Camp Lemonnier Domestic Violence & Abuse Defense Lawyers
Table Contents
Article 128b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice establishes criminal liability for domestic violence and related abusive conduct within military jurisdiction. It covers acts such as physical harm, attempts or threats of harm, and certain forms of coercive or controlling behavior committed against a qualifying partner or family member, reflecting the military’s recognition of domestic abuse as a distinct offense.
The article applies when the alleged conduct occurs within defined relationship categories, including spouses, intimate partners, former partners, and individuals with whom the accused shares a child. These relationship‑based allegations are central to determining whether the conduct falls under Article 128b rather than under general assault provisions.
Violations of Article 128b can result in felony‑level exposure within the military justice system, including the possibility of confinement, punitive discharges, and loss of rank or benefits. Separately from court‑martial punishment, the same allegations may trigger administrative actions such as command‑directed investigations, family‑advocacy findings, and adverse personnel decisions.
Article 128b differs from civilian domestic violence laws in its jurisdiction, evidentiary standards, and definitional structure. While civilian statutes vary by state and rely on local criminal codes, Article 128b provides a uniform federal framework applicable to service members worldwide, with elements tailored to military contexts and the unique expectations of good order and discipline.
Domestic violence and abuse under military law, defined in Article 128b UCMJ, involve harmful or threatening acts against protected persons. At Camp Lemonnier, allegations can quickly trigger administrative separation proceedings and potential court-martial. Gonzalez & Waddington can be reached at 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
At Camp Lemonnier, mandatory reporting requirements mean that any indication of domestic violence or abuse must be promptly elevated through the chain of command and relevant support agencies. This structured response ensures safety and compliance, but it also results in rapid official involvement once an allegation is communicated.
Standard protective measures, such as no-contact orders and temporary restrictions on access to firearms, are often implemented early in the process to reduce risk while facts are being gathered. These steps are precautionary and administrative, yet they can create the perception of swift escalation.
Because of the installation’s operational environment, command risk management emphasizes visibility, accountability, and the preservation of mission readiness. As a result, leadership may take immediate administrative actions to stabilize the situation, support affected personnel, and maintain a controlled environment while formal assessments proceed.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Reports often involve relationship disputes or household conflict in which partners describe disagreements that escalate into loud arguments or tense exchanges. These situations are typically characterized by differing accounts of what occurred, and the information provided reflects perceptions or allegations rather than confirmed findings.
Another recurring pattern involves third-party reporting, such as neighbors, coworkers, or command personnel requesting welfare checks after hearing or observing signs of distress. These reports generally stem from concern for the individuals involved and may include incomplete or secondhand descriptions of a potentially volatile situation.
Alcohol use and emotional escalation are also commonly referenced in statements gathered during these stressful incidents. Individuals may recall conversations, accusations, or expressions of frustration made in the heat of the moment, and such statements are often influenced by heightened emotions rather than clear recollection.
Domestic violence incidents at Camp Lemonnier typically involve coordinated investigative efforts by military police, command authorities, and supporting agencies. These inquiries focus on gathering factual information to understand the circumstances surrounding the reported conduct and to determine how the incident aligns with applicable military regulations and procedures.
Evidence collected during these investigations can come from multiple sources, reflecting both firsthand accounts and objective documentation. The following are common forms of information that may be compiled as part of the investigative record:
Service members at Camp Lemonnier may face administrative separation based solely on domestic violence allegations, even without a criminal conviction. Commanders can initiate this process when they believe the allegations undermine good order and discipline or call into question a member’s suitability for continued service.
When separation is considered, the member may be directed to a Board of Inquiry or show‑cause proceedings. These forums review available evidence, witness statements, and command assessments to determine whether the member should be retained or separated under applicable military regulations.
If separation is upheld, the discharge characterization may range from Honorable to Other Than Honorable, depending on the findings and the member’s overall service record. This characterization becomes part of the permanent military file and can influence post‑service opportunities.
Beyond separation exposure, domestic violence allegations can affect security clearance eligibility and long‑term career prospects. Commands and adjudicators may treat such allegations as potential indicators of risk, which can limit assignment options, advancement, and access to certain operational roles.
Domestic violence cases within the military often trigger parallel criminal military investigations, which evaluate whether the conduct violates the Uniform Code of Military Justice and whether charges should be pursued. These investigations can run concurrently with civilian inquiries and frequently shape command decisions regarding a service member’s future.
In addition to criminal inquiries, commanders may initiate command-directed investigations to assess the broader impact of the alleged misconduct on unit readiness, safety, and good order and discipline. Findings from these administrative inquiries can influence adverse actions even when criminal charges are not pursued.
