Navigating Article 120 UCMJ Sexual Assault Allegations at Bolling AFB: Essential Defense Insights

Navigating Article 120 UCMJ Sexual Assault Allegations at Bolling AFB: Essential Defense Insights

Facing a military criminal accusation can be daunting, especially when it involves allegations of sexual assault under Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). For service members stationed at Bolling Air Force Base near Washington, D.C., understanding the complexities of these charges and the evolving military justice system is crucial for mounting an effective defense. In this blog post, we explore expert insights shared by criminal defense attorney Michael Waddington, who has over two decades of experience defending military personnel in high-stakes court-martial cases.

The Rising Challenge: Sexual Assault Allegations in the Military

Sexual assault and harassment allegations under Article 120 of the UCMJ are some of the most serious charges a service member can face. In recent years, the military has intensified its focus on eliminating sexual violence within its ranks, leading to more aggressive investigations and prosecutions. Attorney Michael Waddington emphasizes that military prosecutors today are well-funded, highly trained, and relentless in their pursuit of convictions.

What makes these cases particularly challenging is the military’s current “victim-centered” approach to justice, a policy shift that became effective in December 2023. Under this framework, allegations are taken at face value from the outset, with little initial scrutiny of the accuser’s credibility or a thorough search for exculpatory evidence. This shift aims to encourage victims to come forward and receive support but also raises significant concerns for the accused regarding their rights and the fairness of the process.

Understanding the New Victim-Centered Military Justice System

The victim-centered approach fundamentally changes the dynamics of military sexual assault cases. According to Waddington, the military does not initially question the accuser’s statement, creating an environment where the accused is presumed guilty as the investigation begins. Law enforcement and prosecutorial teams operate under a mandate to believe the victim, which can complicate the accused’s ability to mount an effective defense early on.

This approach also has troubling implications for false or exaggerated allegations. Even if the accused is later proven innocent or the allegations are disproven in court, the accuser may not face any consequences. In some cases, accusers who made false claims could receive benefits for military sexual trauma, further complicating the accused’s situation.

What This Means for Service Members at Bolling AFB

Service members at Bolling AFB or any military installation should be aware that the prosecution will be vigorous, and the military justice system is currently skewed towards protecting the accuser’s rights and wellbeing. This means that even cases with limited evidence or those where the accused is innocent can still result in court-martials, administrative separations, or negative career impacts such as letters of reprimand.

Given this landscape, Waddington stresses the critical importance of early and aggressive defense strategies. Waiting passively or hoping the issue resolves itself is not a viable option. Immediate consultation with specialized military defense attorneys who understand the nuances of Article 120 and the current military justice environment is essential.

The Role of Experienced Civilian Military Defense Lawyers

While the military has its own judge advocates and processes, civilian military defense lawyers like Michael Waddington and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington provide an indispensable perspective and tenacity in defending accused service members. Their extensive experience spans court-martials across various branches of the military, including the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, both domestically and internationally.

These attorneys are adept at challenging prosecutions, protecting constitutional rights, and navigating the victim-centered system to ensure that the accused have a robust defense. They also handle complex cases involving false accusations, computer crimes, white-collar offenses, and other serious allegations under the UCMJ.

Protecting Your Career, Freedom, and Reputation

Being accused under Article 120 UCMJ can have devastating consequences beyond just legal penalties. It can jeopardize a military career, damage personal reputation, and affect future opportunities. Defense attorneys like those at González & Waddington, LLC, emphasize the importance of standing up and fighting these allegations proactively.

By taking decisive action, service members increase their chances of achieving favorable outcomes, whether through negotiated resolutions or full acquittals. The key message is clear: do not become a passive participant in your defense. Engage experienced counsel immediately to protect your rights and future.

Additional Context: The Broader Military Justice Environment

The military’s intensified efforts to combat sexual assault reflect broader societal movements such as #MeToo, which have brought greater awareness but also complexities to handling such sensitive cases. The military justice system operates differently from civilian courts, with unique rules, procedures, and cultural dynamics.

Moreover, the UCMJ’s Article 120 has undergone revisions to address various forms of sexual misconduct, including harassment and assault, with specific subsections detailing different offenses. Understanding these nuances is critical for both the accused and their defense counsel.

Given these factors, comprehensive legal representation that stays updated on legislative changes and military policies is essential for anyone facing Article 120 allegations.

Conclusion

Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault allegations at Bolling AFB and across the military demand immediate, informed, and aggressive legal defense. With the military’s victim-centered justice system now fully in effect, accused service members face unprecedented challenges that can threaten their freedom, careers, and reputations.

Experienced civilian military defense lawyers like Michael Waddington and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington provide vital expertise to navigate these complex cases. If you or a loved one is accused of a military sexual assault or related offense, do not delay in seeking specialized legal counsel. Protect your rights by understanding the system, acting decisively, and fighting for your future.

Contact Information:
González & Waddington, LLC
1792 Bell Tower Ln #218, Weston, FL 33326
Phone: 1-800-921-8607 / 954-284-1507
Website: https://ucmjdefense.com

For more information about military defense and court-martial representation, visit this video resource.

Full Transcription

If you or a loved one are accused or suspected of any crime under the UCMJ, such as an Article 120 sexual assault or sexual harassment, and you’re stationed at Bowling Air Force Base outside of Washington, D.C., then reach out and speak with one of our experienced military lawyers today. My name is Michael Waddington, and I’m a criminal defense attorney. I have been aggressively defending military service members for over 20 years. If you are accused of any serious offense under the UCMJ, such as a UCMJ Article 120 sexual assault, then you should be concerned. Right now, the military is waging a war on sexual assault. You can expect a zealous and determined prosecution team coming after you and trying to win their case. These elite military prosecution teams are well-funded, well-trained, and bound and determined to win convictions. They are on a mission to prove to Congress that the military does not tolerate any form of sexual assault, domestic violence, or sexual harassment. Military prosecutors will be relentless in seeking a conviction in serious jail time once they have you in their sights. To make matters worse, under new laws that went into effect in December of 2023, the new military justice system is victim-centered. What that means to you, if you’re accused, is that if a person makes an allegation against you, they are believed from the start. They won’t probe the credibility of a person making an allegation. They won’t look for any evidence that could disprove the allegation. They’re taking anyone who comes via victim, and they’re taking their word for it. That also means that people who have made false or exaggerated allegations will not be punished, even if their allegation is proven to be false. If anything, they may be allowed to retire and get military benefits for military sexual trauma, even if the allegation is proven false in court. You can expect to encounter law enforcement trained to start by believing. Therefore, you’re presumed to be guilty once the investigation has started, and the law enforcement and prosecutors will act accordingly. Yes, that cuts against your constitutional rights, and that cuts against what our country was founded upon and what we stand for, but that’s what you can expect in the military justice system. In this new victim-centered approach, the victim, even if the victim is a lying victim, plays a key role in determining what happens to you. W

Facebook
LinkedIn
Reddit
X
WhatsApp
Print

Table of Contents

Navigating Article 120 UCMJ Sexual Assault Allegations at Bolling AFB: Essential Defense Insights

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

Recent Blogs

Site Navigation