Why You Should Never Talk to the Police Without a Lawyer: Expert Advice from a Military Criminal Defense Attorney

Why You Should Never Talk to the Police Without a Lawyer: Expert Advice from a Military Criminal Defense Attorney

When faced with law enforcement questioning, especially if you are suspected or accused of a crime, your first instinct might be to explain yourself. You might think, “I’m innocent, so I have nothing to hide.” However, as seasoned military criminal defense attorney Michael Waddington explains, this is a critical mistake. Speaking to the police or military investigators without legal counsel can severely jeopardize your defense—even if you are completely innocent.

The Hidden Reality Behind Law Enforcement Interrogations

Michael Waddington, who has spent over 20 years defending clients against military investigative agencies such as CID, OSI, CIS, and CGIS, reveals that these agencies often operate with a presumption of guilt. Contrary to popular belief, many investigators are not solely focused on uncovering the truth but are often eager to secure a quick confession and close the case swiftly.

This mindset affects the nature of the interrogation. Investigators employ what Waddington calls a “guilt presumptive interrogation technique,” meaning they start conversations assuming you are guilty. This bias influences how questions are framed and how your answers are interpreted, making it difficult for you to convince them of your innocence.

Why Talking to the Police Can Hurt Your Case

One of the most important legal principles to understand is that anything you say to law enforcement can and will be used against you in court. Importantly, the legal system does not allow your statements to be used to help your defense in the same way. For example, if you admit to certain facts or provide explanations, even if truthful, these can be twisted or taken out of context to support the prosecution’s case.

Within the military justice system, the rules of evidence permit statements made during interrogation to be admissible as evidence against you. This asymmetry means talking to investigators without a lawyer can inadvertently give them ammunition to build a stronger case against you.

The Power of Legal Representation

Given these risks, Waddington strongly advises that if you are approached by military law enforcement or any police agency, you should immediately terminate the interview and request a lawyer. Consulting with an experienced criminal defense attorney before answering any questions protects your rights and ensures your words are not manipulated or misrepresented.

A lawyer acts as a buffer between you and the investigators, preventing them from employing deceptive tactics or guilt presumptive strategies. Your attorney can also guide you on how to respond appropriately or whether to remain silent, preserving your right against self-incrimination.

Additional Context: The Military Justice System and Your Rights

Military justice operates differently than civilian criminal law in some respects. Agencies like CID (Criminal Investigation Division), OSI (Office of Special Investigations), and CGIS (Coast Guard Investigative Service) have unique investigative powers and procedures. Despite these differences, the fundamental right to remain silent and to have legal counsel applies.

Understanding these nuances is crucial because military investigators often have specialized training designed to detect inconsistencies and elicit confessions. Without proper legal guidance, even innocent statements can be misconstrued to imply guilt.

Key Takeaways

  • Do not talk to law enforcement or military investigators without a lawyer present. Silence is your right, and refusing to answer questions cannot be used against you.
  • Investigators often presume guilt and use interrogation techniques aimed at securing a confession. Your statements can be taken out of context and used against you in court.
  • Your words are admissible as evidence against you but rarely as evidence for you. This legal imbalance means speaking without counsel is risky.
  • Request a lawyer immediately if questioned. Legal representation protects your rights and ensures fair treatment.

Conclusion

Whether you are a service member or a civilian, the advice remains the same: never talk to the police or military investigators without consulting a qualified criminal defense attorney first. Innocence alone is not a shield against misinterpretation, manipulation, or wrongful conviction. As Michael Waddington emphasizes, protecting your rights begins with silence and professional legal counsel. If you find yourself under investigation, remember that saying less and seeking expert representation is your best defense.

For more information and to get expert legal help, visit Michael Waddington’s website or call 1-800-921-8607 to speak with a trusted criminal defense attorney today.

Full Transcription

My name is Michael Waddington and I’m a court-martial defense attorney. In this video, I want to talk about military law enforcement, CID and CIS, OSI and CGIS, that’s the Coast Guard Investigative Service. I spent the past 20 years doing battle with these agencies. Now you may be saying, well, why would you be doing battle with them? They’re the good guys. They’re on the side of justice. They’re looking out for the truth. They’re supposed to be looking for the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. They’re supposed to be seeking justice. In reality, most of these investigators are trying to basically get a quick conviction. They’re trying to get a quick confession. They’re trying to quickly close out the investigation. From the beginning, they believe that you’re guilty. They believe you’re guilty. So do not talk to these investigators. I don’t care if you’re innocent or guilty. Your odds of getting convicted of something go up substantially if you talk to them. There’s a saying, anything that you say can and will be used against you. It isn’t anything you say will be used to help you. And here’s why. In the military system, anything you say is allowed to be used against you. So if I say, you know, I was present and I hooked up with this girl and this happened, that happened, that can be used against me. And if I say, you know what, it was consensual. She sent me these text messages. That can be used against me. Anything you say is accused is admissible against you. It is not admissible for you. If you’re being brought in these agencies, terminate the interview. Ask for a lawyer. Talk to a lawyer. Shut your mouth. And if you have something to say, I don’t care if you’re 100% innocent, do it through a lawyer. That way they won’t twist your words. They’re not going to manipulate you, lie to you, and do all these other games that they play. Because when you talk to them, they have what’s called a guilt presumptive interrogation. Meaning that before they interrogate you, they’ve already believed, they presume, they assume you’re guilty. So when you’re talking to someone that believes, honestly believes you’re guilty and you’re a liar, nothing you say is going to change their mind. So that’s another reason you don’t want to talk to these folks is they have a guilt presumptive interview technique. And that’s just how they’re trained. Someone’s in my office, they probably did something, and we’re going to get them to confess to what they did. That’s what a lot of these investigators think and that’s what they’re taught. So talk to a lawyer, stop talking, and shut your mouth and get the best representation you can before you end up getting convicted of something that you did not do.