Fort Lee Military Defense Lawyers

Fort Lee Military Defense Lawyers for UCMJ Matters

Short answer: Soldiers at Fort Lee, Virginia, including trainees and cadre at the Sustainment Center of Excellence and the Army Logistics University, can hire a civilian military defense lawyer in addition to their free Trial Defense Service counsel (Article 38(b), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 838). If Army CID asks to interview you, you have the right to remain silent and must be told what you are suspected of before questioning (Article 31(b), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 831). An arrest in Petersburg, Hopewell or elsewhere in Prince George County can lead to both a Virginia prosecution and military action (Gamble v. United States, 587 U.S. 678 (2019)). Gonzalez & Waddington travels to Fort Lee for interviews, hearings and trials. Call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-799-4019.

Gonzalez & Waddington, LLC, including civilian military defense counsel Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington, serves service members associated with Fort Lee, Virginia. The firm represents military clients in UCMJ investigations, court-martial defense, and administrative military matters such as separation proceedings, reprimand responses, and other command-driven actions. This page is for Fort Lee Soldiers, students, instructors, staff, and families seeking civilian defense counsel without implying a local office or verified Fort Lee-specific case history.

Fort Lee, Virginia, and the Sustainment Mission

Fort Lee is a U.S. Army garrison and training installation in Virginia. Official Army materials describe the post as a focused training base for sustainment functions, including military supply, subsistence, maintenance, munitions, transportation, and related support work. That mission gives the installation a distinct character: many people connected to Fort Lee are there for training, professional military education, headquarters support, or sustainment-related assignments rather than a conventional combat-unit footprint.

The installation is also closely tied to the Army’s sustainment enterprise. The official Fort Lee units and tenants page lists the Combined Arms Support Command and Sustainment Center of Excellence, the Ordnance School, the Quartermaster School, the Transportation School, and Army Sustainment University among major commands. For service members facing an allegation, those local facts can matter because the surrounding records, witnesses, schedules, and command environment may be shaped by a schoolhouse or sustainment setting.

Local Context for Service Members and Families

Fort Lee sits alongside Virginia’s Tri-Cities of Petersburg, Colonial Heights, and Hopewell, and near Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, and Prince George counties. The installation’s official information reports a daily population averaging more than 29,000, with as many as 70,000 troops passing through classrooms each year. Those numbers reflect a large and rotating military community that may include permanent party personnel, trainees, instructors, support staff, and service members moving through courses or assignments.

The post’s official materials also identify notable tenant organizations, including headquarters elements for the Defense Commissary Agency and Defense Contract Management Agency, Kenner Army Health Clinic, a Military Entrance Processing Station, and Global Combat Support System-Army. The official units and tenants page further lists the 12th Military Police Detachment Criminal Investigation Command, CID, as a military unit at Fort Lee. These are local facts, not assumptions about any individual case, but they help explain why defense planning at Fort Lee may require careful attention to Army records, training timelines, workplace communications, and the command structure involved.

Why Civilian Military Defense Counsel May Matter Early

A UCMJ allegation connected to Fort Lee can place a service member under immediate professional and personal pressure. An investigation, proposed adverse action, or court-martial referral may affect more than the current assignment. It can also raise concerns about rank, duty status, career progression, and future opportunities. Because Fort Lee includes major training and sustainment organizations, a case may involve instructors, classmates, supervisors, administrative personnel, official records, digital communications, or off-post witnesses in nearby Virginia communities.

Civilian military defense counsel can assist by helping a service member understand the risk, avoid unnecessary statements, organize available records, and prepare for military justice or administrative proceedings. Gonzalez & Waddington, LLC represents service members worldwide in military defense matters. Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington may work with a client’s detailed military defense counsel when appropriate, while providing independent civilian advocacy focused on the specific allegation, the evidence, and the client’s military future.

Fort Lee Name History and Search Clarity

Many families and service members still search for help using the name Fort Lee. The official history reflects why that name appears in different ways. The installation was redesignated from Fort Lee to Fort Gregg-Adams on April 27, 2023, and then redesignated from Fort Gregg-Adams to Fort Lee on June 11, 2025. Using Fort Lee accurately matches the current installation name while recognizing that recent name changes can create confusion for people trying to find the right military defense resource.

