Naval Air Station Fallon Boards of Inquiry & Administrative Separation Lawyers
Table Contents
A Board of Inquiry for officers, and an administrative separation board for enlisted personnel, are fact‑finding bodies convened to determine whether a service member should be retained in the military. At Naval Air Station Fallon, these boards follow Department of Defense and service‑specific regulations, but the core purpose remains consistent: to evaluate substantiated allegations and determine whether the member’s conduct or performance meets retention standards.
Officer Boards of Inquiry typically consist of senior officers who assess whether an officer has met the professional, ethical, and performance expectations of their rank, while enlisted administrative separation boards include members whose grades correspond to the enlisted ranks under review. In both settings, the government bears the burden of proof, generally using a preponderance‑of‑the‑evidence standard, meaning the board must find it more likely than not that the underlying basis for separation occurred.
These boards differ substantially from a court‑martial. They are administrative rather than criminal proceedings, do not impose punitive sentences, and follow more flexible evidentiary rules. The proceedings focus on personnel suitability rather than guilt or innocence, and the board’s findings inform administrative actions rather than judicial outcomes.
Because a Board of Inquiry or administrative separation board directly determines whether a service member remains in the military, it frequently represents the decisive moment in a career impacted by alleged misconduct or performance issues. At NAS Fallon, as across the services, the board’s conclusions often become the definitive assessment of a member’s future in uniform.
A Board of Inquiry or administrative separation reviews alleged misconduct and can end a service member’s career without a court-martial, placing rank, retirement, and discharge status at risk. At Naval Air Station Fallon, Gonzalez & Waddington provides guidance on these processes. Call 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
At Naval Air Station Fallon, the combination of tight command oversight and high unit visibility often brings personnel matters to leadership attention more quickly than at larger or more dispersed installations. Training squadrons, operational detachments, and support elements work in close proximity, which naturally increases supervisory awareness of performance, conduct, and readiness issues.
Initial actions such as command investigations, formal reprimands, or nonjudicial punishment can, in some cases, progress into administrative separation processing when patterns of conduct or performance concerns remain unresolved. These procedural steps follow established Navy administrative pathways, where documented findings may prompt leadership to review whether continued service aligns with standards and mission requirements.
Leadership considerations such as organizational risk tolerance and career management priorities also influence when a matter is elevated to a Board of Inquiry or administrative separation. Decisions are guided by service policies intended to balance individual circumstances with operational needs, ensuring that personnel decisions support overall unit effectiveness and mission readiness.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
The Board of Inquiry or administrative separation process at Naval Air Station Fallon follows a structured sequence designed to review the circumstances of a service member’s case. Each stage focuses on gathering and presenting information to determine whether separation is warranted.
The process includes formal notification, an evidentiary review, the presentation of testimony, and a final determination by the appropriate authority based on the board’s findings.
Boards convened at Naval Air Station Fallon commonly review materials generated during earlier stages of the process, including command investigations, written reprimands, and records from non‑judicial punishment proceedings. These documents provide a chronological account of alleged misconduct or performance issues and establish the administrative foundation for the board’s evaluation.
Witness testimony is frequently used to clarify events described in the documentary evidence. Board members consider not only what each witness states, but also the witness’s credibility, familiarity with the underlying events, consistency with prior statements, and any potential bias. This testimony helps contextualize the investigative and disciplinary record.
Administrative records, ranging from service evaluations to personnel qualification documentation, are weighed to determine how the member’s broader service history aligns with the matters under review. These records help the board understand patterns of conduct or performance and how they relate to the issues raised in investigations, reprimands, and NJP records.
In administrative separation cases at Naval Air Station Fallon, the type of discharge characterization issued—Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), or Other Than Honorable (OTH)—reflects the Navy’s assessment of a service member’s overall performance and conduct. An Honorable discharge indicates consistent adherence to standards, a General discharge notes satisfactory service with some deficiencies, and an OTH discharge documents serious misconduct or significant departures from expected behavior.
These characterizations influence retirement eligibility because retirement typically requires completing the necessary years of service and remaining in good standing. When a separation occurs before reaching retirement milestones, or when misconduct becomes part of the record, the member may lose the opportunity to qualify for a military retirement.
Administrative separation documentation, including the characterization and the underlying basis for separation, becomes part of a permanent service record. These entries may affect future opportunities such as reenlistment, access to certain veterans’ programs, and the ability to present a strong service history to civilian employers.
Because these long-term effects can shape both military and post-service paths, service members often seek to understand how their characterization and documented conduct may influence future benefits, employment prospects, and overall professional reputation long after leaving NAS Fallon.
Boards of Inquiry and administrative separation proceedings at Naval Air Station Fallon often arise after command-directed investigations uncover substantiated misconduct or performance issues. These investigations provide the factual basis that commands rely on when deciding whether to initiate separation actions, making them a foundational component of the broader administrative and disciplinary process.
