Schriever Space Force Base Boards of Inquiry & Administrative Separation Lawyers
Table Contents
A Board of Inquiry for officers and an administrative separation board for enlisted members are formal military processes used to determine whether a service member should be retained or separated. At Schriever Space Force Base, these boards function in accordance with Department of Defense and service‑specific regulations, providing a structured forum where a member’s conduct or performance is reviewed by impartial officers.
Officer Boards of Inquiry are convened for commissioned officers and warrant officers, while enlisted administrative separation boards apply to enlisted personnel facing potential involuntary separation. Though the structure is similar, officer boards typically involve senior officers and may address issues tied to an officer’s unique responsibilities, whereas enlisted boards focus on circumstances connected to enlisted duties and standards.
The burden of proof at these boards is on the government, which must meet a preponderance of the evidence standard—showing it is more likely than not that the alleged basis for separation occurred. Rules of evidence are more relaxed than in criminal courts, allowing consideration of materials that might not be admissible at a court‑martial, yet still requiring fairness and relevance.
These boards differ fundamentally from courts‑martial because they are administrative rather than criminal proceedings; they cannot impose punishment and instead focus solely on suitability for continued service. Because an adverse board finding can result in separation and a characterization of service, the board often becomes the decisive point where a service member’s career trajectory is ultimately determined.
A Board of Inquiry or administrative separation is a command review that can end a service member’s career without a court-martial, placing rank, retirement, and discharge status at risk. At Schriever Space Force Base, Gonzalez & Waddington can advise on these proceedings. For assistance, call 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
Schriever Space Force Base hosts highly specialized units whose missions depend on consistent command oversight and clear visibility into personnel performance. In such environments, leaders closely track conduct, readiness, and compliance with standards, which naturally increases the likelihood that administrative processes are used to address concerns promptly and transparently.
When issues surface through routine inspections, workplace reviews, investigations, written reprimands, or nonjudicial punishment, they can progress into administrative separation actions if commanders determine that continued service may be affected. This escalation follows established procedures and reflects the structured way potential problems are identified and evaluated within Space Force units.
Leadership also considers factors such as organizational risk tolerance and long-term career management when deciding whether to initiate a Board of Inquiry or separation action. These decisions are shaped by mission demands, expectations for professional conduct, and the need to maintain trusted teams within specialized operational roles.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
The Board of Inquiry or administrative separation process at Schriever Space Force Base follows a structured sequence designed to review the circumstances leading to potential separation. The process ensures that all procedural requirements are addressed and that the member is given the opportunity to participate through designated stages.
This structured approach outlines how notifications are delivered, how evidence and testimony are considered, and how recommendations and final decisions are formally reached within the administrative framework.
Boards at Schriever Space Force Base typically review a variety of documentary evidence, including prior investigations, letters of reprimand, and nonjudicial punishment records. These materials provide the board with a detailed timeline of alleged conduct, prior corrective actions, and the service member’s response to earlier administrative measures.
Witness testimony is also frequently introduced, ranging from supervisors and coworkers to subject‑matter experts familiar with the underlying events. Boards examine not only what each witness reports but also the credibility of their statements, considering factors such as consistency, firsthand knowledge, and whether the testimony aligns with other established facts.
Administrative records, such as performance evaluations, duty history, and training documentation, are weighed alongside investigative files to establish a broader context of the member’s service. These records help the board assess patterns of performance, documented behavior, and the overall administrative picture relevant to the issues under review.
Administrative separations at Schriever Space Force Base result in one of three primary discharge characterizations: Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), or Other Than Honorable (OTH). An Honorable discharge reflects full compliance with military standards, a General discharge indicates satisfactory but imperfect performance or conduct, and an OTH discharge reflects significant deviations from expected standards.
These characterizations can influence retirement eligibility because retirement requires completing the required years of service under conditions that are not disqualifying. While the administrative separation itself may interrupt a member’s ability to reach a qualifying service milestone, the characterization can also affect post-service access to benefits tied to retirement status.
For Space Force Guardians near retirement thresholds, the risk associated with administrative separation includes potential loss of time-in-service accumulation and the possibility that the characterization may limit certain benefits that depend on the nature of a member’s discharge. The administrative process does not guarantee retention until retirement, and outcomes depend on the evidence and circumstances of the case.
Long-term consequences of an administrative separation record can include impacts on veteran benefits, future federal employment considerations, and civilian career opportunities. Employers, licensing boards, and benefit agencies may review the discharge paperwork, making the characterization an important factor in post-service life.
At Schriever Space Force Base, Boards of Inquiry and administrative separation actions often arise following fact-finding efforts such as command-directed investigations. These investigations help determine whether an Airman or Guardian’s conduct or performance warrants further administrative processing, and their findings frequently serve as foundational evidence in separation cases.
Administrative measures such as Letters of Reprimand can also influence whether a commander initiates a Board of Inquiry. While a single reprimand may not trigger separation by itself, multiple or severe reprimands can build a documented pattern of misconduct or substandard performance that becomes relevant during a board’s deliberations.
