Travis Air Force Base Article 120 Sexual Assault Court-Martial Lawyers
Table Contents
Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice governs a range of sexual misconduct offenses, with sexual assault and abusive sexual contact representing two distinct categories: sexual assault involves compelled or nonconsensual sexual acts, while abusive sexual contact centers on nonconsensual sexual touching without the elements required for a sexual act.
Both categories carry felony-level exposure at a general court-martial, meaning service members at Travis Air Force Base may face serious punitive consequences, including the potential for long-term confinement and mandatory sex-offender registration if convicted.
Prosecution under Article 120 is command-controlled, beginning with the unit chain of command and advancing through the base legal office, with commanders holding unique authority to initiate charges, direct investigations, and refer cases to courts-martial.
This framework differs significantly from civilian criminal systems, where independent prosecutors make charging decisions, civilian rules of evidence apply without military-specific modifications, and the investigative process is not governed by a command hierarchy.
Article 120 defines felony-level sexual assault offenses in the military, where cases can escalate rapidly from investigation to court-martial. At Travis Air Force Base, matters often turn on expert evidence and potential administrative separation. Gonzalez & Waddington offer defense guidance; call 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
Travis Air Force Base maintains a strong zero‑tolerance culture toward sexual misconduct, and personnel have mandatory reporting obligations under military policy. Once an allegation is raised, commanders, first sergeants, and law enforcement are required to elevate the information promptly, creating rapid visibility across multiple levels of the installation.
Because commanders are responsible for risk management and maintaining mission readiness, they often take immediate administrative steps to preserve good order and discipline. These measures can include no‑contact directives, duty adjustments, or temporary reassignment, all of which contribute to the perception of swift escalation.
In addition to any criminal inquiry, service members may face parallel administrative processes that evaluate suitability for continued service. This dual‑track system increases the number of offices involved and can accelerate timelines, adding to the overall pace at which Article 120 matters move forward at Travis Air Force Base.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Many cases involve situations where alcohol use plays a significant role, often accompanied by memory gaps or differing recollections among the individuals involved. These fact patterns can lead to uncertainty about events, contributing to conflicting statements during investigations.
Another recurring element includes interactions that begin through dating apps or digital communications. Screenshots, text messages, and social media exchanges frequently become key pieces of evidence as investigators attempt to understand the context of the relationship and any expectations leading up to the encounter.
Cases may also arise from dynamics within the barracks or close‑knit units, where service members live and work in close proximity. Relationship disputes, misunderstandings among friends or coworkers, and reports made by third parties—sometimes based on concern rather than firsthand knowledge—are common factors that shape how these matters come to the attention of command or law enforcement.
Article 120 cases at Travis Air Force Base typically involve a comprehensive investigative process designed to gather and evaluate all relevant information surrounding an allegation. These investigations are handled through formal military channels and follow established procedures for identifying, collecting, and preserving potential evidence.
The evidence considered in these cases may come from multiple sources and can include both physical and digital materials. Investigators compile this information in order to create a complete record of the events in question, which is later reviewed by the appropriate military authorities.
MRE 412 restricts the introduction of evidence concerning an alleged victim’s sexual behavior or predisposition, making it a key rule that limits what information can be presented in Article 120 cases heard at Travis Air Force Base.
MRE 413 and 414, by contrast, allow the government to introduce evidence of an accused’s prior sexual offenses or child molestation, expanding the range of conduct that may be considered by the factfinder.
The filing of motions under these rules and the resulting decisions on admissibility often determine which narratives, patterns, or past events can be discussed at trial, shaping how both sides frame the evidence.
Because these evidentiary rulings govern what the members or judge are permitted to hear, they frequently define the practical boundaries of the case and influence how the contested facts are presented and understood throughout the proceedings.
Article 120 cases often rely heavily on expert testimony, and the selection, interpretation, and credibility of these experts can significantly influence how evidence is perceived. At Travis Air Force Base, defense teams frequently scrutinize the methodologies and assumptions behind government-provided expert analysis to ensure that findings meet reliable scientific standards.
Because these cases can hinge on nuanced medical, psychological, and forensic issues, understanding the limitations of expert evidence is critical. Each discipline introduces its own potential for bias, misinterpretation, or overstatement, requiring careful cross‑examination and, when appropriate, competing expert testimony.
At Travis Air Force Base, Airmen facing Article 120 allegations can be processed for administrative separation even without a criminal conviction. The administrative system operates independently from courts-martial, meaning a command may pursue separation based solely on the underlying conduct alleged.
These cases frequently trigger a show-cause action or Board of Inquiry, where the member must respond to whether retention is warranted. The board reviews evidence under a lower standard than a criminal court, making it possible for separation to move forward even when charges are not preferred or do not result in trial.
The outcome of this process can include various discharge characterizations, each carrying different long-term consequences. An under honorable conditions (general) or under other than honorable discharge can significantly affect access to Veterans Affairs benefits, educational opportunities, and future background checks.
Beyond immediate discharge, separation proceedings tied to Article 120 allegations can disrupt career progression, impact promotion eligibility, and jeopardize years of service toward retirement. For senior members, losing career status or accumulated service credit can have lasting financial and professional repercussions.