If you are associated with Fort Lee and are facing a UCMJ investigation, court-martial, or administrative military action, speak with qualified civilian military defense counsel before making decisions that may affect the case. To discuss representation by Gonzalez & Waddington, LLC, call 1-800-921-8607.

Fort Lee Military Defense Lawyers | UCMJ & Court-Martial Defense

Fort Lee is a major Army logistics and sustainment installation in central Virginia. It sits near Petersburg, Colonial Heights, Hopewell, Prince George County, Chesterfield County, Dinwiddie County, Richmond, I-95, I-85, Route 36, and the Appomattox River region.

Fort Lee is not a standard combat post. It is a sustainment, logistics, training, and headquarters-heavy installation. Its mission is tied to Army supply, transportation, maintenance, food service, personnel support, commissary operations, and sustainment doctrine.

Service members at Fort Lee may face UCMJ investigations that begin on post, off post, in a schoolhouse, in a logistics unit, in housing, during TDY, during training, or after civilian police contact in Virginia.

Cases may involve:

Army Sustainment University students and instructors
CASCOM and Sustainment Center of Excellence personnel
Quartermaster, Ordnance, and Transportation training environments
Defense Commissary Agency personnel
MEPS, DCMA, logistics, supply, and support personnel
Property records, training records, travel records, and official documents
Off-post incidents in Petersburg, Colonial Heights, Hopewell, Richmond, or Prince George County
DUI stops, domestic calls, hotel allegations, and civilian court matters
Digital evidence, phone extractions, social media, emails, and workplace messages

Civilian Court-Martial Attorneys for Fort Lee Service Members

Gonzalez & Waddington defends service members stationed at Fort Lee in serious UCMJ matters. The firm handles courts-martial, Article 15/NJP actions, GOMOR rebuttals, letters of reprimand, administrative separation boards, and Boards of Inquiry.

An allegation at Fort Lee can threaten a career quickly. This is especially true for students, instructors, officers, NCOs, logistics professionals, supply personnel, transportation personnel, maintenance personnel, and service members in headquarters or schoolhouse environments.

Fort Lee is different from a combat brigade installation. It is the Army’s sustainment hub. A case may involve official records, training files, logistics documents, government property, supply records, travel documents, instructor-student issues, workplace witnesses, and local Virginia police reports.

If you are accused of a UCMJ offense at or near Fort Lee, do not wait for the command’s theory to harden. This includes Article 120 sexual assault, abusive sexual contact, domestic violence, assault, DUI, drug misconduct, fraud, larceny, false official statement, orders violations, harassment, stalking, threats, child exploitation, online misconduct, supply issues, travel-card issues, and training-related allegations.

Call Gonzalez & Waddington at 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-799-4019 to request a confidential consultation with civilian military defense lawyers who defend service members worldwide.

Civilian Military Defense for Service Members at Fort Lee, Virginia

Fort Lee is located near Petersburg in central Virginia. The installation supports Army logistics, sustainment, training, doctrine, and support operations.

The official Fort Lee units and tenants page lists major organizations on the post. These include Army Sustainment University, Defense Commissary Agency, Defense Contract Management Agency, Military Entrance Processing Station, and Kenner Army Health Clinic. See the Fort Lee Units and Tenants.

This mission matters in a military defense case. Fort Lee cases may involve supply records, logistics systems, training rosters, classroom records, official forms, travel vouchers, property accountability, and workplace communications.

A case may begin as a local police matter. It can still become a UCMJ problem. A service member may face Article 15, GOMOR, administrative separation, Board of Inquiry, security clearance review, Article 32 hearing, or court-martial.

Early defense action can help preserve favorable evidence. It can also protect the service member before statements are made to investigators or command representatives.

Fort Lee, Fort Lee and the Current Name Issue

Many service members still search for “Fort Lee military defense lawyer” or “Fort Lee court-martial attorney.” The installation was renamed Fort Gregg-Adams in 2023. The Fort Lee name was later restored in 2025.

This name history matters for search and for families trying to find help. A person may search for Fort Lee, Fort Lee, Petersburg Army base, or Virginia Army logistics base.

This page uses Fort Lee because that is the name many service members, families, veterans, and searchers use. It also recognizes the recent Fort Lee naming history.

