civilian counsel through written rebuttals or advocacy with command.

Why Fort Bragg Relies Heavily on Administrative Separations

The Command Climate

Fort Bragg’s leadership environment is fast-paced, high-visibility, and performance-driven. Senior leaders face pressure to maintain discipline and remove “problem Soldiers” quickly. This often results in administrative separations being used as a risk-reduction tool rather than a fair assessment of a Soldier’s service.

Use of Administrative Separations as Shortcuts

Commands frequently use separation boards instead of court-martials because:

  • The burden of proof is much lower
  • It avoids political scrutiny of weak cases
  • It provides command with quick removals
  • It eliminates Soldiers without giving them full trial rights

This means Soldiers must be prepared for an unfair fight unless they secure experienced civilian defense representation.

Common Reasons for Administrative Separations at Fort Bragg

Misconduct

This includes allegations such as:

  • Assault (Article 128)
  • Domestic violence (Article 128b)
  • Sexual misconduct (Articles 120, 120b, 120c)
  • Drug use or possession (Article 112a)
  • Larceny or fraud (Article 121)
  • Orders violations (Article 92)

Even minor infractions may trigger separation due to the command climate at Fort Bragg.

Pattern of Misconduct

Commands frequently cite “pattern of misconduct” when there are multiple minor incidents or allegations. This category is often misused to remove Soldiers who are otherwise strong performers.

Alcohol-Related Issues

DUI arrests in Fayetteville or on post, public intoxication, or alcohol-related incidents are frequent triggers for separation boards at Fort Bragg.

Domestic Disputes

Domestic incidents are treated harshly due to political and SHARP pressure. Even when both parties participated in the conflict, commands frequently blame the Soldier exclusively.

Substandard Performance

Alleged failures in physical fitness, weight control, leadership performance, or adherence to standards are common reasons for separation.

Drug Abuse

Positive urinalysis results—even disputed ones—often result in immediate separation actions.

Civilian Arrests

Civilian charges from Fayetteville Police or Cumberland County deputies, even when dismissed, often trigger administrative separation.

How Separation Boards Work at Fort Bragg

The Board Members

The board typically consists of:

  • One field grade officer
  • One company grade officer
  • One senior NCO

Their job is to determine whether the allegations are supported by a preponderance of evidence and what characterization of service (Honorable, General, or OTH) is appropriate.

The Recorder (Government Prosecutor)

The Recorder acts as the government’s attorney. They call witnesses, introduce documents, argue the case, and seek to convince the board that separation is necessary. At Fort Bragg, Recorders are often experienced administrative law attorneys who aggressively push the command narrative.

Your Rights at the Board

You have the right to:

  • Civilian counsel
  • Appointed military counsel
  • Call witnesses
  • Cross-examine witnesses
  • Introduce evidence
  • Testify or remain silent
  • Object to evidence
  • Present a closing statement

Your defense strategy should be built around using every one of these rights effectively.

Why Separation Boards at Fort Bragg Are So Dangerous

Low Standard of Proof

The government must only show that the allegations are “more likely than not.” This allows weak, exaggerated, or unsupported claims to survive unless aggressively challenged.

Use of Hearsay

Unlike courts-martial, separation boards allow hearsay, summaries, and written statements—even if unreliable. The defense must counter these decisively.

Bias Based on Command Narrative

Board members are often influenced by the chain of command’s attitude toward the Soldier, especially in high-profile units at Fort Bragg.

Stacked Files

Commands frequently pack separation packets with counseling statements, minor infractions, or unrelated incidents to paint the Soldier as a chronic problem, even when the core allegation is weak.

How to Win a Separation Board at Fort Bragg

1. Attack the Government’s Narrative

The Recorder will present a story that makes you look like a liability to the Army. The defense must dismantle this narrative point-by-point.

2. Reconstruct the Facts

Accurately rebuilding timelines, digital messages, witness statements, and contextual information often reveals that the allegation is exaggerated or false.

3. Use Witnesses Strategically

Character witnesses, leadership testimonies, and unit peers can provide powerful support. Witness credibility deeply influences board outcomes.

4. Present Detailed Character Evidence

Evaluations, deployments, awards, volunteer work, and leadership achievements must be organized into a compelling presentation.

5. Cross-Examine Government Witnesses

Cross-examination is often the most decisive moment of the board. Many allegations collapse when witnesses are confronted with inconsistencies or bias.

6. Challenge Administrative Errors

Flaws in the AR 15-6, improper command influence, procedural defects, or violations of Soldier rights can undermine the entire case.

