Joint Base Lewis-McChord Domestic Violence & Abuse Defense Lawyers
Table Contents
Article 128b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice establishes criminal liability for acts of domestic violence and abuse committed by service members, defining misconduct that includes physical harm, threats, or other coercive behaviors directed at an intimate partner or household member. The provision addresses conduct occurring on or off installation and captures a range of abusive actions that fall within the military justice system’s disciplinary authority.
The article applies when the alleged victim has a qualifying relationship with the accused, such as a current or former spouse, intimate partner, cohabitant, or someone with whom the service member shares a child. These relationship-based elements shape how allegations are categorized and determine whether the conduct meets the statutory threshold for domestic violence under military law.
Violations of Article 128b can expose an accused service member to felony-level punitive consequences under the UCMJ, including confinement and punitive discharges if prosecuted at a court-martial. Separate from criminal exposure, alleged misconduct under this article can also lead to administrative actions such as adverse evaluations, loss of security clearance, or separation proceedings initiated by command authorities.
Article 128b differs from civilian domestic violence laws in that it is tailored to the military environment, incorporating service-specific expectations, jurisdictional rules, and punitive options not found in state systems. While civilian statutes focus on state-defined offenses and penalties, the UCMJ provision integrates military readiness, command oversight, and uniform disciplinary standards into the legal framework governing domestic violence allegations within the armed forces.
Domestic violence and abuse under military law, including conduct charged under Article 128b UCMJ, can trigger rapid escalation to administrative separation or court-martial. At Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Gonzalez & Waddington provide legal guidance in navigating these processes. Call 1-800-921-8607 for information.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
At Joint Base Lewis-McChord, domestic violence and abuse allegations move rapidly because military and civilian personnel are subject to mandatory reporting requirements. Once a concern is raised to law enforcement, medical staff, command teams, or Family Advocacy Program personnel, those individuals are obligated to notify the appropriate authorities. This creates an immediate, structured response instead of allowing concerns to remain informal or unaddressed.
Allegations also trigger command-directed protective measures designed to reduce risk while facts are gathered. These may include no-contact orders, temporary separation of the parties involved, and firearms restrictions under military policy or federal law. Such steps are preventive in nature and do not assume wrongdoing, but they can change a service member’s daily life very quickly.
Finally, commands apply formal risk‑management processes and maintain a high level of visibility on any situation that could affect safety, mission readiness, or unit climate. This emphasis on monitoring and documentation means that even preliminary information can lead to swift administrative actions, scheduled check-ins, and coordination with supporting agencies until the assessment is complete.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Allegations at Joint Base Lewis-McChord often arise from relationship disputes or household conflict in which partners describe disagreements escalating into claims of verbal hostility, perceived threats, or unwanted physical contact. These situations frequently involve differing perspectives from the individuals involved, and reports typically reflect subjective interpretations of a stressful or emotionally charged event rather than an established sequence of facts.
Another recurrent scenario involves third-party reporting, such as neighbors, friends, or command personnel requesting welfare checks after hearing raised voices, observing unusual behavior, or receiving secondhand information. In many cases, the initial report originates from someone who did not witness the underlying incident, leading to investigations centered on indirect statements and assumptions rather than firsthand observations.
Alcohol use and emotional escalation also appear in many allegations, with individuals describing impaired judgment, heightened tension, or statements made during a stressful incident that may later be interpreted differently once emotions have settled. These dynamics can lead to conflicting accounts, uncertainty about intent, and ambiguity regarding what actually took place during the reported event.
Domestic violence cases at Joint Base Lewis-McChord are examined through coordinated efforts between military and civilian entities. Investigative personnel focus on establishing an accurate account of events by gathering information that reflects the circumstances surrounding the alleged incident.
Various forms of evidence are collected to help clarify timelines, interactions, and observed conditions. These materials contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the situation and support official determinations within the military justice system.
At Joint Base Lewis-McChord, service members can face administrative separation even when domestic violence allegations do not result in a criminal conviction. Commanders may initiate separation based solely on the underlying conduct, reports, or perceived risk, making the process independent from civilian or military criminal outcomes.
When separation is pursued, the case may be routed to a Board of Inquiry or show-cause proceedings, where evidence is reviewed to determine whether the member should be retained. These administrative forums use a lower evidentiary threshold than courts, and adverse findings may support recommendations for discharge.
If separation is approved, the resulting discharge characterization—honorable, general under honorable conditions, or other than honorable—depends on the circumstances and documented performance or misconduct. This characterization becomes part of the permanent record and influences post-service opportunities and eligibility for certain benefits.
Domestic violence allegations can also affect security clearance status and long-term career prospects, as adjudicators may view the underlying conduct as a potential risk factor. Even unresolved or unproven allegations can prompt reviews, create barriers to advancement, or limit assignment opportunities across the force.
Domestic violence allegations in the military often trigger criminal military investigations, which may be conducted by agencies such as CID, NCIS, or OSI. These inquiries assess whether the conduct violates the Uniform Code of Military Justice and determine whether charges should be preferred, potentially leading to court-martial proceedings.
