Naval Air Station Lemoore Article 120 Sexual Assault Court-Martial Lawyers
Table Contents
Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice governs a range of sexual offenses at Naval Air Station Lemoore, distinguishing between sexual assault—acts involving penetration without consent—and abusive sexual contact, which involves intentional, nonconsensual touching of certain body areas without the element of penetration.
Both categories fall under felony-level jurisdiction in the military justice system, meaning a substantiated allegation can lead to trial by general court-martial, the highest criminal forum available in the armed forces.
Prosecution of Article 120 offenses at NAS Lemoore is controlled within the command structure, where commanders hold authority to initiate charges, direct investigations, and determine whether allegations proceed to court-martial.
This command-driven process differs from civilian systems, in which independent prosecutors make charging decisions and cases advance through courts that are separate from the organizational hierarchy of the accused.
At Naval Air Station Lemoore, Article 120 allegations involve felony-level sexual assault exposure and can escalate quickly within the military justice system, from investigation to charging decisions. Cases often hinge on expert evidence, and service members may also face administrative separation. Gonzalez & Waddington can be reached at 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
Naval Air Station Lemoore operates under a well-established zero‑tolerance culture for sexual misconduct, and this framework creates a structured and mandatory response whenever an Article 120 allegation is reported. Service members and command personnel have clear reporting obligations, which means that once information reaches the chain of command or designated reporting channels, formal processes are triggered with limited discretion to delay or pause initial steps.
The installation’s command climate emphasizes risk management, transparency, and accountability, all of which increase the visibility of any allegation involving potential misconduct. Commands are required to demonstrate prompt action, coordinate with investigative authorities, and ensure that all involved parties receive appropriate support services. This focus on mitigating organizational risk naturally accelerates the tempo of command decision‑making.
Alongside the military justice process, service members at NAS Lemoore may simultaneously face administrative evaluations, which can include exposure to potential administrative separation procedures. Because these administrative tracks run in parallel to investigatory or judicial proceedings, the overall tempo can feel rapid, even when each step follows standard Navy policy and regulatory requirements.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Many cases involve social settings where alcohol plays a role, often accompanied by memory gaps or differing recollections about what occurred. These situations may lead to uncertainty about intentions, levels of impairment, or the sequence of events as described by those involved.
Digital interactions are also frequently relevant, with service members meeting through dating apps or communicating through text and social media. Screenshots, message histories, and shifting online conversations can become central to how each person understood their interactions.
Incidents are sometimes tied to barracks living or close‑knit unit environments, where relationship disputes, breakups, or interpersonal tensions may influence how events are reported or perceived. In some instances, third parties such as friends, roommates, or supervisors initiate reports based on what they believe may have occurred.
Article 120 investigations at Naval Air Station Lemoore typically involve coordinated efforts by military law enforcement agencies and command authorities to document events, gather information, and evaluate the circumstances surrounding reported misconduct. These inquiries focus on collecting observable facts and recorded materials relevant to the alleged incident.
Evidence developed during these investigations can come from multiple sources, including physical examinations, digital data, and formal interviews. Each component contributes to a comprehensive record that is later reviewed by military justice personnel as part of the broader process.
MRE 412 restricts evidence relating to an alleged victim’s sexual behavior or predisposition, making it a significant gatekeeping rule in Article 120 cases by sharply limiting what a factfinder may hear about past conduct.
MRE 413 and 414, in contrast, allow the government to introduce evidence of an accused’s prior sexual assault or child molestation allegations, creating an evidentiary framework that can expand the scope of admissible information beyond the charged incident.
Because these rules often require detailed pretrial motions, hearings, and proffers, litigators at Naval Air Station Lemoore must navigate how each side argues for or against admissibility, shaping the boundaries of what the members ultimately consider.
Evidentiary rulings under these rules can define the case by determining the narrative presented at trial, influencing which patterns, behaviors, or limitations the court permits the parties to place before the trier of fact.
Article 120 investigations often hinge on complex expert analysis, and cases at Naval Air Station Lemoore are no exception. Defense teams and prosecutors rely on specialized testimony to address medical findings, behavioral assessments, digital evidence, and the impact of alcohol on perception and memory. Because these cases frequently involve conflicting accounts, the credibility of both the alleged victim and the accused becomes central to the final determination.
Understanding how expert testimony shapes the narrative is critical for service members facing allegations. Each type of expert analysis carries its own limitations, potential biases, and methodological challenges, which can influence how evidence is interpreted by investigators, commanders, and court-martial panels.
Sailors at Naval Air Station Lemoore can face administrative separation based solely on the underlying conduct of an Article 120 allegation, even if the case does not result in a criminal conviction. Command authorities may initiate this process when they believe the alleged misconduct is incompatible with continued naval service.
Allegations of sexual assault often trigger a show-cause notification or a Board of Inquiry, where a panel reviews evidence and determines whether separation is warranted. This administrative forum operates under a lower standard of proof than a court-martial, increasing the likelihood that separation proceedings move forward.
The resulting discharge characterization—whether Honorable, General Under Honorable Conditions, or Other Than Honorable—can have long‑lasting effects. It influences how future employers view the service member’s record and shapes the veteran narrative attached to their military tenure.
Administrative separation can also affect long-term career goals and potential retirement eligibility. Loss of continued service time, interruption of promotion pathways, and the inability to reach the required years for military retirement are common consequences of an adverse outcome.