Why Fort Lee Cases Are Different

Fort Lee is a sustainment and schoolhouse installation. Many cases involve students, instructors, staff members, logistics records, and official documents.

That changes the evidence. A Fort Lee case may involve:

Army Sustainment University records
Quartermaster, Ordnance, or Transportation school records
Class rosters and training schedules
Instructor-student communications
Supply records and property accountability documents
Travel cards, vouchers, orders, and TDY records
Command emails and workplace messages
Phone extractions, texts, and social media
Prince George County or Petersburg police reports
911 calls, body-camera footage, hotel records, or rideshare data

The defense must identify what records exist. It must also determine who controls them. At Fort Lee, key evidence may come from a schoolhouse, logistics office, supply system, local police agency, or civilian court file.

Fort Lee History and Army Sustainment Mission

Fort Lee began as Camp Lee during World War I. The installation later became one of the Army’s central logistics and sustainment hubs.

CASCOM traces its history to Army efforts after World War II to improve command, control, training, and doctrine for logistics and support operations. See the CASCOM History.

Today, Fort Lee remains closely tied to sustainment. Its mission reaches far beyond the local installation. The training and doctrine developed there affect how the Army feeds, fuels, supplies, transports, maintains, and supports the force.

This history matters in a defense case. A Fort Lee allegation may involve logistics, supply, transportation, maintenance, training, property accountability, travel claims, official forms, or command-directed inquiries.

A defense strategy must account for the mission. A logistics records case is different from an Article 120 case. A schoolhouse allegation is different from an off-post DUI. A travel-card issue is not automatically a crime.

Video: Fort Gregg-Adams Court-Martial Lawyer | UCMJ Defense VA (2:50) — watch on YouTube

Major Fort Lee Organizations and Why They Matter in a Defense Case

Fort Lee hosts organizations that train and support the Army’s sustainment force. These organizations shape how UCMJ cases develop.

Important Fort Lee mission areas include:

Combined Arms Support Command: Sustainment doctrine, training, and leader development. Cases may involve command records, staff communications, and professional reputation issues.
Army Sustainment University: Professional military education for logistics and sustainment personnel. Cases may involve students, instructors, academic records, and TDY timelines.
Quartermaster School: Supply, fuel, food service, mortuary affairs, and logistics training. Cases may involve property, supplies, official records, or training issues.
Ordnance School: Maintenance and munitions-related training. Cases may involve tools, equipment, safety records, and technical documentation.
Transportation School: Movement and transportation operations. Cases may involve vehicles, movement records, travel, and logistics timelines.
Defense Commissary Agency: Commissary operations worldwide. Cases may involve financial records, workplace complaints, property issues, or civilian witnesses.
Military Entrance Processing Station: Applicant processing and official records. Cases may involve forms, applicant interactions, and professional conduct.

The mission area matters. A supply case requires different evidence than a training misconduct case. A student case is different from a DeCA workplace allegation. A false statement case often turns on exact wording, record completeness, and intent.

Petersburg, Colonial Heights, Hopewell, Richmond and the Fort Lee Community

Fort Lee is located near Petersburg. It is also close to Colonial Heights, Hopewell, Prince George County, Chesterfield County, Dinwiddie County, and Richmond.

This local setting matters. Service members may live off post, drive on I-95 or I-85, stay in hotels, visit restaurants, attend events in Richmond, or interact with civilian police.

Off-post incidents can quickly become military cases. A DUI stop, domestic call, assault allegation, hotel incident, traffic crash, protective order, drug issue, or civilian arrest may lead to command action at Fort Lee.

Local evidence may include:

Prince George County police records
Petersburg police reports
Colonial Heights police reports
Hopewell police reports
Virginia State Police reports
Prince George County court filings
911 calls and body-camera footage
Hospital or urgent care records
Hotel and restaurant records
Private security video
Rideshare and phone location data
Text messages and social media

A defense strategy must account for both systems. A Virginia civilian case may move forward while the command separately considers UCMJ or administrative action.

Virginia Civilian Courts and Federal Court Issues Near Fort Lee

Some Fort Lee cases overlap with Virginia civilian courts. The military does not always wait for the civilian case to finish.

Prince George General District Court is located at 6601 Courts Drive in Prince George. See the Prince George General District Court.

