Fort Irwin Command-Directed Investigation Defense Lawyers
Table Contents
A Command-Directed Investigation is an administrative inquiry ordered by command to examine alleged misconduct. Though not criminal, it can threaten a service member’s career and may escalate to reprimands, separation, or court-martial. Gonzalez & Waddington provide defense guidance for personnel at Fort Irwin. Call 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.








Answer: Yes, administrative separation can occur without a court-martial if the command believes a service member’s conduct or performance warrants review. This process is handled through administrative channels rather than the military justice system. A Board of Inquiry may be convened when required by regulation.
Answer: A Board of Inquiry is an administrative hearing focused on determining whether a service member should be retained. Nonjudicial punishment is a disciplinary measure used by commanders to address alleged misconduct without a judicial process. These actions serve different purposes and follow different procedures.
Answer: The burden of proof at a Board of Inquiry is typically a preponderance of the evidence standard. This means the board evaluates whether the evidence suggests it is more likely than not that the alleged basis for separation occurred. The board applies this standard to each allegation under review.
Answer: A Board of Inquiry is usually composed of three commissioned officers. At least one member is expected to be of the same branch or specialty when possible. The board president oversees the proceedings and ensures regulatory compliance.
Answer: The board may review documents, witness statements, service records, and other relevant materials. Members evaluate both favorable and unfavorable information. All admitted evidence must meet regulatory standards for relevance and reliability.
Answer: A Board of Inquiry may review issues that relate to continued service, which can impact eligibility for retirement. Outcomes can affect a member’s ability to reach required service milestones. Retirement considerations are handled according to applicable regulations.
Answer: Administrative separation can result in several characterizations, including Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), or Other Than Honorable. The characterization is based on a service member’s overall record and the findings reviewed by the separation authority. Each category reflects different aspects of a member’s service history.
Answer: Yes, a service member may choose to have a civilian lawyer represent them during a Board of Inquiry. Civilian counsel participates in the proceedings in accordance with board rules and installation access requirements. The presence of counsel does not alter the board’s authority or procedures.
Fort Irwin sits in the Mojave Desert of Southern California, positioned between Barstow and Death Valley. Its remote setting provides vast maneuver space for large-scale training. The surrounding High Desert communities contribute workers, services, and regional support to base activities.
The arid climate and rugged terrain shape both daily operations and training scenarios. These conditions allow units to rehearse in an environment that mirrors challenging overseas locations. The isolation also reinforces strong ties with nearby towns that help sustain military families.
The installation is primarily an Army post and home to the National Training Center. It hosts units focused on preparing brigade-level formations for complex missions. Tenant organizations support logistics, aviation interface, and mission command functions tied to these rotations.
The base provides immersive training for units preparing for contingency operations. Scenarios integrate combined arms, joint elements, and realistic opposition forces. This mission makes Fort Irwin a strategic hub within the Army’s readiness cycle.
The installation supports a steady resident military population alongside large numbers of rotational units. Personnel include trainers, support staff, medical teams, and command elements. The continual influx of units creates a dynamic operational environment year-round.
Fort Irwin hosts frequent large-scale exercises involving armored, mechanized, and enabler units. These rotations bring significant logistical activity and sustained operational tempo. Aviation support, intelligence integration, and field medical operations are common during these events.
The demanding training schedule can lead to UCMJ matters such as investigations, administrative actions, or courts-martial. High operational activity means command teams frequently address discipline and accountability issues. These processes occur alongside ongoing mission requirements.
The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at or training through Fort Irwin. Their work supports personnel involved in matters such as non-judicial actions or separation proceedings. This representation functions within the installation’s unique training-driven environment.
Fort Irwin is located in the High Desert of Southern California, positioned deep within the Mojave Desert between Barstow and Death Valley. Its remote location, well north of San Bernardino County’s major population centers, provides expansive training space unmatched elsewhere in the region. The installation sits roughly 40 miles from the civilian community of Barstow, which serves as the primary off-post hub for housing, services, and transportation. The stark desert terrain, extreme temperatures, and vast open maneuver areas shape both daily life and operational readiness at Fort Irwin, making the surrounding geography an essential component of the training environment.
Fort Irwin is home to the U.S. Army’s National Training Center, one of the service’s most significant large-scale combat training platforms. Its mission centers on preparing Brigade Combat Teams and joint forces for deployment through realistic, force-on-force scenarios conducted across thousands of acres of desert. Major operational units, including the Opposing Force and specialized support commands, enable visiting units to train in conditions that replicate modern combat environments. The installation’s purpose is not garrison-focused but instead built around continuous rotational training and evaluation, supporting both active-duty and National Guard formations.
The installation hosts a substantial active-duty population, but unlike traditional posts, its numbers regularly surge as entire brigades rotate through for month‑long training cycles. The base supports a wide range of functions necessary for large-scale exercises, including aviation assets, logistics hubs, medical support, and intelligence and communications elements. High operational tempo is the norm, with units arriving year-round to integrate live maneuver, simulated combat systems, and joint operational planning. This dynamic environment brings a steady flow of personnel from across the country, all operating in remote conditions that mirror deployed settings.
The intensity and pace of operations at Fort Irwin can give rise to a variety of UCMJ-related issues. Service members assigned to or rotating through the installation may face investigations, administrative actions, non-judicial punishment, courts‑martial, or separation proceedings stemming from training incidents, field stressors, or mission-related misconduct. Remote duty conditions can also complicate the handling of legal matters. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers at Fort Irwin, providing support for those navigating the military justice system in this demanding training environment.
https://home.army.mil/irwin/
Legal advisors typically review the CDI for sufficiency and compliance before command action is taken. However, the Investigating Officer is not the service member’s lawyer.
Yes, CDI findings are frequently used to support Letters of Reprimand or Non-Judicial Punishment. These administrative actions often rely heavily on the CDI report.
CDIs are often triggered by complaints, performance concerns, policy violations, interpersonal conflicts, or incidents that require command clarification.
Yes, the scope of a CDI can be expanded if new allegations or issues arise during fact-finding. This is common in practice.
The length of a CDI varies depending on complexity, number of witnesses, and command urgency. Some are completed quickly, while others may take weeks or months.