Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling Command-Directed Investigation Defense Lawyers
Table Contents
A Command-Directed Investigation is an administrative, non-criminal inquiry used by command at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling to assess alleged misconduct or performance issues. Although administrative, it can threaten a service member’s career and may escalate to reprimands, separation, or court-martial. Gonzalez & Waddington can be reached at 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Yes, administrative separation can occur without a court-martial when commanders initiate the process based on alleged misconduct, performance issues, or other qualifying grounds. This is a non-judicial process that follows service-specific regulations and procedures at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling. The member is notified and given an opportunity to respond within the administrative system.
A BOI is an administrative hearing focused on determining whether a service member should be retained, while NJP is a disciplinary tool used by commanders for certain offenses. NJP addresses specific allegations of misconduct, whereas a BOI evaluates whether the member’s overall conduct warrants separation. The two processes can occur independently or in connection with each other.
The burden of proof at a BOI is typically a preponderance of the evidence, meaning the board determines whether the allegations are more likely than not. This standard differs from the higher thresholds used in military judicial proceedings. The board reviews all presented materials in reaching its decision.
A BOI is usually composed of three commissioned officers who are senior in grade to the service member. These officers are appointed by the command and are responsible for evaluating the evidence and making findings. A legal advisor may also assist the board with procedural matters.
The board may consider documents, witness testimony, service records, and other relevant materials submitted by either side. Evidence rules are less formal than in courts-martial, allowing broader inclusion of information. The board determines the weight to give each piece of evidence.
A BOI may review whether a service member remains eligible for retirement if separation is recommended. The board’s findings can influence whether the member continues service long enough to reach retirement status. Final decisions follow service-specific regulations governing retirement and separation.
A BOI may recommend an Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), or Other Than Honorable discharge depending on the findings. The characterization reflects an assessment of the member’s overall service record. The final characterization is approved by the appropriate authority.
Service members may retain a civilian attorney at their own expense to assist during the BOI process. Civilian counsel can participate alongside assigned military counsel when permitted by regulations. Representation is subject to standard base access and procedural requirements.
A1: Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling sits along the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers in Washington, D.C., positioned south of downtown and adjacent to neighborhoods such as Congress Heights and Anacostia. Its riverside terrain and proximity to federal institutions contribute to its strategic value. The location allows seamless integration with surrounding civilian communities and national-level agencies.
A2: The base’s position within the National Capital Region places it at the center of federal coordination and interagency activity. Its mild, humid climate allows year‑round operations with minimal weather disruption. The surrounding urban environment shapes how personnel interact with local commerce, transportation networks, and government partners.
A3: Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling hosts Air Force and Navy elements, along with key defense agencies that support national-level missions. These organizations contribute to intelligence, communications, and ceremonial operations. The joint structure enables cross-branch coordination in daily activities.
A4: The installation supports strategic communications, administrative operations, and specialized security functions for the National Capital Region. It sustains units that provide essential command-and-control capabilities for senior military leadership. Its mission profile aligns closely with federal oversight and continuity functions.
A5: The population consists of a significant mix of active-duty personnel, civilians, and contractors supporting headquarters-level missions. Activity levels remain steady due to the constant operational demands of the region. The base accommodates transient and rotational personnel supporting national missions.
A6: Units conduct intelligence support, administrative operations, human capital management, and limited aviation coordination. Many personnel engage in mission planning and interagency collaboration. These activities maintain readiness for national-level responsibilities.
A7: Service members at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling may encounter UCMJ matters linked to high‑visibility missions and interagency operations. Investigations, administrative actions, and courts-martial are handled in coordination with regional legal commands. The installation’s tempo and mission sensitivity can shape the handling of legal proceedings.
A8: The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at or passing through Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling. Their work covers matters such as investigations, non-judicial punishment, and separation proceedings. Representation supports personnel navigating the base’s complex legal environment.
Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling (JBAB) sits along the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers in southeast Washington, D.C., placing it squarely within the National Capital Region. Its location provides immediate proximity to federal agencies, the Pentagon, and the broader defense and intelligence network that surrounds the nation’s capital. The nearby civilian communities of Anacostia, Congress Heights, and Southwest Waterfront maintain close ties to the installation, with service members and families regularly engaging with local schools, transportation hubs, and support services. The region’s humid subtropical climate—marked by distinct seasonal shifts—plays a modest role in year‑round operations and outdoor training activities.
JBAB hosts a mix of Air Force and Navy activities under a joint structure, reflecting its history as the merger of Bolling Air Force Base and Naval Support Facility Anacostia. The installation supports mission sets tied to national security leadership, intelligence operations, ceremonial units, and high‑level administrative commands. Its tenant organizations contribute directly to strategic communications, joint force coordination, and specialized support roles essential to the capital’s defense posture. The base functions as a critical hub for interagency collaboration, with its mission profile shaped by its closeness to national command authorities.
The active duty population at JBAB is diverse, drawing personnel from multiple service branches who support headquarters elements, operational support units, and mission partners engaged in intelligence, logistics, communications, and aviation-related activities. While not a large-scale training post, the installation sees steady rotational movement tied to joint assignments, short-term duty, and support for national events. Its operational tempo remains consistent due to the demands of sustaining worldwide command and control networks and capital-region security operations.
Because JBAB houses joint-service personnel working in high‑visibility and mission-critical roles, UCMJ matters frequently intersect with daily operations. Service members may face investigations, administrative actions, non‑judicial punishment, or courts‑martial related to security responsibilities, workplace conduct, or operational requirements. The unique environment—marked by sensitive missions and interagency coordination—can influence how cases arise and how commanders address disciplinary concerns. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, providing guidance for those navigating these complex legal processes.
https://www.jbab.jb.mil/
Yes, CDI findings are frequently used to support Letters of Reprimand or Non-Judicial Punishment. These administrative actions often rely heavily on the CDI report.
CDIs are often triggered by complaints, performance concerns, policy violations, interpersonal conflicts, or incidents that require command clarification.
Yes, the scope of a CDI can be expanded if new allegations or issues arise during fact-finding. This is common in practice.
The length of a CDI varies depending on complexity, number of witnesses, and command urgency. Some are completed quickly, while others may take weeks or months.
Service members retain certain rights, including Article 31(b) protections when suspected of an offense. These rights apply even though the investigation is administrative.