Federal jurisdiction may also matter in some cases. The Eastern District of Virginia has a Richmond courthouse at 701 East Broad Street. See the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

A service member may face a civilian case and a military case at the same time. The civilian case may involve DUI, assault, domestic violence, traffic offenses, protective orders, drug allegations, weapons issues, or other local charges.

The key point is practical: a local dismissal does not automatically stop a military case. A reduced civilian charge does not automatically prevent an Article 15. A weak civilian case can still become a career-threatening UCMJ matter.

How Local Fort Lee Incidents Become Military Legal Problems

The following examples are hypothetical. They are not claims about any actual case, business, command, employee, student, instructor, contractor, or person. They show how local facts can matter when a service member at Fort Lee is accused of misconduct.

Petersburg DUI: A service member is stopped after dinner, drinks, or a unit event. The civilian case may trigger a reprimand, Article 15, driving restrictions, clearance review, or separation processing.
Schoolhouse allegation: A student or instructor is accused of misconduct involving texts, social media, classroom dynamics, lodging, or professional boundaries.
Supply or property case: A service member is accused of misusing equipment, parts, supplies, tools, vehicles, or government property.
Travel-card or voucher issue: A case involves TDY records, lodging claims, meal claims, travel cards, receipts, or alleged false official statements.
Article 120 allegation: A hotel stay, dating-app encounter, barracks incident, off-post gathering, or workplace relationship leads to a sexual assault or abusive sexual contact allegation.
Off-post domestic call: A family argument in Petersburg, Colonial Heights, Hopewell, or Richmond leads to a 911 call. The command may issue a no-contact order and consider Article 128b or administrative action.
Drug or urinalysis case: A positive urinalysis, prescription issue, vehicle search, suspected distribution allegation, or text-message evidence leads to command action.
Digital evidence case: Investigators rely on screenshots, deleted messages, social media, phone extractions, metadata, or incomplete digital records.

Common UCMJ Charges at Fort Lee

Service members at Fort Lee may face UCMJ allegations tied to training, logistics, sustainment, off-post conduct, digital communications, workplace issues, or command investigations.

Article 120 sexual assault and abusive sexual contact allegations
Article 128 assault and Article 128b domestic violence allegations
Drug offenses, urinalysis cases, and prescription-related allegations
Larceny, fraud, travel-card issues, and property-related misconduct
False official statement allegations
Orders violations and training-related misconduct
Harassment, stalking, threats, or workplace-related allegations
Supply, property, logistics, or maintenance-related allegations
Computer, phone, and digital evidence investigations

Once a case enters the court-martial system, the stakes increase. The result can affect liberty, rank, retirement, clearance, future assignments, civilian employment, and reputation.

If You're Investigated at Fort Lee: What to Know First

Army CID wants to talk to you. An interview request from the Department of the Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) at Fort Lee is evidence collection, not a chance to clear things up. Article 31(b) of the UCMJ requires investigators to tell you what you are suspected of and that you have the right to remain silent before they question you, and you can ask for a lawyer before answering anything. Exercising those rights cannot be used as evidence against you.

Being titled is not the same as being charged. Investigators can title a service member and index the name in the Defense Central Index of Investigations on only "credible information." The case may go nowhere, yet the entry can resurface years later in background investigations and clearance reviews, so how the investigation is handled from the start matters.

Your commander may not be the one deciding. Covered offenses such as sexual assault, domestic violence, stalking, kidnapping, murder, child pornography and (since 2025) sexual harassment are now controlled by an independent Office of Special Trial Counsel, which decides whether charges are preferred and referred. Other allegations at Fort Lee still go through the chain of command.

Domestic violence allegations. Article 128b covers violence against a spouse, intimate partner or family member, and an allegation of strangulation or suffocation can be charged as aggravated assault even without a visible injury. A qualifying conviction can also trigger the federal firearms ban under the Lautenberg Amendment, which can end a career that requires carrying a weapon.

Drug allegations. Marijuana may be legal for adults under Virginia law, but it remains prohibited for service members under Article 112a of the UCMJ, on post and off. A positive urinalysis is serious but contestable: the chain of custody, the testing process and innocent ingestion can all be challenged, and the government must prove the use was knowing and wrongful.

