Table Contents
Non-Judicial Punishment, commonly known as Article 15 in the Army and Air Force, NJP in the Navy and Coast Guard, and Captain’s Mast or simply Mast in naval services, is a command-level disciplinary process used to address minor violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It allows commanders to resolve misconduct internally without initiating a formal judicial proceeding.
NJP differs from a court-martial in that it is administrative rather than judicial. A court-martial is a formal criminal trial with a military judge, legal representation, rules of evidence, and the possibility of criminal conviction. NJP, by contrast, is conducted by a commanding officer, uses streamlined procedures, and does not result in a criminal conviction.
Even though NJP is not a criminal court action, it creates a permanent entry in a service member’s military records because it documents substantiated misconduct and the disciplinary action taken. This record becomes part of the individual’s official personnel file, ensuring the military maintains an accurate history of administrative actions throughout the member’s career.
Non‑Judicial Punishment (Article 15, NJP, or Mast) is formal military discipline, not a minor administrative action. Service members in Homestead can face significant consequences to rank, pay, and career progression. Gonzalez & Waddington provides guidance on NJP procedures and defense considerations. Call 1‑800‑921‑8607 for information.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
At Homestead, Non‑Judicial Punishment is treated as a formal command action rather than minor discipline because it involves clear command discretion and official visibility. Commanders evaluate evidence, determine appropriate measures, and document the outcome, creating a record that is reviewed by supervisory channels and becomes part of the member’s administrative history.
NJP can also influence a member’s career trajectory, which goes beyond the scope of routine corrective counseling. Because the action is recorded and may be reviewed during career development processes, it can affect promotion competitiveness, assignment opportunities, and eligibility for certain professional roles.
Additionally, NJP often leads to follow‑on administrative steps due to the documented nature of the proceeding. The record may prompt further evaluation of suitability, requirements for additional oversight, or consideration of corrective programs, demonstrating that NJP is more consequential than minor disciplinary measures.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
The Non‑Judicial Punishment process at Homestead follows a structured sequence that outlines how an alleged violation is reviewed and addressed by command authorities. Each stage ensures the member is informed of the basis for the action and the steps involved in the proceedings.
The process moves from the initial report of conduct concerns through the commander’s actions and concludes with formal documentation. The flow below reflects the standard progression used when administering this type of administrative action.
Service members at Homestead may face administrative discipline when expectations in official orders or regulations are not followed. These situations can include missed deadlines, improper uniform wear, or misunderstandings about duty requirements, all of which may prompt leadership to address the matter through Non‑Judicial Punishment rather than criminal proceedings.
Alcohol-related incidents are another area where NJP may be used. This can involve situations such as showing up late to duty after drinking, possessing alcohol in restricted areas, or other circumstances where alcohol use affects readiness. These issues are typically handled administratively to correct behavior and maintain good order.
Conduct and performance concerns can also lead to NJP when they affect a unit’s cohesion or mission effectiveness. Examples include friction with coworkers, failure to follow instructions, or repeated lapses in responsibilities. In these cases, NJP functions as a corrective tool focused on improvement rather than a determination of criminal guilt.
Non‑Judicial Punishment proceedings at Homestead often rely on written statements and official reports created during the initial stages of an incident, including duty logs, security forces documentation, and member statements collected by unit personnel.
Investigative summaries prepared by command or base agencies may also be included, providing a consolidated account of the relevant findings, timelines, and materials gathered during preliminary inquiries or command‑directed investigations.
Witness accounts are frequently incorporated to clarify events, and all evidence is considered within the framework of command discretion, which determines how the information is weighed and what materials are deemed pertinent to the proceeding.
At Homestead, Non‑Judicial Punishment can trigger further administrative scrutiny, including the issuance of letters of reprimand that become part of a member’s official record and may influence subsequent decisions by commanders and review authorities.
Depending on the circumstances and the member’s prior disciplinary history, NJP may prompt separation processing, where commanders evaluate whether continued service is appropriate under existing regulations and standards.
In more serious cases, adverse findings associated with NJP can increase the risk of a Board of Inquiry, which determines whether a service member should be retained or separated based on a broader evaluation of conduct and performance.
Even when separation does not occur, the administrative actions that follow NJP can carry long‑term career consequences, potentially affecting future assignments, promotion competitiveness, and overall standing within the service.
Non‑Judicial Punishment (NJP) often follows command-directed investigations, which establish factual findings before a commander decides whether Article 15 action is appropriate. Although an NJP is less formal than a court-martial, it is still grounded in evidence gathered through these investigative processes.
Depending on the nature and severity of the misconduct, NJP may be issued instead of administrative measures such as Letters of Reprimand, or it may be used in combination with them. A Letter of Reprimand can accompany or precede NJP and may influence the commander’s decision on the appropriate level of discipline.