7. Present Mitigation Strategically

Even when some misconduct occured, strong mitigation may convince the board to retain the Soldier or recommend a higher characterization of service.

Common Separation Scenarios at Fort Bragg

Alcohol and Barracks Incidents

Many Soldiers are separated after a single alcohol-related incident involving disorderly conduct, fighting, or verbal disputes. These cases often rely on unreliable witness accounts and emotion-driven assumptions.

Domestic Conflicts

Breakups, arguments, and emotional disputes are frequently misinterpreted as misconduct. Commands are quick to separate Soldiers involved in family disputes, even without criminal charges.

Drug Use or Positive Urinalysis

Urinalysis tests are not infallible. Chain-of-custody errors, contamination, supplement confusion, or lab mistakes may explain results—but commands still pursue separation aggressively.

Sexual Misconduct Allegations

Article 120 allegations often result in administrative separation when prosecutors believe the evidence is too weak for court-martial but still want the Soldier removed.

Patterns of Minor Infractions

A series of small mistakes, lateness, or counseling statements may result in separation for pattern of misconduct. This is common among junior Soldiers under high stress.

Special Considerations for NCOs and Senior Enlisted Soldiers

NCO Leadership Impact

NCOs are held to a higher standard. A single allegation—true or not—may trigger immediate separation action. Commands often claim “loss of confidence” or “failure to demonstrate leadership qualities.”

How to Defend NCOs

Defense must emphasize:

  • Leadership evaluations
  • Training success
  • Awards and recognitions
  • Impact on Soldiers
  • Operational deployments

Special Considerations for Junior Enlisted Soldiers

Barracks Culture and Immaturity

Younger Soldiers often make mistakes due to stress, youth, and peer influence. Commands frequently overlook context and move straight to separation.

Defending Junior Soldiers

Defense should highlight:

  • Growth potential
  • Training performance
  • Resilience
  • Support from leaders

Why Hiring Civilian Counsel Is Critical

Military Counsel Are Overloaded

Trial Defense Service attorneys at Fort Bragg handle heavy caseloads. Separation boards require intensive preparation that often exceeds what TDS can provide.

Civilian Lawyers Provide Independence

We are not influenced by the chain of command. Our loyalty is exclusively to the Soldier.

Civilian Counsel Brings Trial Skill

Separation boards require the same cross-examination skill and narrative strategy as a court-martial. Our firm specializes in these techniques.

Civilian Counsel Levels the Playing Field

Government attorneys come prepared. Soldiers must do the same.

Pro Tips for Soldiers Facing Separation at Fort Bragg

Tip 1: Do Not Speak to Investigators Without Counsel

Your statements can be twisted or taken out of context.

Tip 2: Preserve All Evidence

Save texts, emails, screenshots, and anything relevant to your case.

Tip 3: Stay Silent About the Case

Rumors spread fast in units. Talking about your situation can create witnesses against you.

Tip 4: Maintain Professionalism

Your behavior leading up to the board influences the panel.

Tip 5: Hire Civilian Counsel Early

The earlier your legal team begins building your case, the stronger your defense will be.

Connection to the Fort Bragg Military Justice Hub

This page connects to the full Fort Bragg Military Justice system, including specialized guides on Article 15, BOIs, Article 120, Article 120b, Article 120c, assault allegations, domestic violence, child pornography cases, and command-directed investigations. Taken together, these pages form the most comprehensive legal defense resource available to Soldiers stationed at Fort Bragg.

Bottom Call to Action

If you are stationed at Fort Bragg and facing an administrative separation board, your career and future are on the line. Hire the defense team that understands Fort Bragg’s command climate, CID patterns, and separation procedures. Contact Gonzalez & Waddington at 1-800-921-8607 for a confidential consultation. We are ready to fight for your career, your honor, and your future.

Understanding Military Administrative Separation Boards at Fort Bragg, North Carolina

Facing an administrative separation board at Fort Bragg in North Carolina can have significant implications for your military career. These boards evaluate service members to determine whether separation from service is warranted, which may affect your benefits and future opportunities. Our team understands the unique challenges faced by soldiers stationed near Fayetteville, NC, and is here to provide guidance throughout this complex process.

Navigating the administrative separation process requires careful preparation and a thorough understanding of military law. At UCMJ Defense, based in Florida but serving clients nationwide, including those at Fort Bragg, we help service members protect their rights and advocate for the best possible outcomes during their board proceedings.

