Fort Greely Command-Directed Investigation Defense Lawyers
Table Contents
A Command-Directed Investigation is an administrative inquiry ordered by command to address alleged misconduct or performance issues. Although not criminal, it can threaten a career and may escalate into reprimands, separation, or court‑martial actions. At Fort Greely, Gonzalez & Waddington provide defense guidance. Call 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Answer: Administrative separation can occur without a court-martial when commanders believe a service member’s conduct or performance warrants review. This process is separate from criminal proceedings and uses its own standards. It does not require a conviction or judicial finding.
Answer: A BOI is an administrative fact‑finding process to determine whether separation is appropriate, while NJP is a disciplinary action used to address minor offenses. NJP can precede a BOI but does not automatically trigger separation. Each process has different procedures and potential consequences.
Answer: The burden of proof in a BOI is a preponderance of the evidence, meaning the board must find it more likely than not that the alleged basis for separation occurred. This standard is lower than what is required in criminal proceedings. The board applies this standard to each allegation presented.
Answer: A BOI is typically composed of three commissioned officers who outrank the service member being reviewed. One officer serves as the board president and leads the proceedings. All members evaluate the evidence and vote on findings and recommendations.
Answer: The board may consider documents, witness testimony, service records, and any other relevant materials offered by the government or the service member. The rules of evidence are more flexible than in a court-martial. The board determines the weight and relevance of each item presented.
Answer: A BOI may review whether a service member is eligible to continue service long enough to reach retirement. Administrative separation before qualifying service is complete may affect retirement eligibility. The board’s recommendations influence how the command proceeds.
Answer: The board recommends a characterization of service based on the member’s overall record and the findings related to the case. Possible characterizations range from Honorable to Other Than Honorable. The final characterization decision is made by the separation authority.
Answer: Service members may retain a civilian lawyer at their own expense to participate in the BOI process. Civilian counsel can appear alongside appointed military counsel. Their involvement is subject to the board’s procedural rules.
Fort Greely sits in interior Alaska, south of Delta Junction and along the Richardson Highway. Its remote Arctic setting includes subarctic terrain marked by long winters and expansive training land. This location is strategically tied to missile defense operations and cold‑region military research.
The installation connects closely with Delta Junction and nearby rural communities that support personnel with services, housing, and seasonal employment. Both military and civilian populations rely on shared infrastructure in this sparsely populated region. The base’s presence influences local economic and community planning.
The U.S. Army maintains the primary mission at Fort Greely, supported by joint-service personnel tied to national defense activities. Its operations center on strategic missile defense readiness and cold‑weather support functions. These roles give the installation a unique place in northern security operations.
The installation hosts key missile defense assets that contribute to homeland protection. It also provides training and testing grounds for Arctic and subarctic operations. These missions require specialized facilities and continuous coordination with national defense commands.
Fort Greely maintains a modest active-duty presence compared to larger Army posts, supplemented by civilian contractors and rotational personnel. Activity levels fluctuate with missile defense requirements and seasonal training schedules. The population supports both operational and technical functions.
Personnel support missile defense operations, cold-weather testing, and mission‑critical maintenance tasks. Training rotations add periodic increases in operational tempo. These activities require coordination among military, civilian, and contractor teams.
Service members stationed at or transiting through Fort Greely remain subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Investigations, administrative actions, and courts‑martial may arise from incidents occurring during operations or within the installation’s controlled areas. The remote environment can influence how such matters are managed and processed.
The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at Fort Greely. They handle cases involving UCMJ actions, administrative matters, and courts‑martial linked to the installation’s mission and operational tempo. Their experience includes work within the unique legal landscape of remote Alaska posts.
Fort Greely is located in interior Alaska, just south of Delta Junction and roughly 100 miles southeast of Fairbanks. Its position along the Richardson Highway places it within a remote subarctic region defined by long winters, rugged mountain terrain, and vast stretches of boreal forest. This isolated environment is central to the installation’s purpose, providing the geographic separation and controlled airspace needed for missile defense operations and cold‑weather military activities. The surrounding civilian communities, particularly Delta Junction, maintain close ties with the base through shared infrastructure, workforce connections, and support services that sustain daily life in such a challenging climate.
Fort Greely is best known for its role in the nation’s Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system. The installation hosts Army units responsible for safeguarding and supporting missile interceptor fields that protect the United States from long‑range ballistic threats. While the post does not house large maneuver forces, its tenant units operate highly specialized missions tied to strategic defense, sustainment, and site security. The base’s geographic isolation enables controlled testing, constant readiness, and secure operations that are essential to the missile defense enterprise.
The active-duty population at Fort Greely is modest compared to major Army posts, but personnel operate in a high‑responsibility environment requiring continuous monitoring, maintenance, and operational preparedness. Training focuses on technical proficiency, cold‑weather skills, and mission‑support functions rather than large‑scale field exercises. Rotational activity from units at Fort Wainwright and other Alaska installations can increase the local military footprint, especially during winter training cycles. Despite its size, the installation maintains year‑round readiness tied to national defense commitments.
Service members stationed at or transiting through Fort Greely may encounter UCMJ matters ranging from investigations and administrative actions to non‑judicial punishment, courts‑martial, or separation proceedings. The demanding operational environment, remote location, and technical nature of the mission can influence how disciplinary issues arise and how cases are processed. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers at Fort Greely who require experienced counsel in navigating these challenges.
https://home.army.mil/greely/
Yes, the scope of a CDI can be expanded if new allegations or issues arise during fact-finding. This is common in practice.
The length of a CDI varies depending on complexity, number of witnesses, and command urgency. Some are completed quickly, while others may take weeks or months.
Service members retain certain rights, including Article 31(b) protections when suspected of an offense. These rights apply even though the investigation is administrative.
Yes, statements made during a CDI are often included in the investigative report and can be used in later administrative or criminal proceedings.
Yes, a CDI can escalate into a court-martial if the findings support criminal charges under the UCMJ. Commands may refer the case for prosecution after review.