More serious or repeated misconduct can move beyond NJP into more consequential proceedings, including Boards of Inquiry for service members whose continued service is in question, or court-martial escalation when the offense warrants full judicial action. In this way, NJP serves as a middle point within the broader range of military legal responses at Homestead.
When Non‑Judicial Punishment is initiated at Homestead, service members often retain Gonzalez & Waddington because the firm’s administrative defense practice is grounded in decades of military justice experience. Their work helps clients understand the regulatory landscape, the command’s procedural obligations, and the strategic considerations that arise the moment NJP is announced.
The firm’s experience extends beyond the immediate NJP hearing to the broader administrative consequences that may follow, including potential separation actions. Their attorneys understand how adverse findings at NJP can influence later administrative boards, and they help clients align their defense strategy so that the record created today supports a coherent and defensible position if separation proceedings occur.
Gonzalez & Waddington emphasize thorough record‑building, documentation, and mitigation advocacy. By helping service members prepare statements, gather supporting materials, and present their service history and mitigating factors effectively, they work to ensure that the administrative record accurately reflects the client’s performance, circumstances, and response to the allegations.
NJP is an administrative action and is not classified as a criminal proceeding. It does not create a federal criminal conviction. However, it is still an official disciplinary action under military regulations.
NJP is handled within a command and is designed for addressing misconduct without a formal trial. A court-martial is a judicial process with formal rules of evidence and procedure. The potential consequences and formality of a court-martial are significantly greater.
NJP can include reductions in rank or temporary forfeitures of pay as authorized by regulations. The specific authority depends on the imposing commander’s rank. These actions become part of the member’s service record.
An NJP can be reviewed during promotion evaluations. It may be considered by boards when assessing a service member’s overall performance and suitability. The extent of its influence varies by service policies.
NJP itself is not a separation process, but it may be used as supporting documentation in later administrative actions. Commands may reference it when evaluating a member’s duty performance or conduct. Any separation decision follows its own procedures and standards.
NJP records are maintained according to service-specific retention rules. Some entries may remain in personnel files accessible to promotion and assignment authorities. The duration and location of the record depend on regulatory guidelines.
Civilian lawyers may advise a service member before the NJP hearing. Commanders are not required to allow civilian counsel to speak during the proceeding itself. The member can still consult with counsel to understand the process.
A: Homestead sits at the southern edge of Miami-Dade County, positioned between Miami and the entrance to the Florida Keys. Its coastal setting and flat terrain create a distinctive environment shaped by tropical weather patterns. The surrounding civilian communities maintain close ties with the installation due to shared infrastructure and regional coordination.
A: The installation’s location near Key Largo, Biscayne Bay, and major South Florida transit corridors makes it significant for regional response and aviation operations. This positioning supports rapid movement of aircraft and personnel across the Caribbean basin. Local communities often interact with the base through emergency planning and cooperative support agreements.
A: Homestead hosts Air Force and joint-service elements that emphasize aviation readiness and support functions. The base’s mission centers on air defense, contingency staging, and training activities aligned with regional and hemispheric requirements. Key tenant units contribute to both operational capacity and steady-state support tasks.
A: Homestead’s mission profile leverages its airfield, strategic location, and partnerships with federal agencies. It supports rapid-deployment capabilities and periodic large-scale training events. These activities strengthen coordination across military and interagency stakeholders.
A: The active duty presence is moderate, with personnel supporting aviation, logistics, and command functions. Some units rotate through the installation for short-term training or operational staging. This creates a mix of permanent and transient military populations.
A: Training tempo fluctuates based on air operations and regional mission demands. The installation regularly hosts exercises involving fighter aircraft, support crews, and interagency partners. These activities contribute to a dynamic operational environment.
A: Personnel assigned to or passing through the installation are subject to the UCMJ for matters ranging from command investigations to administrative proceedings. The base’s active aviation and training operations can increase the likelihood of incidents requiring legal review. Command emphasis on readiness shapes how cases are managed.
A: Service members facing UCMJ actions, NJP, or courts-martial can seek legal representation. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers at Homestead in matters arising from the installation’s operational setting. Their work supports members navigating the military justice process.
Accepting NJP is not a formal admission of guilt under criminal law, but it may be treated as adverse information in administrative and career decisions. How it appears in the record often matters more than intent.
Yes, NJP is frequently cited as a basis for administrative separation or a Board of Inquiry. It can establish a pattern of misconduct even without criminal charges.
NJP is commonly used for minor misconduct, orders violations, duty performance issues, and behavior that a commander believes does not require a court-martial. The definition of “minor” is largely discretionary.
NJP is not a criminal conviction, but it is adverse administrative action that can carry serious career consequences. It can still be used against a service member in later proceedings.
Non-Judicial Punishment is an administrative disciplinary process that allows commanders to address alleged misconduct without a court-martial. It is governed by Article 15 of the UCMJ or equivalent service regulations.
