Marine Corps Air Station New River Boards of Inquiry & Administrative Separation Lawyers
Table Contents
A Board of Inquiry for officers and an administrative separation board for enlisted Marines are formal administrative forums used across the military, including at Marine Corps Air Station New River, to determine whether a service member should be retained or separated based on alleged misconduct, substandard performance, or other adverse grounds. Officer cases are heard by a panel of senior officers, while enlisted cases are reviewed by a board typically composed of a mix of officers and senior enlisted members.
The government carries the burden of proof in these proceedings, and the evidentiary standard is generally a preponderance of the evidence, meaning the board must find it more likely than not that the underlying basis for separation occurred. Evidence rules are more flexible than in criminal courts, allowing the board to consider a broad range of documents, testimony, and official records.
These boards differ from courts-martial in that they are administrative rather than criminal in nature. They cannot impose punitive sentences, but they do make findings and recommendations regarding separation and the characterization of a Marine’s service. Their procedures are less formal than trial proceedings, yet they remain structured and governed by service regulations.
Because their findings directly affect retention and service characterization, Boards of Inquiry and administrative separation boards often represent the final decisive point in a Marine’s career. The board’s conclusions typically determine whether a member continues service or departs the military, giving these proceedings significant long-term professional impact.
A Board of Inquiry, or administrative separation, is a command process that can end a service member’s career without court‑martial, affecting rank, retirement, and discharge status. At Marine Corps Air Station New River, Gonzalez & Waddington (1-800-921-8607) provides guidance on navigating these high‑stakes proceedings.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
Marine Corps Air Station New River maintains high levels of command oversight and unit visibility due to its operational tempo and concentration of aviation units. This environment often results in close monitoring of personnel performance and conduct, which can lead to increased administrative actions when standards or expectations are not met.
Initial issues such as formal investigations, written reprimands, or nonjudicial punishment may lead to further administrative review. When patterns of conduct or performance concerns appear, these earlier actions can serve as the basis for commanders to consider whether a Board of Inquiry or administrative separation is appropriate.
Leadership decisions regarding risk tolerance and long-term career management also influence the initiation of separation processes. Commanders may determine that administrative action is necessary to preserve unit readiness or maintain confidence in a Marine’s ability to serve, which can result in an increased frequency of separations at a busy installation like New River.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
The Board of Inquiry or administrative separation process at Marine Corps Air Station New River follows a structured sequence designed to evaluate whether a Marine should be retained or separated based on the issues prompting the action. The process ensures that required notifications, presentation of information, and deliberations occur in a consistent manner.
Each phase involves specific procedural steps, including the opportunity to present materials, the review of all relevant information by designated members, and a final decision made by the appropriate authority.
Boards of Inquiry and separation boards at Marine Corps Air Station New River commonly review a variety of documentary materials generated through military processes. These materials often include command investigations, written reprimands, and records of Non‑Judicial Punishment (NJP), all of which provide the board with formal accounts of alleged incidents and prior administrative actions. Such documents help establish a chronological record and outline the basis for the government’s case.
Witness testimony also plays a central role, offering the board firsthand descriptions of events and clarifying points raised in written reports. Boards typically consider the credibility of each witness by looking at consistency, firsthand knowledge, and possible motives or biases. The combination of live testimony and documentary evidence allows members to compare different perspectives on the same events.
Administrative records, including performance evaluations, training histories, and duty assignments, are frequently reviewed to place the allegations in broader context. These records are weighed for their relevance to the conduct at issue and for what they show about a Marine’s overall duty performance and professionalism. Together, these materials help the board understand both the specific allegations and the service record in which those allegations arose.
An administrative separation at Marine Corps Air Station New River can result in one of several discharge characterizations. An Honorable discharge reflects full compliance with Marine Corps standards. A General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge indicates satisfactory service with noted deficiencies. An Other Than Honorable (OTH) discharge is the most severe form of administrative characterization and may be issued when the command determines there were significant departures from expected conduct or performance.
These characterizations can influence retirement eligibility because retirement in the Marine Corps generally requires the member to complete the necessary years of service under conditions that do not bar continued service. When a separation process is initiated, the characterization under consideration may affect whether the Marine remains eligible to reach the service time required to retire.
Even when a Marine is near retirement, an administrative separation board can recommend a characterization that limits or prevents completion of the remaining service needed. The decision-making process focuses on documented performance and conduct, and the resulting characterization determines whether the Marine can continue toward retirement or is separated before meeting the required milestones.
Long-term consequences of the separation record can include impacts on access to certain veterans’ benefits, employment opportunities, and perceptions by future governmental or civilian evaluators who review military service documents. Because administrative separations become part of a Marine’s permanent record, their characterization can influence post-service options and how prior service is viewed for years after leaving the military.
At Marine Corps Air Station New River, Boards of Inquiry and administrative separation proceedings are often connected to earlier fact-finding efforts such as command-directed investigations. These investigations may uncover misconduct or performance issues that prompt commanders to consider whether a Marine should remain in service, ultimately leading to an administrative separation package or the convening of a Board of Inquiry for cases involving officers or certain enlisted personnel.
