Civilian military defense lawyers · Army · Navy · Air Force · Marine Corps · Coast Guard · Space Force · Worldwide Text 954-799-4019 Call 1-800-921-8607

Vermont Military Defense Lawyers | UCMJ Court-Martial Defense

Former Army JAG and Senior Defense Counsel 25+ years defending service members Courts-martial defense worldwide

Reviewed by Michael Waddington, Founding Partner Updated November 7, 2026

Vermont Military Defense Lawyers

Short answer: Service members in Vermont, including airmen of the 158th Fighter Wing in South Burlington and soldiers of the Vermont Army National Guard, and Guard and Reserve members when they are in a federal status covered by the UCMJ (Article 2, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 802), can hire a civilian military defense lawyer in addition to free military defense counsel (Article 38(b), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 838). If Air Force OSI or Army CID asks to interview you, you have the right to remain silent and must be told what you are suspected of before questioning (Article 31(b), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 831). An arrest in Burlington or elsewhere in Vermont can lead to both a Vermont prosecution and military action (Gamble v. United States, 587 U.S. 678 (2019)). Gonzalez & Waddington travels to Vermont for interviews, hearings and trials. Call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-799-4019.

Service members connected to Vermont can turn to Gonzalez & Waddington, LLC, with civilian military defense counsel Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington, for representation in UCMJ investigations, court-martial defense, and adverse administrative matters. Vermont’s military footprint is centered on the National Guard, so legal issues may arise during federal service, training, mobilization, or other duty statuses. The firm represents service members worldwide and can advise those associated with Vermont without claiming a local office or verified Vermont-specific case history.

Why Vermont military defense issues have a distinct context

Vermont is not defined by a large active-duty installation. Official sources instead show a military presence centered on the Vermont Army National Guard and Vermont Air National Guard. That matters for anyone searching for military defense counsel in Vermont because the legal and command setting is often tied to Guard service, training missions, and the state-federal structure of the National Guard rather than a single major base.

The Vermont National Guard describes its mission as providing ready forces to defend the nation and serve communities. Its role is dual in nature. In state status, Guard forces can respond under the governor’s authority. In federal status, they may be activated for national missions, including overseas service. For service members, that dual structure can make military justice and administrative problems feel especially disruptive, because a case may affect both military responsibilities and civilian life in Vermont.

Key Vermont military locations shaping the statewide picture

A useful Vermont military defense overview starts with a few official locations. Camp Johnson in Colchester is identified as the headquarters of the Vermont Army National Guard. South Burlington is home to the 158th Fighter Wing at the Vermont Air National Guard Base. Camp Ethan Allen Training Site in Jericho is a major training location and also home to the Army Mountain Warfare School, a well-known training mission focused on mountain and cold-weather operations.

These sites help explain why Vermont military cases can involve very different professional settings. A matter connected to headquarters functions at Camp Johnson may look different from one arising from aviation operations associated with the 158th Fighter Wing or from field training at Ethan Allen. Even without a single dominant active-duty post, Vermont has a substantial defense footprint through these Guard-centered facilities and missions.

Command structure and mission depth

Official Vermont National Guard sources identify Joint Force Headquarters and four O-6 level commands: the 86th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (Mountain), the 124th Regional Training Institute, the Garrison Support Command, and the 158th Fighter Wing. That structure shows that Vermont’s military community is more than a collection of small armories. It includes operational, training, support, and aviation commands that can place service members into demanding environments where allegations, command inquiries, and administrative actions may carry serious consequences.

What military defense counsel can help address in Vermont

For service members associated with Vermont, the need for counsel may begin well before any court-martial. A problem can start with questioning, a command-directed inquiry, or notice of adverse paperwork. In other situations, the issue may already involve potential UCMJ charges or a more formal administrative process. In either posture, early civilian defense representation can help a service member understand the accusation, protect communications, and respond carefully to the next step in the process.

That is especially important in a state where the military presence is spread across Guard commands and training sites rather than concentrated in one installation. A Vermont-related matter may involve unit leadership, statewide headquarters functions, aviation personnel, or training cadres. The underlying facts can differ widely, but the need for a measured legal response is constant when a career, reputation, or continued service may be at risk.

