Mastering Military Administrative Separation Boards: The Critical Role of Witnesses and Legal Strategy

Mastering Military Administrative Separation Boards: The Critical Role of Witnesses and Legal Strategy

Facing an Administrative Separation Board (ASB) or a Board of Inquiry (BOI) can be one of the most stressful moments in a military service member’s career. The outcome of these hearings can dramatically impact your military future, retirement benefits, and reputation. In this comprehensive guide, former JAG officer and military defense attorney Michael Waddington breaks down the essential role of witnesses at these boards and how a strategic legal approach can protect your rights and your career.

Understanding the Stakes: Why ASBs and BOIs Matter

Administrative Separation Boards and Boards of Inquiry are formal military processes used to determine whether a service member should be separated from the military, often under conditions that can affect their benefits and future civilian opportunities. Unlike court-martials, these proceedings are administrative in nature but carry serious consequences such as loss of retirement, VA benefits, and even the possibility of a less-than-honorable discharge.

Given these high stakes, it is critical to understand that your rights at these boards, while present, are often limited by military regulations and procedures. This is where knowing how to leverage every advantage — especially witness testimony — becomes vital.

The Power and Challenges of Calling Witnesses

One of the most important rights you have at an ASB or BOI is the ability to call witnesses to testify on your behalf. Witnesses can provide critical testimony that challenges the allegations against you, supports your character, or otherwise influences the outcome in your favor.

However, as Michael Waddington explains, this right is frequently undermined by military bureaucracy and tactical delays. For example, even if you identify several key witnesses within your unit or company, the command might restrict their availability by sending them on field exercises, limiting communication, or simply refusing to facilitate their attendance. This can severely hamper your defense because you might have to locate and bring witnesses yourself, often without any enforcement power.

Waddington emphasizes that this is not uncommon and highlights the importance of having an experienced civilian military defense lawyer who can anticipate these obstacles. A skilled attorney can take proactive steps such as preserving witness testimony in advance through affidavits or sworn statements, ensuring that crucial evidence is not lost due to unavailability.

When the Government’s Witnesses Don’t Testify

An increasingly common and troubling tactic in military boards, especially in cases involving sensitive allegations like sexual assault, is the non-appearance of government witnesses. The alleged victim might not physically appear at the hearing, instead sending a lawyer to represent their interests and submit statements on their behalf.

While this might seem to protect the alleged victim, it puts the accused service member at a distinct disadvantage. Without the ability to cross-examine the actual witness, the defense cannot challenge the credibility, motives, or inconsistencies of their testimony. Waddington advises that service members and their attorneys should rigorously argue the preponderance of the evidence standard and highlight that unchallenged statements lack the scrutiny necessary to be fully credible.

Unfortunately, some board members may be biased toward the victim’s testimony, especially in sensitive cases, making it even more crucial for the defense to meticulously document objections and impeach evidence wherever possible.

Strategies for a Successful Defense at ASBs and BOIs

Success at an administrative separation board hinges on preparation, strategy, and aggressive but respectful advocacy. Here are some key takeaways to consider:

  • Engage a Civilian Military Defense Lawyer Early: Military lawyers often have limited time and resources. A knowledgeable civilian lawyer like Michael Waddington can provide dedicated attention, anticipate procedural hurdles, and craft a tailored defense strategy.
  • Preserve Witness Testimony in Advance: Don’t wait until the last minute. Secure sworn statements or depositions from key witnesses who may be unavailable during the hearing.
  • Prepare for No-Show Government Witnesses: Develop strong legal arguments regarding the evidentiary standards and the importance of cross-examination to challenge untested statements.
  • Stay Aggressive, Yet Diplomatic: You want to vigorously defend yourself without alienating the board members who will decide your fate. Balance assertive advocacy with professionalism.
  • Have Impeachment Material Ready: Be prepared to challenge every piece of evidence and testimony that may unfairly damage your case.

Additional Context: The Long-Term Impact of Board Outcomes

The consequences of an administrative separation board go far beyond the immediate loss of military service. Discharges other than honorable can impact eligibility for VA benefits, future employment opportunities, and even civilian reputation. Therefore, fighting these boards effectively is not just about saving your current job—it’s about protecting your entire future.

Hiring an experienced civilian military defense attorney can make a critical difference. They understand the nuances of military law, the tactical nature of these boards, and the procedural rules that can be leveraged in your favor. They also help service members navigate the complex military justice system with confidence.

Conclusion: Don’t Face a Military Separation Board Alone

If you’re facing an Administrative Separation Board or Board of Inquiry, preparation and expert legal help are your best allies. The right witnesses, a strong defense strategy, and an attorney who knows how to navigate military bureaucracy can preserve your career, protect your retirement, and safeguard your benefits.

Remember, these boards are adversarial, and the military may not always act in your best interest. Taking the battle to your opponent, as Michael Waddington advises, means being proactive and strategic. Don’t leave your future to chance—seek experienced legal counsel who can fight for you.

Need help? Contact military defense attorneys Michael and Alexandra Waddington at 1-800-921-8607 or visit ucmjdefense.com to learn more about defending your military career.

Full Transcription

You have to really take the battle to your opponent and put them on the defense. My name is Michael Waddington and I’m a military defense lawyer who represents military members that are being administratively separated and facing boards of inquiry. Now when it comes to calling witnesses at a board, you have the right to call witnesses. As with everything with the military and with the government, you have all these rights, but then there’s always rules and regulations. You have the right to bear arms, but often they put all these rules into place that starts to impact and cut down on your rights. So yes, you have the right to a lawyer and yes, you have the right to go in there with witnesses. However, some branches will do nothing to help you get the witnesses, even if the witness goes to prove your innocence. Now for example, you have five, six witnesses over at the company area and the company knows your board’s coming up and you’re going to lose your retirement potentially. And you tell them, hey, I want those witnesses. They’re crucial to my board. The commander and the prosecutor slash recorder could be like, nope, they’re going out in the field, no phone access, too bad, so sad. That is not uncommon for them to do that. So you need to know who these witnesses are. It’s a good idea to get a civilian lawyer to get ahead of this. Make sure you lock down testimony of witnesses that are not going to be available. You can do that a variety of ways, which I’m not going to discuss in this video, but there are ways to get that done to preserve that testimony. If you call the witnesses, what you end up doing is having to get those witnesses on your own, which means that the witness hates you and they don’t want to testify. They could duck out and not show up and there’s nothing that can be done about it. You can sometimes ask the board to produce these people and make a compelling argument. I’ve seen some boards order people to show up and testify or call them on the phone. But in most cases, the board doesn’t care. Whatever they have is what they have. Another right at the board is to cross-examine the government’s witnesses. That sounds like a great right. What if they don’t bring any witnesses? That’s another little tactic I’ve been seeing recently. You show up for the board and the alleged victim who’s accusing you of sexual assault won’t show up. They’ll send their lawyer in their place. The lawyer will be there for the board. The witness will be nowhere to be seen. But then that lawyer will submit a statement on behalf of the victim and you cannot cross-examine them on that. So you end up with this long, over-the-top statement about how bad you are, how you victimized them. It’s being read to the board, but you can’t question t

Facebook
LinkedIn
Reddit
X
WhatsApp
Print

Table of Contents

Mastering Military Administrative Separation Boards: The Critical Role of Witnesses and Legal Strategy

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

Recent Blogs

Site Navigation