Holloman Air Force Base Boards of Inquiry & Administrative Separation Lawyers
Table Contents
A Board of Inquiry for officers and an administrative separation board for enlisted members are formal administrative proceedings used across the U.S. military, including at Holloman Air Force Base, to determine whether a service member should be retained or separated based on alleged misconduct, substandard performance, or other qualifying grounds. While both boards serve the same overarching purpose, officer BOIs are convened under officer‑specific regulations and typically involve senior officers as board members, whereas enlisted separation boards follow enlisted administrative processes and include a mix of officers and senior enlisted personnel.
These boards operate under an evidentiary standard known as a preponderance of the evidence, meaning the government must show it is more likely than not that the alleged basis for separation occurred. The burden of proof rests with the government, which must present admissible evidence and witnesses to support the stated grounds, while the respondent has the right to challenge that evidence and present their own.
Unlike a court‑martial, a BOI or administrative separation board is not a criminal proceeding and cannot impose criminal penalties. The rules of evidence are more flexible, the atmosphere is administrative rather than judicial, and the primary question is suitability for continued service rather than criminal guilt or innocence. Despite these differences, the proceedings are formal, recorded, and governed by detailed service regulations.
Because the board determines whether the member will be retained or separated, and on what characterization of service, BOIs and administrative separation boards often represent the decisive moment in a service member’s professional future. The board’s findings and recommendations usually drive the final command decision, making this administrative forum the point where a career is most directly at stake.
A Board of Inquiry, or administrative separation, is a command process that can end a service member’s career without a court-martial, affecting rank, retirement, and discharge status. At Holloman Air Force Base, Gonzalez & Waddington provide guidance on these proceedings. Call 1-800-921-8607 for information.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
At Holloman Air Force Base, command oversight and unit visibility play a significant role in the frequency of administrative actions. Close daily interaction between leadership and personnel allows commanders to identify performance or conduct concerns early, which can lead to formal review processes when trends or recurring issues arise.
Administrative investigations, written reprimands, and nonjudicial punishment can escalate into separation actions when patterns of behavior continue or when commanders determine that previous corrective measures have not achieved the desired outcome. These earlier steps form a documented basis that may support a command decision to initiate a Board of Inquiry or administrative separation.
Leadership risk tolerance and career management priorities also influence these decisions. Commanders must balance the needs of the Air Force with the long‑term suitability of each service member, and in some cases, administrative separation is viewed as a necessary measure to maintain unit readiness and meet mission requirements.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
The administrative separation pathway at Holloman Air Force Base follows established Air Force procedures designed to review a member’s record, evaluate the grounds for discharge, and determine whether separation is appropriate based on the evidence presented.
The sequence below outlines the general steps involved when a case proceeds to a Board of Inquiry, including notification requirements, board roles, evidentiary steps, and final disposition by the designated authority.
Boards at Holloman Air Force Base routinely review documentary evidence such as investigation files, written reprimands, and nonjudicial punishment records. These materials provide a chronological picture of prior administrative actions and help the board understand the context behind the alleged misconduct or performance issues.
Witness testimony is often used to clarify events, describe duty performance, or explain circumstances surrounding specific incidents. Board members may closely observe each witness’s demeanor, consistency, and knowledge of the events to assess credibility and determine how much weight to give their statements.
Administrative records, including performance reports, duty history, and prior counseling entries, are evaluated alongside other evidence to gauge patterns of behavior or performance. The board considers these records as part of the overall evidentiary package, reviewing how they align with the allegations and the broader service history of the member.
Administrative separation actions at Holloman Air Force Base can result in one of several discharge characterizations, each reflecting how the Air Force views a member’s overall military service. An Honorable discharge indicates the member met Air Force standards consistently, a General discharge reflects satisfactory service with some documented issues, and an Other Than Honorable (OTH) discharge signals significant concerns about conduct or performance.
These characterizations can affect retirement eligibility because retirement generally requires completing the minimum years of service under conditions other than dishonorable. While an administrative separation does not automatically remove retirement eligibility, the characterization and underlying basis may influence administrative decisions related to whether a member is permitted to continue service long enough to reach retirement thresholds.
A separation record becomes part of a member’s permanent military file and can shape how the Department of Veterans Affairs, future employers, and review boards interpret the member’s service. Even when benefits remain available, the characterization can influence how agencies evaluate claims or applications that rely on service history.
Because these long-term effects extend well beyond the date of separation, members facing administrative action at Holloman Air Force Base often review their service history, documentation, and rights carefully to ensure they understand how the characterization may affect career opportunities, access to benefits, and future consideration by military or civilian authorities.
At Holloman Air Force Base, command-directed investigations often serve as the earliest formal mechanism for identifying misconduct or performance issues, and their findings can directly influence whether a service member is referred to a Board of Inquiry or considered for administrative separation. These investigations establish a factual foundation that commanders rely on when determining whether more serious administrative or punitive actions are appropriate.
Less severe misconduct may lead to corrective administrative measures such as Letters of Reprimand, which can become part of a service member’s unfavorable information file and later be used as evidence supporting separation actions. When issues escalate, non-judicial punishment under Article 15 provides a disciplinary option short of trial but can still contribute to a record of misconduct that justifies convening a Board of Inquiry or initiating administrative separation proceedings.