A practical starting point for Vermont service members

If you are a soldier or airman serving with, training in, or otherwise connected to Vermont, it helps to begin with the real scope of the location. This is a statewide Vermont military defense issue, not merely an installation-specific question. The most important local facts are that Vermont’s military presence is Guard-heavy, that Camp Johnson in Colchester serves as a headquarters hub, that the 158th Fighter Wing anchors the Air Guard presence in South Burlington, and that Camp Ethan Allen Training Site in Jericho supports significant training activity, including the Army Mountain Warfare School.

Gonzalez & Waddington, LLC, including Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington, represents service members worldwide in military defense matters. If you need counsel related to Vermont service, an investigation, a court-martial, or administrative action, contact the firm to discuss your situation at ucmjdefense.com or call 1-800-921-8607.

Vermont Military Defense Lawyers | UCMJ Court-Martial Defense

Vermont Military Defense Lawyers | Court-Martial Attorneys for Vermont National Guard, Air National Guard, and Military Personnel

Trial-Focused Court-Martial Defense for Service Members Stationed in Vermont

If you are searching for a Vermont military defense lawyer or a court-martial attorney representing service members in Vermont, you are likely facing a serious military justice issue. Although Vermont does not contain large active-duty military installations, it hosts important Air National Guard, Army National Guard, Reserve, and homeland defense missions that place service members under the authority of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) whenever they serve on federal active-duty orders. Allegations that begin as command inquiries or informal complaints can rapidly develop into criminal investigations, administrative separation proceedings, Article 15 actions, Article 32 hearings, and courts-martial.

Gonzalez & Waddington represents service members stationed throughout Vermont and worldwide who face serious military criminal allegations. The firm focuses exclusively on military defense and contested court-martial litigation. Their attorneys defend Soldiers, Airmen, Sailors, Marines, Coast Guardsmen, Reservists, National Guard members, and Space Force personnel accused of felony-level offenses under the UCMJ.

Early legal representation is often critical. By the time many service members learn they are under investigation, investigators may already have collected statements, downloaded phones, interviewed witnesses, and briefed command leadership.

Military Justice in Vermont

Many Vermont service members mistakenly believe that military justice issues only arise on large active-duty bases. In reality, National Guard personnel frequently face federal military investigations involving:

  • Training periods
  • Annual training exercises
  • Federal mobilizations
  • Title 10 deployments
  • Overseas assignments
  • Joint training operations
  • State-to-federal duty transitions
  • Military schools and professional education programs

Because Vermont units regularly deploy throughout the United States, Europe, the Middle East, and Indo-Pacific regions, investigations may involve witnesses and evidence located across multiple states and countries.

How Vermont Court-Martial Lawyers Protect Service Members

  • Immediate investigation control: manage communications with CID, NCIS, OSI, CGIS, FBI agents, state investigators, and command personnel
  • Statement protection: prevent damaging admissions during questioning and rights advisements
  • Evidence preservation: secure text messages, emails, social media communications, videos, and witness accounts
  • Investigative analysis: identify unsupported assumptions, credibility issues, and missing evidence
  • Aggressive motion practice: challenge unlawful searches, seizures, and digital evidence collection
  • Trial preparation: build cross-examination plans, defense themes, expert testimony, and litigation strategy

Common UCMJ Charges Prosecuted in Vermont Military Cases

Military personnel connected to Vermont units frequently face allegations involving:

  • Article 120 sexual assault allegations
  • Article 128 assault and domestic violence allegations
  • Drug offenses and urinalysis cases
  • Article 107 false official statement allegations
  • Orders violations
  • Larceny and financial misconduct investigations
  • Government travel card fraud allegations
  • Recruiting misconduct investigations
  • Security clearance concerns
  • Officer misconduct allegations
  • National Guard administrative investigations

Vermont Military Installations and Commands We Cover

  • Burlington Air National Guard Base – Home of the Vermont Air National Guard’s F-35 Lightning II mission.
  • Camp Johnson National Guard Training Center – Headquarters for the Vermont National Guard.
  • Ethan Allen Firing Range – Major military training facility supporting live-fire and readiness operations.
  • Army National Guard Armories Throughout Vermont
  • Reserve Components and Federal Military Personnel Assigned to Vermont

Burlington Air National Guard Base and F-35 Operations

One of Vermont’s most significant military installations is Burlington Air National Guard Base. The installation supports the Vermont Air National Guard’s F-35 fighter mission and homeland defense responsibilities.

