Civilian military defense lawyers · Army · Navy · Air Force · Marine Corps · Coast Guard · Space Force · Worldwide Text 954-799-4019 Call 1-800-921-8607

I Was Named the Subject of an AR 15-6 Investigation. What Should I Do?

Army Investigations • Gonzalez & Waddington

Gonzalez & Waddington is a civilian military defense firm, founded by Michael Waddington and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington, that has defended service members at courts-martial and in UCMJ matters worldwide for more than two decades.

Quick answer

Being named the subject of an AR 15-6 investigation means the investigating officer is looking at your conduct, but it is not a finding against you. Get legal advice before you give a statement, preserve your evidence, and stay away from witnesses. If you are suspected of a UCMJ offense, you must be read your Article 31 rights. Before the Army takes adverse action based on the findings, it must give you the findings and evidence and at least 10 business days to respond. Civilian military defense lawyer Alexandra González-Waddington of Gonzalez & Waddington explains the steps.

Video: How to Get Your AR 15-6 Investigation File | Evidence, Findings & Your Right to Respond (9:28) — watch on YouTube

What being a subject means

AR 15-6 (22 June 2025) is the Army’s regulation for preliminary inquiries, administrative investigations and boards of officers. A subject is the person whose conduct is being examined, and the issue may be a suspected crime or simply a failure to follow a duty or regulation. A subject is not the same as a respondent: respondents exist only in boards of officers, and in general only a respondent is entitled to counsel (para 3-10a). Most 15-6 matters are administrative investigations, with one investigating officer (IO) who gathers statements and documents and writes findings and recommendations. The standard of proof is a preponderance of the evidence, meaning more likely than not (para 1-9).

Your rights during the investigation

  • Counsel. A subject is not automatically entitled to a lawyer in an administrative investigation (para 3-10a), but you can consult one, and you can hire a civilian lawyer at your own expense.
  • Article 31 rights. If you are suspected of a UCMJ offense, the IO must advise you of your Article 31 rights before asking about it, usually on DA Form 3881. You may ask to consult a lawyer, and no adverse inference may be drawn from invoking your rights (para 3-13d(7)(d)).
  • Voluntary statements. Anything you say or write can be used in the findings, in a GOMOR, in a separation action and, if the facts suggest a crime, in a criminal case.

What to do now

  1. Talk to a lawyer before you talk to the IO. Decide with counsel whether to give a statement, give a written statement instead of an interview, or decline.
  2. Preserve evidence. Save texts, emails, photos, calendars and records in their original form. Do not delete anything.
  3. Do not contact witnesses about the case. Even a friendly call can look like witness tampering or retaliation.
  4. Write a private timeline for your lawyer, not for the IO.
  5. Start gathering character evidence: evaluations, awards and people who can speak to your performance and integrity.
  6. Expect a flag. Commands often flag a subject, which suspends favorable personnel actions such as promotions and schools, while the investigation is open.

After the investigating officer finishes

Administrative investigations get a legal review, which checks whether the findings are supported by the greater weight of the evidence and whether the recommendations match the findings (para 2-6). Before final adverse action based on the investigation, the Army must notify you in writing, give you a redacted copy of the relevant findings and evidence, and give you a reasonable opportunity of no less than 10 business days to respond in writing, or 20 business days in the Army National Guard and Army Reserve (para 3-4d). If you are a commissioned officer and the findings contain adverse information, they must be referred to you with at least 10 business days to respond, and reasonable requests for more time should be granted for good cause (para 5-5). That written rebuttal is often your best chance to change the outcome.

What can follow

An AR 15-6 investigation can lead to no action, counseling, a GOMOR or other reprimand, relief for cause, a referred evaluation, a show-cause or separation board, or, if a crime is suspected, a referral to CID or to court-martial channels. The earlier you respond, the more options you have.

Why service members choose Gonzalez & Waddington

Gonzalez & Waddington, LLC is a civilian military defense firm representing U.S. service members worldwide. Michael Waddington is a former Army JAG prosecutor, Trial Defense Counsel and Senior Defense Counsel who has practiced military criminal defense for more than 25 years and has litigated more than 200 contested trials. Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington is a founding partner with more than 20 years of military and criminal defense experience and a former Georgia public defender. Together they have written 14 books on military justice, cross-examination and trial advocacy, and both teach other lawyers at national CLE programs. The firm limits its caseload so the senior lawyers stay directly involved from investigation through trial or board.