Why Legal Representation Matters for Administrative Separation Boards

Having skilled legal support during an administrative separation board can make a meaningful difference in the resolution of your case. Legal counsel can assist in gathering evidence, preparing testimony, and ensuring that the board follows proper procedures. This support helps safeguard your military record and future benefits, offering peace of mind during a challenging time.

About UCMJ Defense and Our Commitment to Military Personnel

UCMJ Defense, led by attorneys Waddington and Gonzalez, has a strong record defending military members across the United States. While headquartered in Florida, we provide dedicated representation for service members at Fort Bragg and other military installations. Our thorough knowledge of military administrative law equips us to advocate effectively on your behalf.

Comprehensive Guide to Administrative Separation Boards at Fort Bragg

Administrative separation boards review cases where the military considers discharging a service member for various reasons, including misconduct or unsatisfactory performance. Understanding the board’s process is essential for preparing an effective defense and protecting your military career and benefits.

At Fort Bragg, these boards follow specific regulations under military law. Our guide outlines key steps, from notification through the hearing, and highlights how legal representation can help navigate each phase with confidence.

What Is a Military Administrative Separation Board?

A military administrative separation board is a panel that evaluates whether a service member should be separated from the armed forces. The board reviews evidence, hears testimony, and makes recommendations based on the facts of the case. This process can impact a service member’s discharge status, benefits, and future employment opportunities.

Key Components and Procedures of Administrative Separation Boards

The board process includes formal hearings where evidence is presented, witnesses may testify, and the service member has the right to counsel. Understanding each stage, including notification, pre-hearing preparation, and post-hearing procedures, is vital to effectively safeguarding your rights and interests.

Glossary of Important Terms Related to Administrative Separation Boards

Familiarity with military legal terminology is crucial when facing an administrative separation board. Below are definitions of key terms you may encounter throughout the process.

Administrative Separation

The process by which the military discharges a service member based on specific criteria, which may include misconduct, failure to meet standards, or other reasons determined by the board.

Discharge Characterization

The classification assigned to a service member’s discharge, which affects eligibility for veterans’ benefits and future employment, such as honorable, general, or other than honorable.

Board Hearing

A formal proceeding where evidence is presented and the service member can respond to charges or concerns raised by the military prior to separation.

Right to Counsel

The service member’s entitlement to have legal representation or advisory assistance during the administrative separation board process to ensure fair treatment and defense.

Comparing Legal Approaches for Administrative Separation Defense

When facing separation boards, service members can choose from different legal support options, including military defense counsel or civilian attorneys familiar with military law. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each helps in making an informed decision that aligns with your needs.

Situations Where Limited Legal Support May Be Appropriate:

Minor Administrative Issues

In cases involving minor infractions or administrative errors, limited legal assistance focusing on documentation review and procedural guidance may suffice to resolve matters effectively.

Clear Evidence Supporting Separation

When evidence clearly supports separation without dispute, limited legal advice may help ensure the process follows regulations and that rights are respected during the proceedings.

The Importance of Full Legal Representation in Complex Cases:

Contesting Discharge Characterization

When the characterization of discharge is at stake, comprehensive legal support is vital to present a strong defense and protect future benefits and opportunities.

Complex or Disputed Allegations

Cases involving serious allegations or disputed facts require thorough investigation and preparation, which comprehensive legal representation can provide to ensure fairness.

Advantages of Engaging Full Legal Services for Separation Boards

A comprehensive approach offers thorough case evaluation, strategic planning, and effective advocacy during hearings, increasing the likelihood of favorable outcomes.

This level of support helps service members understand their rights fully and navigate complex military regulations with confidence and clarity.

Maximized Defense Preparation

Comprehensive legal service ensures all evidence and witness testimony are thoroughly examined and presented to the board, reinforcing your position.

Better Outcomes and Discharge Results

Extensive representation can lead to more favorable discharge characterizations and preserve benefits, positively impacting your future beyond military service.

As Featured On:

logos

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

justice
Gonzalez & Waddington Law Firm

Top Searched Keywords

Pro Tips for Handling Administrative Separation Boards at Fort Bragg

Understand Your Rights Early

As soon as you receive notice of an administrative separation board, familiarize yourself with your rights and the procedures involved. Early preparation allows for a stronger defense and reduces surprises during the hearing.

Gather Supporting Evidence

Collect all relevant documents, witness statements, and records that support your case. Comprehensive evidence can influence the board’s decision and help demonstrate your position clearly.

