Table Contents
Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice defines a range of sexual offenses, distinguishing between sexual assault, which involves sexual acts accomplished by force, threat, or lack of consent, and abusive sexual contact, which involves nonconsensual sexual touching without rising to the level of a sexual act.
Both categories are treated as serious, felony‑level offenses within the military justice system, meaning they are prosecuted at a general or special court‑martial and carry significant punitive exposure consistent with the gravity of the allegations.
Prosecution under Article 120 is controlled by the military chain of command, with commanders initiating investigative actions, determining whether allegations proceed to court‑martial, and overseeing administrative aspects unique to the military environment.
This structure differs from civilian systems, where independent prosecutors make charging decisions and local jurisdictions govern procedures, resulting in a distinct investigative and adjudicative framework for service members at Homestead and other installations.
Article 120 covers felony-level sexual assault offenses under the UCMJ, where cases in Homestead can escalate quickly from investigation to court-martial. Allegations often involve expert evidence and risks of administrative separation. Gonzalez & Waddington provide guidance; call 1-800-921-8607 for information.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
Homestead’s zero‑tolerance culture and mandatory reporting obligations create an environment where any indication of potential misconduct is rapidly elevated to formal channels. Personnel are expected to report concerns immediately, and once reported, these concerns move into established procedures designed to safeguard all involved.
Command risk‑management responsibilities also drive rapid visibility. Leaders are required to document, assess, and respond to matters that may affect unit readiness, workplace safety, or organizational trust. As a result, an allegation can quickly reach senior levels to ensure compliance with oversight and accountability requirements.
In addition to command processes, individuals may face parallel administrative separation exposure. Even when a matter is still being evaluated, administrative reviews can begin independently of any criminal inquiry, creating a faster operational tempo and contributing to the sense of swift escalation.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Many cases involve alcohol-related settings where service members report impaired recollection or fragmented memories. These situations often include questions about consent, differing perceptions of events, and gaps in memory that make the underlying interactions difficult to reconstruct.
Another recurring pattern involves dating apps, text messages, and social media exchanges. Digital communication can shape expectations, create misunderstandings, or serve as key evidence when parties interpret messages differently before or after an encounter.
Incidents arising in barracks or tight-knit unit environments also appear frequently, especially when prior relationships, interpersonal conflicts, or third-party observations influence how conduct is reported. In some instances, relationship disputes or concerns raised by friends or supervisors contribute to the initiation of reports or command notifications.
In Article 120 cases arising at Homestead, investigations typically involve a coordinated effort between military law enforcement and other specialized personnel to gather information relevant to the alleged misconduct. These inquiries aim to document the circumstances surrounding the report and identify materials that may clarify what occurred.
Evidence collected during these investigations often includes testimonial, digital, and physical components that help create a detailed picture of events. The materials obtained are compiled and organized to support the command’s understanding of the case and to determine how the matter proceeds within the military justice system.
MRE 412 restricts the introduction of evidence concerning an alleged victim’s sexual behavior or predisposition, making it a central rule in Article 120 cases where privacy protections and relevance concerns regularly come to the forefront.
MRE 413 and MRE 414, by contrast, allow the government to introduce evidence of an accused’s other sexual assaults or child molestation offenses, creating a broader evidentiary landscape that can significantly expand what the members may hear.
Because these rules frequently require detailed motions, responses, and hearings, the process of litigating admissibility becomes a major stage in Article 120 trials, shaping which facts and narratives will be presented.
The court’s rulings on these evidentiary issues often define the scope and tone of the entire case, determining how the events are framed and what context the fact-finder is permitted to consider.
Article 120 cases at Homestead often hinge on the strength and interpretation of expert testimony, as well as how credibility is evaluated throughout the investigation and court‑martial process. Because these cases frequently involve complex scientific, psychological, and procedural evidence, the role of qualified experts becomes central to determining what occurred and how the evidence should be understood.
Defense teams and prosecutors alike rely on experts to clarify contested facts, identify weaknesses in investigative methods, and explain how human behavior and physical evidence may be misinterpreted. These expert contributions can significantly influence members’ perceptions of both the accuser’s and the accused’s credibility.
Service members at Homestead face the possibility of administrative separation even when no criminal conviction occurs, because the military may initiate non‑judicial administrative actions based solely on the underlying Article 120 allegations.
These actions often take the form of a show‑cause notification or a Board of Inquiry (BOI), where the command evaluates whether the alleged misconduct renders the member unsuitable for continued service.
The BOI process can result in various discharge characterizations, and outcomes such as General or Other Than Honorable discharges can significantly affect post‑service opportunities and limit benefits that depend on the quality of the discharge.
Because separation actions can end a career regardless of court‑martial results, members may face loss of rank, halted promotions, and disruption of retirement eligibility, creating long‑term professional and financial consequences.
Article 120 cases often begin alongside broader sex crimes investigations, where military law enforcement and special agents collect evidence and interview witnesses to determine whether a service member violated sexual assault or related misconduct statutes. These inquiries frequently run parallel to administrative reviews that help commanders decide whether additional actions are necessary beyond the criminal process.