Video transcript

Transcript of the video “How to Get Your AR 15-6 Investigation File,” with Alexandra González-Waddington of Gonzalez & Waddington.

Read the full transcript of this video

How do you get a copy of your AR 15-6 investigation? Before the Army takes adverse administrative action against you based on a 15-6, it has to give you written notice, a copy of the relevant findings and evidence, and at least 10 business days to respond. If you want more than that, you request it through your command or under the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act. I’m Alexandra González-Waddington, civilian military defense lawyer and co-founder of Gonzalez & Waddington.

We review AR 15-6 investigations for soldiers and officers every week. In this video, I’ll explain how to get your file, what’s in it, and how to read it like a defense lawyer so you can find the weaknesses before you write a single word of your rebuttal. First, the regulation changed. In June 2025, the Army published a new edition of AR 15-6, replacing the 2016 version that most websites still quote.

The new regulation has three kinds of procedures: preliminary inquiries, administrative investigations, and boards of officers. Most soldiers who say they’re under a 15-6 are in an administrative investigation, with a single investigating officer collecting statements and writing findings and recommendations. The standard of proof is a preponderance of the evidence, which means more likely than not. That’s a low bar, which is exactly why you need to see the evidence and challenge it.

Second, are you a subject or a respondent? These words matter. In an administrative investigation, the appointing authority can name you as a subject, meaning there’s some credible evidence you were involved and adverse action may follow. A respondent exists only in a formal board. Respondents get the most rights: notice, the right to counsel, the right to be present, examine evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and call their own.

A subject in an administrative investigation has fewer rights during the investigation itself. You don’t get to sit in on interviews or cross-examine witnesses. But if you’re suspected of a crime, you’re entitled to an Article 31 rights warning before you’re questioned, and the investigating officer can’t hold your silence against you. Your biggest rights come at the end, before action is taken.

Third, the rights you have before adverse action. Under the 2025 regulation, before the Army uses a 15-6 to take adverse administrative action against you, like a general officer memorandum of reprimand, a relief for cause, or a separation, you must get written notice of the proposed action, a copy of the relevant findings and supporting evidence, and at least 10 business days to submit a written rebuttal. Guard and Reserve soldiers get at least 20. The decision maker has to consider what you submit, and if another regulation, like the reprimand or separation regulation, gives you more protection, that one controls.

Commissioned officers have an additional right. If an investigation contains adverse information about an officer, the officer gets to see it and respond before the approval authority acts on the findings, with at least 10 business days, whether or not any adverse action is planned. The approval authority can extend that same opportunity to warrant officers and enlisted soldiers, and it’s worth asking.

Fourth, how to get the file. You’ll usually receive a redacted copy when the command refers the findings to you for rebuttal. Redactions are normally done by the legal office. The names of witnesses and accusers generally stay in, because you can’t respond to evidence if you don’t know where it came from. Other personal information about third parties is removed unless removing it would substantially impair your ability to respond.

If the packet you receive is incomplete, request the rest in writing through your command and the legal office, and if needed, file a Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act request for the full report of investigation, the exhibits, and the legal review. Nothing gets released without approval from the appointing authority or the release authority, so put your request in writing, keep a copy, and follow up. A lawyer can often get a more complete file faster.

Fifth, what’s in the file? A complete 15-6 package usually includes the appointment memorandum, which defines the scope of the investigation and the questions the officer was told to answer; the investigating officer’s report on DA Form 1574-1 with findings and recommendations; sworn statements, interview summaries, and recordings; documents, photos, texts, and emails; a chronology; rights warnings, if any were given; the legal review; and the approval authority’s action approving, disapproving, or modifying the findings.

Sixth, how to read it like a defense lawyer. Start with the appointment memo. Did the investigating officer stay within the scope or wander into issues they weren’t appointed to investigate? Then go to the findings. For each finding, ask what specific evidence supports it. Is it a sworn statement or a summary the investigating officer wrote? Is it an opinion dressed up as a fact? Check who was interviewed and who wasn’t. Missing witnesses are one of the most common flaws, especially witnesses who would have helped you.