Pay and allowance allegations. BAH and other allowance cases are usually charged as larceny under Article 121 or as frauds against the United States under Article 124. An overpayment by itself is not a crime: the government must prove you intended to steal or defraud, and many of these cases begin as paperwork errors.

If you are under investigation at Fort Lee, talk to a military defense lawyer before you make any statement. Call Gonzalez & Waddington at 1-800-921-8607.

How Court-Martial Investigations Often Begin at Fort Lee

Many Fort Lee military justice cases begin with a complaint or command notification. Investigators may then collect statements, digital records, official documents, photos, and witness timelines.

A typical case may involve:

An initial complaint, allegation, or command report
A CID investigation or command inquiry
Witness interviews
Collection of official, documentary, and digital evidence
Review of emails, messages, training records, duty rosters, property records, or travel records
Command review and legal evaluation
Preferral of charges
An Article 32 preliminary hearing when required
Referral to a special or general court-martial

Investigators often seek statements early. Those statements can shape the government’s theory. A service member should not assume an interview is harmless because charges have not yet been filed.

Why Early Defense Action Matters at Fort Lee

Fort Lee cases can move quickly. Many involve students, instructors, logistics records, digital evidence, property issues, and command pressure.

Early defense action can help preserve favorable evidence. It can also identify gaps, inconsistencies, and unsupported assumptions before the command’s view becomes fixed.

This is especially important in cases involving Article 120 allegations, supply records, travel claims, false statements, digital evidence, drug allegations, workplace complaints, or contradictory witness accounts.

A civilian military defense lawyer can help protect the service member before avoidable mistakes are made.

Military Law Issues for Service Members at Fort Lee

Article 120 Sexual Assault & Abusive Sexual Contact

Article 120 cases may involve hotels, barracks rooms, lodging, unit events, alcohol, dating apps, delayed reports, text messages, social media, phone extractions, and civilian witnesses.

These cases often turn on consent, credibility, intoxication, timing, digital evidence, witness contamination, and command assumptions.

Domestic Violence & Assault

Domestic violence and assault cases may involve Virginia police reports, 911 calls, medical records, photographs, protective orders, Family Advocacy records, text messages, and command no-contact orders.

Even if the civilian case is reduced or dismissed, the command may still pursue Article 15, adverse paperwork, separation, Board of Inquiry, or clearance-related action.

Logistics, Supply & Property Allegations

Fort Lee cases may involve property accountability, supply records, government equipment, tools, fuel, food service, transportation records, maintenance records, or official documentation.

The defense must determine whether the allegation is criminal, administrative, professional, or based on incomplete information.

Fraud, Travel, False Statements & Records Issues

These cases may involve travel cards, official claims, lodging records, orders, official forms, emails, text messages, or command-directed inquiries.

The defense must evaluate whether the government can prove intent. It must also determine whether records are complete and whether administrative mistakes are being treated as crimes.

Drug & Alcohol Cases

A positive urinalysis, prescription issue, DUI, drunk-and-disorderly allegation, or off-post incident can lead to adverse paperwork, Article 15, separation processing, or clearance concerns.

For service members in training, logistics, support, supervisory, or clearance-sensitive roles, administrative consequences may move faster than the criminal process.

Why Service Members at Fort Lee Hire Civilian Court-Martial Lawyers

Military criminal cases are not routine administrative matters. A serious allegation can threaten confinement, punitive discharge, rank, pay, clearance, reputation, and long-term career prospects.

A civilian military defense lawyer provides independent trial-focused representation. The goal is to protect the client early and prepare the case as if it may be litigated in court.

Immediate intervention during CID, NCIS, OSI, CGIS, or command investigations
Protection from damaging statements during interviews, rights advisements, and written responses
Evidence preservation involving texts, emails, call logs, social media, photos, and witness timelines
Record review when allegations involve training, logistics, supply, travel, property, or official documents
Investigation review to identify credibility problems and missing evidence
Article 32 preparation designed to expose weaknesses in the government’s proof
Motions practice challenging unlawful searches, statements, digital extractions, expert testimony, and procedural violations
Trial preparation for contested special and general courts-martial

Civilian Military Defense Counsel Working With Detailed Military Defense Counsel

A service member facing court-martial generally has the right to detailed military defense counsel. Civilian military defense counsel does not replace detailed military counsel. Civilian counsel can work alongside the detailed military lawyer.

