Naval Station Everett Article 120 Sexual Assault Court-Martial Lawyers
Table Contents
Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice defines a range of sexual offenses, with sexual assault involving acts carried out without consent and abusive sexual contact covering non-penetrative, unwanted sexual touching. These distinctions determine how alleged conduct is classified within the military justice framework at Naval Station Everett.
The article carries felony-level exposure at a general court-martial, meaning service members accused under Article 120 can face prosecution in the military’s highest trial forum. The seriousness of these charges shapes how cases are handled from the initial report through referral for trial.
Prosecution under Article 120 is command-controlled, with commanders deciding whether allegations move forward and what level of court-martial is pursued. This authority influences case progression, investigative prioritization, and the convening of judicial proceedings within the installation.
Unlike civilian systems where independent prosecutors make charging decisions, the military process at Naval Station Everett operates within a command-centric structure and the UCMJ’s standardized rules, creating procedural differences in how allegations are evaluated, charged, and brought to trial.
Article 120 allegations at Naval Station Everett carry felony-level exposure and can escalate quickly within the military justice system. Cases often turn on early investigation steps, expert evidence, and parallel administrative separation risks. Gonzalez & Waddington provide guidance in navigating these processes. Call 1-800-921-8607 for information.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
Naval Station Everett operates within a zero‑tolerance culture regarding sexual misconduct, and service members have mandatory reporting obligations that trigger rapid notification up the chain of command. Once an allegation is received, command representatives, legal personnel, and investigative authorities are required to act promptly, which naturally accelerates the pace of official responses.
Command risk‑management practices also contribute to fast escalation. Leadership must immediately address potential safety, readiness, and unit‑cohesion concerns, resulting in increased visibility, temporary restrictions, and early coordination with investigative entities to ensure compliance with Navy and DoD policy.
In addition to the criminal process, service members may simultaneously face exposure to administrative actions, including potential administrative separation. Because these processes can proceed in parallel, the administrative track often advances quickly, creating a sense of rapid escalation even while the underlying investigation continues.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Many cases involve situations where alcohol use leads to uncertainty or memory gaps, creating conflicting accounts about interactions during off‑duty gatherings or nights out near Naval Station Everett. These scenarios often revolve around how much each person recalls and how their perceptions of events differ after drinking.
Digital communications also appear frequently, with service members meeting through dating apps or exchanging messages that later become central to determining context and intent. Screenshots, deleted messages, and shifting online conversations can influence how incidents are understood by investigators or command.
Additionally, the close‑quarters nature of barracks life or small-unit environments can contribute to misunderstandings, relationship disputes, or rumors. Third-party reporting—sometimes based on concerns from friends or shipmates—may initiate inquiries even when involved individuals describe events differently, adding another layer of complexity to these cases.
Investigations under Article 120 at Naval Station Everett involve coordinated efforts among military authorities to gather and evaluate all available information related to an allegation. These inquiries focus on documenting facts, interviewing involved parties, and preserving any material that may help clarify what occurred.
Investigators collect multiple forms of evidence to build a comprehensive understanding of the circumstances. The process often incorporates statements, digital records, and specialized forensic examinations, which are later compiled into formal investigative materials reviewed by command and legal personnel.
MRE 412 restricts the introduction of evidence concerning an alleged victim’s prior sexual behavior or sexual predisposition, making it a key rule that limits what background information can be presented during Article 120 proceedings.
MRE 413 and 414, by contrast, allow the government to introduce evidence of an accused’s prior sexual offenses or child molestation offenses, creating a framework in which past conduct may be considered for its relevance to the charged misconduct.
Because these rules govern whether sensitive or potentially prejudicial information may be heard by the fact-finder, pretrial motions and admissibility hearings become pivotal stages in shaping what narrative ultimately reaches the courtroom in cases at Naval Station Everett.
The resulting evidentiary rulings often define the contours of the litigation, influencing how the parties present their theories, what context the fact-finder receives, and which details form the foundation of the case.
Article 120 cases often hinge on the interpretation of specialized evidence, making expert testimony a critical factor in shaping how fact-finders view credibility, memory, and the reliability of investigative steps taken by law enforcement. At Naval Station Everett, these cases typically involve a blend of military and civilian experts whose evaluations can significantly influence the direction and outcome of the proceedings.
Because allegations may involve conflicting accounts, intoxication, or digital evidence, the defense and prosecution frequently rely on experts to clarify technical issues and challenge or support witness credibility. Understanding the role and limitations of each expert discipline is essential for evaluating the strength of the evidence and ensuring a fair adjudication process.
Service members at Naval Station Everett can face administrative separation based solely on Article 120 allegations, even in the absence of a criminal conviction. Commands may initiate this parallel administrative process whenever they believe the underlying conduct calls a sailor’s suitability for continued service into question.
Such actions often lead to a show-cause notification and a Board of Inquiry, where officers review the available evidence and determine whether separation is warranted. This administrative forum uses a lower evidentiary standard than court-martial proceedings, which increases the likelihood that a case may move forward despite unresolved or contested allegations.
If separation is recommended, the board also determines the characterization of discharge. The outcome can range from Honorable to Other Than Honorable, with each category carrying different implications for benefits, future opportunities, and how the service record is viewed by civilian and military authorities.
Administrative separation decisions can significantly affect a sailor’s career trajectory, advancement opportunities, and access to retirement benefits. Even long-serving members nearing retirement eligibility may face the loss of accrued benefits if separated before achieving the necessary service milestones.
Article 120 cases at Naval Station Everett are closely intertwined with broader sex crimes investigations, as the same evidence, victim statements, and investigative findings often inform both the criminal process under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and parallel administrative reviews. These investigations help determine not only whether a court-martial is appropriate but also whether additional administrative actions should be pursued.
