Article 134 UCMJ – The General Article

UCMJ Military Defense Guide by Gonzalez & Waddington

Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice—known as “The General Article”—is the most wide-ranging, versatile, and frequently abused punitive article in the entire UCMJ. Unlike specific offenses such as Article 120 or Article 128, Article 134 is a catch-all provision used to prosecute conduct that is not specifically listed elsewhere, but which the government claims is prejudicial to good order and discipline or service-discrediting.

Article 134 covers dozens of offenses, including adultery, indecent conduct, fraternization, disorderly conduct, threats, false claims, firearm offenses, negligent discharge, bigamy, obstruction of justice, child pornography (non-120c variants), online misconduct, and an enormous range of morality-based accusations.

This article is the government’s “flex weapon.” Commands frequently use Article 134 when they cannot prove the underlying allegation or when they want to punish behavior that is morally frowned upon—even when it is not illegal in the civilian world.

Florida is one of the most dangerous states for Article 134 charges due to:

High tourism and nightlife (Pensacola, Jacksonville Beach, Miami Beach, Tampa/Ybor City, Key West)
Large trainee populations at Pensacola, Whiting Field, NDSTC
Barracks environments producing rumors and command-prosecuted relationships
Social media exposure creating “service-discrediting” accusations
High domestic conflict rates in young military families
Commands under pressure to punish morality-based misconduct

Gonzalez & Waddington, Attorneys at Law defends service members across every branch and every Florida installation. Our firm is internationally known for dismantling Article 134 cases by exposing government overreach, weak evidence, and command bias. Most Article 134 cases fall apart once we challenge assumptions, motivations, and the government’s interpretation of “discrediting conduct.”

➤ Request a Confidential Article 134 Defense Consultation

Article 134 – Complete List of Offenses Under the General Article

UCMJ Article Hub

Article 134 – Overview of the General Article

Article 134 – Child Endangerment

Article 134 – Bigamy

What Is Article 134 UCMJ?

Article 134 criminalizes three types of conduct:

Conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline
Conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces
Crimes and offenses not capital (federal assimilated offenses)

These categories give the government enormous latitude to prosecute almost anything, including off-duty civilian behavior, private consensual acts, and situations with no complainant at all. This is why Article 134 is the most commonly misused article in the UCMJ.

Examples of Article 134 Offenses:

Adultery / Extramarital Sexual Conduct
Fraternization
Indecent Conduct
Disorderly Conduct
Drunk and Disorderly Behavior
Communicating Threats
Obstruction of Justice
Firearm Misconduct
Negligent Discharge of a Firearm
Child Pornography (non-120c variants)
Harassment / Cyber Harassment
Service-Discrediting Social Media Posts
Wrongful Co-Habitation
Financial Misconduct (beyond 121/132)
Public Indecency
Solicitation
Bigamy
Gambling Offenses
Stolen Valor

Prosecutors often use Article 134 when they cannot prove the underlying offense beyond a reasonable doubt—because Article 134 allows them to convict based on moral judgment rather than hard evidence.

Elements the Government Must Prove

Every Article 134 charge requires prosecutors to prove at least one of the following elements:

1. Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline

The government must show the conduct had a clear, measurable, negative effect on military operations or discipline.

2. Service-Discrediting Conduct

The government must show the conduct harmed the reputation of the military in the eyes of the public.

3. Violation of an Assimilated Federal Law

These charges mirror civilian federal offenses, but are prosecuted under military authority.

These standards are subjective and often abused. We expose that lack of objectivity at trial.

Maximum Punishments for Article 134

Because Article 134 includes dozens of offenses, punishments vary, but may include:

Dishonorable discharge
Bad-conduct discharge
Confinement (up to several years)
Total forfeitures
Reduction to E-1
Loss of clearance
Revocation of retirement eligibility

Even low-level Article 134 offenses—such as adultery or disorderly conduct—can end a military career through NJP, GOMOR/Page 11 entries, separation boards, or BOI actions.

The Most Common Article 134 Charges

Article 134 covers dozens of specific crimes. The most common include:

1. Adultery / Extramarital Sexual Conduct

Consensual relationships punished as misconduct
Often linked to divorce, jealousy, or command favoritism
Requires proof the conduct harmed the unit or was discrediting

2. Fraternization

Off-duty, consensual relationships between ranks
Rumors spreading in the barracks
Social media photos misunderstood

3. Indecent Conduct

Bathroom or barracks exposure incidents
Consensual adult behavior labeled “indecent” due to location
Sexual jokes taken out of context

4. Disorderly Conduct

Drunken arguments
Yelling in barracks hallways
Misbehavior at Florida bars

5. Obstruction of Justice

Accused allegedly told someone not to talk
Deleting messages during emotional panic
Misinterpreted attempts at de-escalation

6. Service-Discrediting Social Media Conduct

Videos in uniform
DMs taken out of context
Memes or comments misinterpreted

7. Child Pornography (Non-120c)

Possession or viewing of prohibited images
Cases involving teenagers and age misunderstandings
Accidental downloads or spam content

8. Firearm Offenses

Negligent discharge
Improper transportation on base
Carrying in restricted areas

9. Threats

Texts during heated arguments
Jokes misinterpreted as real threats

Why Article 134 Is So Abused

Article 134 is easy for commands to use because:

It requires no physical evidence
It can be based on opinion or perception
It can criminalize otherwise legal behavior
It allows commands to punish “immoral” or “embarrassing” conduct
It is often added as a backup to other, failing charges

This article is the military’s version of “we don’t like what you did, so we’ll call it misconduct.”