Civilian counsel can bring independent investigation, family communication, digital evidence review, witness preparation, cross-examination strategy, and continuity outside the command structure.

At Fort Lee, civilian defense counsel may need to review evidence from many sources. These may include CID reports, command emails, local police records, 911 calls, body-camera footage, official records, training schedules, duty rosters, property records, supply records, travel records, phone extractions, text messages, social media, hotel records, civilian court filings, protective order records, urinalysis documents, and adverse administrative paperwork.

Gonzalez & Waddington represents service members worldwide in serious military cases. The firm defends clients in courts-martial, Article 120 cases, Article 128 and 128b cases, CID, NCIS, OSI, and CGIS investigations, Article 15/NJP actions, Boards of Inquiry, administrative separations, GOMOR rebuttals, fraud cases, violent offenses, digital evidence cases, and other serious UCMJ matters.

Quick Answer: Military Defense Lawyers for Fort Lee

Service members stationed at Fort Lee can face military consequences from both on-post and off-post allegations. Cases may involve Fort Lee, Petersburg, Colonial Heights, Hopewell, Prince George County, Richmond, Virginia civilian courts, training records, logistics documents, digital evidence, workplace witnesses, and command investigations.

A civilian military defense lawyer can work alongside detailed military defense counsel in courts-martial, Article 120 cases, Article 15/NJP matters, letters of reprimand, GOMOR rebuttals, administrative separations, Boards of Inquiry, and command investigations.

Because Fort Lee is a logistics, sustainment, training, and headquarters installation, defense strategy should account for supply records, travel claims, property documents, schoolhouse records, local court exposure, digital evidence, witness timelines, and long-term military career consequences.

Video transcript

Transcript of the video “Fort Gregg-Adams Court-Martial Lawyer | UCMJ Defense VA,” from Gonzalez & Waddington.

Read the full transcript of this video

If you or a loved one are stationed at Fort Lee, Virginia, and you’re under investigation or facing UCMJ action, what you do in the first 24 to 48 hours can decide everything. If you’re facing a court-martial, you’re not dealing with a workplace issue. You’re facing a federal criminal prosecution inside of the military justice system where the UCMJ rules, where prosecutors pursue good order and discipline aggressively and sometimes with an iron fist. You are up against trained prosecutors, trained investigators in a command structure that has already made decisions about how serious your case is. By the time charges are even preferred, the government has been building its case for months.

Here’s the reality. Most court-martial cases are not won just by telling the truth. They’re won by preparation, strategy, and execution. And in most cases, those who make the most mistakes lose. We see it all the time.

Service members who believe that if they just tell their side and say what happened, the system will work itself out. That is not how this works. Every statement you make, every text message you send, every witness, every timeline, every inconsistency, those will be analyzed and used against you if you’re not prepared. The government is not trying to quote hear your side. They’re trying to prove their case.

They’re trying to win the case and get a conviction. If you don’t have a defense strategy early before the Article 32 hearing, before the motions, before trial, you are behind the power curve. At Gonzalez & Waddington, we approach court-martial defense like trial lawyers. That means building a theory of the case from day one, identifying the weaknesses in the government’s case and in their evidence. We methodically prepare cross-examinations.

We challenge forensic assumptions, and we force the government to prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt. because that burden matters and it only works if you know how to hold their feet to the fire and how to hold them accountable to that standard. We’ve defended service members around the world in serious felony level court-martial cases including sexual assault, violent offenses, and complex investigations. So, if you’re under investigation or charges are coming, do not wait until it’s too late. The earlier an experienced military defense lawyer gets involved, the more options you have.

Because once the case is fully built against you, your margin for error disappears. If you or loved one are stationed at Fort Lee, Virginia and facing a court-martial or UCMJ action, then reach out to our experienced military defense lawyers for a free consultation. At Gonzalez & Waddington, our military defense lawyers have been defending service members for decades. If you’re dealing with this right now, you need to act immediately and call an experienced military defense lawyer.

Exceptional defense attorney. Highly recommend his service with any military matters.

— Gage R. ★★★★★ Google review · More client reviews

Prior results and client testimonials do not guarantee a similar outcome, and you may not obtain the same or similar results. Every case is different. No client was paid for a review.