Compare statements against each other and against the documents: dates, times, and who said what. Look for witnesses who talked to each other before giving statements. Check whether you were treated as a suspect without being read your rights. Check whether the recommendations go beyond what the findings support. And read the legal review. Sometimes the government’s own lawyer flags the same problems you’re about to raise.

Seventh, common problems we find: investigations that are one-sided, where the investigating officer accepted every allegation and never tested it; hearsay stacked on hearsay with no firsthand witness; findings based on a climate or perception rather than specific acts, which is common in toxic leadership investigations; statements taken in groups or after the witnesses compared notes; evidence that clearly favors the soldier left out of the analysis; and findings that are drafted to justify a decision that was already made. Each of those is a point for your rebuttal.

Eighth, what happens after the approval authority acts? The approval authority can approve, disapprove, or change the findings and recommendations, or send the investigation back for more work. There’s no formal appeal of approved 15-6 findings, but you can ask for reconsideration based on new evidence or a mistake of law, fact, or procedure, generally within one year of approval. And your rebuttal to any adverse action based on the 15-6 is your chance to attack the investigation itself. In our next video, we’ll walk through how to write that rebuttal section by section.

Ninth, what to do right now. One, if you’re named a subject, don’t give a statement until you’ve talked to a lawyer, especially if there’s any chance of criminal misconduct. Two, request the complete file in writing as soon as the findings are referred to you. Three, calendar your deadline the day you get the notice, and if you need more time, ask for an extension in writing before the deadline passes. Four, start gathering your own evidence: witnesses, documents, texts, and evaluations. Five, get a lawyer to review the file. The investigating officer had weeks or months. You have 10 business days.

At Gonzalez & Waddington, we review AR 15-6 investigations, write rebuttals, and fight the general officer memorandums of reprimand, reliefs, and separations that come after them, for soldiers and officers worldwide. So, how do you get your AR 15-6 file? Before adverse action, the Army has to give you notice, the relevant findings and evidence, and at least 10 business days to respond. And you can request the full report in writing or through FOIA and the Privacy Act. Get the file, read it critically, and get help.

I’m Alexandra González-Waddington, a civilian military defense lawyer and co-founder of Gonzalez & Waddington. We defend service members worldwide facing military investigations, courts-martial, administrative separation boards, and military disciplinary actions. If your career, reputation, or freedom is on the line, you need experienced military defense lawyers fighting for you. When the government builds a case, we build your defense. Visit ucmjdefense.com or call 1-800-921-8607 for a free, confidential consultation.

Frequently asked questions

What should I do if I am named as the subject of an AR 15-6 investigation?

Talk to a lawyer before giving any statement, preserve your evidence, avoid discussing the case with witnesses, and prepare to respond in writing to any adverse findings.

Do I have to talk to the AR 15-6 investigating officer?

If you are suspected of a UCMJ offense, you have Article 31 rights and may decline to answer questions about it. Whether to give a statement in other situations is a strategic decision to make with counsel.

Do I get a lawyer for an AR 15-6 investigation?

A subject is not automatically entitled to appointed counsel in an administrative investigation, but you can consult Trial Defense Service or hire a civilian lawyer at your own expense.

Will I see the AR 15-6 findings?

Before final adverse action based on the investigation, the Army must give you the relevant findings and evidence and at least 10 business days to respond (20 business days in the Guard and Reserve).

Can an AR 15-6 investigation lead to a GOMOR or separation?

Yes. Adverse findings are commonly used to support a GOMOR, relief for cause, a referred evaluation or an administrative separation.

Official sources

Speak with a civilian military defense lawyer

If you are dealing with this now, the next step is a confidential conversation about the allegation, the evidence, your deadlines and what is at stake. Gonzalez & Waddington represents service members worldwide.

Call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-799-4019 to request a consultation.

Legal information notice: This page provides general educational information, not legal advice for any specific person or case. Military law changes, service regulations differ, and case-specific facts matter. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Call now Text us Message