Camp Casey Domestic Violence & Abuse Defense Lawyers
Table Contents
Article 128b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice establishes criminal liability for domestic violence and abuse within the military justice system. It covers acts of violence, force, or threats directed at a spouse, intimate partner, or other protected person and recognizes both physical harm and conduct intended to intimidate or control another individual in a domestic context.
The article applies when allegations arise within qualifying relationship categories, such as current or former spouses, individuals who share a child in common, or those in a romantic or intimate partnership. Its scope includes situations involving shared households or ongoing personal relationships, allowing the military to address misconduct tied to interpersonal dynamics.
Violations of Article 128b may expose a service member to felony-level punitive exposure under the UCMJ, along with potential administrative actions. These can include separation proceedings, loss of rank, or other career-impacting consequences that exist apart from any criminal adjudication.
While civilian domestic violence laws address similar misconduct, Article 128b differs by integrating unique military considerations, jurisdiction, and elements of proof aligned with the UCMJ framework. It allows commanders and military courts to address domestic violence through a system tailored to military discipline, service requirements, and the distinct status of service members.
Domestic violence and abuse under military law, defined by Article 128b, UCMJ, includes assaultive or coercive conduct against a protected person. At Camp Casey, military allegations can quickly trigger administrative separation or court-martial action. Gonzalez & Waddington provide legal guidance; call 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
At Camp Casey, any report related to domestic violence or abuse triggers mandatory reporting requirements under military regulations. Once information reaches law enforcement, medical personnel, or a service member’s chain of command, a formal response must begin. This structured process is designed to ensure safety and compliance, which can make situations advance rapidly from an initial report to official action.
Units often implement no-contact orders and temporary firearms restrictions as immediate precautionary measures. These steps are standard risk‑reduction tools used across the military and are put in place before any final determination is made. Their purpose is to stabilize the situation while relevant agencies review the circumstances.
Commanders at Camp Casey also follow established risk‑management and visibility requirements. Because overseas environments demand close oversight of service member welfare and readiness, commands may act quickly to document incidents, notify supporting agencies, and monitor involved personnel. This coordinated response can make the process feel fast‑moving, even when each step is part of routine protective procedures.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Reports often involve relationship disputes or household conflict, where service members or dependents describe disagreements that escalated into calls for assistance. These situations are typically framed through the perspectives of the individuals involved rather than as verified events.
Some cases stem from third-party reporting, such as neighbors, coworkers, or unit members requesting welfare checks after hearing or observing signs of distress. These reports usually reflect concern rather than confirmed wrongdoing and are treated as initial indicators requiring further assessment.
Alcohol use and heightened emotions are frequently mentioned in statements made during stressful incidents. Such statements may be incomplete, inconsistent, or influenced by the moment, and are understood as contributing context rather than definitive evidence of misconduct.
Domestic violence cases at Camp Casey often involve coordinated investigative efforts by military police, command authorities, and other relevant personnel. These investigations aim to document events, gather information, and establish an objective record of what occurred.
Evidence collected typically reflects both physical and testimonial sources, as well as materials generated through the official investigative process. The items below represent commonly reviewed forms of evidence in these cases.
At Camp Casey, domestic violence allegations can trigger administrative separation actions even when no criminal conviction exists. Commanders may initiate these actions based on credible evidence, incident reports, or patterns of conduct that raise concerns about a service member’s suitability for continued service.
Depending on rank and circumstances, the member may face a Board of Inquiry (BOI) or show-cause proceedings, where evidence is reviewed and the service member may present a response. These proceedings focus on whether the alleged conduct undermines good order, discipline, or the expectations of military professionalism.
Outcomes can include a range of discharge characterizations, such as Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), or Other Than Honorable. The characterization often reflects the nature of the allegations, documented conduct, and the findings of the administrative board or reviewing authority.
Administrative separation related to domestic violence concerns can also affect a service member’s security clearance and future career opportunities. Even absent a conviction, the underlying allegations may be evaluated during clearance reviews or assignment considerations, potentially limiting advancement or eligibility for certain positions.
Domestic violence allegations within the military often trigger simultaneous or sequential criminal military investigations, which assess whether service members violated the Uniform Code of Military Justice and whether criminal charges should be pursued. These investigations can run parallel to civilian inquiries and often set the stage for more formal military legal consequences.
In addition to criminal inquiries, commanders may initiate command-directed investigations to evaluate the service member’s conduct, safety risks, and overall impact on unit readiness. These administrative reviews can proceed even if criminal charges are not filed and frequently influence career-related actions and disciplinary decisions.
