Mastering Trial Etiquette: Why Overusing Objections Can Cost You the Case

Mastering Trial Etiquette: Why Overusing Objections Can Cost You the Case

In the courtroom, every action and reaction can profoundly impact the jury’s perception — and ultimately, the outcome of the case. Among the many tactical tools available to trial lawyers, raising objections is a critical one. However, as military defense lawyer Michael Waddington explains in his insightful discussion, not every objection serves justice; some are just counterproductive noise.

Why Objections Matter: The Balance Between Advocacy and Annoyance

Michael Waddington, an experienced trial lawyer and co-founder of González & Waddington, LLC, emphasizes that objections should be used judiciously. The courtroom is a place for uncovering truth, and the jury’s job is to understand what happened. When a lawyer objects incessantly—especially on trivial or petty grounds—it can disrupt this process and alienate the jury.

Imagine sitting on a jury panel. You’re eager to hear testimonies and piece together the facts. Yet, time and again, a lawyer objects to every question or statement, not because the objection is legally warranted, but seemingly just to interrupt. This behavior can frustrate jurors, as Waddington vividly describes, making them view the objecting lawyer as disorganized, annoying, or unprofessional. Such perceptions can unconsciously bias the jury against the side the lawyer represents.

Understanding the Jury’s Perspective

Juries are composed of everyday people, not legal experts. Their patience is limited, and their primary goal is to discern the facts. Excessive objections can make the process feel disjointed and confusing. Moreover, when judges frequently overrule these frivolous objections, it further diminishes the objecting lawyer’s credibility in the eyes of the jury.

Waddington highlights this by painting a clear picture: the jury notices the lawyer’s demeanor, posture, and behavior. If a lawyer appears disorganized or overly aggressive with objections, jurors may question their professionalism or motives. This subtle psychological impact can be the difference between winning and losing a case.

The Right Way to Use Objections in Trial

So, what is the correct approach? Objections should be meaningful, strategic, and aimed at preserving your client’s rights. They work best when they are based on solid legal grounds such as relevance, hearsay, leading questions, or violations of evidentiary rules. A well-timed objection can prevent inadmissible or prejudicial information from being presented, ensuring a fair trial.

Lawyers need to strike a balance—being assertive enough to protect their case, yet respectful enough to maintain courtroom decorum and jury goodwill. As Waddington advises, if you’re going to object, it better be something worth it.

Additional Insights from Military Defense Expert Michael Waddington

Michael and Alexandra Waddington, partners at González & Waddington, LLC, bring a wealth of experience defending serious criminal cases in Florida State, Federal, and military courts worldwide. Their expertise includes challenging false accusations and military sexual assault cases under Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

Their approach is aggressive yet professional, focusing on both legal precision and courtroom demeanor. Their advice on objections reflects this philosophy—fight fiercely for your client, but never at the expense of appearing unprofessional or irritating the jury.

Conclusion: Less is More When It Comes to Objections

Objections are a necessary legal tool, but like any tool, they must be used wisely. Overusing objections can not only annoy jurors but also undermine a lawyer’s credibility and the client’s case. By understanding the jury’s perspective and reserving objections for truly critical moments, lawyers can maintain courtroom control and enhance their chances of success.

If you or a loved one is facing serious criminal charges, including complex military cases, consulting with experienced defense attorneys like Michael and Alexandra Waddington can make all the difference. Their team’s combination of courtroom savvy and strategic legal defense ensures that every move in trial advances the client’s best interest.

For more expert legal insights and guidance, visit https://ucmjdefense.com or call 1-800-921-8607 to schedule a consultation.

Liked this post? Subscribe to our channel for more legal tips from seasoned defense lawyers.

Full Transcription

There’s nothing more petty and more annoying and just bad lawyering to object to every question for the sake of objecting. My name is Michael Waddington and I’m a trial lawyer. If you’re going to object, it better be something worth it. Imagine you’re on the jury and you’re trying to find out what actually happened. Like, what did the guy say or what did the police officer find? And you keep getting objected to by a lawyer. And you look over and the lawyer that’s objecting… Oh, it’s that lawyer again. The same one who doesn’t stand up straight. The same one who seems disorganized. The same one that kept objecting in the opening statement. The same one who looks all frumpy. The same lawyer that is getting on my nerves. This is the mindset of some of these jurors. I just want to hear what this guy has to say and that lawyer over there doesn’t want to let me for some reason. And the judge keeps overruling that lawyer. That’s a very bad look, a very bad look if you’re trying to win your case. If you like our content, like and click subscribe below.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Reddit
X
WhatsApp
Print

Table of Contents

Mastering Trial Etiquette: Why Overusing Objections Can Cost You the Case

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

Recent Blogs

Site Navigation