Because of the highly technical nature of aviation operations, investigations frequently involve:

  • Classified information allegations
  • Professional relationship investigations
  • Government computer usage allegations
  • Flight operations-related incidents
  • False statement investigations
  • Fitness-for-duty concerns
  • Drug and alcohol allegations

These cases often involve extensive digital evidence, administrative records, and witness testimony from both military and civilian personnel.

Camp Johnson Military Investigations

Camp Johnson serves as the headquarters of the Vermont National Guard and supports administrative, training, and readiness operations.

Investigations arising from Camp Johnson frequently involve:

  • National Guard administrative actions
  • Leadership misconduct allegations
  • Officer investigations
  • Equal opportunity complaints
  • Sexual harassment allegations
  • Travel voucher investigations
  • Government property allegations
  • Duty performance concerns

Ethan Allen Firing Range and Training-Related Cases

The Ethan Allen Firing Range hosts military training involving Vermont National Guard personnel and units from around the country.

Training-related investigations often involve:

  • Weapons accountability issues
  • Training accidents
  • Vehicle incidents
  • Orders violations
  • Barracks misconduct
  • Alcohol-related allegations
  • Property damage investigations
  • Safety violations

Because exercises frequently involve personnel from multiple states, these investigations can become highly complex.

Vermont-Specific Fictional Court-Martial Examples

The following examples are entirely fictional and provided only to illustrate common fact patterns that may arise in Vermont military communities.

  • Burlington Article 120 Investigation: An Air National Guard member assigned to the F-35 mission attends an off-duty gathering near downtown Burlington. Months later an allegation is reported involving disputed consent, conflicting witness accounts, and extensive text-message evidence.
  • St. Albans Domestic Violence Case: A National Guard NCO becomes involved in a domestic dispute following a drill weekend. Civilian police respond and military authorities later initiate a separate investigation under the UCMJ.
  • Montpelier Government Travel Card Investigation: A Soldier attending training allegedly uses a government travel card for unauthorized purchases. Financial records and reimbursement paperwork become central issues.
  • Camp Johnson False Official Statement Allegation: During an administrative inquiry, a service member allegedly provides inaccurate information concerning deployment readiness requirements.
  • Ethan Allen Training Accident Investigation: Following a live-fire exercise, questions arise regarding safety compliance and command supervision. Investigators examine training records and witness testimony from multiple units.
  • South Burlington Drug Case: A random urinalysis results in a positive laboratory report. The defense focuses on collection procedures, laboratory documentation, supplement usage, and chain-of-custody issues.
  • Barre Recruiting Misconduct Investigation: A recruiter is accused of providing inaccurate enlistment information. Investigators review recruiting records, communications, and applicant interviews.

Military Communities Frequently Connected to Vermont Investigations

Military justice matters often arise in civilian communities where service members live and work.

Common Vermont locations include:

  • Burlington
  • South Burlington
  • Colchester
  • Essex Junction
  • St. Albans
  • Montpelier
  • Barre
  • Rutland
  • Bennington
  • Brattleboro
  • Middlebury
  • Newport
  • White River Junction

Investigations often involve civilian police agencies, surveillance footage, digital communications, and civilian witnesses.

National Guard and Reserve Issues Unique to Vermont

Because Vermont’s military presence is heavily National Guard-focused, many service members face legal issues involving:

  • Federal activation orders
  • Title 10 service
  • Deployment-related misconduct allegations
  • Officer Boards of Inquiry
  • Administrative separation proceedings
  • General Officer Memoranda of Reprimand (GOMORs)
  • Security clearance suspensions
  • Adverse evaluation reports
  • Fitness-for-duty investigations
  • Professional licensing concerns

Many of these matters carry career consequences even when no criminal charges are ultimately filed.

When to Contact a Vermont Military Defense Lawyer

  • You have been contacted by military investigators
  • You have received an Article 31 rights advisement
  • You are scheduled for questioning
  • You are asked to provide a written statement
  • You received adverse administrative paperwork
  • You are facing an Article 15 or NJP proceeding
  • You are pending an Article 32 hearing
  • You are under investigation for an Article 120 allegation
  • You received notice of an administrative separation board
  • You believe court-martial charges may be filed

Nearby Military Installations and Regional Defense Coverage

Vermont UCMJ Defense Links

I was wrongly accused under articles 120, 128b, and 130, and the legal battle was an incredibly draining experience. Throughout the two-and-a-half-year ordeal, Michael and Alexandra displayed unmatched professionalism, deep legal expertise, and genuine care for my case.