Depending on the findings, outcomes may include Letters of Reprimand for misconduct, or escalation to Boards of Inquiry and court-martial proceedings when the allegations are severe or substantiated. These processes collectively determine not only potential punishment but also whether a service member may continue their military career.
Gonzalez & Waddington bring decades of military justice experience to cases involving relationship‑driven allegations, allowing them to contextualize complex interpersonal dynamics and help clients navigate the unique pressures of domestic incidents arising in a command environment.
The firm is known for integrating criminal defense with administrative and collateral‑consequence representation, ensuring that actions such as investigations, no‑contact orders, and command notifications are addressed within a unified strategy that reflects the realities of military life.
Their attorneys regularly challenge the government’s evidence through rigorous cross‑examination of witnesses and investigators, drawing on long-term familiarity with military investigative procedures and the ways in which statements, interviews, and reports are developed in domestic‑related cases at overseas installations like Camp Casey.
Article 128b addresses offenses involving domestic violence, including acts or threats of physical harm against protected persons. It identifies specific conduct that may qualify as domestic violence within the military justice system. The article also establishes how such conduct can be charged under the UCMJ.
Service members may face administrative separation proceedings based on allegations alone. These proceedings are separate from criminal processes and have different standards. Commanders can initiate them depending on the circumstances and available information.
No-contact or military protective orders are command-issued directives intended to prevent communication or proximity between involved parties. They remain in effect until modified or lifted by the issuing authority. Violations can have independent military consequences.
Certain domestic violence-related conditions can trigger military or federal firearms restrictions. These restrictions may impact a service member’s ability to carry or access weapons during duty. Command notifications and compliance requirements can vary by circumstance.
Investigations may consider statements, physical evidence, digital communications, and law enforcement reports. Command authorities may also review medical records or witness observations. The specific items reviewed depend on what is available to investigators.
Allegations can result in administrative steps such as flags, duty restrictions, or evaluations. These actions are not determinations of guilt but part of the command’s management options. Their application depends on the unit’s assessment of the situation.
Service members are allowed to consult with civilian counsel at their own expense. Civilian lawyers can communicate with military authorities when authorized by the service member. Their involvement does not replace access to assigned military defense counsel.
Camp Casey is located in Dongducheon, Gyeonggi Province, in the northern region of the Republic of Korea. Positioned just south of the Korean Demilitarized Zone, the installation sits within a mountainous landscape marked by cold winters, humid summers, and rapidly shifting weather patterns that influence year-round operations. Its proximity to the DMZ and the city of Uijeongbu underscores the importance of continuous readiness, while nearby civilian communities rely on the base as a major economic and cultural partner. The surrounding area blends dense urban corridors with rural foothills, creating a unique environment where military activity and local life intersect closely.
Camp Casey supports elements of the United States Army that contribute to deterrence and defense on the Korean Peninsula. The installation anchors forward-stationed ground forces whose mission centers on maintaining stability near the DMZ and ensuring rapid response capabilities. Major maneuver, artillery, and support units operate from the installation, training regularly with Republic of Korea forces and participating in joint exercises designed to sustain interoperability. The base’s strategic placement and operational focus make it one of the most significant Army hubs in Korea.
The installation hosts a substantial active-duty population, including both permanently assigned personnel and rotational forces arriving for mission-specific deployments. Training facilities surrounding Camp Casey support high-tempo field exercises, gunnery operations, and readiness certifications. The base also includes logistics, medical, and command support elements that sustain units conducting daily operations near the DMZ. Frequent rotations, multinational training events, and forward-deployed obligations shape a dynamic environment for soldiers and their families.
The operational tempo at Camp Casey means service members may encounter a range of military justice matters, from investigations and administrative actions to non-judicial punishment or courts-martial. High-intensity training, frequent field exercises, overseas living conditions, and the strategic mission all contribute to scenarios in which UCMJ issues can arise. These matters are handled within the military justice framework established for forward-stationed forces in Korea. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at Camp Casey who are facing such challenges.
You should consult a civilian military defense lawyer as soon as you learn of an allegation or investigation to protect both your legal and career interests.
A not guilty verdict does not automatically prevent administrative action or career-impacting consequences.
Prior relationship conflict may be admitted to show context, motive, or pattern, but it is often contested by the defense.
Text messages, bodycam footage, and 911 recordings can strongly influence credibility assessments and charging decisions.
Yes, Article 128b cases often proceed without physical evidence and rely on statements, recordings, or circumstantial proof.