Fort Lee Military Defense FAQ

Can a service member hire a civilian lawyer for a Fort Lee court-martial?

Yes. Service members have the right to military defense counsel and may also retain civilian defense counsel. Civilian counsel can assist during investigations, Article 32 hearings, courts-martial, Article 15 proceedings, administrative separations, Boards of Inquiry, and rebuttals to adverse paperwork.

What types of cases go to court-martial at Fort Lee?

Serious UCMJ cases may include Article 120 sexual assault allegations, assault, domestic violence, drug offenses, fraud, false official statements, property allegations, digital evidence cases, and other felony-level military charges.

Do CID investigations happen before charges are filed?

Yes. Investigations often begin long before charges are preferred. Investigators may request interviews, collect witness statements, search devices, and review digital or official records before the service member fully understands the risk.

Can a civilian arrest near Fort Lee affect my military career?

Yes. A civilian arrest or police report in Petersburg, Colonial Heights, Hopewell, Prince George County, Richmond, or another Virginia community can lead to command action. The command may consider Article 15, adverse paperwork, administrative separation, Board of Inquiry, clearance review, or court-martial.

Are Fort Lee cases different from normal Army post cases?

They can be. Fort Lee is a logistics and sustainment installation. Cases may involve supply records, travel cards, property documents, official forms, schoolhouse witnesses, contractor witnesses, and workplace messages.

Can commanders take action before civilian charges are resolved?

Yes. The military does not always wait for civilian courts. A command may issue adverse paperwork, impose restrictions, initiate Article 15 proceedings, or begin separation action while the civilian case is still pending.

Army CID wants to interview me at Fort Lee. Do I have to talk to them?

No. Article 31(b) of the UCMJ requires investigators to tell you what you are suspected of and that you have the right to remain silent, and you can ask for a lawyer before answering anything. An interview is evidence collection, and Army CID can title you as a subject on a low "credible information" standard that can follow you into background and clearance checks even if the case is dropped. Politely decline, ask for counsel, and call a military defense lawyer before you say anything.

Why Gonzalez & Waddington for Fort Lee Military Defense Cases

Gonzalez & Waddington, LLC is a civilian military defense law firm representing service members worldwide. The firm focuses on military criminal defense, court-martial litigation, UCMJ investigations, administrative separation boards, Boards of Inquiry, GOMOR and letter of reprimand rebuttals, Article 15/NJP matters, sexual assault defense, violent offense defense, fraud cases, digital evidence cases, and other high-stakes military legal matters.

Michael Waddington is a former Army officer and former Army JAG. He has served as an Army Trial Defense Counsel, Senior Defense Counsel, Army prosecutor, Special Assistant United States Attorney, and Chief of Military Justice. He has more than 25 years of military defense experience and is admitted to all U.S. military trial courts worldwide.

Alexandra González-Waddington is a founding partner, former public defender, and experienced military defense lawyer. She is admitted to all U.S. military trial courts worldwide and has defended service members in sexual assault, violent crime, war crimes, murder, classified-information, domestic violence, and white-collar cases.

For Fort Lee service members, that background matters. Cases at this installation may involve logistics records, property files, schoolhouse evidence, Virginia civilian evidence, digital messages, command pressure, clearance concerns, and serious UCMJ allegations.

Talk to a Civilian Military Defense Lawyer Serving Fort Lee

If you are stationed at Fort Lee and are under investigation, do not wait. Get legal guidance before making statements or submitting paperwork that may be used against you later.

Gonzalez & Waddington can work alongside detailed military defense counsel. The firm can help review the evidence, preserve favorable information, prepare for command decisions, and build a defense strategy that accounts for both the military case and the Virginia sustainment environment.

Call Gonzalez & Waddington at 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-799-4019 to request a confidential consultation. No attorney can guarantee a result. The goal is to intervene early, protect your rights, and help you make informed decisions before the command or prosecution theory hardens.

Helpful Fort Lee and Virginia Legal Resources

Aggressive Criminal Defense Lawyers

This video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make a difference.

Facing a military investigation, UCMJ allegation, or serious criminal charge? Gonzalez & Waddington provides trial-focused defense for high-stakes cases. Call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-799-4019 for a confidential, no-cost consultation.