New Hampshire Military Defense Lawyers – UCMJ Attorneys
Legal Guide Overview
New Hampshire Military Defense Lawyers – UCMJ Attorneys
Gonzalez & Waddington are civilian military defense lawyers providing representation to service members stationed in New Hampshire in UCMJ investigations, court-martial cases, and administrative actions. Their practice is exclusively focused on military justice, supported by worldwide defense experience, including matters involving CID, NCIS, and OSI investigations.
Watch the military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend service members worldwide against UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced civilian military counsel can make the difference.
The operational environment, command culture, and tempo at New Hampshire create a military justice climate where UCMJ investigations and serious charges can escalate quickly, sometimes before facts are fully developed or tested. Units operating in and around the state often balance training cycles with community interaction, leading to heightened scrutiny of alleged misconduct.
Military elements operating in New Hampshire typically function under close command oversight, and leadership often prioritizes accountability to maintain readiness and public trust. As a result, suspected misconduct is routinely elevated for review, and even preliminary allegations can lead to command-directed inquiries or formal investigative actions.
The combination of training requirements, community engagement, and small-unit environments increases visibility of individual behavior. Allegations alone may initiate administrative restrictions, removal from duties, or notification to higher command levels, creating immediate career impacts while facts are still being gathered.
Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault allegations receive significant attention in New Hampshire, particularly when off-post social settings, alcohol consumption, and mixed-unit interactions are involved. Local nightlife areas and informal gatherings often create situations where perceptions of consent, relationships, and witness accounts conflict, prompting immediate investigative action.
Relationship disputes, credibility challenges, and peer reporting frequently intersect in these cases, especially in environments where service members socialize with civilian communities in nearby towns. Because Article 120 cases are treated as felony-level matters, investigative personnel pursue an aggressive posture with substantial potential impact on liberty, duty status, and long-term career prospects.
Because New Hampshire does not host a major active-duty installation, investigations are typically handled by military investigators such as CID, NCIS, OSI, or CGIS (depending on branch). These agencies commonly initiate interviews, collect witness statements, and review digital evidence early in the process, often within hours of an allegation.
Commands generally escalate significant allegations quickly, leading to coordination between local civilian authorities and military investigators when incidents occur off-post. Controlled communications, timeline reconstruction, and collateral interviews are standard tools used to corroborate or challenge statements and establish the sequence of events.
At New Hampshire, investigative actions frequently progress faster than service members anticipate, and early decisions during interviews or command interactions can lead to criminal charges, administrative measures, or enduring professional consequences.
Gonzalez & Waddington routinely defend service members facing serious military justice actions arising in New Hampshire, drawing on extensive experience with high‑stakes UCMJ matters connected to this region. Their practice includes representing clients across the United States and in global jurisdictions when cases extend to overseas commands or involve cross-border procedural requirements. This reach allows them to manage geographically dispersed evidence, witnesses, and investigative timelines linked to New Hampshire-origin cases.
The firm has handled severe allegations, including Article 120 sexual assault cases, along with court-martial litigation, Article 32 hearings, and complex investigative phases. Their work frequently involves navigating interactions with CID, NCIS, OSI, and CGIS when those agencies conduct inquiries tied to joint-service operational environments in and around New Hampshire. This background reflects a detailed understanding of how major investigative bodies approach cases involving service members stationed or residing in the state.
They emphasize early legal intervention to help clients address investigative steps, command inquiries, and the risk of premature statements before charging decisions are made. Their trial readiness and strategic approach are grounded in experience working within command-controlled systems that shape how New Hampshire cases progress from investigation to potential trial. The firm also manages related administrative actions, ensuring continuity across the full spectrum of military proceedings connected to the region.
The United States maintains a military presence in New Hampshire to support regional readiness, homeland defense responsibilities, and coordinated air and logistics operations throughout the Northeast. Units positioned in the state contribute to deterrence by ensuring rapid response capability along critical domestic air corridors. The presence also supports training and interagency cooperation essential to civil support missions during emergencies. These functions align with broader national defense objectives without implying any specific political posture.
New Hampshire’s geography includes rugged terrain, significant forested areas, and access to coastal air and maritime approaches through the broader New England region. These features influence how units train for cold-weather operations, navigation, and disaster response scenarios. The state’s location along key northeastern transit routes also affects operational tempo, especially for aviation and support elements. Seasonal weather patterns add further complexity to planning, sustainment, and movement.
The military footprint in New Hampshire typically includes aviation activities, ground training areas, logistics support nodes, and joint-service coordination between federal and state components. These missions integrate with surrounding civilian communities, requiring careful management of airspace, transport corridors, and emergency response partnerships. Units often conduct support functions such as medical readiness, communications, and regional command coordination. This creates a diverse operational environment spanning routine training through high-tempo contingency preparation.
These operational conditions create circumstances in which military justice matters can arise quickly due to the pace of missions and the close oversight under which service members operate. Commanders must manage rapid decision-making, safety requirements, and accountability standards in dynamic settings. Investigations can begin promptly when incidents occur, and administrative actions may proceed in parallel with potential judicial processes. Understanding this environment is essential for recognizing how military justice readiness supports overall mission effectiveness in New Hampshire.