Depending on the outcomes of these processes, service members may face Letters of Reprimand, which can have career‑ending consequences, or be required to appear before Boards of Inquiry. In more serious circumstances, domestic violence allegations can escalate into court-martial proceedings, where the service member’s freedom, rank, and continued service are at stake.
Our team has decades of experience in military justice, including cases where domestic violence or abuse allegations arise from complex relationship dynamics common in deployed environments like Camp Lemonnier. This background allows us to understand the interpersonal factors that often shape these cases and to build defense strategies grounded in the realities of military life.
We integrate both criminal defense and administrative action defense, recognizing that domestic violence allegations can trigger parallel processes such as command investigations, adverse administrative measures, and potential separation actions. By addressing these components together, we help service members navigate the full scope of the military justice system.
Our lawyers are experienced in cross-examining witnesses, commanders, law enforcement personnel, and investigators, ensuring that the evidence is scrutinized and that the service member’s rights are protected. This approach is informed by years of litigating serious cases across military courts and administrative forums worldwide.
Article 128b of the UCMJ defines offenses involving domestic violence, including assault, threats, and other harmful conduct against protected persons. It establishes elements prosecutors must prove and clarifies what relationships qualify under the statute.
Yes, administrative separation can be initiated independently of any trial. Commands may pursue administrative actions based on conduct, patterns of behavior, or risk assessments, even if no court-martial occurs.
No-contact orders restrict communication or proximity between involved parties and are issued for safety and command management purposes. They are enforcement tools that remain in effect regardless of whether criminal charges are filed.
Federal law can limit firearm possession for individuals subject to certain protective orders or qualifying convictions. Commands may also implement internal restrictions to maintain safety and compliance with applicable regulations.
Evidence can include statements, digital communications, medical records, photographs, and physical observations. Investigators may also review witness accounts and any relevant documentation collected during the inquiry.
Allegations can trigger administrative reviews, including command-directed investigations or evaluations of suitability for continued service. Administrative actions are separate from criminal processes and follow different evidentiary standards.
Civilian lawyers may assist service members by providing representation or guidance alongside military counsel. Coordination between civilian and military defense teams is permitted within the boundaries of command requirements and access rules.
Camp Lemonnier is located in Djibouti, along the Horn of Africa’s strategic coastline near the Gulf of Aden. Positioned just south of Djibouti City and adjacent to the international airport, the installation operates in an arid, desert environment where temperatures routinely climb high and seasonal winds shape daily activity. Its placement along one of the world’s busiest maritime chokepoints provides critical access to East Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, and key shipping lanes. The base sits close to civilian neighborhoods and commercial hubs, creating a unique environment where U.S. operations intersect with local Djiboutian communities through shared infrastructure, contracted services, and cooperative initiatives.
Camp Lemonnier hosts a forward-deployed U.S. military presence, primarily led by the Navy but supporting joint and combined operations across multiple branches. The installation serves as the primary hub for U.S. Africa Command missions in the region, supporting counterterrorism, intelligence, air operations, maritime security, and crisis response. Tenant commands and rotating task forces use the base as a launch point for missions across East Africa and the broader Indian Ocean region. Its location enables rapid deployment, aerial refueling, and coordination with partner nations.
The installation supports a sizeable and constantly shifting population of active duty personnel, contractors, and rotational units. Aviation elements, intelligence teams, medical personnel, logisticians, and quick-response units all operate from the base. Due to its overseas status and demanding operational tempo, Camp Lemonnier experiences continuous movement of deployed units, short-term rotations, and mission-focused training cycles. The airfield’s activity level and joint-service integration create a dynamic environment for service members on both long-term and temporary assignment.
Because of its forward-operating role, service members at Camp Lemonnier frequently encounter legal issues associated with high-tempo missions and deployment conditions. UCMJ actions such as investigations, administrative measures, non‑judicial punishment, courts-martial, and separation proceedings can arise during operational rotations. Jurisdictional considerations, remote command structures, and deployment stressors can influence how cases are processed and resolved. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at Camp Lemonnier, providing support when legal challenges occur in this unique overseas environment.
Physical injury is not required; offensive touching, attempted force, or credible threats can be sufficient.
Verbal arguments alone usually do not qualify, but threats combined with conduct, context, or fear of imminent harm can support charges.
Article 128 addresses general assault, while Article 128b applies when the alleged assault occurs within a domestic or intimate relationship defined by the statute.
A protected victim includes a current or former spouse, intimate partner, cohabitant, person with whom the accused shares a child, or someone in a qualifying dating relationship.
Article 128b is the UCMJ offense that criminalizes domestic violence involving an intimate partner or family member and incorporates specific relationship and conduct elements beyond simple assault.
