Legal Guide Overview

Jordan Military Defense Lawyers – UCMJ Attorneys

Jordan Military Defense Lawyers – UCMJ Attorneys

Jordan Military Defense Lawyers – UCMJ Attorneys

Gonzalez & Waddington are civilian military defense lawyers providing guidance to service members stationed in Jordan facing UCMJ investigations, court-martial cases, or administrative actions. Their practice is exclusively focused on military justice, backed by worldwide defense experience, including handling investigations involving CID, NCIS, and OSI.

Aggressive Military Defense Lawyers: Gonzalez & Waddington

Watch the military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend service members worldwide against UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced civilian military counsel can make the difference.

Jordan

Contact Our Aggressive Military Defense Lawyers

Authority and Experience in Jordan-Related Military Cases

Gonzalez & Waddington routinely defend service members facing allegations stemming from incidents in Jordan, an overseas environment that often adds jurisdictional and logistical complexity to UCMJ matters. Their work includes high-stakes cases connected to operations in the region, where coordination across commands and investigative agencies is common. The firm represents clients both in Jordan and worldwide, assisting service members involved in overseas proceedings and stateside actions arising from conduct occurring in the area.

The attorneys handle serious allegations, including Article 120 sexual assault cases, that frequently lead to intensive court-martial litigation and Article 32 preliminary hearings. Their experience includes navigating complex investigations involving CID, NCIS, OSI, or CGIS, which routinely support inquiries tied to deployments and missions in Jordan. This background enables them to address the evidentiary and procedural issues that arise in cases shaped by an operational setting.

They emphasize early legal intervention to help service members avoid missteps during interviews or before charging decisions are made. Their practice is grounded in trial-level readiness, ensuring cases are prepared for contested proceedings within command-driven military justice systems. The firm also manages the intersection of administrative and criminal actions that can occur when cases originate in Jordan’s unique overseas context.

Jordan Geographic and Military Context

The United States maintains a military presence in Jordan to support regional stability, reinforce deterrence, and enable rapid response options in a strategically sensitive area. The presence facilitates cooperative training, improves interoperability with Jordanian forces, and sustains forward readiness for contingencies. It also supports access to air corridors and logistics networks that link multiple operational theaters. These factors together make Jordan a practical location for sustained security cooperation.

Jordan’s geography includes desert expanses, rugged highlands, and urban centers situated near multiple regional borders, all of which influence operational planning. The climate can impose significant demands on personnel and equipment, affecting mobility and maintenance cycles. Air routes and transit corridors around Jordan provide access to key regional hubs and chokepoints. These geographic conditions shape force posture decisions and guide how units rotate, deploy, and sustain daily operations.

The U.S. footprint in Jordan typically involves joint-service elements supporting aviation activities, ground maneuver exercises, intelligence coordination, and logistics operations. Cooperation with Jordanian counterparts is routine, involving shared training areas and synchronized planning processes. Support units may address medical, communications, cyber, or space-related requirements as mission needs evolve. This environment requires ongoing coordination to balance operational objectives with host-nation procedures and administrative expectations.

The operational tempo and multinational coordination inherent to missions in Jordan can create conditions where military justice issues develop quickly. Commanders often make rapid decisions to preserve good order and mission continuity, prompting swift administrative or investigative actions. High accountability standards apply even during short rotations or joint operations. As a result, service members must navigate an environment where administrative measures may move forward concurrently with formal legal processes.

Pro Tips

Jordan

Jordan

Link to the Official Base Page

Jordan Military Defense Lawyers – UCMJ Attorneys

Experienced Civilian Defense for Serious Military Justice Matters

Gonzalez & Waddington are civilian military defense lawyers who represent U.S. service members stationed in Jordan facing complex UCMJ investigations, court-martial charges, Article 15 nonjudicial punishment, administrative separation actions, and Boards of Inquiry. The firm’s practice is exclusively focused on military justice, providing representation grounded in a deep understanding of service regulations, evidentiary standards, and command-driven procedures. Their attorneys have extensive experience addressing investigative actions conducted by CID, NCIS, and OSI, ensuring that servicemembers receive informed and strategic guidance from the earliest stages of a case.

U.S. forces operating in Jordan work within a demanding joint-environment footprint that supports regional missions, rotational deployments, and coordination with host‑nation elements. In this setting, allegations involving Article 120 sexual assault, domestic violence, fraternization, drug offenses, and other forms of misconduct can arise quickly and carry significant risk due to the operational tempo and close living and working conditions. Because military justice actions remain command-controlled, administrative and punitive actions can move rapidly once concerns are reported. Even preliminary allegations may generate consequences affecting rank, pay, clearance eligibility, access to duty positions, benefits, and long-term professional trajectory.

Effective defense in this environment requires early legal intervention before any statements are made or charging decisions are finalized, particularly when the record may already reflect preliminary assumptions. A defense team must evaluate and challenge unlawful, incomplete, or rushed investigations and ensure that procedural safeguards are enforced throughout the process. Gonzalez & Waddington provide trial-ready court-martial defense and representation in administrative proceedings for service members worldwide, including those stationed in Jordan. This information is intended to support users seeking clarity when searching for terms such as “Jordan military defense lawyer” and “UCMJ attorney,” reflecting informational search intent rather than a call to action.

  • UCMJ investigations and court-martial defense
  • Article 120 sexual assault and high-risk allegations
  • CID, NCIS, and OSI investigations
  • Administrative separation boards and adverse actions

Get Your Free Confidential Consultation