Joint Base Lewis-McChord Article 120 Sexual Assault Court-Martial Lawyers
Table Contents
Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice defines a range of sexual offenses investigated and prosecuted at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, distinguishing between sexual assault, which involves acts such as penetration without consent, and abusive sexual contact, which involves intentional, nonconsensual touching of specific body areas. These distinctions determine the categorization of conduct within the military justice system.
Because these offenses fall under federal military law, service members accused under Article 120 face felony-level exposure at a general court-martial, where the government may pursue confinement, punitive discharges, and registration requirements depending on the findings and sentencing authority.
Prosecution under Article 120 is driven by command authority at JBLM, meaning commanders initiate actions, direct investigations, and decide whether cases proceed to court-martial, subject to legal review by military attorneys and the formal process established in the UCMJ.
Unlike civilian jurisdictions that rely on elected prosecutors or district attorneys, the military system applies centralized command discretion, uniform federal statutes, and a separate judicial structure, resulting in procedural differences that affect case initiation, investigation, and adjudication when allegations arise on base.
Article 120 covers felony-level sexual assault offenses under the UCMJ, which can escalate quickly through military investigations at Joint Base Lewis-McChord. Cases often involve expert evidence, command inquiries, and possible administrative separation. Gonzalez & Waddington provide legal guidance; contact 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
Joint Base Lewis-McChord operates under a zero‑tolerance culture for sexual misconduct, and this framework includes mandatory reporting obligations for commanders, supervisors, and first-line leaders. Once an allegation surfaces, established policy requires rapid notification to investigative authorities, creating an environment where cases move forward swiftly regardless of the rank or position of those involved.
Commanders at the installation also maintain heightened risk‑management responsibilities and visibility requirements. Allegations tied to Article 120 can carry significant operational and community impact, so command teams often act quickly to ensure safety, maintain unit readiness, and demonstrate compliance with Department of Defense oversight standards.
In addition to the criminal investigation pathway, service members at Joint Base Lewis-McChord may face immediate administrative processes. These parallel actions, including potential administrative separation consideration, can begin early in the timeline, adding momentum and making the overall situation feel fast‑moving even before any legal findings are made.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Many cases involve social settings where alcohol use leads to uncertainty, impaired judgment, or memory gaps. Service members often report difficulty recalling events, and investigators frequently evaluate how consumption may have influenced perceptions, consent, or the clarity of later statements.
Digital interactions also appear regularly, especially when initial contact occurs through dating apps or messaging platforms. Screenshots, chat histories, and shifting tones in digital conversations can become central to understanding expectations, intentions, and how each party interpreted the lead-up to an encounter.
Incidents within the barracks or close-knit unit environments arise as well, sometimes tied to ongoing relationship tensions, breakups, or interpersonal disputes. Third-party reporting—such as friends, supervisors, or partners bringing concerns forward—can also shape how allegations emerge and develop during an investigation.
Article 120 investigations at Joint Base Lewis-McChord rely on structured military processes designed to gather factual information about alleged misconduct. These inquiries typically involve coordinated efforts between military law enforcement personnel, medical professionals, and command authorities to document events and compile materials relevant to the alleged offense.
The evidence collected can span physical, digital, testimonial, and medical sources. Each component contributes to a comprehensive investigative file that is later reviewed by legal authorities within the military justice system.
MRE 412 is central in Article 120 cases because it restricts the introduction of evidence concerning an alleged victim’s past sexual behavior or sexual predisposition, making it a key rule that shapes what background information the factfinder may hear and how narrowly the case facts are framed.
MRE 413 and 414, by contrast, allow the government to introduce evidence of the accused’s other alleged sexual offenses or child molestation, giving prosecutors a unique evidentiary tool that can expand the scope of what is considered relevant beyond the charged conduct.
Because these rules often require extensive motions practice, litigation over admissibility can dominate pretrial proceedings, with parties presenting detailed arguments on whether specific evidence fits within the rules’ prohibitions or allowances.
The resulting evidentiary rulings frequently define the contours of the trial itself, influencing what narratives can be presented, what context the members or judge can consider, and ultimately how the allegations are understood within the courtroom at Joint Base Lewis-McChord.
Article 120 cases at Joint Base Lewis-McChord often turn on the credibility of witnesses and the strength of expert testimony. Because these cases frequently involve limited physical evidence, attorneys rely heavily on specialists whose findings may either reinforce or undermine the government’s narrative. Understanding how these experts operate is essential for evaluating the reliability of the evidence presented.
Defense and prosecution teams must scrutinize the methods, qualifications, and assumptions underlying each expert’s work. Small errors in interpretation, biased interviewing techniques, or unsupported scientific claims can dramatically affect the outcome of a court-martial, making careful review and cross-examination critical in sexual assault proceedings.
Service members facing Article 120 allegations at Joint Base Lewis-McChord can encounter administrative separation even if no court-martial conviction occurs. Commanders may initiate this process based on the underlying conduct or the perceived impact on good order and discipline.
These cases frequently move to a Board of Inquiry or show-cause proceeding, where the government presents evidence and the member has an opportunity to respond. The outcome of this board can determine whether separation is recommended.
If separation is pursued, the discharge characterization—honorable, general under honorable conditions, or other than honorable—can significantly affect a member’s record. The characterization is based on the service history and the board’s findings, not on a criminal conviction.
Because separation can occur before or instead of court-martial resolution, the consequences may include loss of benefits, limitations on future military service, and potential effects on retirement eligibility, depending on the characterization and length of service at the time administrative action is initiated.