Command-directed investigations frequently run alongside Article 120 proceedings to assess a service member’s overall conduct, compliance with orders, and impact on unit readiness. Even when criminal charges are not preferred, a command-directed investigation may still produce findings that lead to administrative consequences.
Outcomes from Article 120 cases can influence subsequent or concurrent administrative actions, including Letters of Reprimand or initiation of Boards of Inquiry to evaluate a member’s suitability for continued service. These administrative tools allow the command to address misconduct that may not meet the threshold for criminal conviction but still raises concerns regarding good order, discipline, and professional integrity.
Drawing on decades of military justice experience, the firm is often selected by service members facing Article 120 allegations at Naval Station Everett because its attorneys understand how to craft a trial strategy that addresses the specific procedures, evidentiary issues, and command dynamics of the military system, including the rigorous motions practice that often shapes the scope of what a panel will hear.
The attorneys have developed a reputation for methodical cross-examination techniques and the ability to challenge the reliability of government evidence, including the impeachment of forensic, medical, and investigative experts whose testimony frequently drives Article 120 prosecutions.
The firm’s published work on trial advocacy and military court practice informs its approach to preparing cases, helping clients benefit from well-established methods for presenting complex facts, examining witnesses, and navigating the unique procedural environment of courts-martial.
Answer: Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice outlines offenses related to sexual assault and abusive sexual contact. It includes definitions of prohibited conduct, required elements for each offense, and potential punitive articles. The statute applies to all service members, including those stationed at Naval Station Everett.
Answer: Consent is generally described as a freely given agreement by a competent person to engage in a sexual act. Lack of resistance alone does not constitute consent under military law. Investigators and courts examine the words, actions, and circumstances to determine whether consent existed.
Answer: Alcohol can affect a person’s ability to consent if it impairs their awareness or decision-making capacity. Investigations often review witness statements, timelines, and levels of intoxication to evaluate the role alcohol may have played. Both parties’ alcohol consumption can become part of the evidence.
Answer: Digital evidence may include text messages, social media activity, photos, or location data relevant to the events in question. Investigators examine this material to help establish timelines or interactions between individuals. Such evidence can be collected from devices, service providers, or online platforms.
Answer: Experts may be called to explain topics such as forensic findings, trauma responses, or toxicology. Their role is to help the fact-finder understand technical or scientific information that may not be commonly known. The court determines the relevance and admissibility of expert testimony.
Answer: Allegations of sexual assault can trigger administrative reviews separate from criminal proceedings. Commands may initiate administrative separation based on the underlying conduct or on broader concerns about good order and discipline. These processes operate under different standards than courts-martial.
Answer: Investigations usually begin when a report is made to command or law enforcement, prompting interviews and evidence collection. Agencies such as NCIS may conduct the investigative work and coordinate with military legal authorities. The process can involve multiple stages, including review by commanders and legal personnel.
Answer: Service members may retain civilian counsel to assist alongside detailed military defense counsel. Civilian attorneys can participate in meetings, review evidence, and represent the service member in proceedings when permitted. Their involvement is coordinated with the existing military defense team.
Naval Station Everett is located in Everett, Washington, along the eastern shoreline of Possession Sound in the Puget Sound region. Positioned about 30 miles north of Seattle and adjacent to communities such as Mukilteo, Marysville, and Snohomish, the installation is tightly integrated into a maritime‑focused civilian environment. The region’s cool, temperate climate and deepwater access make it well suited for year‑round naval operations. The surrounding ports, shipyards, and transportation corridors reinforce the base’s strategic value as one of the Navy’s key homeports in the Pacific Northwest.
Naval Station Everett supports the U.S. Navy’s fleet operations on the West Coast, hosting surface combatants and tenant commands that enable maritime security, fleet readiness, and deployment support across the Indo‑Pacific. While ship compositions change over time, the installation routinely supports destroyers and auxiliary vessels, along with command elements that coordinate maintenance, logistics, and operational planning. Its mission centers on delivering an efficient, modern homeport for forward‑deploying units, ensuring they can rapidly mobilize for joint and multinational missions across the Pacific theater.
The installation’s active duty population fluctuates depending on ship cycles, maintenance schedules, and deployment rotations. The base supports underway training, pier‑side maintenance, and pre‑deployment preparation for crews assigned to Everett‑based vessels. While it is not a large training hub, the station houses commands responsible for operational support, administrative functions, and mission planning. The rhythm of ship arrivals and departures creates a dynamic environment in which personnel may transition quickly between local duties, exercises in the Puget Sound, and extended overseas operations.
Service members stationed at or transiting through Naval Station Everett may encounter UCMJ matters tied to the high operational tempo, shipboard environments, and the demands of deployment preparation. Investigations, administrative actions, non‑judicial punishment, courts‑martial, or separation proceedings can arise from incidents occurring on the waterfront, aboard vessels, or during training evolutions. Because legal issues can directly affect readiness and career progression, many Sailors seek experienced counsel. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers at Naval Station Everett in a wide range of UCMJ matters.
You are not required to speak to investigators, and invoking your rights cannot legally be held against you.
After an allegation is reported, investigators gather statements and evidence, and commanders decide whether to pursue criminal charges or administrative action.
Intoxication alone does not prove sexual assault, despite how cases are often framed during investigations.
Alcohol does not automatically eliminate consent, and the analysis focuses on capacity, awareness, and the specific facts of the encounter.
Consent under Article 120 must be freely given and can be expressed through words or conduct, but it cannot exist if a person is legally incapable of consenting.