At Travis Air Force Base, Article 120 cases are often intertwined with broader sex crimes investigations, which can involve the Office of Special Investigations, security forces, and command authorities. These investigations frequently serve as the foundation upon which decisions are made regarding the pursuit of criminal charges, administrative measures, or both.
When allegations arise, commanders may initiate command-directed investigations to gather additional facts separate from the criminal inquiry. These administrative reviews can influence decisions about a service member’s duty status, access to sensitive areas, and potential interim corrective actions while the Article 120 process unfolds.
Outcomes of Article 120 cases may also lead to administrative actions such as Letters of Reprimand or trigger more serious proceedings like Boards of Inquiry. These measures allow the command to address conduct that may not meet the threshold for court-martial conviction but still raises concerns about a member’s suitability for continued military service.
Our team brings decades of experience in military justice, allowing us to navigate the unique procedures and evidentiary rules that apply to Article 120 cases arising at Travis Air Force Base. This background supports a disciplined approach to trial strategy, including identifying issues early and preparing targeted motions that address the specific legal and factual challenges common in these cases.
Effective defense in an Article 120 case often turns on careful cross-examination, and our attorneys focus heavily on challenging assumptions, clarifying inconsistencies, and exposing weaknesses in testimony. This includes the ability to impeach government experts through detailed preparation and a deep understanding of forensic, psychological, and investigative methodologies frequently presented in sexual assault litigation.
The firm’s attorneys have published extensively on trial advocacy, contributing to professional materials used across the military justice community. These publications reflect a commitment to refining courtroom strategies and ensuring that service members facing Article 120 allegations receive representation grounded in both practical experience and ongoing scholarly engagement.
Article 120 addresses sexual assault and related offenses, defining prohibited conduct and outlining how intent, force, and circumstances factor into charges. It applies to all service members, including those stationed at Travis Air Force Base.
Consent is assessed based on whether a person freely agreed to the conduct, considering words, actions, and circumstances. Investigators focus on communication between the individuals involved and any indicators of unwillingness or incapacity.
Alcohol use can influence assessments of capacity and perception during an incident. Case investigators typically examine intoxication levels, witness accounts, and how alcohol may have affected memory or decision-making.
Digital material such as texts, social media messages, photos, or location data may be reviewed to reconstruct timelines and interactions. Investigators often analyze metadata and device records to corroborate or refute statements.
Experts may be brought in to explain forensic evidence, memory processes, or injury patterns. Their testimony can help the factfinder understand technical or scientific information presented during proceedings.
Service members facing Article 120 allegations may undergo administrative evaluation in addition to any criminal process. Command decisions can consider conduct, readiness, and service record when determining whether separation proceedings are appropriate.
Investigations typically involve interviews, evidence collection, and review of digital and physical materials. Security Forces or OSI at Travis AFB coordinate with legal authorities to determine the next procedural steps.
Service members may choose to retain a civilian attorney to work alongside appointed military defense counsel. Civilian lawyers can participate in meetings, evidence review, and strategic discussions within the rules governing military justice proceedings.
Travis Air Force Base is located in Northern California’s Solano County, positioned between Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay Area. The base sits adjacent to the city of Fairfield, with Vacaville, Suisun City, and the Napa Valley region forming a broader community that closely supports its operations. The local terrain features rolling hills, agricultural land, and a mild Mediterranean climate that allows flight and logistics activity throughout the year. Its proximity to major interstate corridors, seaports, and international airfields gives the installation a strategic advantage for rapid global mobility operations. Travis AFB is deeply integrated with surrounding civilian communities, which provide housing, schools, and services for thousands of military families.
Travis Air Force Base is a key installation within Air Mobility Command and is widely known as the “Gateway to the Pacific.” It hosts major airlift and refueling units that support global reach missions, humanitarian operations, and joint-force movements. The base operates strategic aircraft capable of long-range cargo transport and aerial refueling, making it a central hub for deploying personnel, equipment, and supplies across the Indo-Pacific region and beyond. Additional tenant organizations contribute to medical readiness, command support, and specialized mobility functions.
The installation supports a large active duty population, including aircrew, maintainers, medical professionals, and mobility support personnel. Travis AFB maintains a steady operational rhythm due to constant global taskings, rotational deployments, and aviation training requirements. Its medical facilities draw service members from across the West Coast, while its airlift and refueling missions keep units in regular coordination with joint and allied forces. This high tempo creates a dynamic environment where service members may be assigned permanently or transit through during missions.
The pace and scope of operations at Travis Air Force Base mean that service members may encounter UCMJ matters ranging from command investigations and administrative actions to non-judicial punishment and courts-martial. Training demands, deployment pressures, and joint operations can shape how legal issues arise and are addressed on the installation. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at or passing through Travis Air Force Base who are facing these challenges.
Sexual assault generally involves penetration or qualifying sexual acts, while abusive sexual contact involves non-penetrative sexual touching defined by the statute.
Article 120 of the UCMJ criminalizes sexual assault, abusive sexual contact, rape, and related offenses involving lack of consent or incapacity.
You should consult a civilian military defense lawyer as soon as you learn you are under investigation or suspected of an Article 120 offense.
A not guilty verdict does not automatically protect against administrative actions such as separation or loss of clearance.
Prior consensual conduct may be admissible in limited circumstances but is heavily restricted by military evidentiary rules.
