Saudi Arabia Military Defense Lawyers – UCMJ Attorneys
Legal Guide Overview
Saudi Arabia Military Defense Lawyers – UCMJ Attorneys
Gonzalez & Waddington are civilian military defense lawyers providing representation to service members stationed in Saudi Arabia facing UCMJ investigations, court-martial cases, and administrative actions. Their practice is exclusively focused on military justice, drawing on worldwide defense experience and handling investigations involving CID, NCIS, and OSI.
Watch the military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend service members worldwide against UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced civilian military counsel can make the difference.
Saudi Arabia
Gonzalez & Waddington routinely defend U.S. service members whose cases arise in Saudi Arabia, an overseas environment that often involves complex coordination and jurisdictional considerations. Their background includes handling high-stakes UCMJ matters connected to this region, where operational demands can influence investigative timelines and legal processes. The firm represents clients both in Saudi Arabia and worldwide, ensuring continuity of defense throughout overseas and stateside proceedings.
The firm’s work includes defending serious allegations such as Article 120 sexual assault cases, which frequently require extensive litigation experience and familiarity with cross-border investigative challenges. They have handled court-martial litigation, Article 32 hearings, and intricate investigative actions that affect cases originating in Saudi Arabia. Their practice regularly involves interacting with military investigative agencies such as CID, NCIS, OSI, or CGIS operating within the region’s military environment.
They emphasize early legal intervention to address issues that arise before statements are made or charges are preferred, particularly important in remote or command-driven settings. Their approach includes trial-level readiness and the development of strategic defenses suited to the command-controlled military justice systems connected to Saudi Arabia. The firm’s experience extends to navigating both administrative and criminal military proceedings that emerge from cases linked to this overseas location.








The United States maintains a military presence in Saudi Arabia to support regional stability, enhance deterrence, and ensure readiness for contingencies across key Middle Eastern corridors. This presence facilitates coordination with a longstanding security partner and supports shared objectives related to countering regional threats. It also enables forward-positioned logistics, air access, and interoperability efforts that strengthen broader coalition operations. The posture is designed to be adaptive, limited, and focused on mission requirements rather than permanent force expansion.
Saudi Arabia’s vast desert terrain, coastal access to the Red Sea and the Arabian Gulf, and proximity to critical maritime routes shape operational planning and movement. Long distances between major population centers, combined with extreme heat and dust conditions, influence equipment sustainment, travel timelines, and rotation cycles. The region’s air corridors and chokepoint-adjacent geography make it valuable for monitoring regional activity and supporting rapid mobility missions. These environmental and geographic factors drive a force posture that must remain flexible and resilient.
The U.S. footprint in Saudi Arabia typically includes joint-service elements conducting aviation support, air defense coordination, logistics operations, intelligence activities, and contingency planning. Maritime and air components often integrate with host‑nation counterparts to ensure safe transit and operational deconfliction. Ground elements may engage in training, advisory functions, and readiness exercises that align with bilateral defense cooperation. Daily operations require consistent coordination with Saudi authorities, contributing to a complex but structured multinational operating environment.
These operational realities create conditions in which military justice matters can surface quickly, as commanders must maintain discipline and accountability in a high-tempo, host‑nation environment. Rapid decision-making, frequent personnel movements, and multinational coordination demands can accelerate the need for timely fact‑finding and administrative actions. Service members operate under close oversight, and even routine incidents may trigger command reviews due to mission sensitivity. This environment underscores why understanding military justice processes is essential for maintaining readiness and organizational integrity.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Gonzalez & Waddington are civilian military defense lawyers dedicated to representing service members stationed in Saudi Arabia who are facing UCMJ investigations, court-martial charges, Article 15 nonjudicial punishment, administrative separation, or Boards of Inquiry. The firm’s practice is exclusively focused on military justice, providing representation grounded in a detailed understanding of how allegations develop and how cases move through the military legal system. Their attorneys routinely navigate complex investigative landscapes, including cases involving CID, NCIS, and OSI, and bring experience working with the unique challenges posed when service members are operating overseas under heightened command scrutiny.
The military presence in Saudi Arabia operates within a strategically important theater, where joint missions, multinational coordination, and demanding deployment cycles create an environment in which service members must adhere to strict standards both on and off duty. In this setting, allegations such as Article 120 sexual assault, domestic violence, fraternization, drug offenses, and other forms of misconduct can arise quickly and often under circumstances influenced by high operational tempo, cultural restrictions, and close working environments. Military justice in this region is command-controlled, and once an allegation is reported, the response can move rapidly, affecting a service member’s rank, pay, clearance eligibility, benefits, and long-term career trajectory even before a full evidentiary record is developed.
Effective defense in these situations requires early legal intervention, ideally before a service member provides statements, participates in interviews, or faces charging decisions that may be based on preliminary or incomplete information. A strong defense strategy includes challenging unlawful, incomplete, or rushed investigations, addressing procedural flaws, and ensuring that all evidentiary issues are fully examined. Gonzalez & Waddington maintain a trial-ready posture for court-martial litigation and provide comprehensive representation in administrative proceedings around the world, ensuring continuity of defense regardless of location. This information is intended to support service members researching terms such as “Saudi Arabia military defense lawyer” and “UCMJ attorney” as part of informational search intent related to understanding their rights and the military justice process.