Adverse administrative measures, including Letters of Reprimand, also play a significant role in this process. A formal reprimand can serve as key evidence during administrative separation actions, demonstrating a pattern of misconduct or poor judgment. While a Letter of Reprimand is not punitive in the same way as criminal sanctions, it can heavily influence a Board of Inquiry’s assessment of a Marine’s suitability for continued service.
Non-judicial punishment and court-martial proceedings further shape the pathway to administrative separation. At MCAS New River, NJP results can be used to support separation for misconduct, while convictions at court-martial often trigger mandatory processing for separation. However, administrative boards remain distinct from criminal proceedings, focusing not on guilt or innocence but on whether the Marine’s conduct, as documented through NJP or court-martial outcomes, warrants retention in the Marine Corps.
With decades of military justice experience, Gonzalez & Waddington bring a deep understanding of Board of Inquiry and administrative separation procedures, including the unique considerations that arise at Marine Corps Air Station New River. Their background in board-level litigation enables them to navigate the complex rules governing the presentation of evidence, procedural rights, and command-driven administrative actions.
The firm’s experience includes structured witness examination, strategic responses to adverse testimony, and meticulous development of the administrative record. This record-building approach is central to ensuring that the board has a complete and accurate factual foundation when evaluating alleged misconduct or performance issues.
Their board representation is further reinforced by experience handling related matters such as reprimands, Non-Judicial Punishment, and investigative actions that often lead to separation processing. By integrating these interconnected areas, they provide continuity across the full spectrum of administrative and investigative challenges service members may face.
Yes. Administrative separation can occur independently of any court-martial process. It is handled through command channels and does not require judicial findings to proceed.
A BOI is an administrative proceeding focused on determining whether separation is appropriate. NJP is a disciplinary tool used by commanders to address minor misconduct without creating a record equivalent to a court-martial.
The government typically must meet a preponderance of the evidence standard. This means the board must decide whether it is more likely than not that the alleged basis for separation occurred.
The board usually consists of three commissioned officers. They are selected to review the evidence, ask questions, and determine whether separation is warranted.
The board may consider documents, witness statements, and testimony relevant to the alleged misconduct or performance issues. Rules of evidence are more flexible than in a court-martial, allowing a broader range of materials.
A BOI can influence whether a service member remains eligible for retirement benefits. The board’s findings may affect continued service, which in turn impacts retirement qualification.
The board evaluates the service member’s overall record and the basis for separation. Its recommendation helps determine whether the discharge is Honorable, General, or Other Than Honorable.
Yes, civilian counsel is permitted at the service member’s own expense. The attorney may review evidence, present arguments, and participate in the proceeding as allowed by regulations.
Answer: Marine Corps Air Station New River sits in southeastern North Carolina, just south of Jacksonville and adjacent to Camp Lejeune. Its coastal plain setting features pine forests, tidal waterways, and a humid subtropical climate that supports year‑round aviation activity. The installation is closely tied to surrounding Onslow County communities, forming a shared regional identity centered on military aviation.
Answer: The flat terrain and access to coastal training ranges allow for consistent flight operations and rapid movement of rotary‑wing aircraft. Nearby civilian infrastructure supports transportation and housing for military families. This blend of military and community resources reinforces the base’s regional significance.
Answer: The air station is a Marine Corps installation focused on rotary‑wing and tiltrotor aviation. It hosts operational squadrons and aviation support commands that contribute to expeditionary operations. These units provide essential lift, assault support, and training capabilities.
Answer: MCAS New River enables aviation readiness through maintenance, training, and flight operations. Its mission supports both East Coast Marine Air‑Ground Task Force requirements and global deployment commitments. The installation plays a central role in preparing aircrews for operational tasks.
Answer: The base hosts a substantial community of aviators, maintainers, and support personnel. Activity levels remain high due to constant training cycles and deployment rotations. The presence of multiple squadrons contributes to steady operational movement.
Answer: Daily operations include flight training, logistical support, and aircraft maintenance. The tempo reflects the needs of both stateside readiness and overseas commitments. These functions shape the pace of life for service members and families.
Answer: Service members may encounter UCMJ issues related to investigations, administrative actions, non‑judicial punishment, or courts‑martial. The aviation training environment can influence when and how these matters arise. Command responsibilities often intersect with fast‑moving operational demands.
Answer: The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at Marine Corps Air Station New River. Their work supports personnel dealing with UCMJ processes connected to the base’s operational setting. This representation reflects the installation’s active and dynamic military community.
Statements from prior investigations are commonly introduced in separation proceedings. These statements may be used even if they were never tested in a court-martial.
Yes, a service member has the right to present witnesses and evidence at a Board of Inquiry. Witness testimony can play a significant role in credibility and character assessments.
Letters of Reprimand and Non-Judicial Punishment are frequently used as evidence to support separation. They are often presented as proof of a pattern of misconduct or poor judgment.
Yes, a Board of Inquiry can have a direct impact on retirement eligibility, especially for service members close to retirement. In some cases, separation may prevent retirement entirely.
Possible discharge characterizations include Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), or Other Than Honorable. The characterization directly affects post-service benefits and employment.