More serious misconduct may lead commanders to consider non-judicial punishment under Article 15 or, in the most severe cases, referral to court-martial proceedings. Although these actions are distinct from administrative separation, their outcomes—such as guilty findings, imposed restrictions, or documented violations—can significantly impact the evidence presented to a Board of Inquiry and shape the ultimate decision regarding a member’s continued service.
Our team brings decades of military justice experience to the complex administrative forums that shape a service member’s future, including Boards of Inquiry and administrative separation proceedings. This background allows us to navigate the unique rules, evidentiary standards, and strategic considerations that define board-level litigation within Space Force and Air Force channels.
We focus heavily on witness examination, documentation, and building a clear and complete administrative record—key elements that influence how decision-makers evaluate allegations, credibility, and mitigating factors. By approaching each case with a meticulous record‑development strategy, we help ensure that the board receives a fully articulated presentation of the facts.
Our representation also integrates seamlessly with related issues such as letters of reprimand, nonjudicial punishment actions, command‑directed investigations, and IG or security‑related inquiries. This holistic approach enables us to align board strategy with the broader administrative and investigative landscape that often accompanies cases at Schriever Space Force Base.
Yes, administrative separation can occur without a court-martial because it is a non‑criminal process. It focuses on whether a member should remain in service based on performance or conduct. This process is separate from criminal proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
A Board of Inquiry is an administrative forum, while NJP is a disciplinary action imposed by a commander. A BOI evaluates whether separation is appropriate, whereas NJP addresses misconduct without determining retention. They operate under different procedures and standards.
The burden of proof at a BOI is typically a preponderance of the evidence. This means the board looks at whether the allegations are more likely true than not. The standard is lower than that used in criminal courts.
A BOI usually consists of three commissioned officers. These officers review the evidence, hear testimony, and make findings. Their role is to act as an impartial panel evaluating the case.
A BOI may consider documents, witness statements, testimony, and other relevant materials. The board determines the weight and credibility of the evidence presented. Both the government and the member may submit materials for review.
A BOI can impact retirement eligibility depending on its findings and the resulting administrative actions. The board’s conclusions may influence whether a member continues service long enough to reach retirement status. Retirement effects depend on final decisions made through the administrative process.
The characterization explains the quality of the member’s service. Possible characterizations include Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), or Other Than Honorable. The board reviews the service record and evidence to determine the appropriate level.
Service members may have civilian counsel represent them at a BOI. The civilian lawyer can participate in examining witnesses, presenting evidence, and making statements. Their involvement follows the rules governing administrative hearings on the installation.
Schriever Space Force Base sits east of Colorado Springs in the high plains of central Colorado. Its proximity to the Front Range provides clear skies and stable terrain useful for space operations. The base is closely linked to nearby civilian communities such as Ellicott and Falcon.
The open landscape surrounding Schriever allows for secure facility placement and minimal electromagnetic interference. The semi‑arid climate supports consistent year‑round operations. These conditions contribute to the base’s role as a hub for satellite control and space defense activities.
The base hosts units from the United States Space Force, along with select joint partners supporting space operations. Major tenant activities focus on satellite command, space domain awareness, and missile warning networks. These missions position the installation as a core node in national space infrastructure.
Schriever’s mission centers on operating and protecting critical space-based systems. Units on the installation manage global communications, navigation, and surveillance platforms. The base supports continuous command functions rather than large-scale troop movements.
The base hosts a substantial population of active-duty Guardians, Airmen, and civilian specialists. Personnel conduct highly technical operations tied to space control and global monitoring. Its activity level remains steady due to persistent, around‑the‑clock mission requirements.
While Schriever does not operate traditional training ranges, it supports rotational crews and specialized mission readiness programs. Many units maintain deployment ties through joint commands that rely on the base’s space capabilities. This creates a consistent operational rhythm for assigned personnel.
Service members at Schriever may encounter UCMJ actions related to investigations, administrative matters, or courts‑martial. The high‑security environment and continuous operations can influence how legal issues arise and are processed. Command structures on the installation manage these matters in coordination with regional authorities.
The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent service members stationed at Schriever Space Force Base. Their work includes supporting personnel involved in allegations, administrative proceedings, or criminal cases under the UCMJ. Representation extends to those permanently assigned or temporarily attached to the installation.
A Board of Inquiry is administrative in nature, while a court-martial is a criminal trial under the UCMJ. The rules of evidence and burden of proof are significantly lower at a Board of Inquiry.
A Board of Inquiry is an administrative hearing used to determine whether a service member should be retained or separated from service and, if separated, what characterization of discharge should apply. It is not a criminal proceeding.
Many service members choose to hire civilian military defense lawyers because Boards of Inquiry involve complex procedures, high career stakes, and long-term consequences. Experienced counsel can help manage evidence, witnesses, and the administrative record.
Civilian courts generally have no role in Boards of Inquiry because they are internal military administrative proceedings. Civilian outcomes do not control military separation decisions.
Separation decisions can sometimes be appealed or challenged through boards for correction of military records. These processes are complex and success is not guaranteed.
