Fort Polk Command-Directed Investigation Defense Lawyers
Table Contents
A Command-Directed Investigation is an administrative inquiry, not a criminal case, but it can still threaten a service member’s career. At Fort Polk, findings may escalate into reprimands, separation actions, or even court-martial proceedings. Gonzalez & Waddington provide defense guidance at 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Answer: Yes, administrative separation can occur without a court-martial when the command believes there is sufficient basis for separation. This process relies on administrative procedures rather than criminal prosecution. It is handled under military regulations instead of the Uniform Code of Military Justice judicial system.
Answer: A Board of Inquiry is an administrative board that examines whether separation is warranted, while Nonjudicial Punishment is a disciplinary action imposed by a commander. NJP does not decide separation on its own, though it may be used as evidence in a BOI. A BOI focuses specifically on retention or separation.
Answer: The burden of proof at a BOI is generally a preponderance of the evidence. This means the board must determine whether the alleged basis for separation is more likely than not. The standard is lower than that used in criminal courts.
Answer: A BOI typically consists of three commissioned officers. They are selected by the command and must be impartial. One officer serves as the board president and oversees the proceedings.
Answer: The board may review documents, witness statements, service records, and other materials relevant to the alleged basis for separation. Both the government and the service member may present evidence. The board evaluates all information admitted during the hearing.
Answer: A BOI may review a service member’s entire record, including time in service. Its findings can affect whether the member continues service long enough to reach retirement eligibility. Any impact depends on the board’s final recommendations.
Answer: A BOI can recommend a characterization such as Honorable, General, or Other Than Honorable based on the evidence. The characterization reflects the board’s assessment of the service member’s performance and conduct. Final approval is made by the separation authority.
Answer: Yes, a service member may retain a civilian lawyer at personal expense to participate in the BOI. The civilian attorney can attend the hearing and take part in presenting evidence and questioning witnesses. Their role is in addition to any assigned military counsel.
A1: Fort Polk sits in west-central Louisiana near the town of Leesville, positioned within the heavily forested Kisatchie National Forest. Its location places it between Alexandria and Lake Charles, giving it access to key transportation corridors in the Gulf South region. The surrounding civilian communities maintain close ties with the installation through commerce, housing, and shared services.
A2: The dense woodlands and humid subtropical climate create an environment well suited for large-scale field exercises. These conditions allow units to train in terrain that simulates challenging global deployments. The region’s relative isolation also provides ample space for maneuver operations without conflicting with urban development.
A3: Fort Polk is primarily an Army installation and hosts major training and readiness elements. It supports operational brigades as well as specialized training units that prepare forces for a wide range of missions. Tenant commands coordinate closely to manage field rotations, live-fire exercises, and support functions.
A4: The installation emphasizes readiness and realistic training, with large-scale field environments used to evaluate unit performance. Its role includes preparing forces for contingency operations and maintaining deployable capability. The demanding training tempo shapes both daily activity and long-term unit development.
A5: Fort Polk hosts a substantial active duty population, reinforced by rotating units conducting multi-week training cycles. Aviation, logistics, medical support, and operational staffs contribute to daily activity across the post. The influx of rotational forces adds seasonal surges in personnel and equipment.
A6: High-intensity field exercises dominate the schedule, creating constant movement of troops, vehicles, and aircraft. Units preparing for overseas missions often cycle through the installation’s training areas. This operational rhythm influences both garrison functions and community interaction.
A7: The fast-paced training environment means service members may encounter UCMJ issues tied to field operations, investigations, or administrative reviews. Commanders regularly manage matters such as non-judicial punishment, courts-martial, or separation actions. These processes unfold within the unique demands of a readiness-focused installation.
A8: The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at or training through Fort Polk. Their work includes assisting personnel confronted with UCMJ actions connected to the installation’s operational tempo. This representation supports individuals navigating complex military justice proceedings.
Fort Polk is located in west-central Louisiana, anchored near the small city of Leesville and within driving distance of Alexandria and the broader Kisatchie National Forest region. The installation sits in a heavily wooded, humid subtropical environment that provides dense vegetation, rolling pine forests, and varied terrain ideal for field exercises. Its relative isolation allows for expansive maneuver areas while maintaining close ties to surrounding civilian communities, where many military families live, work, and access essential services. The regional economy and daily life in Vernon Parish are deeply interconnected with the installation’s presence and activity.
Military Presence and Mission
Fort Polk is a major U.S. Army training hub, home to the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC), one of the Army’s premier combat training environments. The installation hosts combat brigades on rotational cycles, along with active-duty units permanently stationed on post. Training at Fort Polk focuses on preparing brigade combat teams for deployment, emphasizing realistic scenarios that mirror contemporary operational challenges. The base’s mission supports force readiness at the national level, providing the Army with a location capable of large-scale, immersive exercises supported by aviation, logistics, and observer/controller teams.
Service Member Population and Activity
Fort Polk supports a substantial active-duty population, including soldiers assigned to home-station units, rotational brigade elements, and the extensive trainer and support workforce required for JRTC operations. The installation hosts frequent movement of personnel and equipment, with aviation, medical, and sustainment assets integrated into large force-on-force exercises. The training tempo is continuous, with units arriving from across the country for pre-deployment certification and joint readiness operations.
Military Law and UCMJ Relevance
The demanding training schedule and operational intensity at Fort Polk contribute to a steady flow of military justice actions. Service members stationed at or rotating through the installation may encounter UCMJ‑related issues, including investigations, administrative measures, non‑judicial punishment, courts‑martial, or separation actions. The fast‑paced environment, high stress of JRTC rotations, and the transient nature of visiting units can all affect how legal matters arise and are processed. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent service members at Fort Polk, providing guidance and defense for those facing military justice challenges linked to their service on the installation.
https://home.army.mil/polk/
The investigation is conducted by an appointed Investigating Officer, usually another service member, who is tasked with gathering facts and reporting findings to the command.
A Command-Directed Investigation is ordered by a commander with appropriate authority over the service member or unit involved. The decision is often made after consultation with legal advisors.
No, a Command-Directed Investigation is administrative, not criminal, but it can lead to criminal, disciplinary, or separation action based on its findings.
A Command-Directed Investigation is an administrative inquiry ordered by a commander to gather facts about alleged misconduct, performance issues, or concerns affecting good order and discipline. It is not a criminal proceeding.
Many service members choose to hire civilian military defense lawyers during a CDI because early involvement can affect how statements, evidence, and findings are documented and later used.