Engage Experienced Military Legal Counsel

Working with attorneys knowledgeable about military administrative separations, such as those at UCMJ Defense, can enhance your preparation and representation during the board process.

Why You Should Consider Legal Representation for Separation Boards at Fort Bragg

Legal representation provides crucial support in understanding military regulations, preparing your defense, and navigating the administrative separation process effectively. This can protect your career and post-service benefits.

Attorneys familiar with Fort Bragg and military law can tailor strategies to your individual circumstances, helping you achieve the best possible outcome from your board hearing.

Common Situations That Lead to Administrative Separation Boards

Service members may face administrative separation for a variety of reasons, including misconduct, failure to meet performance standards, or medical issues. Legal guidance is vital in these situations to ensure a fair process.

Misconduct Allegations

Charges such as violations of military regulations or criminal offenses often lead to separation boards, requiring strong legal advocacy to contest or mitigate consequences.

Unsatisfactory Performance or Conduct

When performance or behavior falls below military standards, administrative separation may be considered. Legal counsel can help present mitigating factors and character evidence.

Medical or Physical Limitations

In cases where medical issues affect service capability, boards assess suitability for continued service. Representation ensures your rights are respected and proper procedures followed.

Meet Your Defense Team

11 Michael Waddington HeadshotPro
Alexandra Gonzalez - Top Military Defense Lawyer

Michael S. Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

five golden stars product rating review for apps and websites vector 1

PARTNER

Michael Waddington is a best‐selling author and criminal defense attorney who represents military personnel in courts worldwide—both after charges are filed and during pre‐charge investigations—specializing in serious offenses such as war crimes, sex crimes, violent crimes, and white‐collar cases. Drawing on his rigorous discipline from Brazilian Jiu‐Jitsu, he trains both civilian and military defense lawyers in advanced cross‐examination techniques, a skillset detailed in his three popular books on the subject. His expertise is regularly sought by major media outlets—ranging from CNN and 60 Minutes to the BBC and ABC’s “Nightline”—and he has even contributed to episodes of the Golden Globe–winning series “The Good Wife.” Michael instructs both civilian and military criminal defense attorneys on the art of effectively cross-examining and discrediting adversarial witnesses. Drawing from his three best-selling books on cross-examination and years of experience confronting numerous cunning and aggressive prosecution witnesses.
Alexandra Gonzalez - Top Military Defense Lawyer

Alexandra González-Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

five golden stars product rating review for apps and websites vector 1

PARTNER

Alexandra González is a founding partner of González & Waddington Law Firm, practicing in Florida, Georgia, and military courts worldwide, where she has defended hundreds of clients charged with violent crimes, sexual assault, and white-collar offenses since 2003. She has led high-profile military sexual assault and war-crimes cases stemming from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and is regularly featured by major outlets such as 60 Minutes, ABC’s Nightline, Rolling Stone, the BBC, Fox News, and CNN. As one of the first Public Defenders for Georgia’s Augusta Judicial Circuit, she handled a broad spectrum of cases—including rape, larceny, violent crimes, and domestic violence—and she holds a J.D. from Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, where she completed the nationally ranked Integrated Trial Advocacy Program. A Georgia-registered mediator, she continues to shape the practice of military and civilian defense through her courtroom work and advocacy.

Battle-Tested Results

Recent Case Results

Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year

U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA

Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2

Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape

U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration

ucmj2

Take Command of Your Defense

At UCMJ Defense, we are committed to supporting service members at Fort Bragg through every step of the administrative separation process. Our legal team is available to discuss your case and provide the guidance you need during this difficult time.

Why Military Personnel at Fort Bragg Trust UCMJ Defense for Separation Board Representation

Service members choose UCMJ Defense because of our comprehensive knowledge of military law and our dedication to protecting clients’ rights during administrative separations. We understand the unique challenges faced by soldiers at Fort Bragg and provide personalized support.
Our attorneys Waddington and Gonzalez have extensive experience representing military clients nationwide. We strive to deliver clear guidance, responsive communication, and vigorous advocacy tailored to your situation.