Article 120 cases at Joint Base Lewis-McChord are closely tied to broader sex crimes investigations, which often begin with military law enforcement or the Criminal Investigation Division gathering evidence and interviewing witnesses. Because Article 120 allegations involve sensitive and high‑stakes criminal charges, these investigations frequently run parallel to other administrative or command-level processes.
Command-directed investigations may occur alongside the criminal process, allowing commanders to assess unit impact, evaluate misconduct outside the criminal elements, or determine interim actions such as no-contact orders or duty restrictions. Even while a criminal investigation is ongoing, these command-directed inquiries can influence a service member’s career and the overall handling of the case.
Depending on the findings, Article 120 allegations can lead to administrative consequences such as Letters of Reprimand or even Boards of Inquiry, which evaluate whether a service member should be retained in the military. Thus, an Article 120 case can expose a service member to simultaneous criminal, administrative, and career-impacting actions, all operating within different but interconnected military legal frameworks.
Our firm brings decades of military justice experience to Article 120 cases, with a focus on developing trial strategies tailored to the unique procedures of courts-martial at Joint Base Lewis-McChord. This includes early motion practice designed to challenge the admissibility of statements, digital evidence, and forensic conclusions that may shape the trajectory of a case.
We are frequently retained for our ability to conduct rigorous cross-examination of accusers and government witnesses, as well as our methodical impeachment of prosecution experts in fields such as SANE examinations, toxicology, and digital forensics. This approach reflects a deep understanding of how government evidence is constructed—and how it can be tested under the rules of military evidence.
The attorneys at Gonzalez & Waddington have authored widely referenced works on trial advocacy and military justice, which inform the techniques used in contested Article 120 litigation. Service members at JBLM turn to the firm because of this blend of scholarship and long-standing courtroom experience within the military system.
Answer: Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice outlines offenses related to sexual assault, abusive sexual contact, and related misconduct. It defines prohibited conduct and the elements investigators and courts consider when evaluating an allegation.
Answer: Consent is generally assessed based on whether a person freely agreed to the sexual conduct. Investigators look at words, actions, and circumstances to determine whether consent was present or absent.
Answer: Alcohol can influence assessments of perception, memory, and decision-making for everyone involved. Investigators often examine how intoxication may have affected the ability to consent or recall events.
Answer: Digital evidence such as texts, social media activity, and phone data is often collected to understand timelines and interactions. Investigators may review this information to corroborate or challenge statements from involved parties.
Answer: Experts may address topics such as forensic evidence, trauma responses, or alcohol effects. Their input can help explain technical or scientific aspects that are not obvious to non-specialists.
Answer: An allegation can trigger administrative review processes within a service member’s chain of command. These processes operate separately from courts-martial and may examine whether continued service is appropriate.
Answer: Investigations typically involve interviews, evidence collection, and coordination with military law enforcement agencies. The process aims to gather information so commanders and legal authorities can make decisions about next steps.
Answer: Service members sometimes consult civilian lawyers who can participate alongside assigned military defense counsel. Civilian attorneys may assist with communication, document review, and preparation during the military justice process.
Joint Base Lewis-McChord, located in western Washington between Tacoma and Olympia, sits at the southern end of Puget Sound with the Cascade Range to the east and forests and glacial waterways surrounding the installation. Its proximity to Mount Rainier, the Port of Tacoma, and major transportation corridors gives the base both strategic depth and rapid access to regional and global transit routes. The installation is closely connected to nearby civilian communities such as Lakewood, Lacey, and DuPont, where many military families live, work, and interact daily with the local economy. The Pacific Northwest climate—marked by mild temperatures, heavy rainfall, and varied terrain—supports year-round training and air-ground integration.
The base hosts a joint Army and Air Force presence, serving as one of the nation’s primary power‑projection platforms. It supports major operational units that focus on rapid deployment, airlift, ground combat readiness, and regional engagement in the Indo-Pacific. Key aviation, airborne, medical, and support elements operate from the installation, contributing to the base’s reputation as a central hub for expeditionary operations. Training areas, ranges, and airfields enable large-scale exercises that integrate active-duty, Reserve, and National Guard forces.
Joint Base Lewis-McChord supports a substantial active-duty and civilian workforce, along with a high tempo of rotational forces transiting the installation. The base hosts deployable brigades, aviation assets, special operations elements, medical centers, and logistics hubs. Its traffic through McChord Field includes strategic airlift missions, while Lewis Main and North support maneuver, sustainment, and mission command activities. Frequent training cycles, field exercises, and Indo-Pacific deployment rotations shape daily life for service members and families.
The operational pace at Joint Base Lewis-McChord often intersects with military justice matters, including investigations, administrative actions, non‑judicial punishment, and courts‑martial. Training demands, deployment pressure, and joint‑service environments can influence how UCMJ issues arise and are addressed by command channels on the installation. Service members assigned to or passing through the base who face legal challenges can seek representation, and the military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers at Joint Base Lewis-McChord.
In limited circumstances, an Article 120 case can proceed without an Article 32 hearing if waived or legally bypassed.
An Article 32 hearing is a preliminary proceeding where evidence is reviewed and witnesses may testify before referral to court-martial.
Text messages and social media often play a critical role because they can contradict or undermine allegation narratives.
Yes, many Article 120 cases proceed without physical or forensic evidence and rely heavily on testimony and credibility assessments.
Article 31(b) rights require investigators to advise you of your right to remain silent and consult counsel before questioning.