At Naval Air Station Lemoore, Article 120 cases often intersect with broader sex crimes investigations, which may involve NCIS, command authorities, and specialized military prosecutors. These investigations frequently run parallel to administrative inquiries, creating a complex environment where evidence and findings can influence multiple legal processes at once.
Commands may initiate command-directed investigations when allegations arise, even before formal charges are considered. The results of these inquiries can shape how an Article 120 case proceeds, including decisions about preferral of charges, interim safety measures, or the need for additional administrative oversight during the investigative phase.
Beyond the criminal process, Article 120 allegations can trigger administrative consequences such as Letters of Reprimand or even Boards of Inquiry. These actions may occur regardless of court-martial outcomes and can significantly affect a service member’s career, making it essential to understand how each legal pathway interacts within the military justice system at NAS Lemoore.
Service members facing Article 120 allegations at Naval Air Station Lemoore often seek counsel with extensive trial strategy experience, including the development of tailored defense themes, pretrial motions practice, and proactive litigation planning. Gonzalez & Waddington draw on decades of military justice involvement to structure a defense that anticipates evidentiary challenges, command actions, and issues unique to Article 120 cases.
The firm is frequently retained for its ability to conduct rigorous cross-examinations and to challenge government experts through detailed impeachment techniques. Their approach includes dissecting forensic conclusions, questioning the reliability of investigative steps, and highlighting inconsistencies in testimonial evidence while maintaining strict adherence to professional standards.
In addition to courtroom practice, Gonzalez & Waddington’s published work on trial advocacy contributes to their reputation as practitioners who emphasize education and clarity in military litigation. Their long-standing participation in courts‑martial, combined with contributions to professional literature, provides service members with counsel grounded in deep, practical knowledge of the military justice system.
Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice outlines criminal offenses related to sexual assault and abusive sexual contact. It defines prohibited conduct, key legal elements, and how such offenses are categorized within the military justice system.
Consent under Article 120 is assessed based on whether a person freely and voluntarily agreed to the conduct. Military authorities examine communication, circumstances, and the ability of each person to understand and participate in the situation.
Alcohol may influence a person’s ability to consent and can become a significant factor in evaluating what occurred. Investigators often consider the level of impairment and how it may have impacted perceptions and decision‑making.
Digital evidence can include text messages, location data, social media activity, or photos. Such information may be reviewed by investigators to understand timelines, interactions, and context surrounding the allegations.
Experts may be called to explain topics such as forensic testing, memory, or behavioral responses. Their role is to help the fact‑finder understand technical or specialized information relevant to the case.
An investigation can trigger administrative review processes within a command. These reviews may examine a service member’s conduct and determine whether administrative action is warranted based on military regulations.
Investigations generally begin with reporting and an initial assessment by military law enforcement. Interviews, evidence collection, and coordination with command authorities often follow as the inquiry progresses.
Service members may choose to involve a civilian attorney alongside their appointed military defense counsel. Civilian lawyers can communicate with the defense team and participate in the representation as permitted by military rules.
Naval Air Station Lemoore is located in California’s Central Valley, positioned between the small cities of Lemoore and Hanford and within driving distance of Fresno. The surrounding region is characterized by flat agricultural terrain, open airspace, and a dry inland climate, all of which make the area well-suited for high-tempo naval aviation operations. The base sits within a largely rural community that relies heavily on agriculture, creating a clear distinction between the military installation and nearby civilian towns while still maintaining strong economic and community partnerships.
As the Navy’s largest Master Jet Base, Naval Air Station Lemoore serves as the primary West Coast home for the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and the F-35C. Its mission centers on supporting carrier-based strike fighter operations, enabling squadrons to train, maintain readiness, and deploy worldwide. The installation hosts multiple operational and training squadrons as well as key tenant commands responsible for maintaining aircraft, preparing aircrews, and supporting carrier air wings assigned to Pacific Fleet carriers. This aviation-focused mission makes the base a critical hub for naval air power projection in the Indo-Pacific region.
The base supports a large population of active duty aviators, aircrew, support personnel, and maintenance specialists. Daily activity reflects a steady operational rhythm driven by squadron workups, carrier qualifications, and deployment cycles. While the installation does not function as a basic training site, it sustains a continuous flow of incoming and outgoing squadron personnel tied to Pacific Fleet operations. The presence of advanced aircraft maintenance facilities, ordnance operations, and air wing headquarters amplifies the tempo and complexity of life for service members and their families.
The demanding aviation environment at Naval Air Station Lemoore can contribute to a range of military justice issues. Service members may face investigations, administrative actions, non-judicial punishment, courts-martial, or separation proceedings arising from the pressures of flight operations, deployment schedules, or workplace requirements. Because legal matters can develop quickly in such a high-tempo setting, the military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at Naval Air Station Lemoore who need experienced guidance under the UCMJ.
Expert witnesses can be used to explain memory, intoxication, perception, trauma, and investigative flaws.
You should not consent to a phone search without legal advice because digital evidence is frequently misinterpreted.
Failure to interview key witnesses can significantly weaken the government’s case and create defense leverage.
An accuser can recant and the case may still proceed if the command believes other evidence supports the allegation.
Article 120 investigations often take months and sometimes over a year, depending on complexity and command priorities.