Call Us Today

Check Out Our Newest Book

UCMJ Survival Guide

UCMJ Survival Guide: The Complete Military Justice Manual for Service Members & Families: Whether you’re facing an investigation, court-martial, Article 15 (NJP), or administrative separation, UCMJ Survival Guide is your essential resource for navigating the military justice system. Written by two of the most experienced and respected military defense lawyers in the field—Michael and Alexandra Waddington—this comprehensive guide delivers clear, actionable strategies to protect your career, reputation, and future. Michael and Alexandra are among the top military defense lawyers and recognized as some of the most experienced sexual assault defense attorneys in the country. They have successfully defended service members in high-profile Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault cases, complex court-martials, and administrative separation proceedings across all branches of the U.S. military.
amazonbuy
ucmjbook

UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers

ucmjglobe

Worldwide Military Defense Experience

Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation

The González & Waddington Law Firm’s global reach sets them apart from regional military defense attorneys. With active cases spanning from Fort Bragg to forward operating bases in combat zones, from Norfolk Naval Station to remote Air Force installations, their practice truly encompasses the worldwide nature of modern military service.
ucmjsoldier 1

Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses

War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense

The most serious charges under the UCMJ require the most experienced defense attorneys. The González & Waddington Law Firm has built its reputation by successfully defending service members against the gravest allegations—cases where the stakes couldn’t be higher and the margin for error is virtually nonexistent.
ucmjmedia

Media and High-Profile Case Experience

Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets

The legal expertise of Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington has garnered attention from the world’s most prestigious media outlets, a testament to their standing as leading authorities in military criminal defense. This media recognition reflects not only their legal acumen but also their ability to handle high-stakes cases under intense public scrutiny.
gwyoutube scaled

Playlist

7 Videos

Frequently Asked Questions About Administrative Separation Boards at Fort Bragg

What is an administrative separation board?

An administrative separation board is a military panel that determines whether a service member should be separated from the armed forces based on various factors such as misconduct or performance issues. The board reviews evidence and hears testimony before making recommendations. This process can significantly impact a service member’s career and benefits. It is important to understand the procedures and your rights during this process. Legal representation can help you navigate the complexities and prepare an effective defense to protect your interests.

Preparing for a separation board hearing involves gathering all relevant evidence, including service records, character references, and any documentation that supports your case. Understanding the charges against you and the procedures of the board is vital. Consulting with legal counsel experienced in military law can greatly improve your readiness by helping you develop a clear strategy and ensuring your rights are fully protected throughout the hearing.

Yes, you have the right to legal counsel or advisory assistance during an administrative separation board. Legal representation ensures that your case is presented effectively and that the board follows proper procedures. Having an attorney familiar with military administrative law can help protect your rights and advocate on your behalf during the hearing.

The board can recommend various types of discharge characterizations, including honorable, general, or other than honorable. The type of discharge affects your eligibility for veterans’ benefits and future employment opportunities. It is important to have legal representation to advocate for the most favorable discharge characterization possible based on the circumstances of your case.

The administrative separation process timeline varies depending on the complexity of the case and the military branch involved. Typically, it includes notification, investigation, the board hearing, and final decision. It is important to stay informed and work with legal counsel to ensure timely and proper handling of your case throughout this process.

In some cases, it may be possible to appeal the decision of an administrative separation board. The appeals process requires strict adherence to military regulations and deadlines. Consulting with an attorney experienced in military law will help you understand your options and the steps necessary to pursue an appeal if warranted.

Your discharge characterization from an administrative separation board can impact your eligibility for veterans’ benefits, including healthcare, education, and retirement benefits. An unfavorable discharge may limit access to these benefits. Legal representation aims to secure the best possible discharge status to protect your entitlement to these important resources.

UCMJ Defense provides comprehensive legal support for service members facing administrative separation boards. Our attorneys assist with case evaluation, evidence gathering, hearing preparation, and representation during the board. We strive to ensure your rights are protected and that you receive fair treatment throughout the process.

Attendance requirements vary by branch and case specifics, but generally, it is advisable to attend the hearing to provide testimony and respond to charges. If you cannot attend in person, your legal representative can often appear on your behalf. Discussing attendance options with your attorney will help clarify the best approach for your situation.

If you receive a notification for an administrative separation board, it is important to act promptly. Review the notice carefully, gather relevant documents, and seek legal advice immediately. Early preparation improves your ability to present a strong defense and protect your military career and benefits during the board proceedings.

LEGAL SERVICES

MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS
LEGAL DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES
MILITARY DEFENSE
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
INVESTIGATIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE & DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
ARMY
AIR FORCE
SPACE FORCE
MARINE CORPS
COAST GUARD
UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE
SEX CRIMES
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
VIOLENT CRIMES
PROPERTY & FINANCIAL
INTEGRITY & TRUTH
MILITARY CONDUCT
CYBER & MISCONDUCT

Leave a Reply