Holloman Air Force Base Domestic Violence & Abuse Defense Lawyers
Table Contents
Article 128b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice establishes criminal offenses related to domestic violence and abuse within the military, defining prohibited conduct that includes physical harm, threats, or certain coercive behaviors committed against protected persons. It captures a range of actions that, when directed at someone within a qualifying domestic or intimate relationship, fall under military criminal jurisdiction.
The article applies specifically to allegations involving relationship-based connections, such as spouses, intimate partners, co-parents, or individuals who share a domestic household. These relational elements determine whether conduct that might otherwise fall under general assault provisions is instead charged as domestic violence under the article’s specialized framework.
Violations of Article 128b can expose a service member to felony-level punitive exposure under the UCMJ, which may include confinement, a punitive discharge, and loss of rank or pay. Separate from judicial punishment, substantiated misconduct can also trigger administrative consequences, including adverse evaluations, administrative separation processing, or loss of career opportunities.
Article 128b differs from many civilian domestic violence statutes by applying uniquely military definitions, evidentiary standards, and punitive structures, including elements tailored to military service and command authority. While civilian DV laws vary by state, Article 128b provides a standardized federal military framework that governs domestic violence offenses across the armed forces.
Domestic violence and abuse under military law include intentional harm, threats, or coercive conduct addressed under Article 128b, UCMJ. At Holloman Air Force Base, allegations can quickly lead to administrative separation and court-martial. Gonzalez & Waddington provide legal guidance; call 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
Allegations of domestic violence or abuse tend to move rapidly at Holloman Air Force Base because military policy requires mandatory reporting and prompt command response. Once an incident is reported through Security Forces, medical personnel, or other official channels, commanders and the Family Advocacy Program must be notified and take immediate action to ensure safety and compliance with Air Force regulations.
Initial steps often include issuing a no-contact order to separate the parties while the situation is assessed, as well as reviewing whether temporary restrictions on firearms access are required under Department of Defense policies. These measures are intended to prevent further conflict and maintain safety during the fact‑finding period.
Command risk management responsibilities also contribute to the speed of the process. Commanders must document their decisions, ensure visibility of all related actions, and coordinate with legal, investigative, and support agencies. This structured oversight can make the response appear accelerated, but it is designed to maintain accountability and protect all involved.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Allegations at Holloman Air Force Base often arise from relationship disputes or escalating household conflict, where routine disagreements may be interpreted differently by those involved or by observers. These situations can result in security forces or command involvement when tensions increase or when someone expresses concern about how an argument unfolded.
Another frequent pattern involves third‑party reporting, including neighbors, friends, or unit members requesting welfare checks based on noises, text messages, or incomplete information. These reports can trigger official responses even when the people involved did not intend for the situation to be viewed as a domestic disturbance.
Alcohol use and emotional escalation are also commonly referenced in statements taken during stressful incidents. Individuals may provide inconsistent or incomplete accounts due to heightened emotions, misunderstandings, or the fast‑moving nature of the event, which can complicate how the situation is documented and evaluated.
Domestic violence cases at Holloman Air Force Base typically involve detailed investigative procedures conducted by military and law enforcement authorities. These investigations focus on gathering objective information to document what occurred and to understand the circumstances surrounding the alleged incident.
Evidence collected in these cases can come from multiple sources, reflecting both physical documentation and recorded accounts. The goal of the investigative process is to assemble a clear factual record that can be reviewed by the appropriate military or legal authorities.
Service members at Holloman Air Force Base may face administrative separation even without a criminal conviction when domestic violence allegations arise. Commanders can initiate this action based on the underlying conduct, the perceived impact on good order and discipline, or concerns about future risk to the unit.
Depending on rank and years of service, the member may be required to appear before a Board of Inquiry or show-cause proceedings. These forums review evidence, hear testimony, and determine whether retention is appropriate under Air Force standards.
If separation is pursued, the resulting discharge characterization can range from Honorable to General or Other Than Honorable. The characterization is influenced by the nature of the alleged conduct, the member’s record, and the findings of the administrative board.
Domestic violence allegations can also affect security clearance eligibility and long-term career prospects. Clearance reviews may consider the incident as a potential risk factor, and an unfavorable decision can limit assignment options or advancement opportunities within the Air Force.
Domestic violence cases in the military often trigger criminal military investigations, which can involve law enforcement entities such as CID, NCIS, or OSI. These investigations assess whether the conduct violates the Uniform Code of Military Justice and gather evidence for potential disciplinary or judicial action.
Command-directed investigations may also run concurrently, focusing on a service member’s fitness for duty, compliance with command expectations, and any impacts on unit readiness. These inquiries can influence administrative decisions even when criminal charges are not pursued.