In addition to criminal inquiries, commanders may initiate command-directed investigations to evaluate the broader impact of the alleged misconduct on good order and discipline. These administrative reviews operate independently from criminal processes and can influence decisions regarding duty status, access to weapons, and suitability for continued service.
Findings from either type of investigation may lead to administrative actions such as Letters of Reprimand or trigger administrative separation mechanisms, including Boards of Inquiry. These actions can occur even without a court‑martial conviction, demonstrating how domestic violence cases often evolve into multiple, overlapping military legal processes.
Our team brings extensive experience handling relationship‑driven domestic violence and abuse allegations, including cases where communication patterns, family dynamics, and the pressures of military life shape the narrative. This background allows the defense to identify inconsistencies, contextual factors, and evidentiary issues that often arise in intimate‑partner disputes.
We provide integrated representation that addresses both the criminal process and the administrative actions that frequently accompany domestic violence allegations on Joint Base Lewis-McChord, such as command investigations, protective orders, and potential career impacts. This combined approach helps service members navigate all parallel proceedings with coordinated strategy.
Our attorneys have spent decades working within the military justice system and are skilled in the cross‑examination of witnesses, complainants, and investigators. Their familiarity with military law, investigative protocol, and evidentiary procedure helps ensure that testimony and reports are tested thoroughly and professionally in contested cases.
Article 128b of the UCMJ addresses domestic violence offenses, including assault, battery, and other harmful acts against protected persons. It outlines definitions, jurisdiction, and potential charges specific to domestic violence situations. The article provides the legal framework the military uses to evaluate alleged conduct.
A domestic violence allegation can result in administrative separation proceedings independent of any court-martial. Commanders may initiate administrative processes based on the circumstances and available information. These proceedings function separately from the criminal justice system within the UCMJ.
No-contact orders are command-issued directives intended to prevent communication or physical contact between involved parties. They remain in effect until modified or lifted by the issuing authority. Violations can influence how a case is monitored or managed by command.
Federal law can restrict firearm possession for individuals subject to certain domestic violence-related conditions or findings. The military may enforce these restrictions through command channels and access control procedures. These limitations can affect a service member’s duties when firearms are involved.
Investigations may review statements, digital records, physical evidence, and observations from responding personnel. Both military and civilian investigative bodies may gather and document information. The evidence collected helps determine the nature and context of the allegation.
Domestic violence allegations can influence various administrative processes, such as evaluations, security reviews, or suitability determinations. These actions occur independently from any criminal proceedings. Commands may consider the overall circumstances when initiating administrative steps.
Service members may consult or retain a civilian lawyer to assist with matters related to domestic violence allegations. A civilian attorney can participate alongside assigned military counsel where permitted. Their involvement depends on case type, access rules, and command procedures.
Joint Base Lewis-McChord sits in western Washington, positioned between Tacoma and Olympia and extending toward the communities of Lakewood, Lacey, Yelm, and DuPont. Its location along the Interstate 5 corridor provides immediate access to the Puget Sound region and connects the installation to major seaports, rail networks, and air transportation hubs. The terrain combines dense evergreen forests, rolling prairies, and proximity to Mount Rainier, creating conditions well suited for year‑round training across varied environments. The base’s placement near population centers means that military and civilian life intersect closely, with JBLM serving as one of the region’s largest employers and a central contributor to local economic, educational, and community partnerships.
JBLM hosts both Army and Air Force elements, making it one of the most significant joint installations in the western United States. The presence of I Corps and major aviation and Stryker formations underscores the installation’s role in rapid deployment and power‑projection across the Indo-Pacific region. The Air Force component at McChord Field supports global airlift and mobility missions, enabling personnel and equipment movement for operations and humanitarian response. Together, these capabilities make JBLM a hub for strategic readiness, joint training, and multinational exercises that shape U.S. engagement throughout the Pacific.
The base supports a large and diverse active duty population, including deployable combat units, aviation brigades, medical commands, logistics elements, and intelligence activities. High rotational frequency and an active training schedule characterize day‑to‑day life, with field exercises on the surrounding training ranges and continuous air mobility operations from McChord Field. Many units maintain direct ties to overseas missions, resulting in regular deployment cycles and a steady flow of inbound and outbound personnel.
The operational tempo at JBLM means that service members may encounter a wide spectrum of military justice issues, including investigations, administrative actions, non‑judicial punishment, courts‑martial, or involuntary separation proceedings. Training demands, deployment pressures, and joint environment complexities can influence how cases develop and how commands address potential UCMJ violations. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at Joint Base Lewis‑McChord, assisting those facing legal challenges connected to their duties on this strategically vital installation.
An MPO is a command-issued order enforceable under military law, while a civilian restraining order is issued by a court and enforced by civil authorities.
Yes, a Military Protective Order can be issued quickly and does not require charges or a court finding.
Article 31(b) requires investigators to advise you of your right to remain silent and to consult with counsel before questioning.
You are not required to speak to law enforcement or command investigators and may invoke your right to remain silent.
After a report, law enforcement investigates, command may issue protective orders, and administrative or criminal action can begin immediately.
