Article 134 UCMJ – Child Endangerment – Military Defense Lawyers

UCMJ Military Defense Guide by Gonzalez & Waddington

Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice criminalizes child endangerment—conduct that exposes a child under the age of 16 to mental or physical harm, emotional trauma, unsafe conditions, neglect, or situations likely to risk the child’s health or welfare. Unlike civilian child neglect statutes, Article 134 child endangerment is extremely broad and is frequently misapplied in military settings, often based on misunderstandings, exaggerations, or the opinions of inexperienced investigators or overreacting commanders.

In the military, child endangerment is often charged in cases involving domestic disputes, alcohol use around children, unsafe home environments, accidental injuries, co-sleeping, mental health crises, financial stress, childcare breakdowns, divorce disputes, custody battles, and emotional conflicts. Many cases originate from angry spouses, jealous partners, neighbor complaints, mandatory reporters, or child services workers misinterpreting cultural or parenting differences.

Florida consistently produces a high number of Article 134 child endangerment allegations due to its large military population, high stress levels, family separation, financial strain, hurricane evacuations, cohabitation environments, and high civilian involvement in military communities. Bases such as NAS Jacksonville, Mayport, Pensacola, Whiting Field, Eglin, Hurlburt Field, Tyndall, Patrick Space Force Base, MacDill, NSA Panama City, NAS Key West, and Coast Guard Sectors frequently deal with allegations stemming from emotional disputes or high-conflict domestic environments.

Gonzalez & Waddington is internationally known for defending military members accused of child endangerment, child neglect, domestic violence, and family-based allegations under Article 134. We expose exaggeration, misinterpretation, false reporting, retaliation, emotional manipulation, and flawed investigative processes that commonly drive these cases.

➤ Request a Confidential Child Endangerment Defense Consultation

Legal Definition of Child Endangerment Under Article 134

Child endangerment occurs when a service member:

• Has a duty for the care or welfare of a child under 16, AND
• Engages in conduct, or fails to act, AND
• Such conduct endangers the child’s physical or mental health or safety, AND
• The conduct is wrongful, AND
• The conduct is prejudicial to good order and discipline or service-discrediting.

The definition encompasses both acts and omissions, making it one of the most flexible—and dangerous—charges under Article 134.

What Child Endangerment Is NOT

Many situations are falsely alleged as “child endangerment” in the military. Under Article 134, the following do NOT automatically constitute child endangerment:

• Co-sleeping with infants (unless extreme risk exists)
• Accidental child injuries
• Using age-appropriate discipline
• Minor parenting mistakes
• Poverty or limited resources
• Allowing supervised contact with relatives or friends
• Smoking or drinking away from children
• Emotional arguments between adults (unless children are directly harmed)

Many service members are wrongfully accused because of civilian misinterpretation or biased reporting by partners, neighbors, or social workers unfamiliar with military life.

Examples of Conduct Commonly Alleged as Child Endangerment

• Leaving children unattended for short periods
• Drinking alcohol while children are present
• Domestic disputes occurring in front of children
• Driving with children while impaired
• Allowing a child access to hazardous items
• Leaving children with an unapproved babysitter
• Failure to secure medication, alcohol, firearms, or cleaning products
• Unsafe sleeping conditions
• Failure to seek medical care quickly
• Exposing children to emotional distress during arguments

However, Article 134 cases often exaggerate the danger when no real threat existed.

Elements the Government Must Prove

To convict under Article 134 Child Endangerment, prosecutors must prove:

1. The Child Was Under 16

The alleged victim must be a minor under UCMJ definition.

2. The Accused Had a Duty of Care

Parent, guardian, caregiver, or someone responsible for the child.

3. The Accused’s Conduct Endangered the Child

The danger must be real, not speculative.

4. The Conduct Was Wrongful

Error in judgment does NOT automatically make conduct wrongful.

5. The Conduct Was Prejudicial or Service-Discrediting

This is often the prosecution’s weakest point.