New Hampshire hosts a small number of active military installations, each with distinct missions, operational demands, and community environments that influence the types of military justice issues commonly encountered.
Pease Air National Guard Base – U.S. Air Force (Air National Guard).
The installation supports air refueling missions carried out by Air National Guard personnel, with a mix of full-time and part-time service members balancing operational readiness with civilian employment. Training cycles can be intense during mobilization periods or joint exercises, creating fluctuating operational tempo. The base also supports aviation operations and logistics functions tied to national air mobility requirements.
Because the base sits near the Portsmouth and Seacoast region, service members operate close to nightlife areas, seasonal tourist zones, and cross-border traffic between New Hampshire and Maine, contributing to off-duty environments where alcohol-related allegations, relationship-based disputes, and orders-related investigations may arise. Fluctuating duty schedules and the blend of civilian and military responsibilities can lead to administrative action involving workplace expectations, standards of conduct, or UCMJ inquiries tied to readiness requirements. In cases requiring outside investigative support, matters may be referred to military investigators such as CID, NCIS, OSI, or CGIS, depending on branch.
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard – U.S. Navy.
Although physically located in Kittery, Maine, this installation directly borders New Hampshire and employs large numbers of uniformed naval personnel supporting submarine maintenance and overhaul missions. The shipyard environment involves long shifts, technical workspaces, and coordination with civilian shipyard employees. Operational tempo surges during major maintenance cycles, generating demanding schedules and high accountability for safety and procedural compliance.
The proximity to coastal nightlife, tourist-driven communities, and cross-state commuting patterns contributes to off-duty settings where allegations of misconduct or command-directed inquiries may occur. The industrial nature of the installation can also give rise to investigations involving compliance with technical procedures, workplace conduct, or safety-related orders. Naval command oversight is typically rapid, resulting in UCMJ investigations or administrative processes when incidents occur in or around the shipyard environment.
Question: Does the UCMJ apply to service members stationed in New Hampshire?
Answer: The UCMJ applies to service members regardless of their duty station, including those located in New Hampshire. Its jurisdiction extends to members on active duty, in training, or otherwise subject to military orders.
Question: Who has authority over military justice matters and where are cases handled for personnel in New Hampshire?
Answer: Command authorities make decisions on many military justice actions, and the location of processing can depend on command structure, assignment, and the facts of the situation. When assignments or operational responsibilities cross regions, coordination can introduce jurisdictional complexity.
Question: How do civilian laws interact with military jurisdiction in New Hampshire?
Answer: An incident may fall under both civilian law enforcement and military jurisdiction, depending on the circumstances. Each system can review the same event independently and determine whether to take action.
Question: How are military investigations conducted for incidents involving service members in New Hampshire?
Answer: Military investigations may be conducted by CID, NCIS, OSI, or CGIS, depending on the service member’s branch. These inquiries can involve gathering statements, digital evidence, and witness information to establish the facts.
Question: What is the role of civilian military defense lawyers for service members in New Hampshire?
Answer: Civilian military defense counsel may represent service members in court-martial proceedings or administrative actions. They can work alongside appointed military defense counsel to provide additional resources and perspective within the existing defense structure.
Gonzalez & Waddington are civilian military defense lawyers who represent service members stationed in New Hampshire facing UCMJ investigations, court-martial charges, Article 15 nonjudicial punishment, administrative separation, and Boards of Inquiry. Their practice is exclusively focused on military justice, providing representation across all branches and commands. The firm routinely handles matters involving CID, NCIS, and OSI, bringing extensive experience with complex investigative processes, command decision-making, and military-specific evidentiary issues. Service members in New Hampshire rely on authoritative military counsel who understand both the legal framework and the operational realities that shape how cases develop within the armed forces.
New Hampshire hosts a range of active-duty, Guard, and Reserve missions that contribute to a diverse military environment, with units supporting aviation, logistics, cyber operations, and joint training activities. Within this setting, service members may confront allegations that fall under high-risk categories such as Article 120 sexual assault, domestic violence, fraternization, drug offenses, and other forms of misconduct. Military justice in this environment remains command-controlled, meaning decisions can unfold rapidly once allegations surface and can significantly alter the course of a service member’s career. Adverse actions have potential consequences for rank, pay, clearance eligibility, benefits, and long-term professional trajectory, making it essential for service members to understand how the military justice system operates in New Hampshire.
Effective defense in military cases depends on early legal intervention before any statements are given or charging decisions are finalized. A focused strategy often requires challenging unlawful, incomplete, or rushed investigations to ensure that rights are protected and that the evidentiary record reflects the true circumstances of the allegation. Gonzalez & Waddington provide trial-ready court-martial defense and representation in administrative proceedings worldwide, preparing each case with the expectation that it may proceed to litigation. This approach supports service members seeking reliable information about their rights, their options, and the realities of the military justice process when searching for terms such as “New Hampshire military defense lawyer” and “UCMJ attorney,” reflecting informational search intent rather than a call to action.