— Chad E. ★★★★★ Google review · More client reviews

Prior results and client testimonials do not guarantee a similar outcome, and you may not obtain the same or similar results. Every case is different. No client was paid for a review.

Vermont Military Defense FAQ

Can I hire a civilian military defense lawyer for a case in Vermont?

Yes. At a general or special court-martial you may be represented by a civilian lawyer you hire, and your detailed military defense counsel stays on the case unless you excuse them (Article 38(b), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 838). A civilian lawyer can also help during the investigation, at an Article 32 preliminary hearing, and with administrative actions such as reprimands and separation boards.

Do I have to answer questions from Air Force OSI or Army CID?

No. Before military investigators question you as a suspect, they must tell you what you are suspected of, that you have the right to remain silent, and that anything you say can be used against you at a court-martial (Article 31(b), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 831). Say that you want a lawyer and do not answer questions until you get advice.

Can Vermont and the military both prosecute me for the same incident?

Yes. A state and the federal government are separate sovereigns, so a Vermont prosecution does not bar a court-martial for the same conduct (Gamble v. United States, 587 U.S. 678 (2019)). Your command can also take administrative action, such as a reprimand or separation, based on the same facts.

Can I use marijuana in Vermont if it is legal under state law?

No. Wrongful use or possession of marijuana is a crime under the UCMJ no matter what Vermont law allows (Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a). A positive urinalysis or an admission can lead to nonjudicial punishment, separation or a court-martial.

Does the UCMJ apply to National Guard members in Vermont?

Only in federal service. Reserve members are subject to the UCMJ on active duty and during inactive-duty training, and National Guard members are subject to it only when they are in federal service (Article 2, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 802). Guard members on state active duty or in Title 32 status are governed by the state’s military code instead.

Military investigators want to interview me at Vermont. Do I have to talk to them?

No. Article 31(b) of the UCMJ requires investigators to tell you what you are suspected of and that you have the right to remain silent, and you can ask for a lawyer before answering anything. An interview is evidence collection, and military investigators can title you as a subject on a low "credible information" standard that can follow you into background and clearance checks even if the case is dropped. Politely decline, ask for counsel, and call a military defense lawyer before you say anything.

Video: What to Look For When Hiring a Court-Martial Lawyer (7:29) — watch on YouTube

Video transcript

Transcript of the video “How to Choose a Court-Martial Lawyer | What Trial Experience Actually Matters?,” with Michael Waddington of Gonzalez & Waddington.

Read the full transcript of this video

What trial experience actually matters in a court-martial lawyer? The experience that counts is personally trying contested cases to a verdict. Standing up, cross-examining government witnesses, arguing motions, making objections, and giving the closing. Recent contested trials in military courts matter most. Years in practice, the number of cases handled and plea deals don’t tell you whether a lawyer can win a trial.

And here’s the part people miss. Trial experience matters even if your case never goes to trial. I’m Michael Waddington, civilian military defense lawyer and co-founder of Gonzalez & Waddington. And I’ve tried cases in military and civilian courts around the world for 26 years. I teach trial skills to other defense lawyers and I wrote kick-ass closings and the art of trial warfare.

In this video, I’ll explain which kinds of experience matter, how plea practice differs from trial work, and how to check what a lawyer has really done. First, why trial experience matters even if you plead. Most cases don’t end in a full trial. Many end in a plea agreement, a dismissal, or an administrative resolution. So, why does trial experience matter?

Leverage. Prosecutors, special trial counsel, and convening authorities know which defense lawyers try cases and which ones always plead. When the government believes your lawyer will take the case to verdict and do it well, the offers get better, weak charges get dropped, and some cases go away. A lawyer who never tries cases negotiates from weakness, whether they say so or not. If a plea agreement is the right choice for you, you want it negotiated by someone the government doesn’t want to face at trial.

We have a separate video on how plea agreements work. Second, the kinds of experience and what each one is worth. Lawyers describe their experience in ways that sound alike but aren’t. Contested trials to verdict. The lawyer led the defense through a full trial and the panel or the judge decided.