Why Child Endangerment Cases Are Often Weak

Most Article 134 child endangerment cases collapse because prosecutors cannot prove:

• A true danger existed
• The accused acted knowingly or recklessly
• The alleged danger was substantial
• The child was actually harmed or fearful
• The accused had actual responsibility at the time
• The conduct affected good order and discipline
• The accuser’s story is reliable

Many cases involve accidental injuries, emotional conflicts, false allegations, or exaggerations by an upset spouse or partner.

Why Child Endangerment Allegations Are Common in Florida

Florida produces more Article 134 child endangerment accusations than most states due to:

• High divorce and breakup rates leading to retaliatory accusations
• Civilian social workers unfamiliar with military norms
• High alcohol consumption combined with parenting duties
• Stress from training environments
• Off-base living exposing families to civilian mandatory reporters
• Custody disputes involving service members
• Military families frequently moving, losing support networks

Most Florida cases involve family conflict—not criminal intent.

Florida-Specific Real-World Child Endangerment Scenarios

1. Domestic Arguments in Front of Children

Civilian neighbors call police during an argument, leading to child endangerment charges.

2. Drinking at Home With Children Present

Often exaggerated into “endangering the children” despite no harm.

3. Leaving Children in Cars Briefly

In Florida heat, accusations spike—even when engine and AC were on.

4. Co-Sleeping With Infants

Controversial practice often misrepresented by investigators.

5. Babysitter Availability Issues

Parents accused after leaving children with trusted but “unapproved” friends.

6. Accidental Household Injuries

Falls, bumps, or cuts misinterpreted as neglect.

7. Emotional Behavior During Deployment Stress

Arguments due to PTSD, depression, or exhaustion.

8. Wildlife or Environmental Hazards

Florida’s environment (snakes, pools, heat) leads to allegations after accidents.

9. Social Media Exposure

Posting photos of kids in harmless but misunderstood situations.

10. Miscommunication During Hurricane Evacuations

Command misinterprets emergency decisions as neglect.

How Child Endangerment Investigations Work

Investigations typically involve:

• Family Advocacy Program (FAP)
• CID / NCIS / OSI / CGIS
• Civilian law enforcement
• Child Protective Services (Florida DCF)
• Command-directed inquiries

Common Investigation Problems We Expose

• Accuser exaggeration or retaliation
• No proof of actual wrongdoing
• One-sided interviews
• Unqualified investigators drawing false conclusions
• Failure to understand normal childhood injuries
• Misinterpretation of emotional context
• Command panic or political pressure
• Incorrect application of Florida law

FAP and DCF frequently make errors due to lack of context about military families.

Defense Strategies for Article 134 Child Endangerment

1. Attack the “Endangerment” Element

We show there was no real danger or substantial risk to the child.

2. Expose Accuser Motive

• Anger
• Revenge
• Custody disputes
• Divorce strategy
• Attempt to gain advantage in family court

3. Show the Conduct Was Reasonable or Misunderstood

Many “dangerous” situations are normal parts of parenting.

4. Challenge Medical or Safety Assumptions

Experts often exaggerate risks based on limited data.

5. Florida-Specific Defense Angles

• Coastal or outdoor hazards misinterpreted
• AC malfunction blamed for “unsafe environment”
• Tourist or neighbor misinterpretation

6. Demonstrate Parental Competence

Good parenting history undermines allegations.

7. Use Digital/Medical Evidence

Time-stamped messages, videos, medical records, and photographs often disprove allegations.

8. Attack the Prejudice-to-Good-Order Requirement

Private family disputes rarely impact mission readiness.

Pro Tips for Anyone Accused of Child Endangerment

• Do NOT speak to FAP, DCF, or investigators without a lawyer.
• Do NOT argue with the accuser.
• Preserve all texts, photos, videos, and messages.
• Document your parenting routine and evidence of care.
• Identify neutral witnesses who have seen your parenting.
• Never admit wrongdoing “to clear things up.”
• Hire a civilian defense attorney immediately.

➤ Protect Your Family & Career – Contact Gonzalez & Waddington

Article 134 Child Endangerment – Frequently Asked Questions