Why Article 134 Allegations Are Extremely Common in Florida

Tourism-heavy nightlife leading to alcohol-related misunderstandings
Hotel, beach, and club environments where conduct is misinterpreted
High volume of trainee misconduct reported by peers
Social media posts from Miami, Pensacola, Jax Beach taken out of context
Domestic disputes leading to allegations of indecency or threats
Barracks gossip producing fraternization claims
Florida police arrests triggering service-discrediting allegations

Most Florida Article 134 cases involve nondangerous conduct blown out of proportion due to command optics.

How Article 134 Investigations Work

Investigations involve:

NCIS
OSI
CID
CGIS
Civilian police (Florida generates many triggering incidents)
Command-directed investigations (15-6, CDI, JAGMAN)

Investigation Weaknesses We Exploit

No tangible evidence
Misunderstandings of military culture
Moral bias of investigators
Accuser motives (jealousy, revenge, politics)
One-sided interviews
Social media misinterpretation

How Gonzalez & Waddington Defends Article 134 Cases

Our defense strategy dismantles the three core claims the government relies on:

1. The Conduct Was NOT Prejudicial to Good Order

No operational impact
No disruption to discipline
No witnesses felt disorder

2. The Conduct Was NOT Service-Discrediting

No public awareness
No media coverage
No harm to the reputation of the service

3. The Accused Acted Legally or Reasonably

Consensual behavior
Misinterpreted jokes or comments
Misunderstood social media content

4. Motive Exposed

Jealous partner
Disgruntled peer
Command retaliation
Moral judgment disguised as criminality

5. Florida-Specific Defense Strategies

Tourist allegations without evidence
Nightlife incidents misinterpreted
Training command overreactions
Barracks gossip weaponized

Most Article 134 cases crumble when the defense demands real evidence—not speculation or moral outrage.

Pro Tips for Service Members Accused Under Article 134

Do NOT explain anything to investigators or command.
Preserve all digital evidence (texts, DMs, photos).
Identify witnesses early.
Stop posting on social media.
Avoid contact with the accuser.
Do not delete anything—that can create obstruction issues.
Get a civilian attorney before NJP/CO’s Mast.
Request all investigative reports through counsel.
Do not sign statements or counseling forms without advice.

➤ Speak With an Article 134 Defense Lawyer Today

Article 134 UCMJ – Frequently Asked Questions

Can I be convicted under Article 134 even if I didn’t break a law?

Yes. Article 134 allows prosecutors to criminalize behavior that is legal for civilians if the government claims it harmed good order or was service-discrediting. This is why Article 134 must be aggressively challenged.

Is adultery still a crime under Article 134?

Yes. Adultery (now called “Extramarital Sexual Conduct”) is still punishable under Article 134
if prosecutors can prove the conduct harmed unit cohesion, the chain of command, good order
and discipline, or brought discredit upon the armed forces.
However, most adultery cases fall apart because the government cannot prove actual harm —
only moral disapproval. Our firm routinely gets adultery charges dismissed or downgraded.

Can I be charged under Article 134 for social media posts?

Yes. Commands commonly misuse Article 134 to punish memes, jokes, DMs, and off-duty social
media activity — even when completely lawful. They claim posts “bring discredit” on the service.
We expose overreach, context errors, and selective enforcement. Social media cases are among
the easiest Article 134 charges to defeat with proper defense.

What counts as indecent conduct under Article 134?

Indecent conduct includes sexual or lewd behavior that the command claims violates accepted
military standards. This can include consensual acts, accidental exposure, or off-duty behavior
taken out of context. Many indecent conduct cases rely on subjective moral interpretations rather
than evidence. These cases are highly defensible once challenged aggressively.

What if the accusation is based on rumors or gossip?

Rumors are the driving force behind a huge percentage of Article 134 cases — especially fraternization,
adultery, and indecent conduct allegations. Rumors alone cannot support a conviction. We expose
gossip-based investigations, challenge credibility, and force prosecutors to produce real evidence.
Most rumor-driven cases collapse under cross-examination.

Is drunk and disorderly conduct always charged under Article 134?

Yes — drunk behavior that commands view as embarrassing or disruptive is often charged under Article 134.
This is extremely common in Florida near Pensacola Beach, Jacksonville Beach, Duval Street in Key West,
Ybor City in Tampa, and Miami nightlife districts. These cases are often weak because witnesses were
intoxicated, police exaggerated behavior, or events were misinterpreted. We win these cases frequently.

Why choose Gonzalez & Waddington for Article 134 defense?

Our firm has decades of worldwide court-martial experience and is known for dismantling vague,
moralistic, and evidence-light prosecutions under Article 134. We expose command overreach,
investigator bias, and the lack of actual harm or discredit to the service. Our cross-examination,
psychological strategy, and ability to deconstruct narrative-driven cases make us one of the most
effective Article 134 defense teams in the world.

How do I get immediate help?

Visit

Florida Military Defense Lawyers – Court-Martial Attorneys

to schedule a confidential Article 134 consultation. Our team responds immediately
and begins building a strategic defense tailored to your case.

Final Takeaway: Article 134 Is the Most Abused Article in Military Law — And the Easiest to Defend With the Right Lawyer

Article 134 charges often rely on moral judgment, hearsay, rumor, selective enforcement,
and subjective interpretations rather than hard evidence. This makes them uniquely vulnerable
to an aggressive, experienced defense strategy. Gonzalez & Waddington has successfully defended
Article 134 cases at every major military installation worldwide — including every base in Florida.

If you or a loved one is facing Article 134 allegations, do NOT try to explain yourself to investigators,
your chain of command, or anyone else. These cases require precision, strategy, and an attorney who
understands how to dismantle narrative-driven prosecutions.

Your silence is your protection.
Your lawyer is your weapon.
Your strategy determines your future.

➤ Contact Gonzalez & Waddington for Article 134 Defense

Article 134 UCMJ – The General Article – Military Defense Lawyers