Administrative separation can be pursued alongside or following other adverse administrative measures, such as Letters of Reprimand and non-judicial punishment. While these actions do not constitute criminal proceedings, they may be used as evidence of a pattern of behavior or seriousness of misconduct, influencing whether a service member is recommended for retention or separation through a Board of Inquiry.
Though administrative separation is distinct from court-martial proceedings, it can run parallel to or occur after a court-martial referral when the command believes that administrative remedies are more appropriate or when criminal charges do not result in a conviction. In all cases, Boards of Inquiry serve as a critical decision point in determining continued service when other military legal actions have raised concerns about a member’s fitness for duty.
Our team brings extensive board‑level litigation experience, including regular representation of service members facing Boards of Inquiry and administrative separation actions at Naval Air Station Fallon. This experience allows us to navigate the procedural demands of board hearings, address evidentiary challenges, and manage the strategic considerations unique to administrative forums.
We focus on developing a clear, well‑supported record by conducting thorough witness examination and ensuring that key facts, context, and mitigating information are properly documented. This meticulous approach helps ensure that the board has a complete and accurate understanding of the events and circumstances under review.
With decades of military justice experience, our attorneys integrate BOI and separation defense with related matters such as letters of reprimand, Nonjudicial Punishment, and command investigations. This comprehensive perspective helps ensure that the client’s broader administrative and career considerations are addressed throughout the process.
Yes. A service member at Naval Air Station Fallon may face administrative separation without a court-martial because the processes are independent. Administrative separation focuses on a member’s suitability for continued service rather than criminal guilt.
A Board of Inquiry is an administrative hearing used to determine whether separation is appropriate, while Nonjudicial Punishment is a disciplinary action imposed by a commander. NJP does not automatically require separation, but its results may be considered at a BOI.
The burden of proof at a BOI is a preponderance of the evidence. This means the board must determine whether the alleged basis for separation is more likely true than not.
A BOI typically consists of three commissioned officers, with at least one being senior to the respondent. These officers review the case, listen to evidence, and make findings based on the record presented.
The board may review service records, witness testimony, investigative reports, and any documents submitted by the member. The goal is to evaluate the circumstances surrounding the alleged misconduct or performance issues.
A BOI may address whether a member remains eligible to continue toward retirement. The findings can influence whether a member stays in service long enough to qualify for retired status.
The characterization is based on the member’s overall record of service and the circumstances leading to the separation action. Boards consider performance evaluations, conduct history, and the nature of the incident prompting the BOI.
Yes, service members may retain a civilian lawyer to represent them at a BOI. The lawyer can assist with preparing the case, presenting evidence, and participating in the hearing.
Naval Air Station Fallon sits in western Nevada, just east of the small city of Fallon and about an hour from Reno. The installation lies within the high desert basin, where open terrain and dry conditions support year-round aviation operations. Its proximity to rural communities shapes how the base and local residents share resources and infrastructure.
The broad valleys and surrounding mountain ranges create an ideal setting for complex flight and training scenarios. The region’s predictable weather patterns provide consistent operational windows for aviation units. These geographic factors allow the base to support training demands that require expansive, unrestricted airspace.
The installation is operated by the U.S. Navy and supports aviation units that specialize in advanced air-to-air and air-to-ground training. Its mission centers on preparing aircrews and supporting elements for deployment. Major tenant commands help maintain readiness across multiple carrier air wings.
The base provides integrated training environments designed to replicate operational combat scenarios. Its ranges and facilities allow coordinated exercises involving aircraft, command staffs, and support teams. This mission ensures deploying units receive cohesive, realistic preparation.
The installation hosts a steady active duty population, supplemented by rotational aviation units and carrier air wings. Personnel include pilots, aircrew, maintenance teams, and command staff. The influx of temporary training units contributes to fluctuating activity levels throughout the year.
Fallon supports advanced aviation training, logistical coordination, and command planning functions. The facility regularly conducts integrated exercises that draw units from across the fleet. Its tempo reflects the Navy’s broader deployment cycle.
Service members stationed at or rotating through the installation may encounter UCMJ processes such as investigations, administrative actions, or courts‑martial. The demanding training environment can create situations requiring formal legal review. Procedures are handled according to established military justice standards.
The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at Naval Air Station Fallon. Their work includes navigating legal matters that arise within the base’s training and operational setting. Their presence supports personnel across the installation’s diverse missions.
Yes, a service member can be administratively separated without any criminal conviction or court-martial. Separation decisions are based on administrative standards rather than criminal guilt.
A Board of Inquiry is administrative in nature, while a court-martial is a criminal trial under the UCMJ. The rules of evidence and burden of proof are significantly lower at a Board of Inquiry.
A Board of Inquiry is an administrative hearing used to determine whether a service member should be retained or separated from service and, if separated, what characterization of discharge should apply. It is not a criminal proceeding.
Many service members choose to hire civilian military defense lawyers because Boards of Inquiry involve complex procedures, high career stakes, and long-term consequences. Experienced counsel can help manage evidence, witnesses, and the administrative record.
Civilian courts generally have no role in Boards of Inquiry because they are internal military administrative proceedings. Civilian outcomes do not control military separation decisions.