Depending on the findings, service members may face Letters of Reprimand, Boards of Inquiry, or court-martial proceedings. Each action carries significant consequences, ranging from administrative sanctions to the possibility of separation from service or criminal conviction.
Our team brings decades of military justice experience to domestic violence and abuse cases, allowing us to navigate relationship‑driven allegations that often involve conflicting accounts, emotional dynamics, and evolving statements.
Because these matters can trigger both criminal exposure and command-level administrative action, we integrate defense strategies that address investigations, potential UCMJ charges, and parallel processes such as no-contact orders, administrative inquiries, and adverse paperwork.
We are frequently retained for our ability to scrutinize the government’s evidence, including the cross-examination of witnesses, first responders, and investigators whose interviews, documentation, or procedures may influence how an allegation is interpreted and pursued.
Article 128b of the UCMJ addresses domestic violence offenses involving physical harm, threats, or certain forms of coercive conduct against a spouse, intimate partner, or household member. It outlines specific elements prosecutors must establish in a court-martial setting. Its application depends on the facts of each case and command decisions.
Administrative separation can occur independently of a court‑martial, depending on command discretion and the evidence available. The process follows administrative rules, which differ from criminal procedures. A trial is not required for a command to initiate administrative action.
No-contact orders are command directives that restrict communication or proximity between involved parties. They are designed to maintain safety and preserve good order and discipline during an investigation. Violating such orders can lead to further administrative or disciplinary actions.
Firearms restrictions may apply under federal law when certain qualifying domestic violence conditions are present. Commands may also impose temporary access limits during investigations. These restrictions vary based on legal status, military requirements, and individual case factors.
Evidence may include statements, physical evidence, digital communications, and law enforcement or medical reports. Commands and investigators review materials that help establish the circumstances surrounding the allegation. The relevance and weight of each item depend on procedural rules and investigative findings.
Allegations can trigger administrative processes such as investigations, evaluations, or separation proceedings. These actions operate under administrative standards rather than criminal burdens of proof. Command authorities determine which actions are appropriate based on policy and available information.
Service members may consult or retain a civilian lawyer in addition to any military defense counsel provided. Civilian attorneys can participate in interviews or proceedings when permitted by applicable rules. Their involvement depends on access granted by investigative or command authorities.
Holloman Air Force Base is located in southern New Mexico, just west of Alamogordo and near the expansive White Sands region. Set within the Tularosa Basin and bordered by the Sacramento Mountains, the base operates in a high‑desert climate defined by dry air, wide temperature swings, and vast open terrain. This environment supports aviation training and testing activities that require large, uncongested airspace. The surrounding civilian communities, including Alamogordo and smaller towns across Otero County, maintain close ties with the installation through workforce support, shared services, and long-standing economic connections. Holloman’s location places it within a strategic corridor for air mobility and training operations across the southwestern United States.
The installation is operated by the United States Air Force and is home to missions centered on advanced pilot training, remotely piloted aircraft operations, and operational test activities. Major units at Holloman focus on preparing aircrews for modern air combat and ensuring the readiness of systems vital to national defense. The base’s isolated airspace, ranges, and access to the White Sands Missile Range corridor make it a key hub for safe, controlled training and evaluation of cutting-edge aviation capabilities.
Holloman supports a substantial active duty population, along with civilian personnel, contractors, and rotational forces. The base’s flight training programs bring continuous waves of students and instructors, creating a dynamic operational tempo. Aviation operations, aircraft maintenance, medical support, and command functions all contribute to a busy, mission-focused environment. Units stationed at Holloman also maintain ties to overseas operations, with personnel frequently rotating through deployments or mission-support assignments.
The fast pace of training and operational duties at Holloman can lead to a range of military justice matters under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Service members may face investigations, administrative actions, non-judicial punishment, courts-martial, or separation proceedings. These issues often arise from the unique pressures associated with student training pipelines, aircrew responsibilities, and high‑tempo operational requirements. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers at Holloman Air Force Base, providing support to those navigating complex UCMJ actions linked to their service at this installation.
An MPO is a command-issued order enforceable under military law, while a civilian restraining order is issued by a court and enforced by civil authorities.
Yes, a Military Protective Order can be issued quickly and does not require charges or a court finding.
Article 31(b) requires investigators to advise you of your right to remain silent and to consult with counsel before questioning.
You are not required to speak to law enforcement or command investigators and may invoke your right to remain silent.
After a report, law enforcement investigates, command may issue protective orders, and administrative or criminal action can begin immediately.
