What Makes Board Members Decide to Retain Someone? Military Defense Attorneys
Understanding the Psychology Behind Retention Decisions
Retention decisions at BOIs, ADSEP boards, and enlisted separation boards are not purely legal—they are deeply psychological. Board members evaluate not only the allegation, but who you are, how you present yourself, your value to the service, your credibility, and your future potential. Knowing what influences board members allows you to tailor your defense and drastically improve your chances of staying in uniform.
After defending thousands of clients, Gonzalez & Waddington, Attorneys at Law has identified the core factors that consistently persuade board members to retain service members—even in difficult cases.
The 10 Factors Board Members Consider Most
1. Credibility
Credibility outweighs almost everything. Board members ask:
- Does the service member seem honest?
- Are they consistent with the evidence?
- Do they take appropriate responsibility?
2. Professionalism & Bearing
The way you sit, speak, and react under pressure sends powerful signals. Calm, respectful, self-controlled behavior earns trust.
3. Strength of Your Narrative
Boards want to understand the story behind the allegation. A compelling, evidence-based narrative can outweigh accusations.
4. Quality of Your Retention Packet
Board members take retention packets seriously. They want:
- Awards showing sustained excellence
- Strong evaluations
- Character letters with substance
- Evidence contradicting or contextualizing allegations
5. Your Service Record & Mission Impact
Past performance matters. Long-term excellence often leads to benefit-of-the-doubt rulings.
6. Evidence of Growth & Accountability
Boards respond positively to honorable accountability—not to self-blame or denial.
7. Whether You Can Still Serve Effectively
Boards consider mission needs, MOS/AFSC shortages, leadership ability, and future utility.
8. Whether the Allegation Was Misleading or Exaggerated
Boards often see through thin, biased, or politically driven cases—if the defense exposes the weaknesses.