In the most serious cases, conduct that might otherwise justify administrative separation may instead be routed to court-martial proceedings, especially when criminal punishment is warranted. While administrative separation and Boards of Inquiry focus on suitability for continued service, a court-martial is punitive in nature; however, outcomes from court-martial trials—both convictions and acquittals—can still influence whether a service member remains subject to administrative review at Holloman Air Force Base.
Gonzalez & Waddington bring decades of military justice experience to Boards of Inquiry and administrative separation actions, giving service members access to counsel who understand the full spectrum of administrative and quasi-judicial procedures. Their background in board‑level litigation allows them to navigate the procedural framework, evidentiary rules, and strategic considerations that shape complex separation cases.
A key component of their approach involves meticulous witness examination and record‑building. By developing a clear, well‑supported administrative record, they help ensure that the facts, testimony, and documentation presented to the board are organized, relevant, and grounded in established administrative law principles.
The firm also integrates BOI and separation defense with related issues such as letters of reprimand, nonjudicial punishment, command‑directed investigations, and other administrative actions. This comprehensive view allows them to align defense efforts across all parallel processes that may affect the outcome of a service member’s case at Holloman Air Force Base.
Yes, administrative separation is a process that can occur independently of any court-martial. It is handled through command channels and does not require criminal charges. The focus is on service suitability rather than criminal guilt.
A Board of Inquiry is an administrative hearing focused on determining a service member’s retention. Nonjudicial punishment is a disciplinary tool used by commanders to address minor misconduct. NJP does not decide separation, while a BOI can affect a member’s career status.
The burden of proof at a BOI is typically a preponderance of the evidence. This means the board evaluates whether the evidence shows it is more likely than not that the alleged conduct occurred. This standard is lower than that used in courts-martial.
A BOI is usually composed of three commissioned officers. These officers are selected to review the case and make findings based on the evidence presented. None of them may have been directly involved in the underlying matter.
The board may review documents, witness statements, service records, and other relevant materials. Both the government and the member may present evidence. The board determines what weight to give each item.
A BOI can review factors that relate to a member’s eligibility to continue serving, which may indirectly influence retirement possibilities. Findings about conduct or performance can become part of the record. Retirement decisions depend on the final administrative action.
The board evaluates service history, performance, and the nature of any alleged misconduct. These factors contribute to whether a discharge is characterized as honorable, general, or under other categories. The characterization reflects the overall quality of service.
Service members may be represented by civilian counsel at a BOI. A civilian lawyer participates alongside any appointed military counsel. Their involvement is permitted as long as the member arranges it independently.
Q1: Where is Holloman Air Force Base located?
A1: Holloman Air Force Base sits in southern New Mexico, just west of Alamogordo and near the Tularosa Basin. Its position along the edge of the Chihuahuan Desert gives it vast airspace and clear weather conditions. These geographic traits shape both daily operations and regional partnerships.
Q2: How does the surrounding region influence the base?
A2: Nearby civilian communities rely on the base for economic and cultural connections, while the installation benefits from local infrastructure and support services. The desert terrain and proximity to White Sands Missile Range create a unique training corridor. This environment allows for coordinated testing and flight activity uncommon in other regions.
Q3: What military presence defines Holloman?
A3: Holloman is primarily an Air Force installation known for advanced flight training and operational support missions. Major units focus on aircrew development and unmanned aircraft operations. The base’s role extends into joint training that supports broader Air Force readiness.
Q4: What missions are central to the installation?
A4: Flight training, remotely piloted aircraft operations, and airfield support form the core mission set. These activities contribute directly to global air operations and personnel preparation. The installation also provides key test and evaluation capabilities tied to regional ranges.
Q5: What is the scale of the service member population?
A5: Holloman hosts a substantial active duty population with a steady influx of trainees. Frequent class rotations and aviation activity create a dynamic operational rhythm. The base also supports personnel involved in intelligence, maintenance, and command functions.
Q6: How active is the training environment?
A6: Training cycles run year‑round due to favorable flying conditions. The pace supports continuous qualification and requalification demands. This tempo directly shapes daily life for both permanent party members and students.
Q7: How does the base intersect with military law?
A7: The high operational tempo can lead to UCMJ matters ranging from investigations to administrative and judicial actions. Flight and training demands often place service members in situations where procedural compliance is closely evaluated. These circumstances make timely legal support essential on base.
Q8: Who represents service members facing UCMJ actions at Holloman?
A8: The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at or passing through Holloman Air Force Base. Their work includes cases arising from training environments, operational duties, and command‑related proceedings. This representation supports personnel navigating the complexities of military justice.
In many cases, a service member remains on active duty while separation processing is ongoing. However, duty restrictions or administrative holds may apply.
Statements from prior investigations are commonly introduced in separation proceedings. These statements may be used even if they were never tested in a court-martial.
Yes, a service member has the right to present witnesses and evidence at a Board of Inquiry. Witness testimony can play a significant role in credibility and character assessments.
Letters of Reprimand and Non-Judicial Punishment are frequently used as evidence to support separation. They are often presented as proof of a pattern of misconduct or poor judgment.
Yes, a Board of Inquiry can have a direct impact on retirement eligibility, especially for service members close to retirement. In some cases, separation may prevent retirement entirely.