This is the experience that matters most. Motions litigation. Suppressing statements or searches, unlawful command influence, speedy trial, and illegal pre-trial punishment. Strong motions practice can win a case before trial. Article 32 hearings useful and a chance to lock in witness testimony, but a preliminary hearing isn’t a trial.

Second chair, valuable training, but the person in the second chair didn’t make the decisions. Plea negotiation, a real skill, but a different one. Prosecution experience. A former trial counsel knows how the government builds a case. That helps, but prosecuting and defending take different instincts.

And civilian criminal trials. Many trial skills carry over, but a court-martial has different rules, a different jury, and a different culture. Third, why military trial experience is its own thing. A good civilian trial lawyer can still be lost in a courtroom on base. Here’s what’s different.

The panel. Court-martial members are officers, and if you ask, enlisted members selected by the convening authority. They’re educated, used to following orders, and trained to respect the chain of command. You don’t argue to them the way you argue to a civilian jury. The rules, the military rules of evidence and the rules for courts-martial are close to the federal rules, but not the same.

The differences decide motions. Sentencing for offenses after December 27th, 2023. The military judge decides most sentences under new sentencing parameters. That changes how you present mitigation and when you choose a panel. And rank and culture.

How a witness’s rank, a unit’s reputation, or a commander’s opinion plays with members. That’s learned in the courtroom, not from a book. Fourth, what trial skill actually looks like. When you’re judging a lawyer, these are the skills behind the word experienced. Witness control on cross.

Short leading questions. The witness answers the lawyer’s questions, not the ones they wish they’d been asked. Impeachment. When a witness changes their story, the lawyer commits them to the new version, builds up the earlier statement, and then confronts them with it cleanly so the panel sees it. Objections knowing when to object, when not to, and how to preserve the issue for appeal.

Experts challenging whether an expert should testify at all and cross-examining them if they do. A theory that runs from start to finish. The same story in voadier, opening, cross, and closing. Adapting testimony goes sideways in every trial. Experienced lawyers adjust without losing the thread and the closing pulling the evidence together into reasonable doubt the members can explain to each other in deliberations.

Fifth, recency. Military justice has changed more in the last 10 years than in the 40 years before. The Military Justice Act of 2016, the Office of Special trial counsel, and new sentencing rules have changed how cases are charged, tried, and sentenced. Ask about contested trials in the last few years, not just a career total. Sixth, things that sound impressive, but don’t prove trial skill.

Years licensed. 20 years of paperwork is not 20 years of trials. Never lost a case. That often means the lawyer doesn’t try cases. Every trial lawyer who tries hard cases has lost some.

Television appearances. I’ve done a lot of media work. It doesn’t prove anything about trial skill. Mine or anyone else’s and the number of cases handled. Most of those may be please Article 15s and administrative actions.

Seventh, how to check. Ask directly. How many contested trials to verdict in the last 3 years? What were the charges? Who conducted the cross and the closing?

Ask about a loss. What happened? And what did you learn? A real trial lawyer answers that without flinching. Look at appellet opinions.

Opinions from the court of appeals for the armed forces and from the service courts of criminal appeals often name defense counsel. They’re public. Look at what they teach and write. If other lawyers ask someone to teach trial skills, that’s a signal you can check and watch them. Many lawyers have videos of themselves teaching or explaining cases.

Watch how they think. At Gonzalez & Waddington, Alexandra and I personally try contested courts. Marshall, I’ve defended cases in Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Bahrain, Iraq, England, and across the United States. I’ve taught cross-examination and trial strategy for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the National Trial Lawyers Summit, and Gideon’s Promise. And I teach as an adjunct professor at Florida International University College of Law.

I’m Michael Waddington with Gonzalez & Waddington. So, what trial experience actually matters? Recent contested trials to verdict in military courts where the lawyer you’re hiring did the cross and the closing. That experience wins trials and it gets better results in the cases that never go to trial. I’m Michael Waddington with Gonzalez & Waddington.

We defend service members worldwide. Call us at 1800-921-8607 or visit ucmjdefense.com. When the command knows you’ve got real defense, the game changes.

Aggressive Criminal Defense Lawyers

This video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make a difference.

Facing a military investigation, UCMJ allegation, or serious criminal charge? Gonzalez & Waddington provides trial-focused defense for high-stakes cases. Call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-799-4019 for a confidential, no-cost consultation.

Call now Text us Message