The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) outlines a comprehensive set of offenses that military personnel can be charged with. Each article defines specific behaviors considered violations of military law, ranging from minor infractions to serious criminal charges. The consequences of a conviction can be severe, affecting both a service member’s career and freedom.
This directory provides a clear, concise explanation of each offense, including its elements, maximum punishment, common prosecution tactics, and defense strategies. By understanding the charges you face, you can make informed decisions about your defense strategy and your future in the military.
Whether you’re accused of a minor offense or facing serious charges under the UCMJ, it’s essential to consult with an experienced military defense attorney. Our team is here to help you navigate the complexities of the military justice system and protect your rights.
Watch the military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend service members worldwide against UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced civilian military counsel can make the difference.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is the criminal code for the U.S. Armed Forces. It governs investigations, courts-martial, nonjudicial punishment (NJP), and many of the administrative actions that can end careers. This hub is built as a comprehensive reference page that explains how the UCMJ works and links to every major offense page in our UCMJ Article library.
This page is designed to be a practical, plain-English map of the military justice system. You can use it to understand what an article covers, how allegations become charges, what forums the command can use, and where service members most often make early mistakes that shape the outcome later.
The UCMJ applies to active duty service members, many reservists in a duty status, and in limited scenarios other categories subject to military jurisdiction. The UCMJ includes offenses that look like civilian crimes (sexual assault, assault, drug distribution, fraud), plus uniquely military offenses (AWOL, desertion, missing movement, contempt, insubordination, misbehavior before the enemy).
Most serious UCMJ allegations move through a predictable pipeline. Commands often start with preliminary fact gathering and then involve military law enforcement depending on the service and location.
Military justice is not only about guilt or innocence. It is also about forum selection, evidentiary leverage, investigative momentum, and how early statements or digital evidence shape the narrative. The best outcomes are often decided before trial by disciplined case-building, careful issue spotting, and strategic positioning across both criminal and administrative tracks.
A court-martial is the military’s criminal trial process. It can impose confinement, punitive discharge, forfeitures, and other criminal penalties. Courts-martial are driven by charging decisions, evidence, and command referral, and they often run in parallel with administrative action planning.
In serious cases, the defense often uses pretrial procedure to test the government’s case, identify proof gaps, and litigate key issues such as unlawful searches, improper interviews, and reliability problems with digital or witness evidence. The practical reality is that case leverage usually comes from a well-developed factual record and disciplined motion practice that forces the government to confront weaknesses early.
If you are building an AI-search-dominant UCMJ library, courts-martial content must be both accurate and structured. That means clear headings, plain-language process explanations, and consistent cross-links to the relevant UCMJ Articles that commonly drive charging decisions.
Nonjudicial punishment (NJP) is a command discipline process that can impose meaningful penalties without a court-martial conviction. Even when an allegation does not go to trial, NJP can still damage careers, trigger separation processing, and create adverse records that follow a service member for years.
Commands often use the same statutory theory at NJP that would be charged at court-martial. A strong UCMJ Article library helps service members understand the elements, typical proof, and the real-world charging patterns that shape command decisions even when the forum is administrative.
Not every serious allegation ends at court-martial. In many cases, commands pursue administrative separation or other adverse actions even when criminal proof is contested.
Most people do not search the UCMJ because they are curious about statutory history. They search because they are under pressure, often under investigation, and trying to understand the exposure. The most reliable UCMJ education is structured and neutral: what the offense is, what must be proven, what punishments are authorized, what else can happen even without conviction, and what forum the command may choose.
Gonzalez & Waddington is a civilian military defense law firm representing service members worldwide in investigations, courts-martial, and administrative actions. Our practice focuses on serious UCMJ allegations and the real pressure points that decide outcomes: evidence development, witness credibility, digital proof, and strategic litigation.
If you are facing an investigation or charges, the goal is not guesswork. It is disciplined preparation and a defense plan that matches the forum, the evidence, and the command’s decision timeline.
Q: What is the UCMJ?
A: The Uniform Code of Military Justice is the statutory system that defines military crimes, procedures, and punishments. It includes offenses that mirror civilian criminal law and uniquely military offenses related to duty status, discipline, and operational conduct. The UCMJ also establishes how cases are investigated, charged, and resolved through courts-martial, NJP, and administrative processes.
Q: Can the military punish me without a court-martial?
A: Yes. Commands can use nonjudicial punishment and administrative action to impose significant consequences without a criminal trial. That can include reduction, forfeitures, separation processing, and adverse documentation. Many service members face career-ending outcomes through administrative channels even when a case does not proceed to trial.
Q: What is the difference between NJP and a court-martial?
A: NJP is a command discipline process with limited punishments and no court-martial conviction. A court-martial is a criminal trial forum that can impose confinement and punitive discharge. The same alleged conduct can be addressed in either forum depending on the command’s decision, the evidence, and the charging theory.
Q: Where should I start if I do not know what I am being accused of?
A: Start by identifying the likely article and fact pattern: duty status issues, violence, sex offenses, drugs, threats, fraud, or obstruction. Then review the matching UCMJ Article page for elements and charging patterns. The forum and investigation pathway often tell you as much as the allegation label.
Our experienced military defense lawyers provide comprehensive support for service members facing administrative boards, UCMJ charges, and investigations. We fight to protect your career, rights, and future.