Because alleged sexual misconduct can raise concerns about command climate, judgment, or professionalism, commanders may initiate command-directed investigations to examine any collateral issues uncovered during the Article 120 inquiry. These administrative investigations can address conduct that may not rise to the level of a court-martial offense but still requires corrective action.
Depending on the findings, commanders may issue Letters of Reprimand or recommend Boards of Inquiry to evaluate whether the service member should remain in the military. Thus, an Article 120 case at Homestead can trigger a chain of criminal, administrative, and career-impacting processes that operate simultaneously but serve distinct legal and disciplinary purposes.
With decades of military justice experience, the team brings a deep command of trial strategy, from developing comprehensive defense themes to identifying procedural issues that support powerful motions practice. Their familiarity with the unique environment of Homestead and other military installations allows them to tailor every step of preparation to the realities of courts‑martial.
They are frequently retained for their ability to conduct exacting cross‑examination, including the strategic impeachment of government experts. Their method focuses on exposing weaknesses in forensic conclusions, challenging assumptions, and presenting the panel with a clear, evidence‑driven narrative.
The firm’s attorneys have also published extensively on trial advocacy, which informs the structured approaches they bring to investigations, case theory, and in‑court presentation. This blend of scholarship and long-standing courtroom experience is a key reason service members entrust them with defending complex Article 120 allegations at Homestead.
Article 120 of the UCMJ outlines offenses related to sexual assault, abusive sexual contact, and other non-consensual sexual acts. It defines prohibited conduct and establishes the elements prosecutors must address during a case.
Consent in Article 120 cases is viewed as a freely given agreement by a competent person to engage in sexual activity. The military evaluates consent based on words, actions, and surrounding circumstances.
Alcohol can influence whether a person was capable of consenting under military law. Investigators often scrutinize the level of intoxication and its impact on decision-making and awareness.
Digital evidence such as text messages, social media activity, and phone data may be used to establish timelines or interactions between individuals. Investigators typically review this material to help reconstruct events.
Experts may be called to explain topics such as intoxication effects, forensic findings, or memory and behavior patterns. Their testimony provides context for the fact-finder when evaluating complex or technical information.
Service members facing Article 120 allegations may be subject to administrative review in addition to any criminal process. Commands can initiate separation procedures based on conduct concerns or perceived risk to unit readiness.
The investigation typically involves interviews, evidence collection, and coordination with legal authorities. Service members may be contacted multiple times as investigators gather information from all relevant sources.
Service members are permitted to retain a civilian attorney to assist them during an Article 120 case. A civilian lawyer can communicate with military authorities and participate alongside appointed military counsel.
Homestead is located in southern Miami-Dade County, Florida, positioned at the gateway to the Florida Keys and south of the Miami metropolitan area. Its proximity to Biscayne Bay, the Everglades, and major transportation corridors gives the region a distinct subtropical character that influences both daily operations and disaster-response planning. The nearby communities of Homestead, Florida City, and Cutler Bay maintain close ties to the installation, supporting military families with schools, housing, and services. The surrounding terrain—flat coastal plains with exposure to Atlantic storms—adds strategic value, as the area plays a key role in hurricane preparedness, defense support to civil authorities, and rapid-response air operations.
Homestead Air Reserve Base hosts primarily Air Force Reserve Command units, with a mission centered on air defense, fighter operations, and contingency deployment support. The base’s fighter presence provides rapid-response capabilities for regional and hemispheric missions, including air sovereignty and support to U.S. Northern and Southern Commands. Additional tenant units contribute to intelligence, logistics, and support functions that enhance joint-force interoperability. Its location near Caribbean and Latin American flight routes makes Homestead a critical platform for training exercises and international partnership operations.
The installation supports a mix of full-time active guard and reserve personnel, traditional reservists, and rotating active-duty detachments. Aviation operations dominate activity on the base, with regular training sorties, alert missions, and deployment preparation cycles. Periodic large-scale exercises, visiting units, and humanitarian readiness training contribute to a dynamic operational tempo. While the base is not a primary trainee hub, it frequently supports personnel preparing for regional deployments, disaster-response missions, and joint exercises that connect directly to U.S. interests in the Caribbean and South America.
Service members assigned to or transiting through Homestead may encounter UCMJ issues stemming from aviation duties, alert responsibilities, deployment cycles, or administrative and security requirements. Investigations, non-judicial punishment, administrative separation actions, and courts-martial can arise from the base’s high-visibility operational environment and readiness demands. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers at Homestead, providing support to those facing military justice challenges connected to the installation’s unique mission and tempo.
Command influence can affect investigative scope, charging decisions, and how aggressively a case is pursued.
Yes, administrative separation can occur even if charges are dismissed or a not guilty verdict is returned.
Punishments can include confinement, dishonorable discharge, forfeitures, reduction in rank, and sex offender registration.
In limited circumstances, an Article 120 case can proceed without an Article 32 hearing if waived or legally bypassed.
An Article 32 hearing is a preliminary proceeding where evidence is reviewed and witnesses may testify before referral to court-martial.
