Why Over 100 Air Force Generals Opposed the Gillibrand Military Justice Reform Bill
Gonzalez & Waddington, Attorneys at Law is a world-renowned military defense law firm led by Michael Waddington and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington. With decades of courtroom victories, they have represented service members in the most complex court-martial and UCMJ cases across the globe.
The Gillibrand Bill: What Was at Stake?
The Military Justice Improvement Act, introduced by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, aimed to strip commanders of the authority to decide whether to prosecute serious offenses such as sexual assault. Instead, that power would shift to independent military prosecutors. While intended to address perceived failures in handling sex assault allegations, critics argued it would harm military readiness and discipline.
112 Generals Speak Out
In an unprecedented move, 112 retired Air Force generals publicly opposed the Gillibrand bill, warning that it would:
- Undermine commanders’ authority and accountability
- Create a dual justice system within the military
- Disrupt unit cohesion and combat readiness
- Fail to improve actual outcomes for victims or the accused
The Political Backdrop: A War on Command Authority?
Military defense lawyers, including Michael Waddington, have long warned that emotional, media-fueled reforms often create more problems than they solve. In this case, removing commanders from the prosecution decision-making process risked turning military justice into a political and reactive system—driven more by headlines than facts.
Watch the Legal Analysis
In this episode of the Military Law News Network, attorneys Michael Waddington, Tim Bilecki, and Noel Tipon break down why so many military leaders—who have seen combat, led troops, and prosecuted real cases—stood up against this bill.
Implications for Service Members Accused of UCMJ Offenses
If the Gillibrand bill had passed, it could have shifted prosecution decisions into the hands of attorneys unfamiliar with operational realities. While this might sound “independent,” it could have resulted in:
- More politically motivated prosecutions
- Less discretion in resolving weak or unfounded cases
- Increased court-martial rates without increased fairness
Why You Need a Strategic Civilian Defense Team
Regardless of how the law changes, the government is investing millions in aggressively prosecuting service members accused of serious misconduct. That’s why you need civilian military defense lawyers who:
- Understand military politics and command climate
- Have defended cases in real-world combat zones
- Know how to fight both the charges and the narrative
About Gonzalez & Waddington
- Top-rated UCMJ defense attorneys with 20+ years of global trial experience
- Defended military personnel in Germany, Iraq, Korea, Japan, Kuwait, Italy, and across the U.S.
- Authors of leading legal books used in law schools and JAG training
- Featured by major media outlets for landmark military justice cases
FAQs: Military Justice Reform & Your Rights
- Did the Gillibrand Bill pass?
- No, it failed in the Senate. However, the military justice system continues to evolve, with increasing restrictions on command authority.
- What does this mean for my military case?
- It means more scrutiny, more aggressive prosecution, and more political pressure on military leadership—making your choice of legal counsel more important than ever.
- Can Gonzalez & Waddington defend me anywhere in the world?
- Yes. We have defended clients at military bases and courts across 5 continents and over a dozen countries.
- How do I contact your firm?
- Call 800-921-8607 or visit ucmjdefense.com to schedule your confidential case review.
Download Our Free UCMJ Survival Guide
Don’t face the military justice system alone. Get our free UCMJ Survival Guide and learn how to protect your career, your future, and your freedom.
